Day 364
Week 52 Day 7: Assignment: Thank One Person Who Shaped Your Leadership
This is the final assignment of the course. It is the simplest and possibly the most important. Choose one person -- a mentor, a peer, a direct report, a leader you observed -- who significantly shaped how you lead. Contact them and tell them specifically what they taught you and how it changed your leadership. Do not send a generic thank-you. Send a specific acknowledgment of their impact.
Lesson Locked
Choose the person. Write a message (or better, have a conversation) that includes three things: what they did (the specific behavior, conversation, or moment that shaped you), what you learned (the specific leadership lesson or behavioral change that resulted), and the impact (how that lesson has affected your leadership and your team). Be specific enough that they can remember the moment you are referencing.
Here is why this assignment matters, and here is the complete process. This assignment matters for three reasons. Reason one -- it closes the loop. Development that is never acknowledged remains abstract. When you tell someone 'you changed how I lead by doing X, which taught me Y,' you convert an internal lesson into an external connection. The act of articulating the impact forces you to crystallize what you actually learned, which strengthens the learning. Reason two -- it multiplies. The person you thank may not know the impact they had. When they learn that their behavior shaped another leader's development, they are more likely to continue that behavior -- with you and with others. Your acknowledgment creates a reinforcement loop that sustains the developmental behavior in the relationship ecosystem. Reason three -- it models the behavior you want to see. When your team observes you acknowledging the people who shaped you, they learn that leadership is relational, that gratitude is a strength rather than a weakness, and that acknowledging others' contributions is part of how leaders operate. Here is the process. Step one -- choose the person. This should not be the obvious choice (your first mentor, your favorite boss). It should be the person whose impact was most significant -- which might be the peer who told you something uncomfortable, the direct report who changed your approach, or the leader whose failure taught you a critical lesson. Choose the person whose influence you can describe most specifically. Step two -- write the message. Structure it in three parts. Part one -- the moment: 'I want to tell you about a moment that changed how I lead. In [year/context], you [specific behavior -- what they did, said, or demonstrated].' Part two -- the lesson: 'That moment taught me [specific principle or behavioral change]. Before that, I [what you used to do]. After that, I [what you do now].' Part three -- the impact: 'Because of what you taught me, I [specific leadership behavior or outcome that traces back to their influence]. I wanted you to know that your impact extends beyond what you may have realized.' Step three -- deliver it. In person or on a call is best -- the vulnerability of live delivery adds to the impact. Written is acceptable if a live conversation is not possible. Do not overthink the delivery. The content matters more than the medium. Step four -- document it. In your Leadership Operating Manual, add a final section: 'People Who Shaped My Leadership.' List the key people and what each one taught you. This section is the most personal part of the Manual, and it serves as a reminder that your leadership was built through relationships, not through solo achievement. This is the end of the course. But it is not the end of the work. The frameworks are tools. The assignments were practice. The relationships are the real thing. Invest in them. Learn from them. And when someone shapes your leadership in the future -- and they will -- tell them. The loop of development and gratitude is the engine of leadership growth, and it runs as long as you keep it running.
The gratitude expression assignment implements what Seligman, Steen, Park, and Peterson (2005) call the 'gratitude visit' -- one of the most empirically validated positive psychology interventions, which involves writing and personally delivering a letter of gratitude to someone who has been influential in the participant's life. Their randomized controlled trial found that the gratitude visit produced significant increases in happiness and decreases in depressive symptoms that persisted for one month after the intervention, making it one of the most potent single-session interventions in the positive psychology literature. Research by Grant and Gino (2010) on 'a little thanks goes a long way: explaining why gratitude expressions motivate prosocial behavior' found that expressing gratitude to a helper increased the helper's prosocial behavior by 50% in subsequent interactions, because the gratitude expression activated the helper's sense of social worth and efficacy -- they learned that their behavior had a meaningful impact, which motivated them to continue the behavior. This explains the 'multiplication' effect: your acknowledgment does not just close the loop with one person; it increases the probability that the person will continue the developmental behavior with others, creating a cascading effect through the relationship network. The documentation step (adding the 'People Who Shaped My Leadership' section to the Operating Manual) implements what narrative identity researchers (McAdams, 2001) call 'narrative identity integration' -- the practice of constructing a coherent life narrative that connects past experiences to present identity. Research by Bauer, McAdams, and Pals (2008) found that individuals with well-integrated narrative identities (who could articulate how specific people and events shaped their current values and behaviors) showed higher psychological well-being, higher social functioning, and more consistent behavior across situations, because the integrated narrative provided a stable identity foundation that buffered against situational pressure and identity threat. The 52-week course as a whole implements what Mezirow (1991) calls the complete 'transformative learning cycle': disorienting dilemma (Week 1 -- confronting the gap between the leader you think you are and the leader you actually are), critical reflection (Weeks 2-42 -- examining assumptions, building frameworks, practicing behaviors), reflective discourse (Weeks 43-52 -- integrating learning through documented reflection, shared stories, and relational acknowledgment), and action (the ongoing application of these practices in real leadership contexts beyond the course).
Continue Reading
Subscribe to access the full lesson with expert analysis and actionable steps
Start Learning - $14.99/month View Full Syllabus