"It is also written in your law, that the testimony of two men is true."
Commentary
Gill's Exposition
It is also written in your law,.... The law of Moses, which was given unto them, and they boasted of; the passage referred to is in Deu 19:15 ; see also Deu 17:6 ; where though what follows is not to be found in so many words, yet the
sense is there expressed: that the testimony of two men is true: concerning which the Jewish writers say (y), "they used not to determine any judiciary matter by the mouth of one witness, neither pecuniary causes, nor causes of life and death, as it is said, Deu 17:6 . It is asked (z) in their oral law, if the testimony of two men stand, why does the Scripture particularly mention three? (for no other reason) but to compare or equal three with two, that as three convict two of a falsehood, two may also convict three.'' On which one of their commentators (a) has this observation, taking notice of Deu 19:18 , which speaks of a single witness; "Mar (a doctor) says, wherever it is said a "witness", it is to be understood of two, unless the Scripture particularly specifies one.'' In the case of a wife suspected of adultery, and in the business of striking off the neck of the heifer in case of murder, they admitted of one witness (b). (y) Maimon. Hilchot Eduth. c. 5. sect. 1. (z) Misn. Maccot. c. 1. sect. 7. (a) Bartenora in ib. (b) Maimon. Hilchot Eduth, ib. sect. 2.
Source: Gill's Exposition (Public Domain)
Interlinear data not available for this verse yet.
Commentary
Gill's Exposition
It is also written in your law,.... The law of Moses, which was given unto them, and they boasted of; the passage referred to is in Deu 19:15 ; see also Deu 17:6 ; where though what follows is not to be found in so many words, yet the
sense is there expressed: that the testimony of two men is true: concerning which the Jewish writers say (y), "they used not to determine any judiciary matter by the mouth of one witness, neither pecuniary causes, nor causes of life and death, as it is said, Deu 17:6 . It is asked (z) in their oral law, if the testimony of two men stand, why does the Scripture particularly mention three? (for no other reason) but to compare or equal three with two, that as three convict two of a falsehood, two may also convict three.'' On which one of their commentators (a) has this observation, taking notice of Deu 19:18 , which speaks of a single witness; "Mar (a doctor) says, wherever it is said a "witness", it is to be understood of two, unless the Scripture particularly specifies one.'' In the case of a wife suspected of adultery, and in the business of striking off the neck of the heifer in case of murder, they admitted of one witness (b). (y) Maimon. Hilchot Eduth. c. 5. sect. 1. (z) Misn. Maccot. c. 1. sect. 7. (a) Bartenora in ib. (b) Maimon. Hilchot Eduth, ib. sect. 2.