"To have respect of persons is not good: for for a piece of bread that man will transgress."
Commentary
Gill's Exposition
To have respect of persons is not good, &c. In courts of judicature, to give a cause or pass sentence in favour of a person, because he is rich, or is a relation,
a friend, an acquaintance, or has done a kindness; and against another, because of the reverse, Lev 19:15 ; nor in religious assemblies, making a difference between the rich and the poor, Jam 2:1 ; this is not good in itself, nor productive of good effects, and cannot be well pleasing to God, who himself is no respecter of persons; for for a piece of bread that man will transgress; the laws of God and men; having used himself to such unrighteous methods of proceeding, he will do any base action for a small gain, he will stick at nothing, and do it for anything; as Cato used to say of M. Coelius the tribune, "that he might be hired, for a morsel of bread, to speak or hold his peace;'' see Eze 13:19 .
Source: Gill's Exposition (Public Domain)
Interlinear data not available for this verse yet.
Commentary
Gill's Exposition
To have respect of persons is not good, &c. In courts of judicature, to give a cause or pass sentence in favour of a person, because he is rich, or is a relation,
a friend, an acquaintance, or has done a kindness; and against another, because of the reverse, Lev 19:15 ; nor in religious assemblies, making a difference between the rich and the poor, Jam 2:1 ; this is not good in itself, nor productive of good effects, and cannot be well pleasing to God, who himself is no respecter of persons; for for a piece of bread that man will transgress; the laws of God and men; having used himself to such unrighteous methods of proceeding, he will do any base action for a small gain, he will stick at nothing, and do it for anything; as Cato used to say of M. Coelius the tribune, "that he might be hired, for a morsel of bread, to speak or hold his peace;'' see Eze 13:19 .