And seeing the multitudes, he went up onto the mountain, and when he had sat down, his disciples came to him.
KJV
And seeing the multitudes, he went up into a mountain: and when he was set, his disciples came unto him:
Commentary
Commentary
This chapter, and the two that follow it, are a sermon; a famous
sermon; the sermon upon the mount. It is the longest and fullest
continued discourse of our Saviour that we have upon record in all the
gospels. It is a practical discourse; there is not much of the credenda
of Christianity in it--the things to be believed, but it is wholly taken
up with the agenda--the things to be done; these Christ began with in
his preaching; for if any man will do his will, he shall know of the
doctrine, whether it be of God. The circumstances of the sermon being
accounted for
( ver. 1, 2 ),
the sermon itself follows, the scope of which is, not to fill our heads
with notions, but to guide and regulate our practice.
I. He proposes blessedness as the end, and gives us the character of
those who are entitled to blessedness (very different from the
sentiments of a vain world), in eight beatitudes, which may justly be
called paradoxes, ver. 3-12 .
II. He prescribes duty as the way, and gives us standing rules of that
duty. He directs his disciples,
1. To understand what they are--the salt of the earth, and the lights
of the world, ver. 13-16 .
2. To understand what they have to do--they are to be governed by the
moral law. Here is,
(1.) A general ratification of the law, and a recommendation of it to
us, as our rule, ver. 17-20 .
(2.) A particular rectification of divers mistakes; or, rather, a
reformation of divers wilful, gross corruptions, which the scribes and
Pharisees had introduced in their exposition of the law; and an
authentic explication of divers branches which most needed to be
explained and vindicated, ver. 20 .
Particularly, here is an explication,
[1.] Of the sixth commandment, which forbids murder, ver. 21-26 .
[2.] Of the seventh commandment, against adultery, ver. 27-32 .
[3.] Of the third commandment, ver. 33-37 .
[4.] Of the law of retaliation, ver. 38-42 .
[5.] Of the law of brotherly love, ver. 43-48 .
And the scope of the whole is, to show that the law is spiritual.
1 And seeing the multitudes, he went up into a mountain: and
when he was set, his disciples came unto him:
2 And he opened his mouth, and taught them, saying,
I. The Preacher was our Lord Jesus, the Prince of preachers, the
great Prophet of his church, who came into the world, to be the Light of the world. The prophets and John had done
virtuously in preaching, but Christ excelled them
all. He is the eternal Wisdom, that lay in the bosom of the
Father, before all worlds, and perfectly knew his will
( John i. 18 );
and he is the eternal Word, by whom he has in these last days spoken
to us. The many miraculous cures wrought by Christ in Galilee,
which we read of in the close of the foregoing chapter, were intended
to make way for this sermon, and to dispose people to receive
instructions from one in whom there appeared so much of a divine power
and goodness; and, probably, this sermon was the summary, or rehearsal,
of what he had preached up and down in the synagogues of Galilee. His
text was, Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand. This is
a sermon on the former part of that text, showing what it is to repent; it is to reform, both in judgment and practice; and here
he tells us wherein, in answer to that question
( Mal. iii. 7 ), Wherein shall we return? He afterward preached upon the latter
part of the text, when, in divers parables, he showed what the kingdom
of heaven is like, ch. xiii.
II. The place was a mountain in Galilee. As in other things, so
in this, our Lord Jesus was but ill accommodated; he had no convenient
place to preach in, any more than to lay his head on. While the
scribes and Pharisees had Moses' chair to sit in, with all possible
ease, honour, and state, and there corrupted the law; our Lord Jesus,
the great Teacher of truth, is driven out to the desert, and finds no
better a pulpit than a mountain can afford; and not one of the holy mountains neither, not one of the mountains of Zion, but a common mountain; by which Christ would intimate that there
is no such distinguishing holiness of places now, under the gospel, as
there was under the law; but that it is the will of God that men
should pray and preach every where, any where, provided it
be decent and convenient. Christ preached this sermon, which was an
exposition of the law, upon a mountain, because upon a mountain the law was given; and this was also a solemn promulgation of the
Christian law. But observe the difference: when the law was
given, the Lord came down upon the mountain; now the
Lord went up: then, he spoke in thunder and lightning; now, in a still small voice: then the people were ordered to
keep their distance; now they are invited to draw near: a blessed
change! If God's grace and goodness are (as they certainly are) his
glory, then the glory of the gospel is the glory that excels, for grace and truth came by Jesus Christ, 2 Cor. iii. 7; Heb. xii. 18 ,
&c. It was foretold of Zebulun and Issachar, two of the tribes of
Galilee
( Deut. xxxiii. 19 ),
that they shall call the people to the mountain; to this mountain we are called, to learn to offer the sacrifices of
righteousness. Now was this the mountain of the Lord, where
he taught us his ways, Isa. ii. 2, 3; Mic. iv. 1, 2 .
III. The auditors were his disciples, who came unto
him; came at his call, as appears by comparing Mark iii. 13, Luke vi. 13 .
To them he directed his speech, because they followed him for love and
learning, while others attended him only for cures. He taught
them, because they were willing to be taught (the meek will he
teach his way ); because they would understand what he
taught, which to others was foolishness; and because they were to teach
others; and it was therefore requisite that they should have a clear
and distinct knowledge of these things themselves. The duties
prescribed in this sermon were to be conscientiously performed by all
those that would enter into that kingdom of heaven which they
were sent to set up, with hope to have the benefit of it. But though
this discourse was directed to the disciples, it was in the hearing of the multitude; for it is said
( ch. vii. 28 ), The people were astonished. No bounds were set about this
mountain, to keep the people off, as were about mount Sinai ( Exod. xix. 12 );
for, through Christ, we have access to God, not only to speak to him,
but to hear from him. Nay, he had an eye to the multitude, in
preaching this sermon. When the fame of his miracles had brought a vast
crowd together, he took the opportunity of so great a confluence of
people, to instruct them. Note, It is an encouragement to a faithful
minister to cast the net of the gospel where there are a great many
fishes, in hope that some will be caught. The sight of a multitude puts life into a preacher, which yet must arise from a
desire of their profit, not his own praise.
IV. The solemnity of his sermon is intimated in that word, when he was set. Christ preached many times occasionally, and by
interlocutory discourses; but this was a set sermon, kathisantos
autou , when he had placed himself so as to be best heard. He
sat down as a Judge or Lawgiver. It intimates with what sedateness and
composure of mind the things of God should be spoken and heard. He
sat, that the scriptures might be fulfilled ( Mal. iii. 3 ), He shall sit as a refiner, to purge away the dross, the corrupt
doctrines of the sons of Levi. He sat as in the throne,
judging right ( Ps. ix. 4 );
for the word he spoke shall judge us. That phrase, He opened
his mouth, is only a Hebrew periphrasis of speaking, as Job iii. 1 .
Yet some think it intimates the solemnity of this discourse; the
congregation being large, he raised his voice, and spoke louder than
usual. He had spoken long by his servants the prophets, and opened their mouths ( Ezek. iii. 27; xxiv. 27; xxxiii. 22 );
but now he opened his own, and spoke with freedom, as one
having authority. One of the ancients has this remark upon it;
Christ taught much without opening his mouth. that is, by
his holy and exemplary life; nay, he taught, when, being led
as a lamb to the slaughter, he opened not his mouth, but now he
opened his mouth, and taught, that the scriptures might be
fulfilled, Prov. viii. 1, 2, 6 . Doth not wisdom cry--cry on the top of high places? And the
opening of her lips shall be right things. He taught them, according to the promise
( Isa. liv. 13 ), All thy children shall be taught of the Lord; for this purpose
he had the tongue of the learned ( Isa. l. 4 ),
and the Spirit of the Lord, Isa. lxi. 1 . He taught them, what was the evil they should abhor, and what
was the good they should abide and abound in; for Christianity is not a
matter of speculation, but is designed to regulate the temper of our
minds and the tenour of our conversations; gospel-time is a time of
reformation
( Heb. ix. 10 );
and by the gospel we must be reformed, must be made good, must be made
better. The truth, as it is in Jesus, is the truth which is
according to godliness, Tit. i. 1 .
3 Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom
of heaven.
4 Blessed are they that mourn: for they shall be comforted.
5 Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth.
6 Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst after
righteousness: for they shall be filled.
7 Blessed are the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy.
8 Blessed are the pure in heart: for they shall see God.
9 Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the
children of God.
10 Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness'
sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
11 Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for
my sake.
12 Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward
in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before
you.
Christ begins his sermon with blessings, for he came into the world
to bless us ( Acts iii. 26 ),
as the great High Priest of our profession; as the blessed
Melchizedec; as He in whom all the families of the earth should
be blessed, Gen. xii. 3 .
He came not only to purchase blessings for us, but to pour out and
pronounce blessings on us; and here he does it as one having
authority, as one that can command the blessing, even life for
evermore, and that is the blessing here again and again promised to
the good; his pronouncing them happy makes them so; for those whom he
blesses, are blessed indeed. The Old Testament ended with a curse
( Mal. iv. 6 ),
the gospel begins with a blessing; for hereunto are we called, that
we should inherit the blessing. Each of the blessings Christ here
pronounces has a double intention:
1. To show who they are that are to be accounted truly happy, and what
their characters are.
2. What that is wherein true happiness consists, in the promises made
to persons of certain characters, the performance of which will make
them happy. Now,
1. This is designed to rectify the ruinous mistakes of a blind and
carnal world. Blessedness is the thing which men pretend to pursue; Who will make us to see good? Ps. iv. 6 .
But most mistake the end, and form a wrong notion of happiness; and
then no wonder that they miss the way; they choose their own delusions,
and court a shadow. The general opinion is, Blessed are they that are rich, and great, and honourable in the world; they spend their
days in mirth, and their years in pleasure; they eat the fat, and drink
the sweet, and carry all before them with a high hand, and have every
sheaf bowing to their sheaf; happy the people that is in such a
case; and their designs, aims, and purposes are accordingly; they bless the covetous ( Ps. x. 3 );
they will be rich. Now our Lord Jesus comes to correct this
fundamental error, to advance a new hypothesis, and to give us quite
another notion of blessedness and blessed people, which, however
paradoxical it may appear to those who are prejudiced, yet is in
itself, and appears to be to all who are savingly enlightened, a rule
and doctrine of eternal truth and certainty, by which we must shortly
be judged. If this, therefore, be the beginning of Christ's doctrine,
the beginning of a Christian's practice must be to take his measures of
happiness from those maxims, and to direct his pursuits
accordingly.
2. It is designed to remove the discouragements of the weak and poor
who receive the gospel, by assuring them that his gospel did not make
those only happy that were eminent in gifts, graces, comforts, and
usefulness; but that even the least in the kingdom of heaven, whose heart was upright with God, was happy in the honours and
privileges of that kingdom.
3. It is designed to invite souls to Christ, and to make way for his
law into their hearts. Christ's pronouncing these blessings, not at the
end of his sermon, to dismiss the people, but at the beginning of it,
to prepare them for what he had further to say to them, may remind us
of mount Gerizim and mount Ebal, on which the blessings and cursings of
the law were read, Deut. xxvii. 12 ,
&c. There the curses are expressed, and the blessings only
implied; here the blessings are expressed, and the curses
implied: in both, life and death are set before us; but the law
appeared more as a ministration of death, to deter us from sin; the
gospel as a dispensation of life, to allure us to Christ, in whom alone
all good is to be had. And those who had seen the gracious cures
wrought by his hand
( ch. iv. 23, 24 ),
and now heard the gracious words proceeding out of his mouth, would say that he was all of a piece, made up of love and
sweetness.
4. It is designed to settle and sum up the articles of agreement
between God and man. The scope of the divine revelation is to let us
know what God expects from us, and what we may then expect from him;
and no where is this more fully set forth in a few words than here, nor
with a more exact reference to each other; and this is that gospel
which we are required to believe; for what is faith but a conformity to
these characters, and a dependence upon these promises? The way to
happiness is here opened, and made a highway ( Isa. xxxv. 8 );
and this coming from the mouth of Jesus Christ, it is intimated that
from him, and by him, we are to receive both the seed and the fruit,
both the grace required, and the glory promised. Nothing passes between
God and fallen man, but through his hand. Some of the wiser heathen had
notions of blessedness different from the rest of mankind, and looking
toward this of our Saviour. Seneca, undertaking to describe a blessed
man, makes it out, that it is only an honest, good man that is to be so
called: De vita beata. cap. 4. Cui nullum bonum malumque sit,
nisi bonus malusque animus--Quem nec extollant fortuita, nec
frangant--Cui vera voluptas erit voluptatum comtemplio--Cui unum bonum
honestas, unum malum turpitudo.--In whose estimation nothing is good or
evil, but a good or evil heart--Whom no occurrences elate or
deject--Whose true pleasure consists in a contempt of pleasure--To whom
the only good is virtue, and the only evil vice.
Our Saviour here gives us eight characters of blessed people; which
represent to us the principal graces of a Christian. On each of them a
present blessing is pronounced; Blessed are they; and to each a
future blessing is promised, which is variously expressed, so as to
suit the nature of the grace or duty recommended.
I. The poor in spirit are happy, v. 3 .
There is a poor-spiritedness that is so far from making men blessed
that it is a sin and a snare--cowardice and base fear, and a willing
subjection to the lusts of men. But this poverty of spirit is a
gracious disposition of soul, by which we are emptied of self, in order
to our being filled with Jesus Christ. To be poor in spirit is,
1. To be contentedly poor, willing to be emptied of worldly wealth, if
God orders that to be our lot; to bring our mind to our condition, when
it is a low condition. Many are poor in the world, but high in spirit,
poor and proud, murmuring and complaining, and blaming their lot, but
we must accommodate ourselves to our poverty, must know how to be
abased, Phil. iv. 12 .
Acknowledging the wisdom of God in appointing us to poverty, we must be
easy in it, patiently bear the inconveniences of it, be thankful for
what we have, and make the best of that which is. It is to sit loose to
all worldly wealth, and not set our hearts upon it, but cheerfully to
bear losses and disappointments which may befal us in the most
prosperous state. It is not, in pride or pretence, to make ourselves
poor, by throwing away what God has given us, especially as those in
the church of Rome, who vow poverty, and yet engross the wealth of the
nations; but if we be rich in the world we must be poor in
spirit, that is, we must condescend to the poor and sympathize with
them, as being touched with the feeling of their infirmities; we must
expect and prepare for poverty; must not inordinately fear or shun it,
but must bid it welcome, especially when it comes upon us for keeping a
good conscience, Heb. x. 34 .
Job was poor in spirit, when he blessed God in taking
away, as well as giving.
2. It is to be humble and lowly in our own eyes. To be poor in
spirit, is to think meanly of ourselves, of what we are, and have,
and do; the poor are often taken in the Old Testament for the humble
and self-denying, as opposed to those that are at ease, and the proud;
it is to be as little children in our opinion of ourselves, weak,
foolish, and insignificant, ch. xviii. 4; xix. 14 .
Laodicea was poor in spirituals, wretchedly and miserably poor,
and yet rich in spirit, so well increased with goods, as to have need of nothing, Rev. iii. 17 .
On the other hand, Paul was rich in spirituals, excelling most
in gifts and graces, and yet poor in spirit, the least of the
apostles, less than the least of all saints, and nothing in
his own account. It is to look with a holy contempt upon ourselves, to
value others and undervalue ourselves in comparison of them. It is to
be willing to make ourselves cheap, and mean, and little, to do good;
to become all things to all men. It is to acknowledge that God
is great, and we are mean; that he is holy and we are sinful; that he
is all and we are nothing, less than nothing, worse than nothing; and
to humble ourselves before him, and under his mighty hand.
3. It is to come off from all confidence in our own righteousness and
strength, that we may depend only upon the merit of Christ for our
justification, and the spirit and grace of Christ for our
sanctification. That broken and contrite spirit with which the
publican cried for mercy to a poor sinner, is that poverty of spirit.
We must call ourselves poor, because always in want of God's grace,
always begging at God's door, always hanging on in his house.
Now,
(1.) This poverty in spirit is put first among the Christian graces.
The philosophers did not reckon humility among their moral virtues, but
Christ puts it first. Self-denial is the first lesson to be learned in
his school, and poverty of spirit entitled to the first beatitude. The
foundation of all other graces is laid in humility. Those who would
build high must begin low; and it is an excellent preparative for the
entrance of gospel-grace into the soul; it fits the soil to receive the
seed. Those who are weary and heavy laden, are the poor in
spirit, and they shall find rest with Christ.
(2.) They are blessed. Now they are so, in this world. God looks
graciously upon them. They are his little ones, and have their angels.
To them he gives more grace; they live the most comfortable lives, and
are easy to themselves and all about them, and nothing comes amiss to
them; while high spirits are always uneasy.
(3.) Theirs is the kingdom of heaven. The kingdom of grace is composed of such; they only are fit to be members of
Christ's church, which is called the congregation of the poor ( Ps. lxxiv. 19 );
the kingdom of glory is prepared for them. Those who thus humble
themselves, and comply with God when he humbles them, shall be thus
exalted. The great, high spirits go away with the glory of the
kingdoms of the earth; but the humble, mild, and yielding souls
obtain the glory of the kingdom of heaven. We are ready to think
concerning those who are rich, and do good with their riches, that, no
doubt, theirs is the kingdom of heaven; for they can thus lay up
in store a good security for the time to come; but what shall
the poor do, who have not wherewithal to do good? Why, the same
happiness is promised to those who are contentedly poor, as to those
who are usefully rich. If I am not able to spend cheerfully for
his sake, if I can but want cheerfully for his sake, even that
shall be recompensed. And do not we serve a good master then?
II. They that mourn are happy
( v. 4 ); Blessed are they that mourn. This is another strange blessing,
and fitly follows the former. The poor are accustomed to mourn, the
graciously poor mourn graciously. We are apt to think, Blessed are the merry; but Christ, who was himself a great mourner, says,
Blessed are the mourners. There is a sinful mourning, which is
an enemy to blessedness-- the sorrow of the world; despairing
melancholy upon a spiritual account, and disconsolate grief upon a
temporal account. There is a natural mourning, which may prove a
friend to blessedness, by the grace of God working with it, and
sanctifying the afflictions to us, for which we mourn. But there is a
gracious mourning, which qualifies for blessedness, an habitual
seriousness, the mind mortified to mirth, and an actual sorrow.
1. A penitential mourning for our own sins; this is godly
sorrow, a sorrow according to God; sorrow for sin, with an eye to
Christ, Zech. xii. 10 .
Those are God's mourners, who live a life of repentance, who lament the
corruption of their nature, and their many actual transgressions, and
God's withdrawings from them; and who, out of regard to God's honour,
mourn also for the sins of others, and sigh and cry for their
abominations, Ezek. ix. 4 .
2. A sympathizing mourning for the afflictions of others; the mourning
of those who weep with them that weep, are sorrowful for the
solemn assemblies, for the desolations of Zion ( Zeph. iii. 18; Ps. cxxxvii. 1 ),
especially who look with compassion on perishing souls, and weep
over them, as Christ over Jerusalem.
Now these gracious mourners,
(1.) Are blessed. As in vain and sinful laughter the heart is
sorrowful, so in gracious mourning the heart has a serious
joy, a secret satisfaction, which a stranger does not intermeddle
with. They are blessed, for they are like the Lord Jesus,
who was a man of sorrows, and of whom we never read that he
laughed, but often that he wept. The are armed against the many
temptations that attend vain mirth, and are prepared for the comforts
of a sealed pardon and a settled peace.
(2.) They shall be comforted. Though perhaps they are not
immediately comforted, yet plentiful provision is made for their
comfort; light is sown for them; and in heaven, it is certain, they
shall be comforted, as Lazarus, Luke xvi. 25 .
Note, The happiness of heaven consists in being perfectly and eternally
comforted, and in the wiping away of all tears from their eyes. It is the joy of our Lord; a fulness of joy and pleasures for
evermore; which will be doubly sweet to those who have been
prepared for them by this godly sorrow. Heaven will be a heaven
indeed to those who go mourning thither; it will be a harvest of joy,
the return of a seed-time of tears
( Ps. cxxvi. 5, 6 );
a mountain of joy, to which our way lies through a vale of tears. See Isa. lxvi. 10 .
III. The meek are happy
( v. 5 ); Blessed are the meek. The meek are those who quietly submit
themselves to God, to his word and to his rod, who follow his
directions, and comply with his designs, and are gentle towards all
men ( Tit. iii. 2 );
who can bear provocation without being inflamed by it; are either
silent, or return a soft answer; and who can show their displeasure
when there is occasion for it, without being transported into any
indecencies; who can be cool when others are hot; and in their patience
keep possession of their own souls, when they can scarcely keep
possession of any thing else. They are the meek, who are rarely
and hardly provoked, but quickly and easily pacified; and who would
rather forgive twenty injuries than revenge one, having the rule of
their own spirits.
These meek ones are here represented as happy, even in this world.
1. They are blessed, for they are like the blessed Jesus, in
that wherein particularly they are to learn of him, ch. xi. 29 .
They are like the blessed God himself, who is Lord of his anger, and in
whom fury is not. They are blessed, for they have the most
comfortable, undisturbed enjoyment of themselves, their friends, their
God; they are fit for any relation, and condition, any company; fit to
live, and fit to die.
2. They shall inherit the earth; it is quoted from Ps. xxxvii. 11 ,
and it is almost the only express temporal promise in all the New
Testament. Not that they shall always have much of the earth, much less that they shall be put off with that only; but this branch of
godliness has, in a special manner, the promise of life that now
is. Meekness, however ridiculed and run down, has a real tendency
to promote our health, wealth, comfort, and safety, even in this world. The meek and quiet are observed to live the most easy lives,
compared with the froward and turbulent. Or, They shall inherit the
land (so it may be read), the land of Canaan, a type of
heaven. So that all the blessedness of heaven above, and all the
blessings of earth beneath, are the portion of the meek.
IV. They that hunger and thirst after righteousness are happy, v. 6 .
Some understand this as a further instance of our outward poverty, and
a low condition in this world, which not only exposes men to injury and
wrong, but makes it in vain for them to seek to have justice done to
them; they hunger and thirst after it, but such is the power on
the side of their oppressors, that they cannot have it; they desire
only that which is just and equal, but it is denied them by those that neither fear God nor regard men. This is a melancholy case! Yet, blessed are they, if they suffer these hardships for and with a
good conscience; let them hope in God, who will see justice done, right
take place, and will deliver the poor from their oppressors, Ps. ciii. 6 .
Those who contentedly bear oppression, and quietly refer themselves to
God to plead their cause, shall in due time be satisfied, abundantly
satisfied, in the wisdom and kindness which shall be manifested in his
appearances for them. But it is certainly to be understood spiritually,
of such a desire as, being terminated on such an object, is gracious,
and the work of God's grace in the soul, and qualifies for the gifts of
the divine favour.
1. Righteousness is here put for all spiritual blessings. See Ps. xxiv. 5; ch. vi. 33 .
They are purchased for us by the righteousness of Christ; conveyed and secured by the imputation of that righteousness to us; and
confirmed by the faithfulness of God. To have Christ made of God to
us righteousness, and to be made the righteousness of God in
him; to have the whole man renewed in righteousness, so as
to become a new man, and to bear the image of God; to have an
interest in Christ and the promises--this is righteousness. 2. These we must hunger and thirst after. We must truly and
really desire them, as one who is hungry and thirsty desires meat and
drink, who cannot be satisfied with any thing but meat and drink, and
will be satisfied with them, though other things be wanting. Our
desires of spiritual blessings must be earnest and importunate;
" Give me these, or else I die; every thing else is dross and
chaff, unsatisfying; give me these, and I have enough, though I had
nothing else." Hunger and thirst are appetites that return
frequently, and call for fresh satisfactions; so these holy desires
rest not in any thing attained, but are carried out toward renewed
pardons, and daily fresh supplies of grace. The quickened soul calls
for constant meals of righteousness, grace to do the work of every day
in its day, as duly as the living body calls for food. Those who hunger and thirst will labour for supplies; so we must not only
desire spiritual blessings, but take pains for them in the use of the
appointed means. Dr. Hammond, in his practical Catechism, distinguishes
between hunger and thirst. Hunger is a desire of food to
sustain, such as sanctifying righteousness. Thirst is the
desire of drink to refresh, such as justifying righteousness, and the sense of our pardon.
Those who hunger and thirst after spiritual blessings, are
blessed in those desires, and shall be filled with those
blessings.
(1.) They are blessed in those desires. Though all desires of
grace are not grace (feigned, faint desires are not), yet such a desire
as this is; it is an evidence of something good, and an earnest of something better. It is a desire of God's own
raising, and he will not forsake the work of his own hands. Something
or other the soul will be hungering and thirsting after;
therefore they are blessed who fasten upon the right object,
which is satisfying, and not deceiving; and do not pant after the
dust of the earth, Amos ii. 7; Isa. lv. 2 .
(2.) They shall be filled with those blessings. God will give
them what they desire to complete their satisfaction. It is God only
who can fill a soul, whose grace and favour are adequate to its
just desires; and he will fill those with grace for grace, who,
in a sense of their own emptiness, have recourse to his fulness. He fills the hungry ( Luke i. 53 ), satiates them, Jer. xxxi. 25 .
The happiness of heaven will certainly fill the soul; their
righteousness shall be complete, the favour of God and his image, both
in their full perfection.
V. The merciful are happy, v. 7 .
This, like the rest, is a paradox; for the merciful are not taken to be
the wisest, nor are likely to be the richest; yet Christ pronounces
them blessed. Those are the merciful, who are piously and
charitably inclined to pity, help, and succour persons in misery. A man
may be truly merciful, who has not wherewithal to be bountiful
or liberal; and then God accepts the willing mind. We must not only
bear our own afflictions patiently, but we must, by Christian sympathy,
partake of the afflictions of our brethren; pity must be shown
( Job vi. 14 ),
and bowels of mercy put on ( Col. iii. 12 );
and, being put on, they must put forth themselves in contributing all
we can for the assistance of those who are any way in misery. We must
have compassion on the souls of others, and help them; pity the
ignorant, and instruct them; the careless, and warn them; those who are
in a state of sin, and snatch them as brands out of the burning. We must have compassion on those who are melancholy and in sorrow, and
comfort them
( Job xvi. 5 );
on those whom we have advantage against, and not be rigorous and severe
with them; on those who are in want, and supply them; which if we
refuse to do, whatever we pretend, we shut up the bowels of our
compassion, James ii. 15, 16; 1 John iii. 17 . Draw out they soul by dealing thy bread to the hungry, Isa. lviii. 7, 10 .
Nay, a good man is merciful to his beast.
Now as to the merciful.
1. They are blessed; so it was said in the Old Testament; Blessed is he that considers the poor, Ps. xli. 1 .
Herein they resemble God, whose goodness is his glory; in being merciful as he is merciful, we are, in our measure, perfect
as he is perfect. It is an evidence of love to God; it will be a
satisfaction to ourselves, to be any way instrumental for the benefit
of others. One of the purest and most refined delights in this world,
is that of doing good. In this word, Blessed are the
merciful, is included that saying of Christ, which otherwise we
find not in the gospels, It is more blessed to give than to
receive, Acts xx. 35 .
2. They shall obtain mercy; mercy with men, when they
need it; he that watereth, shall be watered also himself (we
know not how soon we may stand in need of kindness, and therefore
should be kind); but especially mercy with God, for with the
merciful he will show himself merciful, Ps. xviii. 25 .
The most merciful and charitable cannot pretend to merit, but must fly to mercy. The merciful shall find with God sparing mercy
( ch. vi. 14 ), supplying mercy
( Prov. xix. 17 ), sustaining mercy
( Ps. xli. 2 ),
mercy in that day
( 2 Tim. i. 18 );
may, they shall inherit the kingdom prepared for them ( ch. xxv. 34, 35 );
whereas they shall have judgment without mercy (which can
be nothing short of hell-fire ) who have shown no
mercy.
VI. The pure in heart are happy
( v. 8 ); Blessed are the poor in heart, for they shall see God. This is
the most comprehensive of all the beatitudes; here holiness and
happiness are fully described and put together.
1. Here is the most comprehensive character of the blessed: they
are pure in heart. Note, True religion consists in heart-purity.
Those who are inwardly pure, show themselves to be under the power of pure and undefiled religion. True Christianity lies in the
heart, in the purity of heart; the washing of that from wickedness, Jer. iv. 14 .
We must lift up to God, not only clean hands, but a pure heart, Ps. xxiv. 4, 5; 1 Tim. i. 5 .
The heart must be pure, in opposition to mixture --an
honest heart that aims well; and pure, in opposition to pollution and defilement; as wine unmixed, as
water unmuddied. The heart must be kept pure from fleshly lusts, all unchaste thoughts and desires; and from worldly lusts; covetousness is called filthy lucre; from
all filthiness of flesh and spirit, all that which come out of the
heart, and defiles the man. The heart must be purified by
faith, and entire for God; must be presented and preserved a chaste
virgin to Christ. Create in me such a clean heart, O God!
2. Here is the most comprehensive comfort of the blessed; They
shall see God. Note,
(1.) It is the perfection of the soul's happiness to see God; seeing
him, as we may by faith in our present state, is a heaven upon
earth; and seeing him as we shall in the future state, in the heaven of heaven. To see him as he is, face to face, and
no longer through a glass darkly; to see him as ours, and to see him
and enjoy him; to see him and be like him, and be satisfied with that
likeness
( Ps. xvii. 15 );
and to see him for ever, and never lose the sight of him; this is
heaven's happiness.
(2.) The happiness of seeing God is promised to those, and those only,
who are pure in heart. None but the pure are capable of seeing God, nor would it be a felicity to the impure. What
pleasure could an unsanctified soul take in the vision of a holy God?
As he cannot endure to look upon their iniquity, so they cannot endure to look upon his purity; nor shall any unclean thing
enter into the new Jerusalem; but all that are pure in heart, all that are truly sanctified, have desires wrought in them, which
nothing but the sight of God will sanctify; and divine grace will not
leave those desires unsatisfied.
VII. The peace-makers are happy, v. 9 .
The wisdom that is from above is first pure, and then peaceable; the blessed ones are pure toward God, and peaceable toward men; for with reference to both, conscience
must be kept void of offence. The peace-makers are those
who have,
1. A peaceable disposition: as, to make a lie, is to be
given and addicted to lying, so, to make peace, is to have a
strong and hearty affection to peace. I am for peace, Ps. cxx. 7 .
It is to love, and desire, and delight in peace; to be put in it as in
our element, and to study to be quiet.
2. A peaceable conversation; industriously, as far as we can, to
preserve the peace that it be not broken, and to recover it when it is
broken; to hearken to proposals of peace ourselves, and to be ready to
make them to others; where distance is among brethren and neighbours,
to do all we can to accommodate it, and to be repairers of the
breaches. The making of peace is sometimes a thankless
office, and it is the lot of him who parts a fray, to have blows
on both sides; yet it is a good office, and we must be forward to
it. Some think that this is intended especially as a lesson for
ministers, who should do all they can to reconcile those who are at
variance, and to promote Christian love among those under their
charge.
Now,
(1.) Such persons are blessed; for they have the satisfaction of enjoying themselves, by keeping the peace, and of being truly
serviceable to others, by disposing them to peace. They are working
together with Christ, who came into the world to slay all
enmities, and to proclaim peace on earth. (2.) They shall be called the children of God; it will be an
evidence to themselves that they are so; God will own them as such, and
herein they will resemble him. He is the God of peace; the Son of God
is the Prince of peace; the Spirit of adoption is a Spirit of peace.
Since God has declared himself reconcilable to us all, he will not own
those for his children who are implacable in their enmity to one
another; for if the peacemakers are blessed, woe to the peace-breakers!
Now by this it appears, that Christ never intended to have his religion
propagated by fire and sword, or penal laws, or to acknowledge bigotry,
or intemperate zeal, as the mark of his disciples. The children of this
world love to fish in troubled waters, but the children of God are the
peace-makers, the quiet in the land.
VIII. Those who are persecuted for righteousness' sake, are
happy. This is the greatest paradox of all, and peculiar to
Christianity; and therefore it is put last, and more largely insisted
upon than any of the rest, v. 10-12 .
This beatitude, like Pharaoh's dream, is doubled, because hardly
credited, and yet the thing is certain; and in the latter part
there is change of the person, "Blessed are ye --ye my disciples,
and immediate followers. This is that which you, who excel in virtue,
are more immediately concerned in; for you must reckon upon hardships
and troubles more than other men." Observe here,
1. The case of suffering saints described; and it is a hard case, and a
very piteous one.
(1.) They are persecuted, hunted, pursued, run down, as noxious beasts
are, that are sought for to be destroyed; as if a Christian did caput gerere lupinum--bear a wolf's head, as an outlaw is said to
do--any one that finds him may slay him; they are abandoned as the offscouring of all things; fined, imprisoned, banished, stripped
of their estates, excluded from all places of profit and trust,
scourged, racked, tortured, always delivered to death, and accounted as
sheep for the slaughter. This has been the effect of the enmity of the
serpent's seed against the holy seed, ever since the time of
righteous Abel. It was so in Old-Testament times, as we
find, Heb. xi. 35 ,
&c. Christ has told us that it would much more be so with the Christian
church, and we are not to think it strange, 1 John iii. 13 .
He has left us an example.
(2.) The are reviled, and have all manner of evil said against them
falsely. Nicknames, and names of reproach, are fastened upon them,
upon particular persons, and upon the generation of the righteous in
the gross, to render them odious; sometimes to make them formidable,
that they may be powerfully assailed; things are laid to their charge
that they knew not, Ps. xxxv. 11;
Jer. xx. 18; Acts xvii. 6, 7 .
Those who have had no power in their hands to do them any other
mischief, could yet do this; and those who have had power to persecute, had found it necessary to do this too, to
justify themselves in their barbarous usage of them; they could not
have baited them, if they had not dressed them in bear-skins; nor have
given them the worst of treatment, if they had not first represented
them as the worst of men. They will revile you, and persecute
you. Note, Reviling the saints is persecuting them,
and will be found so shortly, when hard speeches must be
accounted for
( Jude 15 ),
and cruel mockings, Heb. xi. 36 .
They will say all manner of evil of you falsely; sometimes
before the seat of judgment, as witnesses; sometimes in the seat of the scornful, with hypocritical mockers at
feasts; they are the song of the drunkards; sometimes to
face their faces, as Shimei cursed David; sometimes behind their backs,
as the enemies of Jeremiah did. Note, There is no evil so black and
horrid, which, at one time or other, has not been said, falsely, of
Christ's disciples and followers.
(3.) All this is for righteousness' sake ( v. 10 ); for my sake, v. 11 .
If for righteousness' sake, then for Christ's sake, for
he is nearly interested in the work of righteousness. Enemies to
righteousness are enemies to Christ. This precludes those from the
blessedness who suffer justly, and are evil spoken of truly for their real crimes; let such be ashamed and confounded,
it is part of their punishment; it is not the suffering, but the cause,
that makes the martyr. Those suffer for righteousness' sake, who
suffer because they will not sin against their consciences, and who
suffer for doing that which is good. Whatever pretence persecutors
have, it is the power of godliness that they have an enmity to; it is
really Christ and his righteousness that are maligned, hated, and
persecuted; For thy sake I have borne reproach, Ps. lxix. 9; Rom. viii. 36 .
(1.) They are blessed; for they now, in their life-time, receive their evil things ( Luke xvi. 25 ),
and receive them upon a good account. They are blessed; for it
is an honour to them
( Acts v. 41 );
it is an opportunity of glorifying Christ, of doing good, and of
experiencing special comforts and visits of grace and tokens of his
presence, 2 Cor. i. 5;
Dan. iii. 25; Rom. viii. 29 .
(2.) They shall be recompensed; Theirs is the kingdom of
heaven. They have at present a sure title to it, and sweet
foretastes of it; and shall ere long be in possession of it. Though
there be nothing in those sufferings than can, in strictness, merit of
God (for the sins of the best deserve the worst), yet this is here
promised as a reward ( v. 12 ); Great is your reward in heaven: so great, as far to transcend
the service. It is in heaven, future, and out of sight; but well
secured, out of the reach of chance, fraud, and violence. Note, God
will provide that those who lose for him, though it be life
itself, shall not lose by him in the end. Heaven, at last, will
be an abundant recompence for all the difficulties we meet with in our
way. This is that which has borne up the suffering saints in all
ages--this joy set before them.
(3.) " So persecuted they the prophets that were before you, v. 12 .
They were before you in excellency, above what you are yet
arrived at; they were before you in time, that they might be
examples to you of suffering affliction and of patience, James v. 10 .
They were in like manner persecuted and abused; and can you expect to
go to heaven in a way by yourself? Was not Isaiah mocked for his line upon line? Elisha for his bald head? Were not
all the prophets thus treated? Therefore marvel not at it as a strange thing, murmur not at it as a hard thing;
it is a comfort to see the way of suffering a beaten road, and an
honour to follow such leaders. That grace which was sufficient for
them, to carry them through their sufferings, shall not be deficient to you. Those who are your enemies are the seed and
successors of them who of old mocked the messengers of the Lord," 2 Chron. xxxvi. 16; ch. xxiii. 31; Acts vii. 52 .
13 Ye are the salt of the earth: but if the salt have lost his
savour, wherewith shall it be salted? it is thenceforth good for
nothing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under foot of men.
14 Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on a hill
cannot be hid.
15 Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel,
but on a candlestick; and it giveth light unto all that are in
the house.
16 Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your
good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven.
Christ had lately called his disciples, and told them that they should
be fishers of men; here he tells them further what he designed
them to be-- the salt of the earth, and lights of the
world, that they might be indeed what it was expected they should
be.
I. Ye are the salt of the earth. This would encourage and
support them under their sufferings, that, though they should be
treated with contempt, yet they should really be blessings to the
world, and the more so for their suffering thus. The prophets, who
went before them, were the salt of the land of Canaan; but the apostles
were the salt of the whole earth, for they must go into all
the world to preach the gospel. It was a discouragement to them
that they were so few and so weak. What could they do in
so large a province as the whole earth? Nothing, if they were to
work by force of arms and dint of sword; but, being to work silent as
salt, one handful of that salt would diffuse its savour far and wide;
would go a great way, and work insensibly and irresistibly as leaven, ch. xiii. 33 .
The doctrine of the gospel is as salt; it is penetrating, quick, and powerful ( Heb. iv. 12 );
it reaches the heart Acts ii. 37 .
It is cleansing, it is relishing, and preserves from putrefaction. We
read of the savour of the knowledge of Christ ( 2 Cor. ii. 14 );
for all other learning is insipid without that. An everlasting covenant
is called a covenant of salt ( Num. xviii. 19 );
and the gospel is an everlasting gospel. Salt was required in all the
sacrifices
( Lev. ii. 13 ),
in Ezekiel's mystical temple, Ezek. xliii. 24 .
Now Christ's disciples having themselves learned the doctrine of the
gospel, and being employed to teach it to others, were as salt. Note,
Christians, and especially ministers, are the salt of the earth.
1. If they be as they should be they are as good salt, white,
and small, and broken into many grains, but very useful and necessary.
Pliny says, Sine sale, vita humana non potest degere--Without salt
human life cannot be sustained. See in this,
(1.) What they are to be in themselves--seasoned with the gospel, with
the salt of grace; thoughts and affections, words and actions, all
seasoned with grace, Col. iv. 6 . Have salt in yourselves, else you cannot diffuse it among
others, Mark ix. 50 .
(2.) What they are to be to others; they must not only be good
but do good, must insinuate themselves into the minds of the
people, not to serve any secular interest of their own, but that they
might transform them into the taste and relish of the gospel.
(3.) What great blessings they are to the world. Mankind, lying in
ignorance and wickedness, were a vast heap of unsavoury stuff, ready to
putrefy; but Christ sent forth his disciples, by their lives and
doctrines, to season it with knowledge and grace, and so to render it
acceptable to God, to the angels, and to all that relish divine things.
(4.) How they must expect to be disposed of. They must not be laid on a
heap, must not continue always together at Jerusalem, but must be
scattered as salt upon the meat, here a grain and there a grain; as the
Levites were dispersed in Israel, that, wherever they live, they may
communicate their savour. Some have observed, that whereas it is
foolishly called an ill omen to have the salt fall towards us, it is
really an ill omen to have the salt fall from us.
2. If they be not, they are as salt that has lost its
savour. If you, who should season others, are yourselves unsavoury,
void of spiritual life, relish, and vigour; if a Christian be so,
especially if a minister be so, his condition is very sad; for,
(1.) He is irrecoverable: Wherewith shall it be salted? Salt is a remedy for unsavoury meat, but there is no remedy for unsavoury salt. Christianity will give a man a relish; but if a
man can take up and continue the profession of it, and yet remain flat
and foolish, and graceless and insipid, no other doctrine, no other
means, can be applied, to make him savoury. If Christianity do not do
it, nothing will.
(2.) He is unprofitable: It is thenceforth good for
nothing; what use can it be put to, in which it will not do more
hurt than good? As a man without reason, so is a Christian without
grace. A wicked man is the worst of creatures; a wicked Christian is
the worst of men; and a wicked minister is the worst of Christians.
(3.) He is doomed to ruin and rejection; He shall be cast
out --expelled the church and the communion of the faithful, to
which he is a blot and a burden; and he shall be trodden under foot
of men. Let God be glorified in the shame and rejection of those by
whom he has been reproached, and who have made themselves fit for
nothing but to be trampled upon.
II. Ye are the light of the world, v. 14 .
This also bespeaks them useful, as the former ( Sole et sale nihil
utilius--Nothing more useful than the sun and salt ), but more
glorious. All Christians are light in the Lord ( Eph. v. 8 ),
and must shine as lights ( Phil. ii. 15 ),
but ministers in a special manner. Christ call himself the Light of
the world ( John viii. 12 ),
and they are workers together with him, and have some of his
honour put upon them. Truly the light is sweet, it is welcome;
the light of the first day of the world was so, when it shone out of
darkness; so is the morning light of every day; so is the gospel,
and those that spread it, to all sensible people. The world sat in
darkness, Christ raised up his disciples to shine in it; and, that
they may do so, from him they borrow and derive their light.
1. As the lights of the world, they are illustrious and
conspicuous, and have many eyes upon them. A city that is set on a
hill cannot be hid. The disciples of Christ, especially those who
are forward and zealous in his service, become remarkable, and are
taken notice of as beacons. They are for signs ( Isa. vii. 18 ), men wondered at ( Zech. iii. 8 );
all their neighbours have any eye upon them. Some admire them, commend
them, rejoice in them, and study to imitate them; others envy them,
hate them, censure them, and study to blast them. They are concerned
therefore to walk circumspectly, because of their
observers; they are as spectacles to the world, and must
take heed of every thing that looks ill, because they are so
much looked at. The disciples of Christ were obscure men before
he called them, but the character he put upon them dignified them, and
as preachers of the gospel they made a figure; and though they were
reproached for it by some, they were respected for it by others,
advanced to thrones, and made judges
( Luke xxii. 30 );
for Christ will honour those that honour him.
2. As the lights of the world, they are intended to illuminate
and give light to others
( v. 15 ),
and therefore,
(1.) They shall be set up as lights. Christ has lighted these
candles, they shall not be put under a bushel, not confined always, as
they are now, to the cities of Galilee, or the lost sheep of the house
of Israel, but they shall be sent into all the world. The churches are
the candlesticks, the golden candlesticks, in which these lights are
placed, that they light may be diffused; and the gospel is so strong a
light, and carries with it so much of its own evidence, that, like a
city on a hill, it cannot be hid, it cannot but appear to be from
God, to all those who do not wilfully shut their eyes against it. It
will give light to all that are in the house, to all that will
draw near to it, and come where it is. Those to whom it does not give
light, must thank themselves; they will not be in the house with it;
will not make a diligent and impartial enquiry into it, but are
prejudiced against it.
(2.) They must shine as lights,
[1.] By their good preaching. The knowledge they have, they must
communicate for the good of others; not put it under a bushel, but spread it. The talent must not be buried in a napkin, but traded
with. The disciples of Christ must not muffle themselves up in privacy
and obscurity, under pretence of contemplation, modesty, or
self-preservation, but, as they have received the gift, must minister the same, Luke xii. 3 .
[2.] By their good living. They must be burning and shining
lights ( John v. 35 );
must evidence, in their whole conversation, that they are indeed
followers of Christ, James iii. 13 .
They must be to others for instruction, direction, quickening, and
comfort, Job xxix. 11 .
See here, First, How our light must shine--by doing such good
works as men may see, and may approve of; such works as are
of good report among them that are without, and as will
therefore give them cause to think well of Christianity. We must do
good works that may be seen to the edification of others, but
not that they may be seen to our own ostentation; we are bid to
pray in secret, and what lies between God and our souls, must be kept
to ourselves; but that which is of itself open and obvious to the sight
of men, we must study to make congruous to our profession, and
praiseworthy, Phil. iv. 8 .
Those about us must not only hear our good words, but see our good works; that they may be convinced that religion is more than a
bare name, and that we do not only make a profession of it, but abide
under the power of it.
Secondly, For what end our light must shine--"That those
who see your good works may be brought, not to glorify you (which was the things the Pharisees aimed at, and it spoiled all their
performances), but to glorify your Father which is in heaven. "
Note, The glory of God is the great thing we must aim at in every thing
we do in religion, 1 Pet. iv. 11 .
In this centre the lines of all our actions must meet. We must not only
endeavor to glorify God ourselves, but we must do all we can to bring
others to glorify him. The sight of our good works will do this,
by furnishing them,
1. With matter for praise. "Let them see your good works, that they may see the power of God's grace in you, and may thank him
for it, and give him the glory of it, who has given such power unto
men."
2. With motives of piety. "Let them see your good works, that
they may be convinced of the truth and excellency of the Christian
religion, may be provoked by a holy emulation to imitate your good
works, and so may glorify God." Note, The holy, regular, and exemplary
conversation of the saints, may do much towards the conversion of
sinners; those who are unacquainted with religion, may hereby be
brought to know what it is. Examples teach. And those who are
prejudiced against it, may hereby by brought in love with it, and thus
there is a winning virtue in a godly conversation.
17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the
prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one
jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be
fulfilled.
19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least
commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the
least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
20 For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall
exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall
in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.
Those to whom Christ preached, and for whose use he gave these
instructions to his disciples, were such as in their religion had an
eye,
1. To the scriptures of the Old Testament as their rule,
and therein Christ here shows them they were in the right:
2. To the scribes and the Pharisees as their example, and
therein Christ here shows them they were in the wrong; for,
I. The rule which Christ came to establish exactly agreed with the
scriptures of the Old Testament, here called the law and the
prophets. The prophets were commentators upon the law, and
both together made up that rule of faith and practice which Christ
found upon the throne in the Jewish church, and here he keeps it on the
throne.
1. He protests against the thought of cancelling and weakening the Old Testament; Think not that I am come to destroy the law
and the prophets. (1.) "Let not the pious Jews, who have an affection for the law and
the prophets, fear that I come to destroy them." Let them be
not prejudiced against Christ and his doctrine, from a jealousy that
this kingdom he came to set up, would derogate from the honour of the
scriptures, which they had embraced as coming from God, and of which
they had experienced the power and purity; no, let them be satisfied
that Christ has no ill design upon the law and the prophets. "Let not
the profane Jews, who have a disaffection to the law and the prophets,
and are weary of that yoke, hope that I am come to destroy them." Let
not carnal libertines imagine that the Messiah is come to discharge
them from the obligation of divine precepts and yet to secure to them
divine promises, to make the happy and yet to give them leave to live
as they list. Christ commands nothing now which was forbidden either by
the law of nature or the moral law, nor forbids any thing which those
laws had enjoined; it is a great mistake to think he does, and he here
takes care to rectify the mistake; I am not come to destroy. The
Saviour of souls is the destroyer of nothing but the works of
the devil, of nothing that comes from God, much less of those
excellent dictates which we have from Moses and the prophets. No, he
came to fulfil them. That is,
[1.] To obey the commands of the law, for he was made under the
law, Gal. iv. 4 .
He in all respects yielded obedience to the law, honoured his parents,
sanctified the sabbath, prayed, gave alms, and did that which never any
one else did, obeyed perfectly, and never broke the law in any thing.
[2.] To make good the promises of the law, and the predictions of the
prophets, which did all bear witness to him. The covenant of grace is,
for substance, the same now that it was then, and Christ the Mediator
of it.
[3.] To answer the types of the law; thus (as bishop Tillotson
expresses it), he did not make void, but make good, the
ceremonial law, and manifested himself to be the Substance of all those
shadows.
[4.] To fill up the defects of it, and so to complete and perfect it.
Thus the word plerosai properly signifies. If we consider
the law as a vessel that had some water in it before, he did not come
to pour out the water, but to fill the vessel up to the brim; or, as a
picture that is first rough-drawn, displays some outlines only of the
piece intended, which are afterwards filled up; so Christ made an
improvement of the law and the prophets by his additions and
explications.
[5.] To carry on the same design; the Christian institutes are so far
from thwarting and contradicting that which was the main design of the
Jewish religion, that they promote it to the highest degree. The gospel
is the time of reformation ( Heb. ix. 10 ),
not the repeal of the law, but the amendment of it, and, consequently,
its establishment.
2. He asserts the perpetuity of it; that not only he designed not the
abrogation of it, but that it never should be abrogated
( v. 18 );
" Verily I say unto you, I, the Amen, the faithful
Witness, solemnly declare it, that till heaven and earth pass, when time shall be no more, and the unchangeable state of recompences
shall supersede all laws, one jot, or one tittle, the least and
most minute circumstance, shall in no wise pass from the law till
all be fulfilled; " for what is it that God is doing in all the
operations both of providence and grace, but fulfilling the scripture?
Heaven and earth shall come together, and all the fulness thereof be
wrapped up in ruin and confusion, rather than any word of God shall
fall to the ground, or be in vain. The word of the Lord endures for
ever, both that of the law, and that of the gospel. Observe, The
care of God concerning his law extends itself even to those things that
seem to be of least account in it, the iotas and the tittles; for
whatever belongs to God, and bears his stamp, be it ever so little,
shall be preserved. The laws of men are conscious to themselves of so
much imperfection, that they allow it for a maxim, Apices juris non
sunt jura--The extreme points of the law are not the law, but God
will stand by and maintain every iota and every tittle of his law.
3. He gives it in charge to his disciples, carefully to preserve the
law, and shows them the danger of the neglect and contempt of it
( v. 19 ); Whosoever therefore shall break one of the least
commandments of the law of Moses, much more any of the greater, as
the Pharisees did, who neglected the weightier matters of the law, and
shall teach men so as they did, who made void the commandment of God
with their traditions
( ch. xv. 3 ), he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven. Though
the Pharisees be cried up for such teachers as should be, they shall
not be employed as teachers in Christ's kingdom; but whosoever shall
do and teach them, as Christ's disciples would, and thereby prove
themselves better friends to the Old Testament than the
Pharisees were, they, though despised by men, shall be called great
in the kingdom of heaven. Note,
(1.) Among the commands of God there are some less than others; none
absolutely little, but comparatively so. The Jews reckon the least of
the commandments of the law to be that of the bird's nest
( Deut. xxii. 6, 7 );
yet even that had a significance and an intention very great and
considerable.
(2.) It is a dangerous thing, in doctrine or practice, to disannul the
least of God's commands; to break them, that is, to go about either to contract the extent, or weaken the obligation of them;
whoever does so, will find it is at his peril. Thus to vacate any of
the ten commandments, is too bold a stroke for the jealous God to pass
by. It is something more than transgressing the law, it is making void
the law, Ps. cxix. 126 .
(3.) That the further such corruptions as they spread, the worse they
are. It is impudence enough to break the command, but is a greater
degree of it to teach men so. This plainly refers to those who at this
time sat in Moses' seat, and by their comments corrupted and perverted
the text. Opinions that tend to the destruction of serious godliness
and the vitals of religion, by corrupt glosses on the scripture, are
bad when they are held, but worse when they are propagated and taught,
as the word of God. He that does so, shall be called least in the
kingdom of heaven, in the kingdom of glory; he shall never come
thither, but be eternally excluded; or, rather, in the kingdom of the
gospel-church. He is so far from deserving the dignity of a teacher in
it, that he shall not so much as be accounted a member of it. The
prophet that teaches these lies shall be the tail in that kingdom
( Isa. ix. 15 );
when truth shall appear in its own evidence, such corrupt teachers,
though cried up as the Pharisees, shall be of no account with the wise
and good. Nothing makes ministers more contemptible and base than
corrupting the law, Mal. ii. 8, 11 .
Those who extenuate and encourage sin, and discountenance and put
contempt upon strictness in religion and serious devotion, are the
dregs of the church. But, on the other hand, Those are truly
honourable, and of great account in the church of Christ, who lay out
themselves by their life and doctrine to promote the purity and
strictness of practical religion; who both do and teach that which is
good; for those who do not as they teach, pull down with one hand what
they build up with the other, and give themselves the lie, and tempt
men to think that all religion is a delusion; but those who speak from
experience, who live up to what they preach, are truly great; they
honour God, and God will honour them
( 1 Sam. ii. 30 ),
and hereafter they shall shine as the stars in the kingdom of our
Father.
II. The righteousness which Christ came to establish by this rule, must
exceed that of the scribes and Pharisees, v. 20 .
This was strange doctrine to those who looked upon the scribes and
Pharisees as having arrived at the highest pitch of religion. The
scribes were the most noted teachers of the law, and the Pharisees the
most celebrated professors of it, and they both sat in Moses' chair
( ch. xxiii. 2 ),
and had such a reputation among the people, that they were looked upon
as super-conformable to the law, and people did not think themselves
obliged to be as good as they; it was therefore a great surprise to
them, to hear that they must be better than they, or they should not go
to heaven; and therefore Christ here avers it with solemnity; I say
unto you, It is so. The scribes and Pharisees were enemies to
Christ and his doctrine, and were great oppressors; and yet it must be
owned, that there was something commendable in them. They were much in
fasting and prayer, and giving of alms; they were punctual in observing
the ceremonial appointments, and made it their business to teach
others; they had such an interest in the people that they ought, if but
two men went to heaven, one would be a Pharisee; and yet our Lord Jesus
here tells his disciples, that the religion he came to establish, did
not only exclude the badness, but excel the goodness, of the scribes
and Pharisees. We must do more than they, and better than they, or we
shall come short of heaven. They were partial in the law, and
laid most stress upon the ritual part of it; but we must be universal, and not think it enough to give the priest his tithe,
but must give God our hearts. They minded only the outside, but
we must make conscience of inside godliness. They aimed at the praise and applause of men, but we must aim at acceptance with God: they were proud of what they did in
religion, and trusted to it as a righteousness; but we, when we
have done all, must deny ourselves, and say, We are unprofitable servants, and trust only to the righteousness of
Christ; and thus we may go beyond the scribes and Pharisees.
21 Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou
shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of
the judgment:
22 But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother
without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever
shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the
council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger
of hell fire.
23 Therefore if thou bring thy gift to the altar, and there
rememberest that thy brother hath ought against thee;
24 Leave there thy gift before the altar, and go thy way; first
be reconciled to thy brother, and then come and offer thy gift.
25 Agree with thine adversary quickly, whiles thou art in the
way with him; lest at any time the adversary deliver thee to the
judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be
cast into prison.
26 Verily I say unto thee, Thou shalt by no means come out
thence, till thou hast paid the uttermost farthing.
Christ having laid down these principles, that Moses and the prophets
were still to be their rulers, but that the scribes and Pharisees were
to be no longer their rulers, proceeds to expound the law in some
particular instances, and to vindicate it from the corrupt glosses
which those expositors had put upon it. He adds not any thing new, only
limits and restrains some permissions which had been abused: and as to
the precepts, shows the breadth, strictness, and spiritual nature of
them, adding such explanatory statutes as made them more clear, and
tended much toward the perfecting of our obedience to them. In these
verses, he explains the law of the sixth commandment, according to the
true intent and full extent of it.
I. Here is the command itself laid down
( v. 12 ); We have heard it, and remember it; he speaks to them who know
the law, who had Moses read to them in their synagogues every
sabbath-day; you have heard that it was said by them, or rather
as it is in the margin, to them of old time, to your forefathers
the Jews, Thou shalt not kill. Note, The laws of God are not
novel, upstart laws, but were delivered to them of old time; they are
ancient laws, but of that nature as never to be antiquated nor
grow obsolete. The moral law agrees with the law of nature, and
the eternal rules and reasons of good and evil, that is, the rectitude
of the eternal Mind. Killing is here forbidden, killing
ourselves, killing any other, directly or indirectly, or being any way
accessory to it. The law of God, the God of life, is a hedge of
protection about our lives. It was one of the precepts of Noah, Gen. ix. 5, 6 .
II. The exposition of this command which the Jewish teachers contended
themselves with; their comment upon it was, Whosoever shall kill,
shall be in danger of the judgment. This was all they had to say
upon it, that wilful murderers were liable to the sword of justice, and
casual ones to the judgment of the city of refuge. The courts of
judgment sat in the gate of their principal cities; the judges,
ordinarily, were in number twenty-three; these tried, condemned, and
executed murderers; so that whoever killed, was in danger of their
judgment. Now this gloss of theirs upon this commandment was faulty,
for it intimated,
1. That the law of the sixth commandment was only external, and forbade
no more than the act of murder, and laid to restraint upon the inward
lusts, from which wars and fightings come. This was indeed the proton pseudos -- the fundamental error of the
Jewish teachers, that the divine law prohibited only the sinful act,
not the sinful thought; they were disposed hærere in
cortice--to rest in the letter of the law, and they never enquired
into the spiritual meaning of it. Paul, while a Pharisee, did not,
till, by the key of the tenth commandment, divine grace let him into
the knowledge of the spiritual nature of all the rest, Rom. vii. 7, 14 .
2. Another mistake of theirs was, that this law was merely political and municipal, given for them, and intended as
a directory for their courts, and no more; as if they only were the
people, and the wisdom of the law must die with them.
III. The exposition which Christ gave of this commandment; and we are
sure that according to his exposition of it we must be judged
hereafter, and therefore ought to be ruled now. The commandment is
exceeding broad, and not to be limited by the will of the flesh, or
the will of men.
1. Christ tells them that rash anger is heart-murder ( v. 22 ); Whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause, breaks the
sixth commandment. By our brother here, we are to understand any
person, though ever so much our inferior, as a child, a servant, for we
are all made of one blood. Anger is a natural passion; there are
cases in which it is lawful and laudable; but it is then sinful, when we are angry without cause. The word is eike , which
signifies, sine causâ, sine effectu, et sine modo--without cause,
without any good effect, without moderation; so that the anger is
then sinful,
(1.) When it is without any just provocation given; either for no
cause, or no good cause, or no great and proportionable cause; when we
are angry at children or servants for that which could not be helped,
which was only a piece of forgetfulness or mistake, that we ourselves
might easily have been guilty of, and for which we should not have been
angry at ourselves; when we are angry upon groundless surmises, or for
trivial affronts not worth speaking of.
(2.) When it is without any good end aimed at, merely to show our
authority, to gratify a brutish passion, to let people know our
resentments, and excite ourselves to revenge, then it is in vain, it is
to do hurt; whereas if we are at any time angry, it should be to awaken
the offender to repentance, and prevent his doing so again; to clear
ourselves
( 2 Cor. vii. 11 ),
and to give warning to others.
(3.) When it exceeds due bounds; when we are hardy and headstrong in
our anger, violent and vehement, outrageous and mischievous, and when
we seek the hurt of those we are displeased at. This is a breach of
the sixth commandment, for he that is thus angry, would kill if he
could and durst; he has taken the first step toward it; Cain's killing
his brother began in anger; he is a murderer in the account of God, who
knows his heart, whence murder proceeds, ch. xv. 19 .
2. He tells them, that given opprobrious language to our brother is
tongue-murder, calling him, Raca, and, Thou fool. When
this is done with mildness and for a good end, to convince others of
their vanity and folly, it is not sinful. Thus James says, O vain
man; and Paul, Thou fool; and Christ himself, O fools,
and slow of heart. But when it proceeds from anger and malice
within, it is the smoke of that fire which is kindled from hell, and
falls under the same character.
(1.) Raca is a scornful word, and comes from pride, "Thou empty
fellow;" it is the language of that which Solomon calls proud
wrath ( Prov. xxi. 24 ),
which tramples upon our brother-disdains to set him even with the
dogs of our flock. This people who knoweth not the law, is cursed, is such language, John vii. 49 .
(2.) Thou fool, is a spiteful word, and comes from hatred;
looking upon him, not only as mean and not to be honoured, but as vile
and not to be loved; "Thou wicked man, thou reprobate." The former
speaks a man without sense, this (in scripture language) speaks a man
without grace; the more the reproach touches his spiritual condition,
the worse it is; the former is a haughty taunting of our brother, this
is a malicious censuring and condemning of him, as abandoned of God.
Now this is a breach of the sixth commandment; malicious slanders and
censures are poison under the tongue, that kills secretly and
slowly; bitter words are as arrows that would suddenly
( Ps. lxiv. 3 ),
or as a sword in the bones. The good name of our neighbour, which is
better than life, is thereby stabbed and murdered; and it is an
evidence of such an ill-will to our neighbour as would strike at his
life, if it were in our power.
3. He tells them, that how light soever they made of these sins, they
would certainly be reckoned for; he that is angry with is brother
shall be in danger of the judgment and anger of God; he that calls
him Raca, shall be in danger of the council, of being punished
by the Sanhedrim for reviling an Israelite; but whosoever saith,
Thou fool, thou profane person, thou child of hell, shall be in
danger of hell-fire, to which he condemns his brother; so the
learned Dr. Whitby. Some think, in allusion to the penalties used in
the several courts of judgment among the Jews, Christ shows that the
sin of rash anger exposes men to lower or higher punishments, according
to the degrees of its proceeding. The Jews had three capital
punishments, each worse than the other; beheading, which was inflicted
by the judgment; stoning, by the council or chief Sanhedrim; and
burning in the valley of the son of Hinnom, which was used only
in extraordinary cases: it signifies, therefore, that rash anger and
reproachful language are damning sins; but some are more sinful than
others, and accordingly there is a greater damnation, and a sorer
punishment reserved for them: Christ would thus show which sin was most
sinful, by showing which it was the punishment whereof was most
dreadful.
IV. From all this it is here inferred, that we ought carefully to
preserve Christian love and peace with our brethren, and that if at any
time a breach happens, we should labour for a reconciliation, by
confessing our fault, humbling ourselves to our brother, begging his
pardon, and making restitution, or offering satisfaction for wrong done
in word or deed, according as the nature of the thing is; and that we
should do this quickly for two reasons:
1. Because, till this be done, we are utterly unfit for communion with
God in holy ordinances, v. 23, 24 .
The case supposed is, " That thy brother have somewhat against
thee, " that thou has injured and offended him, either really or in
his apprehension; if thou are the party offended, there needs not this
delay; if thou have aught against thy brother, make short work
of it; no more is to be done but to forgive him
( Mark xi. 25 ),
and forgive the injury; but if the quarrel began on thy side, and the
fault was either at first or afterwards thine, so that thy
brother has a controversy with thee, go and be reconciled
to him before thou offer thy gift at the altar, before thou
approach solemnly to God in the gospel-services of prayer and praise,
hearing the word or the sacraments. Note,
(1.) When we are addressing ourselves to any religious exercises, it is
good for us to take that occasion of serious reflection and
self-examination: there are many things to be remembered, when
we bring our gift to the altar, and this among the rest, whether our brother hath aught against us; then, if ever, we are
disposed to be serious, and therefore should then call ourselves to an
account.
(2.) Religious exercises are not acceptable to God, if they are
performed when we are in wrath; envy, malice, and uncharitableness, are
sins so displeasing to God, that nothing pleases him which comes from a
heart wherein they are predominant, 1 Tim. ii. 8 .
Prayers made in wrath are written in gall, Isa. i. 15; lviii. 4 .
(3.) Love or charity is so much better than all burnt-offerings and
sacrifice, that God will have reconciliation made with an offended
brother before the gift be offered; he is content to stay for the gift,
rather than have it offered while we are under guilt and engaged in a
quarrel.
(4.) Though we are unfitted for communion with God, by a continual
quarrel with a brother, yet that can be no excuse for the omission or
neglect of our duty: " Leave there thy gift before the altar, lest otherwise, when thou has gone away, thou be tempted not to come
again." Many give this as a reason why they do not come to church or to
the communion, because they are at variance with some neighbour; and
whose fault is that? One sin will never excuse another, but will rather
double the guilt. Want of charity cannot justify the want of piety. The
difficulty is easily got over; those who have wronged us, we must
forgive; and those whom we have wronged, we must make satisfaction to,
or at least make a tender of it, and desire a renewal of the
friendship, so that if reconciliation be not made, it may not be our
fault; and then come, come and welcome, come and offer thy
gift, and it shall be accepted. Therefore we must not let
the sun go down upon our wrath any day, because we must go to
prayer before we go to sleep; much less let the sun rise upon our
wrath on a sabbath-day, because it is a day of prayer.
2. Because, till this be done, we lie exposed to much danger, v. 25, 26 .
It is at our peril if we do not labour after an agreement, and that
quickly, upon two accounts:
(1.) Upon a temporal account. If the offence we have done to our
brother, in his body, goods, or reputation, be such as will bear
action, in which he may recover considerable damages, it is our wisdom,
and it is our duty to our family, to prevent that by a humble
submission and a just and peaceable satisfaction; lest otherwise he
recover it by law, and put us to the extremity of a prison. In such a
case it is better to compound and make the best terms we can, than to
stand it out; for it is in vain to contend with the law, and there is
danger of our being crushed by it. Many ruin their estates by an
obstinate persisting in the offences they have given, which would soon
have been pacified by a little yielding at first. Solomon's advice in
case of suretyship is, Go, humble thyself, and so secure and
deliver thyself, Prov. vi. 1-5 .
It is good to agree, for the law is costly. Though we must be merciful
to those we have advantage against, yet we must be just to those that
have advantage against us, as far as we are able. " Agree, and
compound with thine adversary quickly, lest he be exasperated by
thy stubbornness, and provoked to insist upon the utmost demand, and
will not make thee the abatement which at first he would have made." A
prison is an uncomfortable place to those who are brought to it by
their own pride and prodigality, their own wilfulness and folly.
(2.) Upon a spiritual account. " Go, and be reconciled to thy
brother, be just to him, be friendly with him, because while the
quarrel continues, as thou art unfit to bring thy gift to the
altar, unfit to come to the table of the Lord, so thou art
unfit to die: if thou persist in this sin, there is danger lest thou be
suddenly snatched away by the wrath of God, whose judgment thou canst
not escape nor except against; and if that iniquity be laid to thy
charge, thou art undone for ever." Hell is a prison for all that live
and die in malice and uncharitableness, for all that are contentious ( Rom. ii. 8 ),
and out of that prison there is no rescue, no redemption, no escape, to
eternity.
This is very applicable to the great business of our reconciliation to
God through Christ; Agree with him quickly, whilst thou art in the
way. Note,
[1.] The great God is an Adversary to all sinners, Antidikos -- a law-adversary; he has a controversy
with them, an action against them.
[2.] It is our concern to agree with him, to acquaint ourselves
with him, that we may be at peace, Job xxii. 21; 2 Cor. v. 20 .
[3.] It is our wisdom to do this quickly, while we are in the
way. While we are alive, we are in the way; after death, it
will be too late to do it; therefore give not sleep to thine
eyes till it be done.
[4.] They who continue in a state of enmity to God, are continually
exposed to the arrests of his justice, and the most dreadful instances
of his wrath. Christ is the Judge, to whom impenitent sinners will be
delivered; for all judgment is committed to the Son; he that was
rejected as a Saviour, cannot be escaped as a Judge, Rev. vi. 16, 17 .
It is a fearful thing to be thus turned over to the Lord Jesus, when
the Lamb shall become the Lion. Angels are the officers to whom Christ
will deliver them
( ch. xiii. 41, 42 );
devils are so too, having the power of death as executioners to
all unbelievers, Heb. ii. 14 .
Hell is the prison, into which those will be cast that continue in a
state of enmity to God, 2 Pet. ii. 4 .
[5.] Damned sinners must remain in it to eternity; they shall not depart till they have paid the uttermost farthing, and that will
not be to the utmost ages of eternity: divine justice will be for ever
in the satisfying, but never satisfied.
27 Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou
shalt not commit adultery:
28 But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to
lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his
heart.
29 And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy
members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be
cast into hell.
30 And if thy right hand offend thee, cut it off, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members
should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into
hell.
31 It hath been said, Whosoever shall put away his wife, let
him give her a writing of divorcement:
32 But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife,
saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit
adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced
committeth adultery.
We have here an exposition of the seventh commandment, given us by the
same hand that made the law, and therefore was fittest to be the
interpreter of it: it is the law against uncleanness, which fitly
follows upon the former; that laid a restraint upon sinful
passions, this upon sinful appetites, both which ought always to
be under the government of reason and conscience, and if indulged, are
equally pernicious.
I. The command is here laid down
( v. 27 ), Thou shalt not commit adultery; which includes a prohibition of
all other acts of uncleanness, and the desire of them: but the
Pharisees, in their expositions of this command, made it to extend no
further than the act of adultery, suggesting, that if the iniquity was
only regarded in the heart, and went no further, God could not
hear it, would not regard it
( Ps. lxvi. 18 ),
and therefore they thought it enough to be able to say that they were no adulterers, Luke xviii. 11 .
II. It is here explained in the strictness of it, in three things,
which would seem new and strange to those who had been always governed
by the tradition of the elders, and took all for oracular that they
taught.
1. We are here taught, that there is such a thing as heart-adultery, adulterous thoughts and dispositions, which
never proceed to the act of adultery or fornication; and perhaps the
defilement which these give to the soul, that is here so clearly
asserted, was not only included in the seventh commandment, but was
signified and intended in many of those ceremonial pollutions under the
law, for which they were to wash their clothes, and bathe their
flesh in water. Whosoever looketh on a woman (not only another
man's wife, as some would have it, but any woman), to lust after
her, has committed adultery with her in his heart, v. 28 .
This command forbids not only the acts of fornication and adultery,
but,
(1.) All appetites to them, all lusting after the forbidden object;
this is the beginning of the sin, lust conceiving ( James i. 15 );
it is a bad step towards the sin; and where the lust is dwelt upon and
approved, and the wanton desire is rolled under the tongue as a sweet
morsel, it is the commission of sin, as far as the heart can do it;
there wants nothing but convenient opportunity for the sin itself. Adultera mens est--The mind is debauched. Ovid. Lust is
conscience baffled or biassed: biassed, if it say nothing against the
sin; baffled, if it prevail not in what is says.
(2.) All approaches toward them; feeding the eye with the sight of the
forbidden fruit; not only looking for that end, that I may lust; but
looking till I do lust, or looking to gratify the lust, where further
satisfaction cannot be obtained. The eye is both the inlet and outlet
of a great deal of wickedness of this kind, witness Joseph's mistress
( Gen. xxxix. 7 ),
Samson
( Judg. xvi. 1 ),
David, 2 Sam. xi. 2 .
We read the eyes full of adultery, that cannot cease from sin, 2 Pet. ii. 14 .
What need have we, therefore, with holy Job, to make a covenant with
our eyes, to make this bargain with them that they should have the
pleasure of beholding the light of the sun and the works of God,
provided they would never fasten or dwell upon any thing that might
occasion impure imaginations or desires; and under this penalty, that
if they did, they must smart for it in penitential tears! Job xxxi. 1 .
What have we the covering of the eyes for, but to restrain corrupt
glances, and to keep out of their defiling impressions? This forbids
also the using of any other of our senses to stir up lust. If ensnaring
looks are forbidden fruit, much more unclean discourses, and wanton
dalliances, the fuel and bellows of this hellish fire. These precepts
are hedges about the law of heart-purity, v. 8 .
And if looking be lust, they who dress and deck, and expose themselves,
with design to be looked at and lusted after (like Jezebel, that painted her face and tired her head, and looked out at the
window ) are no less guilty. Men sin, but devils tempt to sin.
2. That such looks and such dalliances are so very dangerous and
destructive to the soul, that it is better to lose the eye and the hand
that thus offend then to give way to the sin, and perish eternally in
it. This lesson is here taught us, v. 29, 30 .
Corrupt nature would soon object against the prohibition of
heart-adultery, that it is impossible to governed by it; " It is a
hard saying, who can bear it? Flesh and blood cannot but look with
pleasure upon a beautiful woman; and it is impossible to forbear
lusting after and dallying with such an object." Such pretences as
these will scarcely be overcome by reason, and therefore must be argued
against with the terrors of the Lord, and so they are here
argued against.
(1.) It is a severe operation that is here prescribed for the
preventing of these fleshly lusts. If thy right eye offend thee, or cause thee to offend, by wanton glances, or wanton gazings,
upon forbidden objects; if thy right hand off end thee, or cause thee to offend, by wanton dalliances; and if it were
indeed impossible, as is pretended, to govern the eye and the hand, and
they have been so accustomed to these wicked practices, that they will
not be withheld from them; if there be no other way to restrain them
(which, blessed be God, through his grace, there is), it were better
for us to pluck out the eye, and cut off the hand, though
the right eye, and right hand, the more honourable and
useful, than to indulge them in sin to the ruin of the soul. And if
this must be submitted to, at the thought of which nature startles,
much more must we resolve to keep under the body, and to bring it
into subjection; to live a life of mortification and self-denial;
to keep a constant watch over our own hearts, and to suppress the first
rising of lust and corruption there; to avoid the occasions of sin, to
resist the beginnings of it, and to decline the company of those who
will be a snare to us, though ever so pleasing; to keep out of harm's
way, and abridge ourselves in the use of lawful things, when we find
them temptations to us; and to seek unto God for his grace, and depend
upon that grace daily, and so to walk in the Spirit, as that we
may not fulfil the lusts of the flesh; and this will be as
effectual as cutting off a right hand or pulling out a right
eye; and perhaps as much against the grain to flesh and blood; it
is the destruction of the old man.
(2.) It is a startling argument that is made use of to enforce this
prescription
( v. 29 ),
and it is repeated in the same words
( v. 30 ),
because we are loth to hear such rough things; Isa. xxx. 10 . It is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, though it be an eye or a hand, which can be worse spared, and not
that thy whole body should be cast into hell. Note,
[1.] It is not unbecoming a minister of the gospel to preach of hell
and damnation; nay, he must do it, for Christ himself did it;
and we are unfaithful to our trust, if we give not warning of the
wrath to come. [2.] There are some sins from which we need to be saved with
fear, particularly fleshly lusts, which are such natural
brute beasts as cannot be checked, but by being frightened; cannot
be kept from a forbidden tree, but by cherubim, with a flaming
sword. [3.] When we are tempted to think it hard to deny ourselves, and
to crucify fleshly lusts, we ought to consider how much harder
it will be to lie for ever in the lake that burns with fire and
brimstone; those do not know or do not believe what hell is, that
will rather venture their eternal ruin in those flames, than deny
themselves the gratification of a base and brutish lust.
[4.] In hell there will be torments for the body; the whole body will be cast into hell, and there will be torment in every part
of it; so that if we have a care of our own bodies, we shall possess
them in sanctification and honour, and not in the lusts of
uncleanness. [5.] Even those duties that are most unpleasant to flesh and blood, are profitable for us; and our Master requires nothing from us but
what he knows to be for our advantage.
3. That men's divorcing of their wives upon dislike, or for any other
cause except adultery, however tolerated and practised among the Jews,
was a violation of the seventh commandment, as it opened a door to
adultery, v. 31, 32 .
Here observe,
(1.) How the matter now stood with reference to divorce. It hath
been said (he does not say as before, It hath been said by them
of old time, because this was not a precept, as those were, though
the Pharisees were willing so to understand it, ch. xix. 7 ,
but only a permission), " Whosoever shall put away his wife, let him
give her a bill of divorce; let him not think to do it by word of
mouth, when he is in a passion; but let him do it deliberately, by a
legal instrument in writing, attested by witnesses; if he will dissolve
the matrimonial bond, let him do it solemnly." Thus the law had
prevented rash and hasty divorces; and perhaps at first, when writing
was not so common among the Jews, that made divorces rare things; but
in process of time it became very common, and this direction of how to
do it, when there was just cause for it, was construed into a
permission of it for any cause, ch. xix. 3 .
(2.) How this matter was rectified and amended by our Saviour. He
reduced the ordinance of marriage to its primitive institution: They
two shall be one flesh, not to be easily separated, and therefore
divorce is not to be allowed, except in case of adultery, which breaks
the marriage covenant; but he that puts away his wife upon any other
pretence, causeth her to commit adultery, and him also that
shall marry her when she is thus divorced. Note, Those who lead others
into temptation to sin, or leave them in it, or expose them to it, make
themselves guilty of their sin, and will be accountable for it. This is
one way of being partaker with adulterers Ps. l. 18 .
33 Again, ye have heard that it hath been said by them of old
time, Thou shalt not forswear thyself, but shalt perform unto the
Lord thine oaths:
34 But I say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven; for
it is God's throne:
35 Nor by the earth; for it is his footstool: neither by
Jerusalem; for it is the city of the great King.
36 Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not
make one hair white or black.
37 But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for
whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.
We have here an exposition of the third commandment, which we are the
more concerned right to understand, because it is particularly said,
that God will not hold him guiltless, however he may hold
himself, who breaks this commandment, by taking the name of the Lord
in vain. Now as to this command,
I. It is agreed on all hands that it forbids perjury, forswearing, and
the violation of oaths and vows, v. 33 .
This was said to them of old time, and is the true intent and meaning
of the third commandment. Thou shalt not use, or take up,
the name of God (as we do by an oath) in vain, or unto
vanity, or a lie. He hath not lift up his soul unto
vanity, is expounded in the next words, nor sworn
deceitfully, Ps. xxiv. 4 .
Perjury is a sin condemned by the light of nature, as a complication of
impiety toward God and injustice toward man, and as rendering a man
highly obnoxious to the divine wrath, which was always judged to follow
so infallibly upon that sin, that the forms of swearing were commonly
turned into execrations or imprecations; as that, God do so to me,
and more also; and with us, So help me God; wishing I may
never have any help from God, if I swear falsely. Thus, by the consent
of nations, have men cursed themselves, not doubting but that God would
curse them, if they lied against the truth then, when they solemnly
called God to witness to it.
It is added, from some other scriptures, but shalt perform unto the
Lord thine oaths ( Num. xxx. 2 );
which may be meant, either,
1. Of those promises to which God is a party, vows made to God; these
must be punctually paid
( Eccl. v. 4, 5 ):
or,
2. Of those promises made to our brethren, to which God was a Witness,
he being appealed to concerning our sincerity; these must be performed to the Lord, with an eye to him, and for his sake: for
to him, by ratifying the promises with an oath, we have made ourselves
debtors; and if we break a promise so ratified, we have not lied
unto men only, but unto God.
II. It is here added, that the commandment does not only forbid false
swearing, but all rash, unnecessary swearing: Swear not at all, v. 34;
Compare Jam. v. 12 .
Not that all swearing is sinful; so far from
that, if rightly done, it is a part of religious worship, and we in it give unto God the glory due to his name. See Deut. vi. 13; x. 20;
Isa. xlv. 23; Jer. iv. 2 .
We find Paul confirming what he said by such solemnities
( 2 Cor. i. 23 ),
when there was a necessity for it. In swearing, we pawn the truth of
something known, to confirm the truth of something doubtful or unknown;
we appeal to a greater knowledge, to a higher court, and imprecate the
vengeance of a righteous Judge, if we swear deceitfully.
1. That we must not swear at all, but when we are duly called to
it, and justice or charity to our brother, or respect to the
commonwealth, make it necessary for the end of strife ( Heb. vi. 16 ),
of which necessity the civil magistrate is ordinarily to be the judge.
We may be sworn, but we must now swear; we may be adjured, and so
obliged to it, but we must not thrust ourselves upon it for our own
worldly advantage.
2. That we must not swear lightly and irreverently, in common
discourse: it is a very great sin to make a ludicrous appeal to the
glorious Majesty of heaven, which, being a sacred thing, ought always
to be very serious: it is a gross profanation of God's holy name, and
of one of the holy things which the children of Israel sanctify to
the Lord: it is a sin that has no cloak, no excuse for it, and
therefore a sign of a graceless heart, in which enmity to God reigns: Thine enemies take thy name in vain.
3. That we must in a special manner avoid promissory oaths, of which
Christ more particularly speaks here, for they are oaths that are to be
performed. The influence of an affirmative oath immediately ceases,
when we have faithfully discovered the truth, and the whole truth; but
a promissory oath binds so long, and may be so many ways broken, by the
surprise as well as strength of a temptation, that it is not to be used
but upon great necessity: the frequent requiring and using of oaths, is
a reflection upon Christians, who should be of such acknowledged
fidelity, as that their sober words should be as sacred as their solemn
oaths.
4. That we must not swear by any other creature. It should seem there
were some, who, in civility (as they thought) to the name of God, would
not make use of that in swearing, but would swear by heaven or
earth, &c. This Christ forbids here
( v. 34 )
and shows that there is nothing we can swear by, but it is some way or
other related to God, who is the Fountain of all beings, and therefore
that it is as dangerous to swear by them, as it is to swear by God
himself: it is the verity of the creature that is laid at stake; now
that cannot be an instrument of testimony, but as it has regard to God,
who is the summum verum--the chief Truth. As for instance,
(1.) Swear not by the heaven; "As sure as there is a heaven,
this is true;" for it is God's throne, where he resides, and in
a particular manner manifests his glory, as a Prince upon his throne:
this being the inseparable dignity of the upper world, you cannot swear by heaven, but you swear by God himself.
(2.) Nor by the earth, for it is his footstool. He governs the
motions of this lower world; as he rules in heaven, so he rules over
the earth; and though under his feet, yet it is also under his eye and
care, and stands in relation to him as his, Ps. xxiv. 1 . The earth is the Lord's; so that in swearing by it, you swear by
its Owner.
(3.) Neither by Jerusalem, a place for which the Jews had such a
veneration, that they could not speak of any thing more sacred to swear by; but beside the common reference Jerusalem has to God,
as part of the earth, it is in special relation to him, for it is
the city of the great King ( Ps. xlviii. 2 ), the city of God ( Ps. xlvi. 4 ),
he is therefore interested in it, and in every oath taken by it.
(4.) " Neither shalt thou swear by the head; though it be near
thee, and an essential part of thee, yet it is more God's than thine;
for he made it, and formed all the springs and powers of it; whereas
thou thyself canst not, from any natural intrinsic influence, change
the colour of one hair, so as to make it white or black; so that thou canst not swear by thy head, but thou swearest by
him who is the Life of thy head, and the Lifter up of
it. " Ps. iii. 3 .
5. That therefore in all our communications we must content ourselves
with, Yea, yea, and nay, nay, v. 37 .
In ordinary discourse, if we affirm a thing, let us only say, Yea, it is so; and, if need be, to evidence our assurance of a
thing, we may double it, and say, Yea, yea, indeed it is so: Verily, verily, was our Saviour's yea, yea. So if we deny
a thing, let is suffice to say, No; or if it be requisite, to repeat
the denial, and say, No, no; and if our fidelity be known, that will
suffice to gain us credit; and if it be questioned, to back what we say
with swearing and cursing, is but to render it more suspicious. They
who can swallow a profane oath, will not strain at a lie.
It is a pity that this, which Christ puts in the mouths of all his
disciples, should be fastened, as a name of reproach, upon a sect
faulty enough other ways, when (as Dr. Hammond says) we are not
forbidden any more than yea and nay, but are in a manner
directed to the use of that.
The reason is observable; For whatsoever is more than these cometh
of evil, though it do not amount to the iniquity of an oath. It
comes ek tou Diabolou ; so an ancient copy has it: it
comes from the Devil, the evil one; it comes from the corruption
of men's nature, from passion and vehemence; from a reigning vanity in
the mind, and a contempt of sacred things: it comes from that
deceitfulness which is in men, All men are liars; therefore men
use these protestations, because they are distrustful one of another,
and think they cannot be believed without them. Note, Christians
should, for the credit of their religion, avoid not only that which is
in itself evil, but that which cometh of evil, and has the
appearance of it. That may be suspected as a bad thing, which comes
from a bad cause. An oath is physic, which supposes a disease.
38 Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and
a tooth for a tooth:
39 But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever
shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
40 And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy
coat, let him have thy cloak also.
41 And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him
twain.
42 Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow
of thee turn not thou away.
In these verses the law of retaliation is expounded, and in a manner
repealed. Observe,
I. What the Old-Testament permission was, in case of injury; and
here the expression is only, Ye have heard that is has been
said; not, as before, concerning the commands of the decalogue, that it has been said by, or to, them of old time. It was
a command, that every one should of necessity require such
satisfaction; but they might lawfully insist upon it, if they pleased; an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth. This we find, Exod. xxi. 24;
Lev. xxiv. 20; Deut. xix. 21 ;
in all which places it is appointed to be done by the magistrate, who bears not the sword in vain, but is the minister of God, an
avenger to execute wrath, Rom. xiii. 4 .
It was a direction to the judges of the Jewish nation what punishment
to inflict in case of maims, for terror to such as would do mischief on
the one hand, and for a restraint to such as have mischief done to them
on the other hand, that they may not insist on a greater punishment
than is proper: it is not a life for an eye, nor a limb for a
tooth, but observe a proportion; and it is intimated
( Num. xxxv. 31 ),
that the forfeiture in this case might be redeemed with money; for when
it is provided that no ransom shall be taken for the life of a
murderer, it is supposed that for maims a pecuniary satisfaction
was allowed.
But some of the Jewish teachers, who were not the most compassionate
men in the world, insisted upon it as necessary that such revenge
should be taken, even by private persons themselves, and that there was
no room left for remission, or the acceptance of satisfaction. Even
now, when they were under the government of the Roman magistrates, and
consequently the judicial law fell to the ground of course, yet they
were still zealous for any thing that looked harsh and severe.
Now, so far this is in force with us, as a direction to magistrates, to
use the sword of justice according to the good and wholesome laws of
the land, for the terror of evil-doers, and the vindication of the
oppressed. That judge neither feared God nor regarded man, who
would not avenge the poor widow of her adversary, Luke xviii. 2, 3 .
And it is in force as a rule to lawgivers, to provide accordingly, and
wisely to apportion punishments to crimes, for the restraint of rapine
and violence, and the protection of innocency.
II. What the New-Testament precept is, as to the complainant
himself, his duty is, to forgive the injury as done to himself,
and no further to insist upon the punishment of it than is necessary to
the public good: and this precept is consonant to the meekness of
Christ, and the gentleness of his yoke.
1. We must not be revengeful
( v. 39 ); I say unto you, that ye resist not evil; --the evil person that
is injurious to you. The resisting of any ill attempt upon us, is here
as generally and expressly forbidden, as the resisting of the higher
powers is
( Rom. xiii. 2 );
and yet this does not repeal the law of self-preservation, and the care
we are to take of our families; we may avoid evil, and may resist it, so far as is necessary to our own security; but we
must not render evil for evil, must not bear a grudge, nor
avenge ourselves, nor study to be even with those that have treated us
unkindly, but we must go beyond them by forgiving them, Prov. xx. 22; xxiv. 29; xxv. 21, 22;
Rom. xii. 7 .
The law of retaliation must be made consistent with the law of love:
nor, if any have injured us, is our recompence in our own hands, but in
the hands of God, to whose wrath we must give place; and sometimes in
the hands of his viceregents, where it is necessary for the
preservation of the public peace; but it will not justify us in hurting
our brother to say that he began, for it is the second blow that makes
the quarrel; and when we were injured, we had an opportunity not to
justify our injuring him, but to show ourselves the true disciples of
Christ, by forgiving him.
Three things our Saviour specifies, to show that Christians must
patiently yield to those who bear hard upon them, rather than contend;
and these include others.
(1.) A blow on the cheek, which is an injury to me in my body;
" Whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, " which is not
only a hurt, but an affront and indignity
( 2 Cor. xi. 20 ),
if a man in anger or scorn thus abuse thee, " turn to him the other
cheek; " that is, "instead of avenging that injury, prepare for
another, and bear it patiently: give not the rude man as good as he
brings; do not challenge him, nor enter an action against him; if it be
necessary to the public peace that he be bound to his good behaviour,
leave that to the magistrate; but for thine own part, it will
ordinarily be the wisest course to pass it by, and take no further
notice of it: there are no bones broken, no great harm done, forgive it
and forget it; and if proud fools think the worse of thee, and laugh at
thee for it, all wise men will value and honour thee for it, as a
follower of the blessed Jesus, who, though he was the Judge of Israel,
did not smite those who smote him on the cheek," Micah v. 1 .
Though this may perhaps, with some base spirits, expose us to the like
affront another time, and so it is, in effect, to turn the other
cheek, yet let not that disturb us, but let us trust God and his
providence to protect us in the way of our duty. Perhaps, the forgiving
of one injury may prevent another, when the avenging of it would but
draw on another; some will be overcome by submission, who by resistance
would but be the more exasperated, Prov. xxv. 22 .
However, our recompence is in Christ's hands, who will reward us with
eternal glory for the shame we thus patiently endure; and though it be
not directly inflicted, it if be quietly borne for conscience' sake,
and in conformity to Christ's example, it shall be put upon the score
of suffering for Christ.
(2.) The loss of a coat, which is a wrong to me in my estate
( v. 40 ); If any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat. It
is a hard case. Note, It is common for legal processes to be made use
of for the doing of greatest injuries. Though judges be just and
circumspect, yet it is possible for bad men who make no conscience of
oaths and forgeries, by course of law to force off the coat from a
man's back. Marvel not at the matter ( Eccl. v. 8 ),
but, in such a case, rather than go to the law by way of revenge,
rather than exhibit a cross bill, or stand out to the utmost, in
defence of that which is thy undoubted right, let him even take thy cloak also. If the matter be small, which we may lose
without an considerable damage to our families, it is good to submit to
it for peace' sake. "It will not cost thee so much to buy another
cloak, as it will cost thee by course of law to recover that; and
therefore unless thou canst get it again by fair means, it is better to
let him take it."
(3.) The going a mile by constraint, which is a wrong to me in my
liberty
( v. 41 );
" Whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, to run an errand for
him, or to wait upon him, grudge not at it, but go with him two
miles rather than fall out with him:" say not, "I would do it, if I
were not compelled to it, but I hate to be forced;" rather say,
"Therefore I will do it, for otherwise there will be a quarrel;" and it
is better to serve him, than to serve thy own lusts of pride and
revenge. Some give this sense of it: The Jews taught that the disciples
of the wise, and the students of the law, were not to be pressed, as
others might, by the king's officers, to travel upon the public
service; but Christ will not have his disciples to insist upon this
privilege, but to comply rather than offend the government. The sum of
all is, that Christians must not be litigious; small injuries must be
submitted to, and no notice taken of them; and if the injury be such as
requires us to seek reparation, it must be for a good end, and without
thought of revenge: though we must not invite injuries, yet we must
meet them cheerfully in the way of duty, and make the best of them. If
any say, Flesh and blood cannot pass by such an affront, let them
remember, that flesh and blood shall not inherit the kingdom of
God.
2. We must be charitable and beneficent
( v. 42 );
must not only do no hurt to our neighbours, but labour to do them all
the good we can.
(1.) We must be ready to give; " Give to him that asketh thee. If
thou has an ability, look upon the request of the poor as giving thee
an opportunity for the duty of almsgiving." When a real object of
charity presents itself, we should give at the first word: Give a
portion to seven, and also to eight; yet the affairs of our charity
must be guided with discretion ( Ps. cxii. 5 ),
lest we give that to the idle and unworthy, which should be given to
those that are necessitous, and deserve well. What God says to us, we
should be ready to say to our poor brethren, Ask, and it shall be
given you. (2.) We must be ready to lend. This is sometimes as great a piece of
charity as giving; as it not only relieves the present exigency, but
obliges the borrower to providence, industry, and honesty; and
therefore, " From him that would borrow of thee something to live
on, or something to trade on, turn not thou away: shun not those
that thou knowest have such a request to make of thee, nor contrive
excuses to shake them off." Be easy of access to him that would
borrow: though he be bashful, and have not confidence to make known
his case and beg the favour, yet thou knowest both his need and his
desire, and therefore offer him the kindness. Exorabor antequam
rogor; honestis precibus occuram--I will be prevailed on before I am
entreated; I will anticipate the becoming petition. Seneca, De
Vitâ Beatâ. It becomes us to be thus forward in acts of
kindness, for before we call, God hears us, and prevents us with the
blessings of his goodness.
43 Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy
neighbour, and hate thine enemy.
44 But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse
you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which
despitefully use you, and persecute you;
45 That ye may be the children of your Father which is in
heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the
good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.
46 For if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye? do
not even the publicans the same?
47 And if ye salute your brethren only, what do ye more than
others? do not even the publicans so?
48 Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in
heaven is perfect.
We have here, lastly, an exposition of that great fundamental law of
the second table, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, which was the
fulfilling of the law.
I. See here how this law was corrupted by the comments of the Jewish
teachers, v. 43 .
God said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour; and by neighbour they understood those only of their own country, nation, and religion;
and those only that they were pleased to look upon as their friends:
yet this was not the worst; from this command, Thou shalt love thy
neighbour, they were willing to infer what God never designed; Thou shalt hate thine enemy; and they looked upon whom they
pleased as their enemies, thus making void the great command of God by
their traditions, though there were express laws to the contrary, Exod. xxiii. 4, 5; Deut. xxiii. 7 . Thou shalt not abhor an Edomite, nor an Egyptian, though these
nations had been as much enemies to Israel as any whatsoever. It was
true, God appointed them to destroy the seven devoted nations of
Canaan, and not to make leagues with them; but there was a particular
reason for it--to make room for Israel, and that they might not be snares to them; but it was very ill-natured from hence to infer,
that they must hate all their enemies; yet the moral philosophy of the
heathen then allowed this. It is Cicero's rule, Nemini nocere nisi
prius lacessitum injuriâ--To injure no one, unless previously
injured. De Offic. See how willing corrupt passions are to fetch
countenance from the word of God, and to take occasion by the
commandment to justify themselves.
II. See how it is cleared by the command of the Lord Jesus, who teaches
us another lesson: " But I say unto you, I, who come to be the
great Peace-Maker, the general Reconciler, who loved you when you were
strangers and enemies, I say, Love your enemies, " v. 44 .
Though men are ever so bad themselves, and carry it ever so basely
towards us, yet that does not discharge us from the great debt we owe
them, of love to our kind, love to our kin. We cannot but find
ourselves very prone to wish the hurt, or at least very coldly to
desire the good, of those that hate us, and have been abusive to
us; but that which is at the bottom hereof is a root of bitterness,
which must be plucked up, and a remnant of corrupt nature which grace
must conquer. Note, it is the great duty of Christians to love their
enemies; we cannot have complacency in one that is openly wicked
and profane, nor put a confidence in one that we know to be deceitful;
nor are we to love all alike; but we must pay respect to the human
nature, and so far honour all men: we must take notice, with
pleasure, of that even in our enemies which is amiable and commendable;
ingenuousness, good temper, learning, and moral virtue, kindness to
others, profession of religion, &c., and love that, though they are our
enemies. We must have a compassion for them, and a good will toward
them. We are here told,
1. That we must speak well of them: Bless them that curse
you. When we speak to them, we must answer their revilings with
courteous and friendly words, and not render railing for
railing; behind their backs we must commend that in them which is
commendable, and when we have said all the good we can of them, not be
forward to say any thing more. See 1 Pet. iii. 9 .
They, in whose tongues is the law of kindness, can give good
words to those who give bad words to them.
2. That we must do well to them: " Do good to them that hate
you, and that will be a better proof of love than good words. Be
ready to do them all the real kindness that you can, and glad of an
opportunity to do it, in their bodies, estates, names, families; and
especially to do good to their souls." It was said of Archbishop
Cranmer, that the way to make him a friend was to do him an ill turn;
so many did he serve who had disobliged him.
3. We must pray for them: Pray for them that despitefully use
you, and persecute you. Note,
(1.) It is no new thing for the most excellent saints to be hated, and
cursed, and persecuted, and despitefully used, by wicked people; Christ
himself was so treated.
(2.) That when at any time we meet with such usage, we have an
opportunity of showing our conformity both to the precept and to the
example of Christ, by praying for them who thus abuse us. If we cannot
otherwise testify our love to them, yet this way we may without
ostentation, and it is such a way as surely we durst not dissemble in.
We must pray that God will forgive them, that they may never fare the
worse for any thing they have done against us, and that he would make
them to be at peace with us; and this is one way of making them so.
Plutarch, in his Laconic Apophthegms, has this of Aristo; when one
commended Cleomenes's saying, who, being asked what a good king
should do, replied, Tous men philous euergetein, tous de
echthrous kakos poiein -- Good turns to his friends, and evil
to his enemies; he said, How much better is it tous men
philous euergetein, tous de echthrous philous poiein --to do
good to our friends, and make friends of our enemies. This is heaping coals of fire on their heads.
Two reasons are here given to enforce this command (which sounds so
harsh) of loving our enemies. We must do it,
Lastly, Our Saviour concludes this subject with this exhortation
( v. 48 ), Be ye therefore perfect, as your Father which is in heaven is
perfect. Which may be understood,
1. In general, including all those things wherein we must be followers of God as dear children. Note, It is the duty of
Christians to desire, and aim at, and press toward a perfection in
grace and holiness, Phil. iii. 12-14 .
And therein we must study to conform ourselves to the example of our
heavenly Father, 1 Pet. i. 15, 16 .
Or,
2. In this particular before mentioned, of doing good to our
enemies; see Luke vi. 36 .
It is God's perfection to forgive injuries and to entertain
strangers, and to do good to the evil and unthankful, and it will
be ours to be like him. We that owe so much, that owe our
all, to the divine bounty, ought to copy it out as well as we
can.
Ver. 1. And seeing the multitudes,.... The great concourse of people that followed him from the places before mentioned,
he went up into a mountain; either to pray alone, which was sometimes his custom to do, or to shun the multitude; or rather, because it was a commodious place for teaching the people:
and when he was set: not for rest, but in order to teach; for sitting was the posture of masters, or teachers, see Mt 13:2 Lu 4:20. The form in which the master and his disciples sat is thus described by Maimonides {z}.
"The master sits at the head, or in the chief place, and the disciples before him in a circuit, like a crown; so that they all see the master, and hear his words; and the master may not sit upon a seat, and the scholars upon the ground; but either all upon the earth, or upon seats: indeed from the beginning, or formerly, bvwy brh hyh "the master used to sit", and the disciples stand; but before the destruction of the second temple, all used to teach their disciples as they were sitting.''
With respect to this latter custom, the Talmudists say {a}, that
"from the days of Moses, to Rabban Gamaliel (the master of the Apostle Paul), they did not learn the law, unless standing; after Rabban Gamaliel died, sickness came into the world, and they learnt the law sitting: hence it is a tradition, that after Rabban Gamaliel died, the glory of the law ceased.''
His disciples came unto him; not only the twelve, but the company, or multitude, of his disciples, Lu 6:17 which he made in the several places, where he had been preaching; for the number of his disciples was larger than John's.
{z} Hilch. Talmud Torah, c. 4. sect. 2. {a} T. Bab. Megilla, fol. 21. 1. Vid. Misn. Sota, c. 9. sect. 15. & Jarchi, Maimon, & Bartenora in ib.
Matthew 5:2
Ver. 2. And he opened his mouth,.... He spoke with a clear and strong voice, that all the people might hear him; and with great freedom, utterance, and cheerfulness, and things of the greatest moment and importance;
and taught them; not his disciples only, but the whole multitude, who heard him with astonishment; see Mt 7:28. Some things in the following discourse are directed to the disciples in particular, and others regard the multitude in general.
Matthew 5:3
Ver. 3. Blessed are the poor in spirit,.... Not the poor in purse, or who are so with respect to things temporal: for though God has chosen and called many, who are in such a condition of life, yet not all; the kingdom of heaven cannot be said to belong to them all, or only; but such as are poor in a spiritual sense. All mankind are spiritually poor; they have nothing to eat that is fit and proper; nor any clothes to wear, but rags; nor are they able to purchase either; they have no money to buy with; they are in debt, owe ten thousand talents, and have nothing to pay; and in such a condition, that they are not able to help themselves. The greater part of mankind are insensible of this their condition; but think themselves rich, and increased with goods: there are some who are sensible of it, who see their poverty and want, freely acknowledge it, bewail it, and mourn over it; are humbled for it, and are broken under a sense of it; entertain low and mean thoughts of themselves; seek after the true riches, both of grace and glory; and frankly acknowledge, that all they have, or hope to have, is owing to the free grace of God. Now these are the persons intended in this place; who are not only "poor", but are poor "in spirit"; in their own spirits, in their own sense, apprehension, and judgment: and may even be called "beggars", as the word may be rendered; for being sensible of their poverty, they place themselves at the door of mercy, and knock there; their language is, "God be merciful"; their posture is standing, watching, and waiting, at wisdom's gates, and at the posts of her door; they are importunate, will have no denial, yet receive the least favour with thankfulness. Now these are pronounced "blessed", for this reason,
for theirs is the kingdom of heaven; not only the Gospel, and the ministration of it, which belongs to them. "The poor have the Gospel preached": it not only reaches their ears, but their hearts; it enters into them, is applied unto them, they receive and embrace it with the utmost joy and gladness; but eternal glory, this is prepared for them, and given to them; they are born heirs of it, have a right unto it, are making meet for it, and shall enjoy it.
Matthew 5:4
Ver. 4. Blessed are they that mourn,.... For sin, for their own sins; the sin of their nature, indwelling sin, which is always working in them, and is a continual grief of mind to them; the unbelief of their hearts, notwithstanding the many instances, declarations, promises, and discoveries of grace made unto them; their daily infirmities, and many sins of life, because they are committed against a God of love, grace, and mercy, grieve the Spirit, and dishonour the Gospel of Christ: who mourn also for the sins of others, for the sins of the world, the profaneness and wickedness that abound in it; and more especially for the sins of professors, by reason of which, the name of God, and ways of Christ, are evil spoken of: who likewise mourn under afflictions, spiritual ones, temptations, desertions, and declensions; temporal ones, their own, which they receive, either more immediately from the hand of God, or from men; such as they endure for the sake of Christ, and the profession of his Gospel; and who sympathize with others in their afflictions. These, how sorrowful and distressed soever they may appear, are blessed
for they shall be comforted: here in this life, by the God of all comfort, by Christ the comforter; by the Spirit of God, whose work and office it is to comfort; by the Scriptures of truth, which are written for their consolation; by the promises of the Gospel, through which the heirs of promise have strong consolation; by the ordinances of it, which are breasts of consolation; and by the ministers of the word, who have a commission from the Lord to speak comfortably to them; and then are they comforted, when they have the discoveries of the love of God, manifestations of pardoning grace, through the blood of Christ, and enjoy the divine presence: and they shall be comforted hereafter; when freed from all the troubles of this life, they shall be blessed with uninterrupted communion with Father, Son, and Spirit, and with the happy society of angels and glorified saints. Isa 61:1 seems to be referred to, both in this, and in the preceding verse.
Matthew 5:5
Ver. 5. Blessed are the meek,.... Who are not easily provoked to anger; who patiently bear, and put up with injuries and affronts; carry themselves courteously, and affably to all; have the meanest thoughts of themselves, and the best of others; do not envy the gifts and graces of other men; are willing to be instructed and admonished, by the meanest of the saints; quietly submit to the will of God, in adverse dispensations of providence; and ascribe all they have, and are, to the grace of God. Meekness, or humility, is very valuable and commendable. The Jews, though a proud, haughty, and wrathful people, cannot but speak in its praise:
"Wisdom, fear, and meekness, say {b} they, are of high esteem; but hwne, "meekness", is greater than them all.''
They had two very considerable doctors in the time of Christ, Hillell and Shammai; the one was of a meek, the other of an angry disposition: hence, say they {c},
"Let a man be always meek as Hillell, and let him not be angry as Shammai.''
Here meekness is to be considered, not as a moral virtue, but as a Christian grace, a fruit of the Spirit of God; which was eminently in Christ, and is very ornamental to believers; and of great advantage and use to them, in hearing and receiving the word; in giving an account of the reason of the hope that is in them; in instructing and restoring such, who have backslidden, either in principle or practice; and in the whole of their lives and conversations; and serves greatly to recommend religion to others: such who are possessed of it, and exercise it, are well pleasing to God; when disconsolate, he comforts them; when hungry, he satisfies them; when they want direction, he gives it to them; when wronged, he will do them right; he gives them more grace here, and glory hereafter. The blessing instanced, in which they shall partake of, is,
they shall inherit the earth; not the land of Canaan, though that may be alluded to; nor this world, at least in its present situation; for this is not the saints' rest and inheritance: but rather, the "new earth", which will be after this is burnt up; in which only such persons as are here described shall dwell; and who shall inherit it, by virtue of their being heirs of God, and joint heirs with Christ; whose is the earth, and the fulness thereof. Though some think heaven is here designed, and is so called, partly for the sake of variety of expression, from Mt 5:3 and partly in allusion to the land of Canaan, a type of it; and may be called an earth, or country, that is an heavenly one, in opposition to this earthly one; as the heavenly Jerusalem is opposed to the earthly one, and which will be a glorious inheritance. The passage, referred to is Ps 37:11.
{b} Piske Tosaphot Yebamot, art. 196. {c} T. Bab. Sabbat. fol. 30. 2.
Matthew 5:6
Ver. 6. Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst,.... Not after the riches, honours, and pleasures of this world, but
after righteousness; by which is meant, not justice and equity, as persons oppressed and injured; nor a moral, legal righteousness, which the generality of the Jewish nation were eagerly pursuing; but the justifying righteousness of Christ, which is imputed by God the Father, and received by faith. To "hunger and thirst" after this, supposes a want of righteousness, which is the case of all men; a sense of want of it, which is only perceived by persons spiritually enlightened; a discovery of the righteousness of Christ to them, which is made in the Gospel, and by the Spirit of God; a value for it, and a preference of it to all other righteousness; and an earnest desire after it, to be possessed of it, and found in it; and that nothing can be more grateful than that, because of its perfection, purity, suitableness, and use: happy souls are these,
for they shall be filled: with that righteousness, and with all other good things, in consequence of it; and particularly with joy and peace, which are the certain effects of it: or, "they shall be satisfied", that they have an interest in it; and so satisfied with it, that they shall never seek for any other righteousness, as a justifying one, in the sight of God; this being full, perfect, sufficient, and entirely complete.
Matthew 5:7
Ver. 7. Blessed are the merciful,.... Who show mercy to the bodies of men, to those that are poor, indigent, and miserable, in their outward circumstances; by both sympathizing with them, and distributing unto them; not only making use of expressions of pity and concern; but communicating with readiness and cheerfulness, with affection and tenderness, and with a view to the glory of God: who also show mercy to the souls of men, by instructing such as are ignorant, giving them good counsel and advice: reproving them for sin, praying for them, forgiving injuries done by them, and by comforting those that are cast down. To show mercy is very delightful to, and desirable by God; it is what he requires, and is one of the weightier matters of the law; it is very ornamental to a child of God, and what makes him more like to his heavenly Father. The happiness of such persons is this, that
they shall obtain mercy; from man, whenever they are attended with any uncomfortable circumstances of life; wyle Nymxrm Mxrm lk, "whoever is merciful", men show mercy to him {d}: and from God, through Christ; which is free, sovereign, abundant, and eternal. Men are said to obtain this, when they are regenerated, and called by grace; and when they have a discovery, and an application, of the forgiveness of their sins: but here, it seems to design those supplies of grace and mercy, which merciful persons may expect to find and obtain, at the throne of grace, to help them in time of need; and who shall not only obtain mercy of God in this life, but in the world to come, in the great day of the Lord; for which the Apostle prayed for Onesiphorus, 2Ti 1:18.
{d} Maimon. Hilch. Mattanot Anayim. c. 10. sect. 2.
Matthew 5:8
Ver. 8. Blessed are the pure in heart,.... Not in the head; for men may have pure notions and impure hearts; not in the hand, or action, or in outward conversation only; so the Pharisees were outwardly righteous before men, but inwardly full of impurity; but "in heart". The heart of man is naturally unclean; nor is it in the power of man to make it clean, or to be pure from his sin; nor is any man in this life, in such sense, so pure in heart, as to be entirely free from sin. This is only true of Christ, angels, and glorified saints: but such may be said to be so, who, though they have sin dwelling in them, are justified from all sin, by the righteousness of Christ, and are "clean through the word", or sentence of justification pronounced upon them, on the account of that righteousness; whose iniquities are all of them forgiven, and whose hearts are sprinkled with the blood of Jesus, which cleanses from all sin; and who have the grace of God wrought in their hearts, which, though as yet imperfect, it is entirely pure; there is not the least spot or stain of sin in it: and such souls as they are in love with, so they most earnestly desire after more purity of heart, lip, life, and conversation. And happy they are,
for they shall see God; in this life, enjoying communion with him, both in private and public, in the several duties of religion, in the house and ordinances of God; where they often behold his beauty, see his power and his glory, and taste, and know, that he is good and gracious: and in the other world, where they shall see God in Christ, with the eyes of their understanding; and God incarnate, with the eyes of their bodies, after the resurrection; which sight of Christ, and God in Christ, will be unspeakably glorious, desirable, delightful, and satisfying; it will be free from all darkness and error, and from all interruption; it will be an appropriating and transforming one, and will last for ever.
Matthew 5:9
Ver. 9. Blessed are the peace makers,.... Not between God and man, for no man can make his own peace with God; nor can any mere creature, angels, or men, make it for him; Christ, in this sense, is the only peace maker: but between men and men; and such are they, who are of peaceable dispositions themselves; live peaceably with all men, and with one another, as their relation obliges to, and their mutual comfort requires; and with the men of the world; and who are ready, willing, and very serviceable, in composing differences, and making peace between their fellow creatures and fellow Christians. The Jews speak very highly, and much, in the commendation of peace making; they reckon this among the things which shall be of use to a man, both in this, and the other world.
"These are the things, (say they {e},) the fruit of which a man enjoys in this world, and his lot or portion remains for him in the world to come; honouring father and mother, liberality, wrybxl Mda Nyb Mwlv tabhw, "and making peace between a man and his neighhour."''
This, they say {f}, Aaron was much disposed to.
"Moses used to say, let justice break through the mountain; but Aaron loved peace, and pursued it, and made peace between a man and his neighhour, as is said, Mal 2:6''
Hence that saying of Hillell {g},
"be thou one of the disciples of Aaron, who loved peace, and followed after it; he loved men, and brought them to the law.''
Now of such persons it is said, that
they shall be called the children of God; that is, they are the children of God by adopting grace, which is made manifest in their regeneration; and that is evidenced by the fruits of it, of which this is one; they not only shall be, and more manifestly appear to be, the sons of God hereafter; but they are, and are known to be so now, by their peaceable disposition, which is wrought in them by the Spirit of God; whereby they become like to the God of peace, and to Christ, the great and only peacemaker, and so are truly sons of peace.
{e} Misn. Peah. c. 1. sect. 1. T. Bab. Sabbat. fol. 127. 1. & Kiddushin. fol. 40. 1. {f} T. Bab. Sanhedrim, fol. 6. 2. Vid. Abot. R. Nathan, c. 12. fol. 4. 2. {g} Pirke Abot. c. 1. sect. 12.
Matthew 5:10
Ver. 10. Blessed are they which are persecuted,.... Not for any crimes they have done, for unrighteousness and iniquity, as murderers, thieves, and evildoers, but
for righteousness sake: on account of their righteous and godly conversation, which brings upon them the hatred and enmity of the men of the world: for saints, by living righteously, separate themselves from them, and profess themselves not to belong to them; their religious life sets a brand upon, and distinguishes other persons; yea, it reproves and condemns their wicked lives and practices; and this fills them with wrath against them, and puts them on persecuting them: or by "righteousness" may be meant, a righteous cause, the cause of Christ and his Gospel; for by making a profession of Christ, showing a concern for his interest, and by engaging in a vindication of his person and truths, saints expose themselves to the rage and persecution of men: and particularly, they are persecuted for preaching, maintaining, or embracing, the doctrine of justification by the righteousness of Christ; because it is not of man, nor agreeable to the carnal reason of man; it is opposite to the way of justification, which men naturally receive; it excludes boasting, and is contrary to their carnal and selfish principles: persecution is either verbal with the tongue, by cruel mockings and reproachful language; or real, by deeds, such as confiscation of goods, banishment, imprisonment of body, and innumerable sorts of death: the latter seems here more especially designed, and both are expressed in the following verse; and yet the saints, though thus used, or rather abused, are happy;
for theirs is the kingdom of heaven: the same blessedness is predicated of these as of the poor in spirit, ver. 3.
Matthew 5:11
Ver. 11. Blessed are ye when men shall revile you,.... These words are particularly directed to the disciples of Christ, and are designed to inform them, that they should not be exempted from reproach and persecution, and to animate and fortify them against it; and are prophetical of what they, and the first Christians particularly, were to endure for Christ's sake. Men should "revile" them, speak very reproachfully of them, brand them with infamy, and load them with disgrace; and
persecute you from place to place, by ill usage of all sorts;
and shall say all manner of evil against you: the worst things they could think of and invent, and all of them; such as that they were seditious persons, enemies to the commonwealth, and the public good, guilty of sacrilege, incest, and murder but what would serve to relieve them under these heavy charges is, that they were "falsely" laid; there was not a word of truth in them; wherefore their own hearts would not reproach them; but all were the malicious lies of men, invented on purpose to bring them and Christianity into disgrace: and that they were brought against "them for Christ's sake", for his name's sake, for the sake of his Gospel and interest: the treatment they meet with is on his account, and the same that he himself met with; the like reproaches fell on him, which will be all wiped off from him and them another day; when they will appear to be the blessed persons, and their revilers and persecutors the unhappy ones. The Jews have some sayings not unlike these, and which may serve to illustrate them:
"ajal aht alw ajwl aht, "be thou cursed", or bearing curses, but do not curse {g}. The gloss upon it is, it is better to be one of them that are cursed, than to be of them that curse; for, at the end, the curse causeless returns to him that curseth.''
Again {h},
"for ever let a man be of them that are persecuted, and not of them that persecute; of them that suffer injury, and not of them that do it.''
Once more {i},
"they that suffer injury, and do it not; who hear reproach, and do not return it; who act from love, and rejoice in chastisements, of them the Scripture says, "let them that love him", &c. Jud 5:31.''
{g} T. Bab. Sanhedrim, fol. 49. 1. {h} T. Bab. Bava Kama, fol. 93. 1. Maimon. Hilch. Deyot. c. 5. sect. 13. {i} T. Bab. Sabbat. fol. 88. 2. Yoma, fol. 23. 1. & Gittin, fol. 36. 2.
Matthew 5:12
Ver. 12. Rejoice and be exceeding glad,.... Because of the honour put upon them, the glory they bring to Christ and his cause, by cheerfully suffering for it; and because of the glory and happiness that shall follow upon their sufferings:
for great is your reward in heaven; not of debt, but of grace; for there is no proportion or comparison between what the saints suffer for Christ, and the glory that shall be revealed in them by him; not in earth, but in heaven. Saints must not expect their reward here, but hereafter, when God himself will be their reward; he will be all in all; Christ and all his glory, glory and all the riches of it will be the reward of the inheritance, and which must needs be a "great" one. And the more to animate them to suffer with joyfulness, and to support them under all their reproaches and persecutions, it is added;
for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you; as Isaiah, Jeremiah, Zechariah, and others; which shows, that what should befall them was no new and strange thing, but what had been the lot of the most eminent servants of God in former ages.
Matthew 5:13
Ver. 13. Ye are the salt of the earth,.... This is to be understood of the disciples and apostles of Christ; who might be compared to "salt", because of the savoury doctrines they preached; as all such are, which are agreeable to the Scriptures, and are of the evangelic kind, which are full of Christ, serve to exalt him, and to magnify the grace of God; and are suitable to the experiences of the saints, and are according to godliness, and tend to promote it: also because of their savoury lives and conversations; whereby they recommended, and gave sanction to the doctrines they preached, were examples to the saints, and checks upon wicked men. These were the salt "of the earth"; that is, of the inhabitants of the earth, not of the only, where they first lived and preached, but of the whole world, into which they were afterwards sent to preach the Gospel.
But if the salt have lost its savour, wherewith shall it be salted? The "savour" here supposed that it may be lost, cannot mean the savour of grace, or true grace itself, which cannot be lost, being an incorruptible seed; but either gifts qualifying men for the ministry, which may cease; or the savoury doctrines of the Gospel, which may be departed from; or a seeming savoury conversation, which may be neglected; or that seeming savour, zeal, and affection, with which the Gospel is preached, which may be dropped: and particular respect seems to be had to Judas, whom Christ had chosen to the apostleship, and was a devil; and who he knew would lose his usefulness and place, and become an unprofitable wretch, and at last be rejected of God and men; and this case is proposed to them all, in order to engage them to take heed to themselves, their doctrine and ministry. Moreover, this is but a supposition;
if the salt, &c. and proves no matter of fact; and the Jews have a saying {k}, that all that season lose their savour "hmej hgypm hnya
xlmw, but salt does not lose its savour". Should it do so,
it is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out and to be trodden under foot. Salt is good for nothing, but to make things savoury, and preserve from putrefacation; and when it has lost its savour, it is of no use, neither to men nor beasts, as some things are when corrupted; nor is it of any use to the land, or dunghill, for it makes barren, and not fruitful: so ministers of the word, when they have dropped the savoury doctrines of the Gospel, or have quitted their former seeming savoury and exemplary conversations; as their usefulness is gone, so, generally speaking, it is never retrieved; they are cast out of the churches of Christ, and are treated with contempt by everyone.
{k} T. Bab. Betzah, fol. 14. 1.
Matthew 5:14
Ver. 14. Ye are the light of the world,.... What the luminaries, the sun and moon, are in the heavens, with respect to corporal light, that the apostles were in the world with regard to spiritual light; carrying and spreading the light of the Gospel not only in Judea, but all over the world, which was in great darkness of ignorance and error; and through a divine blessing attending their ministry, many were turned from the darkness of Judaism and Gentilism, of sin and infidelity, to the marvellous light of divine grace. The Jews were wont to say, that of the Israelites in general, and particularly of their sanhedrim, and of their learned doctors, what Christ more truly applies here to his apostles; they observe {l}, that
"on the fourth day it was said, "let there be light": which was done with respect to the Israelites, because they are they Mlwel Myryam, "which give light to the world", as it is written, Da 12:3'
And in another place {m}, say they,
"how beautiful are the great ones of the congregation, and the wise men, who sit in the sanhedrim! for they are they
amlel Nyrhnm, "that enlighten the world", the people of the house of .''
So. R. Meir, R. Akiba his disciple, and R. Judah the prince, are each of them called {n} Mlweh rwa, "the light of the world"; as R. Jochanan ben Zaccai is by his disciples, Mlwe rn, "the lamp of the world" {o}: and it was usual for the head of a school, or of an university to be styled {p} amled arwhn, "the light of the world"; but this title much better agrees and suits with the persons Christ gives it to, who, no question, had a view to those exalted characters the Jews gave to their celebrated Rabbins. A city that
is set on an hill cannot be hid; alluding either to Nazareth, where he was educated, and had lately preached, which was built on an hill, from the brow of which the inhabitants sought to have cast him headlong, Lu 4:29 or to Capernaum, which, on account of its height, is said to be
exalted unto heaven, Mt 11:23 or to the city of Jerusalem, which was situated on a very considerable eminence. The , the Jews say {q}, was higher than all other lands; and the temple at was higher than any other part of the . And as a city cannot be hid which is built on a high place, so neither could, nor ought the doctrines which the apostles were commissioned to preach, be hid, or concealed from men: they were not to shun to declare the whole counsel of God, nor study to avoid the reproaches and persecutions of men; for they were to be "made a spectacle"; to be set as in a public theatre, to be seen by "the world, angels, and men".
{l} Tzeror Hammor, fol. 1. 3. {m} Targum in Cant. iv. 1. {n} Juchasin, fol. 63. 2. {o} Abot R. Nathan, c. 25. fol. 6. 3. {p} Juchasin. fol. 121. 1. {q} T. Bab. Kiddushin, fol. 69. 1. Sanhedrim, fol. 87. 1. Zebachim, fol. 54. 2.
Matthew 5:15
Ver. 15. Neither do men light a candle,.... Which may be read impersonally, "a candle is not lighted": and by it may be meant the Gospel, and gifts qualifying men to preach it; which, like a candle, was lighted in the evening of the Jewish dispensation, though not confined to the land of Judea; but has shone throughout the world, being as a candle to be removed, and has been removed from place to place: wherever it is set, it gives light, more or less, and dispels darkness; it is useful both to work by and walk with; it does not always burn alike clearly, it needs looking after; it has its thieves, as candles sometimes have; and will give the greatest light towards the close of the world, as they usually do, when ready to go out. Now when a candle is lighted by men, they do not
put it under a bushel, or anything which may hide and cover it, and so hinder its light and usefulness. The Greek word modiov, rendered a "bushel", answers to the Hebrew hao, "seah", which is the very word used in Munster's Hebrew Gospel; and this was a dry measure that held about a gallon and a half; and accordingly is rendered here by the Syriac atao. The design of the expression is, that Christ has lighted the candle of the everlasting Gospel, and given gifts to men for the ministration of it, not to be concealed and neglected, or to be used as the servant did his lord's money, wrap it up in a napkin, and hide it in the earth. Ministers are not, through slothfulness, to neglect the gift that is in them; nor, through fear, to hide their talents, or keep back any part of the Gospel, or cover anything out of sight, which may be profitable to souls: "but" men, when they light a candle, put it
on a candlestick, and it giveth light to all that are in the house; as on the candlestick in the temple, a type of the church; where Christ has set the light of the Gospel, where it is held forth particularly by the ministers of the word, to illuminate the whole house and family of God; by the light of which poor sinners, the lost pieces of silver, are looked up; straggling souls are brought home; hypocrites and formalists are detected; and saints are enlightened, directed, and comforted. Much such a proverbial saying is used by the Jews {r}:
"do not leave a vessel of balsam in a dunghill, but move it from its place, that its smell may spread, and men may receive profit from it.''
{r} Vid. Joh. Isaac. Praefat. ad Eliae Levit. Methurgeman.
Matthew 5:16
Ver. 16. Let your light so shine before men,.... Here Christ applies the foregoing simile to his disciples, and more fully opens the meaning and design of it. His sense is this; that the light of the Gospel, which he had communicated to them, the spiritual knowledge of the mysteries of grace, which he had favoured them with, were to be openly declared, and made manifest before men. Light was not given merely for their own private use, but for the public good of mankind; and therefore, as they were placed as lights in the world, they were to hold forth, in the most open and conspicuous manner, the word of light and life:
that they may see your good works: meaning their zeal and fervency; their plainness and openness; their sincerity, faithfulness, and integrity; their courage and intrepidity; their diligence, industry, and indefatigableness in preaching the Gospel; their strict regard to truth, the honour of Christ, and the good of souls; as also their very great care and concern to recommend the doctrines of grace, by their example in their lives and conversations:
and glorify your Father which is in heaven; that is, that when the ministration of the Gospel has been blessed, for the illumination of the minds of men, to a thorough conviction of their state; and for their regeneration, conversion, sanctification, and comfort; they may give praise to God, and bless his name for qualifying and sending such Gospel ministers to show unto them the way of salvation; and that the word has been made useful to them for communicating spiritual light, life, joy, and comfort, Mymvbv wnyba, "Our and your Father which is in heaven", is a name, appellation, or periphrasis of God, frequently used by Jewish writers {s}; and is often expressed by Christ in these his sermons on the mount.
{s} Vid. Misn. Sota, c. 9. sect. 15. & Yoma, c. 8. sect. 9.
Matthew 5:17
Ver. 17. Think not that I am come to destroy the law or the prophets,.... From verse 3 to the 10th inclusive, our Lord seems chiefly to respect the whole body of his true disciples and followers; from thence, to the 16th inclusive, he addresses the disciples, whom he had called to be ministers of the word; and in this "verse", to the end of his discourse, he applies himself to the whole multitude in general; many of whom might be ready to imagine, that by the light of the Gospel, he was giving his disciples instructions to spread in the world, he was going to set aside, as useless, the law of Moses, or the prophets, the interpreters of it, and commentators upon it. Christ knew the thoughts of their hearts, that they had taken up such prejudices in their minds against him; wherefore he says, "think not"; he was sensible what objections they were forming, and what an improvement they would make of them against his being the Messiah, and therefore prevents them, saying,
I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. By "the law" is meant the moral law, as appears from the whole discourse following: this he came not to "destroy", or loose men's obligations to, as a rule of walk and conversation, but "to fulfil" it; which he did doctrinally, by setting it forth fully, and giving the true sense and meaning of it; and practically, by yielding perfect obedience to all its commands, whereby he became "the end", the fulfilling end of it. By "the prophets" are meant the writings of the prophets, in which they illustrated and explained the law of Moses; urged the duties of it; encouraged men thereunto by promises; and directed the people to the Messiah, and to an expectation of the blessings of grace by him: all which explanations, promises, and prophecies, were so far from being made void by Christ, that they receive their full accomplishment in him. The Jews {t} pretend that these words of Christ are contrary to the religion and faith of his followers, who assert, that the law of Moses is abolished; which is easily refuted, by observing the exact agreement between Christ and the Apostle Paul, Ro 3:31 and whenever he, or any other of the apostles, speaks of the abrogation of the law, it is to be understood of the ceremonial law, which in course ceased by being fulfilled; or if of the moral law, not of the matter, but of the ministry of it. This passage of Christ is cited in the Talmud {u}, after this manner:
"it is written in it, i.e. in the Gospel, "I Aven", neither to diminish from the law of Moses am I come, "but", or "nor" (for in the Amsterdam edition they have inserted alw between two hooks), to add to the law of Moses am I come.''
Which, with their last correction, though not a just citation, yet tolerably well expresses the sense; but a most blasphemous character is affixed to Christ, when they call him "Aven"; which signifies "iniquity" itself, and seems to be a wilful corruption of the word "Amen", which begins the next "verse".
{t} R. Isaac Chizuk Emuna, par. 2. c. 10. p. 401. {u} T. Bab. Sabbat. fol. 116. 2.
Matthew 5:18
Ver. 18. For verily I say unto you,.... Or "I Amen say unto you", which is one of the names of Christ; see Re 3:14 or the word "Amen" is only used by Christ as an asseveration of what he was about to say; and which, for greater confirmation, is usually doubled in the Evangelist John, "Amen, Amen", or "verily, verily". The word is used by the Jews {w} for an oath; they swore by it; and it is a rule with them, that whoever answers "Amen" after an oath, it is all one as if he had pronounced the oath itself. The thing so strongly affirmed in this solemn manner is,
till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. The iwta "or jot", in the Greek language, answers to "jod" in the Hebrew, the least of all the letters in the alphabet; hence a little city is called by this name, and this reason is given for it, {x} twytwab hnjq dwyv, "because that jod is the least among letters". We read also of Rabbi Jod {y}, perhaps so called because Njq hyh, he was little, as the author of Juchasin observes {z}. This shows in what language the law was written; not in the Samaritan language, for the jod in that is a large letter, but in the Hebrew, in which it is very small; and particularly is written in a very diminutive character, in De 32:18 "by one tittle" some think is meant one of those ducts, dashes, or corners of letters, which distinguish one letter from another, that are much alike; others have thought that one of the pricks or vowel points is intended; others, one of those little strokes in the tops of letters, which the Jews call {a} "crowns" and "spikes", is here meant, in which they imagined great mysteries were contained; and there were some persons among them, who made it their business to search into the meaning of every letter, and of everyone of these little horns, or pricks, that were upon the top of them. So says R. Meir {b},
"in the time of the prophets there were such who very diligently searched every letter in the law, and explained every letter by itself; and do not wonder at this that they should expound every letter by itself, for they commented
twaw twa lk lv Uwqw Uwq lk le, upon everyone of the tops of each letter.''
Such an expounder was Akiba ben Joseph {c}. To which custom Christ is here supposed to have respect: however, certain it is that he speaks very much in the language, and agreeably to the mind of the Jewish doctors; and some things in their writings will serve to illustrate this passage,
"If, (say they {d},) all the nations of the world were gathered together, "to root one word out of the law", they could not do it; which you may learn from Solomon, who sought to root "one letter out of the law", the letter "jod", in De 17:16 but the holy blessed God said, Solomon shall cease, and an hundred such as he (in the Talmud {e} it is a thousand such as he) Mlwel hlyjb hnya Kmm
dwyw, "but, jod shall not cease from thee (the law) for ever".''
And elsewhere the same expression is used {f}, and it is added,
"ljbm ynya Kmm huwqw, "but a tittle from thee shall not perish."''
The design of Christ, in conformity to the language of the Jews, is to declare, that no part of the law, not one of the least commandments in it, as he explains himself in the next verse, should be unaccomplished; but all should be fulfilled before "heaven and earth pass" away, as they will, with a great noise and fervent heat, as to their present form and condition; or sooner shall they pass away, than the least part of the law shall: which expresses the perpetuity of the law, and the impossibility of its passing away, and the superior excellency of it to the heavens and the earth. It is a saying of one of the Jewish doctors {g}, that
"the whole world is not equal even to one word out of the law,''
in which it is said, there is not one letter deficient or superfluous.
{w} T. Hieros. Kiddushin, fol. 60. 4. Misn. Bava Kama, c. 9. sect. 7, 8. T. Bab. Shebuot, fol. 36. 1. Debarim Rabba, fol. 242. 2. Maimon Hilch. Shebuot, c. 2. sect. 1. {x} T. Bab. Taanith, fol. 21. 2. & Gloss. in ib. {y} T. Bab. Taanith, fol. 22. 2. {z} Fol. 93. 2. {a} T. Bab. Menachot, fol. 29. 2. {b} In Semitis fidei, fol. 104. 4. & 105. 1. apud Capell. in loc. {c} T. Bab. Menachot, fol. 29. 2. {d} Vajikra Rabba, fol. 160. 3. Shirhashirim Rabba, fol 20. 2. {e} T. Hieros. Sanhedrim, fol. 20. 3. {f} Shemot Rabba, fol. 96. 1. {g} T. Hieros. Peah, fol. 15. 4.
Matthew 5:19
Ver. 19. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments,.... Which are to be understood not of the beatitudes in the preceding verses, for these were not delivered by Christ under the form of commandments; nor of any of the peculiar commands of Christ under the Gospel dispensation; but of the precepts of the law, of which some were comparatively lesser than others; and might be said to be broke, loosed, or dissolved, as the word here used signifies, when men acted contrary to them.
And shall teach men so; not only teach them by their example to break the commandments, but by express orders: for however gross and absurd this may seem to be, that there should be any such teachers, and they should have any hearers, yet such there were among the Jews; and our Lord here manifestly strikes at them: for notwithstanding the great and excellent things they say of the law, yet they tell us, that the doctors of the sanhedrim had power to root anything out of the law; to loose or make void any of its commands, for a time, excepting in the case of idolatry; and so might any true prophet, or wise man; which they pretend is sometimes necessary for the glory of God, and the good of men; and they are to be heard and obeyed, when they say, transgress anyone of all the commands which are in the law {h}. Maimonides says {i}, that the sanhedrim had power, when it was convenient, for the time present, to make void an affirmative command, and to transgress a negative one, in order to return many to their religion; or to deliver many of the Israelites from stumbling at other things, they may do whatsoever the present time makes necessary: for so, adds he, the former wise men say, a man may profane one sabbath, in order to keep many sabbaths. And elsewhere {k} he affirms,
"if a prophet, whom we know to be a prophet, should order us twum lkm txa le rwbel, "to transgress anyone of the commands", which are mentioned in the law, or many commands, whether light or heavy, for a time, we are ordered to hearken to him; and so we learn from the former wise men, by tradition, that in everything a prophet shall say to thee hrwt yrbd le rwbe, "transgress the words of the law", as Elias on Mount Carmel, hear him, except in the case of idolatry.''
And another of their writers says {l},
"it is lawful sometimes to make void the law, and to do that which appears to be forbidden.''
Nay, they even {m} say, that if a Gentile should bid an Israelite transgress anyone of the commands mentioned in the law, excepting idolatry, adultery, and murder, he may transgress with impunity, provided it is done privately. You see what reason Christ had to express himself in the manner he does, and that with resentment, saying,
he shall be called, or be the least in the kingdom of heaven; meaning either the church of God, where he shall have neither a name, nor place; he shall not be in the least esteemed, but shall be cast out as a worthless man; or the ultimate state of happiness and glory, in the other world, where he shall not enter, as is said in the next verse; but, on the other hand,
whosoever shall do and teach; whose doctrine and conversation, principles and practices agree together; who both teach obedience to the law, and perform it themselves: where again he glances at the masters in Israel, and tacitly reproves them who said, but did not; taught the people what they themselves did not practise; and so were unworthy of the honour, which he that both teaches and does shall have: for
the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven; he shall be highly esteemed of in the church here, and be honoured hereafter in the world to come. The Jews have a saying somewhat like this;
"he that lessens himself for the words of the law in this world, lwdg hven, "he shall become great" in the world to come {n},''
or days of the Messiah.
{h} T. Bab. Yebamot, fol. 79. 1. & 89. 2. & 90. 2. {i} Hilch. Memarim, c. 2. sect. 4. {k} Hilch. Yesode Hattorah, c. 9. sect. 3. {l} Bartenora in, Misn. Beracot, c. 9. sect. 5. {m} T. Hicros. Sheviith, fol. 35. 1. {n} T. Bab. Bava Metzia, fol. 85. 2.
Matthew 5:20
Ver. 20. For I say unto you,.... These words are directed, not to the true disciples of Christ in general, or to his apostles in particular, but to the whole multitude of the people; who had in great esteem and admiration the Scribes and Pharisees, for their seeming righteousness and holiness; concerning which Christ says,
that except your righteousness exceed the righteousness of the Scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no wise enter into the kingdom of heaven. He mentions the Scribes, because they were the more learned part of the people, who were employed in writing out, and expounding the law; and the Pharisees, because they were the strictest sect among the Jews for outward religion and righteousness; and yet, it seems, their righteousness was very defective; it lay only in an external observance of the law; did not arise from a purified heart, or the principles of grace; nor was it performed sincerely, and with a view to the glory of God; but for their own applause, and in order to obtain eternal life: besides, they neglected the weightier matters of the law, and contented themselves with the lesser ones; and as they were deficient in their practice, so they were very lax in their doctrines, as appears from the foregoing verse. Wherefore Christ informs his hearers, that they must have a better righteousness than these men had, if ever they expected to enter into the kingdom of heaven. There will be no admission into heaven without a righteousness: it was the loss of righteousness which removed Adam out of his earthly paradise; and it is not agreeable to the justice of God, to admit man into his heavenly paradise without one; yea, it is contrary to his nature, and would be destructive to the comfort of saints, to receive an unrighteous person into his kingdom and glory. A "pharisaical" righteousness will never bring a person thither; nor will any righteousness of man's, be it what it will, because the best is imperfect; it must be a righteousness exceeding that of the Scribes and Pharisees; and such is the righteousness of the saints: indeed their inherent righteousness, or the sanctification of the Spirit, is preferable to any righteousness of a natural man; it exceeds it in its author, nature, effects, and usefulness; yea, even works of righteousness done by believers are greatly preferable to any done by such men as are here mentioned: but, above all, the righteousness of Christ, which is imputed to them, and received by faith, is infinitely more excellent in its author, perfection, purity, and use; and which is their only right and title to eternal glory; and without which no man will be admitted into that glorious state.
Matthew 5:21
Ver. 21. Ye have heard,.... That is, from the Scriptures being read to them, and the explanations of the ancients, which were called
atemv, "hearing", being read in the schools, and heard by the scholars {o}; so that to "hear", was along with the recital of the text, to receive by tradition, the sense the elders had given of it: of this kind is the instance produced by Christ. Thus Onkelos, and Jonathan ben Uzziel, render the phrase, "him shall ye hear", in
De 18:15 by Nylbqt hynm, "from him shall ye receive"; so those phrases {p}, hewmvh ypm wdml, "they learn from hearing", or by report from others; and hewmvh ypm wrma "they speak from hearing", or from what they have heard, are often used for receiving and reporting things as they have them by tradition. That "it was said", or "it hath been said"; this is also a Talmudic form of expression; often is this phrase to be met with in the Talmud, rmatya, "it has been said" {q}; that is, by the ancient doctors, as here, "by them of old time", or "to the ancients", Mynwmdql so in Munster's Hebrew Gospel; not to the Israelites in the time of Moses, but to the ancestors of the Jews, since the times of Ezra; by the elders, who were contemporary with them; and who by their false glosses corrupted the law, when they recited any part of it to the people; or "by the ancients", the ancient doctors and commentators, which preceded the times of Christ, whom the Jews often call wnynwmdq, "our ancients" {r}. Now, upon that law, "thou shalt not kill", they put this gloss, or added this by way of interpretation,
and whosoever shall kill, shall be in danger of the judgment; which they understood only of actual murder, either committed in their own persons, or by the means of others. Their rules for the judgment of such persons were these;
"everyone that kills his neighbour with his hand; as if he strikes him with a sword, or with a stone that kills him; or strangles him till he die; or burns him in fire; seeing he kills him in any manner, in his own person, lo! such an one must be put to death Nyd tybb, "by the house of judgment", or the sanhedrim {s}.''
Not that which consisted of three persons only, but either that which consisted of twenty three, or the supreme one, which was made up of seventy one; which two last had only power of judging capital offences. Again,
"if a man hires a murderer to kill his neighbour, or sends his servants, and they kill him, or binds him, and leaves him before a lion, or the like, and the beast kills him, everyone of these is a shedder of blood; and the sin of slaughter is in his hand; and he is guilty of death by the hand of heaven, i.e. God; but he is not to be put to death by the house of judgment, or the sanhedrim {t}.''
A little after, it is said, "their judgment" is delivered to heaven, i.e. to God; and this seems to be the sense of the word "judgment" here, namely, the judgment of God, or death by the hand of God; since it is manifestly distinguished from the council, or sanhedrim, in the next "verse". The phrase,
in danger of judgment, is the same with {u} Nyd byyx, "guilty of judgment", or deserves condemnation.
{o} Vid. Buxtorf. Lex. Rabbin, fol. 2453. {p} Maimon. Hilch. Issure Mizbeach, c. 1. sect. 2, 4, 5, 7, 10. & passim, & T. Bab. Sanhedrim, fol. 88. 1. {q} Vid. Edzardi Not. in Avoda Zara, c. 2. p. 284. {r} Vid. R. Aben Ezra in Exod. xxi. 17. & in Isa. lii. 13. & lxvi. 24. {s} Maimon. Hilch. Rotseach, c. 2. sect. 1. {t} Maimon. Hilch. Rotseach, c. 2. sect. 2. {u} In Targ. in 2 Chron. xix. 10.
Matthew 5:22
Ver. 22. But I say unto you,.... This is a Rabbinical way of speaking, used when a question is determined, and a false notion is refuted; it is a magisterial form of expression, and well suits with Christ, the great teacher and master in Israel; who spake as one having authority, opposing himself, not to the law of "Moses, thou shalt not kill"; but to the false gloss the ancient doctors had put upon it, with which their later ones agreed. You say, that if one man kills another himself, he is to be put to death by the sanhedrim; and if he does it by proxy, he is to be left to the judgment of God, so wholly restraining the law to actual murder; but I affirm, that
whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause, shall be in danger of judgment. By "brother" is meant, not in a religious sense, one that is of the same faith, or in the same church state; nor, in a strict natural sense, one that is so in the bonds of consanguinity; but in a large sense, any man, of whatsoever country or nation: for we are to be angry with no man; that is, as is rightly added,
without a cause: for otherwise there is an anger which is not sinful, is in God, in Christ, in the holy angels; and is commendable in the people of God, when it arises from a true zeal for religion, the glory of God, and the interest of Christ; and is kindled against sin, their own, or others, all manner of vice, false doctrine, and false worship: but it is causeless anger which is here condemned by Christ, as a breach of the law, "thou shalt not kill"; and such persons are
in danger of judgment; not of any of the courts of judicature among the Jews, as the sanhedrim of three, or of twenty three, or of seventy one, which took no notice of anger, as a passion in the mind, only of facts committed; but of the judgment of God, as in the preceding "verse", it being distinguished from the sanhedrim, or council, in the next clause.
And whosoever shall say to his brother Raca, shall be in danger of the council, or "sanhedrim". The word Raca is expressive of indignation and contempt; it was used as a term of reproach. Some derive it from qqr to "spit upon"; as if the person that used it thought the man he spoke to deserved to be spit upon, and treated in the most contemptuous manner: but rather the word signifies "empty" and "vain", and denotes a worthless, empty headed man; a man of no brains; a foolish, witless, fellow: so it is often used in Jewish writings. Take a few instances, as follow:
"a certain person said to R. Jochanan {w}, Rabbi, expound, for it becomes thee to expound; for as thou hast said, so have I seen: he replied to him, aqyr Reka, if thou hadst not seen, thou wouldst not have believed.''
Again {x}, it happened to R. Simeon ben Eliezer of Migdal Edar, who went from the house of Rabbi; and he met with a certain man very much deformed; he says unto him, hqyr Reka, how many are the deformed sons of "Abraham our father?" Many more instances might be given {y}. Now I do not find that the use of this reproachful word was cognizable by the Jewish sanhedrim, or great council; nor is it our Lord's meaning that it was, only that it ought to have been taken notice of in a proper manner, as well as actual murder. He adds,
but whosoever shall say thou fool, shall be danger of hell fire. The word "fool" does not signify a man of weak parts, one that is very ignorant in things natural; this the word Raca imports; but a wicked reprobate man; in which sense Solomon often uses the word. The Persic version renders it here "wicked". There is a manifest gradation in the text from causeless anger in the breast, or reproachful words; and from thence to a censorious judging of a man's spiritual and eternal estate, which is what is here condemned. "Thou fool", is, thou wicked man, thou ungodly wretch, thou graceless creature, whose portion will be eternal damnation. Calling a man by such names was not allowed of by the Jews themselves, whose rules are:
"he that calls his neighbour a servant, let him be excommunicated; a bastard, let him be beaten with forty stripes; evr, "a wicked man", let him descend with him into his life or livelihood {z}.''
The gloss upon it is,
"as if he should say, to this the sanhedrim is not obliged, but it is lawful to hate him, yea to lessen his sustenance, and exercise his trade,''
which was done to bring him to poverty and distress. So, it seems, the sanhedrim were not obliged to take notice of him. Again, they say,
"it is forbidden a man to call his neighbour by a name of reproach {a} everyone that calls his neighbour evr, "a wicked man", shall be brought down to hell;''
which is pretty much what Christ here says,
shall be in danger of hell fire; or deserving of hell fire; or liable to, and in danger of punishment, even "unto hell fire". An expression much like this may be observed in Jarchi, on Isa 24:23 where he speaks of some persons Mnhgl Mnhg ybyywxm, "who are guilty", deserving, or in danger of "hell unto hell". The word
geenna, here used, and which is often used in the New Testament for "hell", is but the Hebrew Mnh ayg, "Ge-Hinnom", the valley of Hinnom, where the children were caused to pass through the fire to Moloch. This place, the Jewish writers {b} say,
"Was a place well known, near to Jerusalem, a valley, whose fire was never quenched; and in which they burned the bones of anything that was unclean, and dead carcasses, and other pollutions.''
Hence the word came to be used among them, as might be shown in innumerable instances, to express the place and state of the damned; and very fitly describes it.
{w} T. Bab. Sanhedrim, fol. 100. 1. T. Bava Bathra, fol. 75. 1. {x} Massechet Derach Eretz, c. 4. fol. 18. 1. {y} Vid. T. Bab. Beracot, fol. 32. 2. Zohar in Exod. fol. 50. 2. {z} T. Bab. Kiddushin, fol. 28. 1. Bava Metzia, fol. 71. 1. {a} Zohar in Exod. fol. 50. 3. {b} Sepher Cosri, fol. 57. 2. Vid. Kimchi in Psal. xxvii. 13.
Matthew 5:23
Ver. 23. Therefore, if thou bring thy gift to the altar,.... The Jews obliged such who had done any damage to their neighbours, by stealing from them, to make satisfaction before they brought their offering; concerning which they say {c},
"he that brings what he has stolen, before he brings his trespass offering, is right; he that brings his trespass offering, before he brings that which he has stolen, is not right.''
Again {d},
"they do not bring the trespass offering before the sum of what is stolen is returned, either to the owners, or to the priests.''
Some have thought Christ refers to this; only what they restrained to pecuniary damages, he extends to all sorts of offences. But not a trespass offering, but a freewill offering, seems to be designed by "the gift": which, when a man either intended to bring, or was going to bring, or had already brought, as a voluntary sacrifice to be offered unto God; and it came into his mind, that he had offended any man by showing any undue passion, or by any reproachful words, then he was to do what is advised in the following verse: "and there", whilst going, or when at the altar,
rememberest that thy brother hath ought against thee: hath anything to charge thee with; any just ground of complaint against thee; if thou hast done him any injury, or given him any offence: particularly, if he had at any time said Raca to him, or called him "fool" for those words have reference to what goes before, and are a corollary, or conclusion from them, as appears from the causal particle "therefore".
{c} Misn. Bava Kama, c. 9. sect. 12. {d} Maimon. Hilch. Gezela, c. 8. sect. 13.
Matthew 5:24
Ver. 24. Leave there thy gift before the altar,.... This might easily be done, and the business soon dispatched, at some seasons; particularly, at their public feasts, as the passover, pentecost, and feast of tabernacles, when all the Israelites were together:
and go thy way; make what haste thou canst,
first be reconciled to thy brother: use all means to reconcile him; acknowledge the offence; ask his pardon; assure him that thou wishest well to him, and not ill;
and then come and offer thy gift, by putting it on the altar, before which it was left. This shows, that acts of love and friendship are preferable to sacrifices; and that sacrifices offered up in wrath, and whilst unreconciled to others, are unacceptable to God, and of no avail: and so much the Jews themselves seem to acknowledge; when they say {e}:
"that transgressions, which are between a man and God, the day of atonement expiates; the transgressions which are between a man and his neighbour, the day of atonement does not expiate, wrybx ta huryv de, "until he hath reconciled his neighbour."''
Which is enlarged upon, and explained by Maimonides {f}, after this manner:
"the day of atonement does not expiate any transgressions, but those that are between a man and God, as when one eats anything that is forbidden, and lies with anything that is forbidden, or the like; but transgressions which are between a man and his neighbour, as he that hurts his neighbour, or curses his neighbour, or steals from him, and the like, are never forgiven, until he has given his neighbour what he owed him, and has "reconciled" him; yea, though he has returned to him the money he owed him, he ought to "reconcile" him, and desire him to forgive him; yea, even though "he has only provoked him by words", (which is the very case in the text before us,) woyypl
Kyru, "he ought to reconcile him", and to meet him until he forgives him: if his neighbour will not forgive, he must bring with him three of his friends, and meet him, and entreat him; and if he will not be reconciled by them, he must bring them a second, and a third time.''
So that he was to use all means to obtain a reconciliation.
{e} Misn. Yoma, c. 8. sect. 9. {f} Hilchot Teshuba, c. 2. sect. 9. Vid. T. Bab. Yoma, fol. 87. 1.
Matthew 5:25
Ver. 25. Agree with thine adversary quickly,.... These words are not to be understood in an allegorical sense, as if "the adversary" was the justice of God, demanding payment of debts; "the way", this present life; "the judge", God himself; "the officer", the devil; "the prison", the pit of hell; and "the uttermost farthing", the least sin, which will never be remitted without satisfaction: but the design of them is to prevent lawsuits about debts, which may be in dispute; it being much better for debtor and creditor, especially the former, to compose such differences among themselves, than to litigate the matter in a court of judicature. By "the adversary" is meant not an enemy, one that bears hatred and ill will, but a brother that has ought against a man; a creditor, who demands and insists upon payment of what is owing to him; and for this purpose has taken methods towards bringing the debtor before a proper magistrate, in order to oblige him to payment: wherefore it is better for him to make up and agree the matter directly, as soon as possible,
whilst thou art in the way with him; that is, whilst the creditor and debtor are going together to some inferior magistrate, or lesser court, as the sanhedrim, which consisted of three persons only, before whom such causes might be tried: for hvwlvb twnwmm ynyd, pecuniary causes, or causes relating to money matters, were tried "by the bench of three" {g}: and the selfsame advice is given in the Talmud {h}, as here, where it seems to be a common proverb; for it is said,
"there are men that say, or men usually say, emtvya Kbbd
lebl Kxrwa bga, "whilst thou art in the way with thine adversary, be obedient".''
Lest at any time the adversary should deliver thee to the judge, a superior magistrate in a higher court; for if the creditor would, he could oblige the debtor to go with him to the supreme court of judicature, and try the cause there; for so say the Jewish {i}; canons:
"if the creditor says we will go to the great sanhedrim, they compel the debtor, and he goes up with them, as it is said, "the borrower is servant to the lender",''
where it might go harder with the poor debtor; and therefore it was advisable to prevent it by an agreement, lest
the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison.
"It was an affirmative command in the law, says Maimonides, to appoint "judges" and "officers" in every country and province, as it is said, De 16:18. Myjpwv, "judges" they are the judges that are fixed in the sanhedrim, and such that engage in law suits come before them: Myrjwv, "officers"; these are the masters of the rod and scourge, i.e. who beat and scourge delinquents; and these stand before the judges--and all they do, is by the order of the judges.''
Now it is one of these that is meant by "the officer"; in Munster's Hebrew Gospel, he is called rjwv; who, when he had authority from the judge, could cast into prison, and that for debt; of which we have no account in the law of Moses.
{g} Misn. Sanhedrim, c. 1. sect. 1. {h} T. Bab. Sanhedrim, fol. 95. 2. {i} Maimof. Hilch. Sanhedrim, c. 6. sect. 7.
Matthew 5:26
Ver. 26. Verily, I say unto thee,.... This may be depended upon, you may assure yourself of it, that
thou shalt by no means come out thence, from prison,
till thou hast paid the uttermost farthing, or "last farthing"; or as the Ethiopic version reads it, "till thou hast exactly paid all"; which seems to express the inexorableness of the creditor, and the impossibility of the debtor's release.
Matthew 5:27
Ver. 27. Ye have heard that it was said,.... These forms of speech, as well as what follows,
by them of old time, have been explained, in ver. 21. The law here mentioned,
thou shalt not commit adultery, is recorded in Ex 20:14 and the meaning of our Lord is, not that the then present Jews had heard that such a law had been delivered "to the ancients", their fathers, at Mount Sinai; for that they could read in their Bibles: but they had received it by tradition, that the sense of it, which had been given to their ancestors, by the ancient doctors of the church, was, that this law is to be taken strictly, as it lies, and only regards the sin of uncleanness in married persons; or, what was strictly adultery, and that actual; so that it had no respect to fornication, or unchaste thoughts, words, or actions, but that single act only.
Matthew 5:28
Ver. 28. But I say unto you, that whosoever looketh on a woman,.... Many and severe are the prohibitions of the Jews, concerning looking upon a woman, which they aggravate as a very great sin: they say {k}, it is not lawful to look upon a beautiful woman, though unmarried; nor upon another man's wife, though deformed; nor upon a woman's coloured garments: they forbid {l} looking on a woman's little finger, and say {m}, that he that tells money to a woman, out of his hand into her's, that he may look upon her, though he is possessed of the law and good works, even as Moses, he shall not escape the damnation of hell: they affirm {n}, that he that looks upon a woman's heel, his children shall not be virtuous; and that a man may not go after a woman in the way, no, not after his wife: should he meet her on a bridge, he must take her to the side of him; and whoever goes through a river after a woman, shall have no part in the world to {o} come: nay, they forbid {p} a man looking on the beauty of his own wife. Now these things were said by them, chiefly to cover themselves, and because they would be thought to be very chaste; when they were, as Christ calls them, an "adulterous generation" in a literal sense: they usually did what our Lord observes, "strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel". We read in the Talmud {q}, of hjwv dyox, a "foolish saint" and it is asked, who is he? and it is answered, one that sees a woman drowning in a river, and says it is not lawful for me hb ylwktoyal, "to look" upon her, and deliver her. It was not any looking upon a woman, that is forbid by Christ as criminal; but so to look, as "to lust after her"; for such an one
hath committed adultery with her already in his heart. But these men, who forbad external looking upon a woman, generally speaking, had no notion of heart sins; and which was the prevailing opinion of the Pharisees, in Christ's time.
"A good thought, they {r} allow, is reckoned as if done; as it is said, Mal 3:16. Upon which it is asked, what is the meaning of that, and "that thought" upon "his name?" Says R. Ase, if a man thinks to do a good work, and is hindered, and does it not, the Scripture reckons it to him, as if he did it; but an evil thought, the holy blessed God does not account of it as if done, as is said,
Ps 66:18.''
Upon which words, a noted commentator {s} of their's has this remark:
"Though I regard iniquity in my heart to do it, even in thought, yea, against God himself, as if I had expressed it with my lips, he does not hear it; that is, Nwe yl bvx
al, "he does not reckon it to me for sin"; because the holy blessed God does not account an evil thought for an action, to them that are in the faith of God, or of the true religion.''
For it seems, this is only true of the Israelites; it is just the reverse with the Gentiles, in whom God does not reckon of a good thought, as if it was done, but does of an evil one, as if it was in act {t}. It must be owned, that this is not the sense of them all; for some of them have gone so far as to say {u}, that
"the thoughts of sin are greater, or harder, than sin itself:''
by which they mean, that it is more difficult to subdue sinful lusts, than to refrain from the act of sin itself; and particularly, some of them say things which agree with, and come very near to what our Lord here says; as when they affirm {w}, that
"everyone that looks upon a woman hnwwkb, with intention, it is all one as if he lay with her.''
And that Pawn arqn wynyeb Pawn, "he that committeth adultery with his eyes, is called an adulterer" {x}. Yea, they also observe {y}, that a woman may commit adultery in her heart, as well as a man; but the Pharisees of Christ's time were of another mind.
{k} T. Bab. Avoda Zara, fol. 1, 2. {l} T. Bab. Beracot, fol. 24. 1. Sabbat. fol. 64. 2. {m} T. Bab. Beracot, fol. 61. 1. Eruvin, fol. 18. 2. {n} T. Bab. Nedarim, fol. 20. 1. T. Hieros. Challa, fol. 58. 3. Derech Eretz. c. 1. fol. 17. 3. {o} T. Bab. Beracot, fol. 61. 1. Eruvin, fol. 18. 2. {p} Zohar in Lev. fol. 34. 4. {q} T. Bab Sota, fol. 21. 2. {r} T. Bab. Kiddushin, fol. 40. 1. {s} R. David Kimchi, in Psal. lxvi. 18. {t} T. Hieros. Peah, fol. 16. 2. {u} T. Bab. Yoma, fol. 29. 1. {w} T. Hieros. Challa, fol. 58. 3. Massechet Calah, fol. 16. 4. Vid. Maimon. Issure Bia, c. 21. sect. 2. & Moses Kotsensis Mitzvot Tora precept. neg. 126. {x} Vajikra Rabba, sect. 23. fol. 265. 1. {y} Bemidbar Rabba, sect. 9. fol. 196. 1.
Matthew 5:29
Ver. 29. And if thy right eye offend thee,.... Or "cause thee to offend", to stumble, and fall into sin. Our Lord has no regard here to near and dear relations seeking to alienate us from God and Christ, and hinder us in the pursuit of divine things; whose solicitations are to be rejected with the utmost indignation, and they themselves to be parted with, and forsaken, rather than complied with; which is the sense some give of the words: for both in this, and the following verse, respect is had only to the law of adultery; and to such members of the body, which often are the means of leading persons on to the breach of it; particularly the eye and hand. The eye is often the instrument of ensnaring the heart this way: hence the Jews have a {z} saying,
"whoever looks upon women, at the end comes into the hands of transgression.''
Mention is only made of the right eye; not but that the left may be an occasion of sinning, as well as the right; but that being most dear and valuable, is instanced in, and ordered to be parted with:
pluck it out, and cast it from thee: which is not to be understood literally; for no man is obliged to mutilate any part of his body, to prevent sin, or on account of the commission of it; this is no where required, and if done, would be sinful, as in the case of Origen: but figuratively; and the sense is, that persons should make a covenant with their eyes, as Job did; and turn them away from beholding such objects, which may tend to excite impure thoughts and desires; deny themselves the gratification of the sense of seeing, or feeding the eyes with such sights, as are graceful to the flesh; and with indignation and contempt, reject, and avoid all opportunities and occasions of sinning; which the eye may be the instrument of, and lead unto:
for it is profitable for thee, that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell. This is still a continuation of the figure here used; and the meaning is, that it will turn to better account, to lose all the carnal pleasures of the eye, or all those pleasing sights, which are grateful to a carnal heart, than, by enjoying them, to expose the whole man, body and soul, to everlasting destruction, in the fire of hell.
{z} T. Bab. Nedarim, fol. 20. 1.
Matthew 5:30
Ver. 30. And if thy right hand offend thee,.... Or "cause thee to offend"; that is, is the means of ensnaring thine heart; and of drawing thee into either mental, or actual adultery; for, as before, all unchaste looks, so here, all unchaste touches, embraces, &c. are condemned. As adultery may be committed in the heart, and by the eye, so with the hand:
"says R. Eliezer {a} what is the meaning of that Scripture, "your hands are full of blood", Isa 1:15? It is replied, dyb Mypanmh wla, "these are they, that commit adultery with the hand". It is a tradition of the house of R. Ishmael, that the sense of that command, "thou shalt not commit adultery", is, there shall be none that commits adultery in thee, whether "with the hand", or "with the foot".''
Like orders are given as before,
cut it off, and cast it from thee; as a man would choose to do, or have it done for him, when such a part of the body is mortified, and endangers all the rest. The Jews enjoined cutting off of the hand, on several accounts; if in a morning, before a man had washed his hands, he put his hand to his eye, nose, mouth, ear, &c. Uuqyt, it was to be "cut off" {b}; particularly, the handling of the "membrum virile", was punishable with cutting off of the hand.
"Says R. {c} Tarphon, if the hand is moved to the privy parts, wdy Uuqt, "let his hand be cut off to his navel".''
That is, that it may reach no further; for below that part of the body the hand might not be put {d}; lest unclean thoughts, and desires, should be excited. In the above {e} place it is added,
"what if a thorn should be in his belly, must he not take it away? It is replied, no: it is further asked, must not his belly be ripped up then? It is answered, it is better that his belly be ripped up, txv rabl dry law, "than that he should go down to the pit of corruption."''
A way of speaking, much like what our Lord here uses; and to the above orders and canons, he may be very well thought to allude: but he is not to be understood literally, as enjoining the cutting off of the right hand, as they did; but of men's refraining from all such impure practices, either with themselves, or women, which are of a defiling nature; and endanger the salvation of them, body and soul; the same reason is given as before.
{a} T. Bab. Nidda, fol. 13. 2. Vid. Maimon. Issure Bia, c. 21. sect. 18. {b} T. Bab. Sabbat. fol. 108. 2. Massechet Callah, fol. 17. 1. {c} T. Bab. Nidda, fol. 13. 2. {d} Maimon. lssure Bia, c. 21. sect. 23. {e} T. Bab. Nidda, fol. 13. 2.
Matthew 5:31
Ver. 31. It hath been said,.... It is not added here, as in the former instances, "by them of old time"; nor prefaced with these words, "ye have heard"; because the case of divorce was not any law of Moses, or of God by him; but only a permission, because of the hardness of the hearts of the Jews: and as to the controversy, about the causes of divorce, this was not debated by them of old time, but was a new thing, just started in the time of Christ; and was a controversy then agitating, between the schools of Hillell and Shammai: the one allowing it upon any frivolous cause; the other, only on account of adultery.
Whosoever shall put away his wife, dissolve the marriage bond, dismiss her from his bed, and send her from his house, see
De 24:1 "let him give her a writing of divorcement", ttyrk rpo, "a bill of divorcement", or "a book of cutting off". For though a wife was obtained by several ways, there was but one way of dismissing her, as the Jews observe {f}, and that was, by giving her a bill. The form of a writing of divorcement, as given by Maimonides {g}, is as follows:
"On such a day of the week, in such a month, of such a year, either from the creation, or the epocha of contracts, according to the usual way of computation, which we observe in such a place; I such an one, the son of such an one, of such a place; or if I have any other name, or surname, or my parents, or my place, or the place of my parents; by my own will, without any force, I put away, dismiss, and divorce thee. Thee, I say, who art such an one, the daughter of such an one, of such a place; or if thou hast any other name, or surname, or thy parents, or thy place, or the place of thy parents; who wast my wife heretofore, but now I put thee away, dismiss and divorce thee; so that thou art in thine own hand, and hast power over thyself, to go, and marry any other man, whom thou pleasest; and let no man hinder thee in my name, from this day forward and for ever; and lo! thou art free to any man: and let this be unto thee, from me, a bill of divorce, an instrument of dismission, and a letter of forsaking, according to the law of Moses and Israel.''
"Such an one, the son of such an one, witness. Such an one, the son of such an one, witness.''
Would you choose to have one of these bills, filled up in proper form, take it in manner {h} following.
"On the fourth day of the week, on the eleventh day of the month Cisleu, in the year five thousand four hundred and fifty four, from the creation of the world; according to the computation which we follow here, in the city of Amsterdam, which is called Amstelredam; situated by the sea side, called Taya, and by the river Amstel; I Abraham, the son of Benjamin, surnamed Wolphius, the priest; and at this time dwelling in the city of Amsterdam, which is called Amstelredam, which is situated by the sea side, called Taya, and by the river Amstel; or if I have any other name, or surname, or my parents, or my place, or the place of my parents; by my own free will, without any compulsion, I put away, dismiss, and divorce thee, my wife Rebecca, the daughter of Jonas the Levite; who at this time abides in the city of Amsterdam, called Amstelredam, situated by the sea side, called Taya, and by the river Amstel; or if thou hast any other name, or surname, or thy parents, or thy place, or the place of thy parents, who wast heretofore my wife; but now I put thee away, dismiss, and divorce thee; so that thou art in thine own hands, and hast power over thyself, to go and marry any other man, whom thou pleasest: and let no man hinder thee in my name, from this day forward, and for ever; and lo! thou art free to any man. Let this be to thee, from me, a bill of divorce, an instrument of dismission, and a letter of forsaking, according to the law of Moses and Israel.''
"Sealtiel, the son of Paltiel, witness. Calonymus, the son of Gabriel, witness.''
This bill being written in twelve lines, neither more nor less, and being sealed by the husband, and signed by the witnesses, was delivered, either by him, or by a messenger, or deputy of his or hers, into her hand, lap, or bosom, in the presence of two persons; after which, she might, if she would, enrol it in the public records, and marry whom she pleased.
{f} Baal Hatturim in Deut. xxiv. 1. Maimon. Hilchot Ishot, c. 1. sect. 2, 3. {g} Hilchot Gerushin, c. 4. sect. 12. {h} In Surenhusii Misna, Vol. III. p. 324. Vid. Moses Kotsensis Mitzvot Tora pr. affirm. 50.
Matthew 5:32
Ver. 32. But I say unto you; that whosoever shall put away his wife,.... Christ does not infringe, or revoke the original grant, or permission of divorce; only frees it from the false interpretations, and ill use, the Pharisees made of it; and restores the ancient sense of it, in which only it was to be understood: for a divorce was allowable in no case,
saving for the cause of fornication; which must not be taken strictly for what is called fornication, but as including adultery, incest, or any unlawful copulation; and is opposed to the sense and practices of the Pharisees, who were on the side of Hillell: who admitted of divorce, upon the most foolish and frivolous pretences whatever; when Shammai and his followers insisted on it, that a man ought only to put away his wife for uncleanness; in which they agreed with Christ. For so it is written {i},
"The house of Shammai say, a man may not put away his wife, unless he finds some uncleanness in her, according to
De 24:1 The house of Hillell say, if she should spoil his food, (that is, as Jarchi and Bartenora explain it, burns it either at the fire, or with salt, i.e. over roasts or over salts it,) who appeal also to De 24:1. R. Akiba says, if he finds another more beautiful than her, as it is said, De 24:1 "and it come to pass that she find no favour in his eyes."''
The commentators {k} on this passage say that the determination of the matter is, according to the school of Millell; so that, according to them, a woman might be put away for a very trivial thing: some difference is made by some of the Jewish doctors, between a first and second wife; the first wife, they say {l}, might not be put away, but for adultery; but the second might be put away, if her husband hated her; or she was of ill behaviour, and impudent, and not modest, as the daughters of Israel. Now our Lord says, without any exception, that a man ought not to put away his wife, whether first or second, for any other reason than uncleanness; and that whoever does, upon any other account,
causeth her to commit adultery; that is, as much as in him lies: should she commit it, he is the cause of it, by exposing her, through a rejection of her, to the sinful embraces of others; and, indeed, should she marry another man, whilst he is alive, which her divorce allows her to do, she must be guilty of adultery; since she is his proper wife, the bond of marriage not being dissolved by such a divorce: and
whosoever shall marry her that is divorced, committeth adultery; because the divorced woman he marries, and takes to his bed; is legally the wife of another man; and it may be added, from Mt 19:9 that her husband, who has put her away, upon any other account than fornication, should he marry another woman, would be guilty of the same crime.
{i} Misn. Gittin, c. 9. sect. 10. Vid. T. Hieros. Gittin, fol. 49. 4. & Sota, fol. 16. 2. & Bemidbar Rabba, sect. 9. fol. 195. 2. {k} Maimon. & Bartenora in Gittin, c. 9. sect. 10. {l} T. Bab. Gittin, fol. 90. 2. Maimon. Hilch. Gerushin, c. 10. sect. 21, 22.
Matthew 5:33
Ver. 33. Again, ye have heard that it hath been said,.... Besides what has been observed, in ver. 21 and 27 you know it has also been said,
by, or to them of old time, what is written in Le 19:12. "And ye shall not swear by my name falsely"; which seems to be referred to, when it is said, "thou shalt not forswear thyself": and is the law forbidding perjury, or false swearing; and was what the Jews were chiefly, if not only concerned about; little regarding the vanity, only the truth of an oath: for they took swearing vainly, to be the same as swearing falsely; wherefore so long as what they swore was truth, they were not careful whether it was of any importance or not: moreover, these men sinned, in that they swore by the creatures, which they thought they might do, and not sin; and when they had so done, were not under obligation to perform; because they made no use of the name of God, to whom only vows and oaths were to be performed, "but shalt perform unto the Lord thine oaths", Nu 30:2 which they understood of vows only made to the Lord, and not to others; and of oaths, when in his name, and not by others; which they did do, and yet thought themselves not obliged by them.
Matthew 5:34
Ver. 34. But I say unto you, swear not at all,.... Which must not be understood in the strictest sense, as though it was not lawful to take an oath upon any occasion, in an affair of moment, in a solemn serious manner, and in the name of God; which may be safely done: but of rash swearing, about trivial matters, and by the creatures; as appears by what follows,
neither by heaven; which is directly contrary to the Jewish canons {m}, which say,
"they that swear Mymvb, "by heaven", and by earth, are free.''
Upon the words in So 2:7, "I adjure you", &c. it is asked {n},
"by what does she adjure them? R. Eliezer says, by the heavens, and by the earth; by the hosts, the host above, and the host below.''
So Philo the Jew says {o} that the most high and ancient cause need not to be immediately mentioned in swearing; but the "earth", the sun, the stars, ouranon, "heaven", and the whole world. So R. Aben Ezra, and R. David Kimchi, explain Am 4:2. "The Lord God hath sworn by his holiness"; that is, say they, Mymvb, "by heaven": which may be thought to justify them, in this form of swearing; though they did not look upon it as a binding oath, and therefore if broken they were not criminal {p}.
"He that swears Mymvb by heaven, and by the earth, and by the sun, and the like; though his intention is nothing less than to him that created them, this is no oath.''
The reason why it is forbidden by Christ to swear by heaven, is,
for it is God's throne; referring to Isa 66:1 where he sits, the glory of his majesty shines forth, and is itself glorious and excellent, and not to be mentioned in a vain way; and especially, for the reason Christ elsewhere gives, Mt 23:22 that "he that shall swear by heaven, sweareth by the throne of God, and by him that sitteth thereon"; so that they doubly sinned, first, by openly swearing by that which is God's creature; and then, by tacitly bringing God into their rash and vain oaths.
{m} Misn. Shebuot, c. 4. sect. 13. {n} Shirhashirim Rabba, fol. 10. 4. {o} De Special. leg. p 770. {p} Maimon. Hilch. Shebuot, c. 12. sect. 3.
Matthew 5:35
Ver. 35. Nor by the earth, for it is his footstool,.... That the Jews were wont to swear by the earth, is clear from the above mentioned instances; and is condemned by Christ for this reason, because the earth is God's "footstool", referring, as before, to Isa 66:1 on which he treads; and where he also manifests forth his glory, and is a considerable part of the work of his hands.
Neither by Jerusalem, which the Jews used to swear by: such forms of vows as these are to be met with in their writings {q};
"as the altar, as the temple, Mlvwryk, "as Jerusalem";''
that is, by Jerusalem, I vow I will do this, or the other thing.
"R. Judah says, he that says Jerusalem (i.e. as Bartenora observes {r}, without the note of comparison, as) says nothing.''
In the Gemara {s} it is,
"he that says as Jerusalem, does not say anything, till he has made his vow concerning a thing, which is offered up in Jerusalem.''
Dr. Lightfoot {t} has produced forms of vowing and swearing, which have not occurred to me.
"Jerusalem; Mlvwryl, "for", or "unto Jerusalem", which exactly answers to eiv Ierosoluma, here; and "by Jerusalem";''
The reason given for prohibiting this kind of oath, is;
for it is the city of the great king: not of David, but of the King of kings, the Lord of hosts; who had his residence, and his worship, here; see Ps 48:2.
{q} Misn. Nedarim, c. 1. sect. 3. {r} In. ib. {s} T. Bab. Nedarim, fol. 11. 1. {t} In loc. ex Tosapht. in Nedarim, c. 1.
Matthew 5:36
Ver. 36. Neither shalt thou swear by thy head,.... This also was a common form of swearing among the Jews: take a few instances.
"If anyone is bound to his friend by an oath, and says to him, vow unto me Kvar yyxb, "by the life of thy head"; R. Meir says {u}, he may retract it; but the wise men say, he cannot.''
Again {w}, a certain Rabbi said to Elijah,
"I heard "Bath Kol" (or the voice from heaven) mourning like a dove, and saying, woe to my children; for, because of their sins, I have destroyed my house, and have burnt my temple, and have carried them captive among the nations: and he (Elijah) said unto him Kvar yyxw Kyyx, "by thy life, and by the life of thy head", not this time only it says so, but it says so three times every day.''
Once more {x}, says R. Simeon ben Antipatras, to R. Joshua,
"I have heard from the mouth of the wise men, that he that vows in the law, and transgresses, is to be beaten with forty stripes: he replies, blessed art thou of God, that thou hast so done, Kvar yyxw Kyyx, "by thy life, and by the life of thy head", he that is used to do so is to be beaten.''
This form of swearing is condemned, for this reason,
because thou canst not make one hair white or black: which shows, that a man's head, nor, indeed, one hair of his head, is in his own power, and therefore he ought not to swear by it; as he ought not to swear by heaven, or earth, or Jerusalem, because these were in the possession of God. Some copies read, "canst not make one white hair black".
{u} Misn. Sanhedrim, c. 3. sect 2. {w} T. Bab. Beracot, fol. 3. 1. {x} Derech. Eretz, c. 6. fol. 18. 2.
Matthew 5:37
Ver. 37. But let your communication be yea, yea,.... That is, let your speech, in your common conversation, and daily business of life, when ye answer to anything in the affirmative, be "yea"; and when ye answer to anything in the negative, "nay": and for the stronger asseveration of the matter, when it is necessary, double these words; but let no oaths be joined unto them: this is enough; a righteous man's yea, is yea, and his no, is no; his word is sufficient. Hence it appears, that our Lord is here speaking of rash swearing, and such as was used in common conversation, and is justly condemned by him. The Jews have no reason to reject this advice of Christ, who often use and recommend the same modes of expression. They endeavour to raise the esteem of their doctors and wise men, by saying, that their words, both in doctrines and dealings with men, are "yea, yea" {y}. One of their {z} commentators on the word "saying", in, Ex 20:1 makes this observation;
"hence we learn, that they used to answer, wal wal lew Nh
Nh le "concerning yea, yea, and concerning nay, nay".''
This way of speaking, they looked upon equivalent to an oath; yea, they affirm it was one.
"Says R. Eliezer {a}, hewbv Nh hewbv wal, "nay is an oath; yea is an oath", absolutely; "nay" is an oath, as it is written, Ge 9:11 and Isa 54:9. But that "yea" is an oath, how does it appear? It is concluded from hence, that "nay" is an oath; saith Rabba, there are that say "nay, nay", twice; and there are that say "yea, yea", twice; as it is written, Ge 9:11 and from hence, that "nay" is twice, "yea" is also twice said.''
The gloss upon it is,
"he that says either "nay, nay", twice, or "yea, yea", twice; lo! it is rxam hewbvk "as an after oath", which confirms his words.''
For whatsoever is more than these, cometh of evil: that is, whatever exceeds this way of speaking and conversation, in the common affairs of life, is either from the devil, who is the evil one, by way of eminency; or from the evil heart of man, from the pride, malice, envy, &c. that are in it.
{y} T. Bab. Moed Katon, fol. 20. 1. Maimon. Hilch. Dayot. c. 5. sect. 13. {z} R. Sol. Jarchi, in Exod. xx. 1. {a} T. Bab. Shebuot, fol. 36. 1. Vid. Maimon. Hilch. Shebuot, c. 2. sect. 1.
Matthew 5:38
Ver. 38. Ye have heard that it hath been said,.... That is, to, or by them of old time, as is expressed in some of the foregoing instances,
an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth, Ex 21:24. This is "lex talionis", the "law of retaliation"; which, whether it is to be understood literally, or not, is a matter of question. The Baithuseans, or Sadducees, among the Jews, took it in a literal sense, and so does Josephus, who says {b}, he that shall blind, i.e. put out a man's eyes, shall suffer the like. But the Jewish doctors generally understood it of paying a price equivalent to the damage done, except in case of life. R. Sol. Jarchi {c} explains the law thus:
"He that puts out his neighbour's eye, must give him wnye
ymd, "the price of his eye", according to the price of a servant sold in the market; and so the same of them all; for, not taking away of the member is strictly meant.''
And, says Maimonides {d},
"if a man cuts off his neighbour's hand, or foot, he is to be considered as if he was a servant sold in a market; what he was worth then, and what he is worth now; and he must pay the diminution which is made of his price; as it is said, "eye for eye". From tradition it is learned, that this for, spoken of, is to be understood of paying money; this is what is said in the law, "as he hath caused a blemish in a man, so shall it be done to him again". Not that he is to be hurt, as he has hurt his neighbour; but inasmuch as he deserves to want a member, or to be hurt as he has done; therefore he ought to pay the damage.''
And Josephus himself {e} says, that he must be deprived of that, which he has deprived another of, except he that has his eye put out is willing to receive money; and which, he observes, the law allows of. The controversy about the sense of this law may be seen in a few words, as managed between R. Sandish Hagson, and Ben Zeta {f}.
"Says R. Sandish, we cannot explain this verse according to its literal sense; for if a man should smite the eye of his neighbour, and the third part of the light of his eye should depart, how will he order it, to strike such a stroke, as that, without adding or lessening? perhaps he will put out the whole light of his eye. And it is yet more difficult with respect to burning, wound, and stripe; for should they be in a dangerous place the man might die but that is intolerable. Ben Zeta answers him, is it not written, in another place, "as he hath caused a blemish in a man, so shall it be done to him again?" To which Hagson replies, b, "in", is instead of le, "upon", or against; and lo! the sense is, so shall the punishment be upon him. Ben Zeta answers him again, as he does, so shall it be done to him. Hagson replies, behold Samson said, "as they have done to me, so will I do to them"; but Samson did not take their wives, and give them to others, he only rendered to them their reward: but Ben Zeta replies, if a poor man should smite, what must be his punishment? Hagson answers him, if a blind man should put out the eye of one that sees, what shall be done to him? as for the poor man, he may become rich, and pay, but the blind man can never pay.''
Now our Lord here, does not find fault with the law of retaliation, as delivered by Moses, but with the false gloss of the Scribes and Pharisees; who, as they interpreted it of pecuniary mulcts, as a compensation for the loss of a member, which sometimes exceeded all just and due bounds; so they applied it to private revenge, and in favour of it: whereas this law did not allow of a retaliation to be made, by private persons, at their pleasure, but by the civil magistrate only.
{b} Antiq. Jud. l. 4. c. 8. sect. 35. {c} In Exod. xxi. 24. {d} Hilchot Chebel. c. 1. sect. 2, 3. {e} In loc. supra citat. {f} In Aben Ezra in Exod. xxi. 24.
Matthew 5:39
Ver. 39. But I say unto you, that ye resist not evil,.... This is not to be understood of any sort of evil, not of the evil of sin, of bad actions, and false doctrines, which are to be opposed; nor of the evil one, Satan, who is to be resisted; but of an evil man, an injurious one, who has done us an injury. We must not render evil for evil, or repay him in the same way; see Jas 5:6. Not but that a man may lawfully defend himself, and endeavour to secure himself from injuries; and may appear to the civil magistrate for redress of grievances; but he is not to make use of private revenge. As if a man should pluck out one of his eyes, he must not in revenge pluck out one of his; or should he strike out one of his teeth, he must not use him in the same manner; but patiently bear the affront, or seek for satisfaction in another way.
But whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also: which is to be understood comparatively, rather than seek revenge, and is directly contrary to the Jewish canons, which require, in such a case, a pecuniary fine {g}.
"He that strikes his neighbour (which Maimonides explains, he that strikes his neighbour with his hand shut, about the neck) he shall give him a "sela", or "shekel": R. Judah says, in the name of R. Jose the Galilean, one pound: if he smite him (i.e. as Maimonides says, if he smite him with his double fist upon the face; or, as Bartenora, with the palm of his hand, yyxl, "on the cheek", which is a greater reproach) he shall give him two hundred "zuzim"; and if he does it with the back of his hand, four hundred "zuzim".''
R. Isaac Sangari {h} manifestly refers to this passage of Christ's, when he says to the king he is conversing with,
"I perceive that thou up braidest us with poverty and want; but in them the great men of other nations glory: for they do not glory but in him, who said, "Whosoever smiteth thee thy right cheek, turn to him the left; and whosoever taketh away thy coat, give him thy cloak".''
{g} Misn. Bava Kama, c. 8. sect. 6. Vid. Maimon. & Bartenora in ib. {h} Sepher Cosri, Orat. 1. Sign. 113. fol. 56. 1.
Matthew 5:40
Ver. 40. And if any man will sue thee at the law,.... Or "will contend with thee", or as the Syriac renders it, Kme Nwdnd, "will strive", or "litigate with thee"; not contest the matter, or try the cause in an open court of judicature, a sense our version inclines to; but will wrangle and quarrel in a private way, in order to
take away thy coat, by force and violence,
let him have thy cloak also; do not forbid, or hinder him from taking it; see Lu 6:29. The "coat", is the same with tylj, "the upper garment": and what we render a "cloak", answers to qwlx, "the inward garment"; by which words Sangari expresses the passage in the place before cited: and the sense is, if a wrangling, quarrelsome man, insists upon having thy coat, or upper garment, let him take the next; and rather suffer thyself to be stripped naked than engage in a litigious broil with him. This also is contrary to the above canon of the Jews {i}, which says;
"If a man should pull another by his ear, or pluck off his hair, or spit, and his spittle should come to him,
wnmm wtylj rybeh or "should take his coat from him", or uncover a woman's head in the street, he shall pay four hundred "zuzim", and all this is according to his dignity; says R. Akiba; even the poor in Israel, they consider them as if they were noblemen, who are fallen from their estates, for they are the children of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.''
{i} Misn. Bava Kama, c. 8. sect. 6.
Matthew 5:41
Ver. 41. And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile,.... The word aggareusei, rendered "compel", is generally said to be of Persic original; the "Angari", among the Persians, were the king's messengers, or those who rode post, and were maintained at the king's expenses; and had power to take horses, and other carriages, and even men, into their service, by force, when they had occasion for them: hence the word is used to force, or compel persons to do this or the other thing; the word ayrgna is often to be met with in the Jewish writings, and is in them expounded to be {k}, the taking of anything for the service of the king. David de Pomis renders it by lwe, "a yoke" {l}; meaning, any servile work, which such, who were pressed into the king's service, were obliged unto. And {m}
ayrgna hve is used to compel persons to go along with others, to do any service; in which sense it is here used: and Christ advises, rather than to contend and quarrel with such a person, that obliges to go with him a mile, to
go with him twain: his meaning is, not to dispute such a matter, though it may be somewhat laborious and disagreeable, but comply, for the sake of peace. The Jews {n}, in their blasphemous book of the birth of Christ, own that he gave advice in such words as these, when they introduce Peter thus speaking of him.
"He, that is, Jesus, hath warned and commanded you to do no more evil to a Jew; but if a Jew should say to a Nazarene, go with me one mile, he shall go with him two miles; and if a Jew shall smite him on the left cheek, he shall turn to him also the right.''
Can a Jew find fault with this advice?
{k} Vid. Maimon. & Bartenora in Misn. Bava Metzia, c. 6. sect. 3. {l} Tzemach David, fol. 8. 4. {m} Vid. Buxtorf. Lex. Rabb. p. 131, 132. {n} Toldos Jesu, p 22.
Matthew 5:42
Ver. 42. Give to him that asketh thee,.... To every man, Lu 6:30 whether Jew or Gentile; friend or foe; believer or unbeliever; a good, or a bad man; worthy or unworthy; deserving or not, that asketh alms, whether food or money; give it freely, readily, cheerfully, according to your abilities, and as the necessity of the object requires: for such rules are always supposed, and to be observed; and though all are to be relieved, yet the circumstances of persons, and their relation to men, are to be considered, and special regard is to be had to the household of faith.
And from him that would borrow of thee, turn not away; refuse him not, turn not away from him with a frown, or without speaking to him, or with a denial; look upon him with a pleasant countenance, cheerfully lend him what he wants, whether he be a Jew, from whom it was not lawful to take usury, or a stranger, from whom it, was lawful to take it, yet take it not; lend him freely, "hoping for nothing again", Lu 6:35 which must not be understood of not hoping for the money lent, for then it would be giving, and not lending; but of not hoping for any reward for lending it: and indeed the money itself is not to be hoped for again, when the circumstances of the borrower are such, that he is not able to make a return.
Matthew 5:43
Ver. 43. Ye have heard that it hath been said,.... By, or to them of old time. This law has been delivered to them,
thou shalt love thy neighbour, with this appendage to it, or false gloss upon it,
and hate thine enemy; for the first of these only is the law of Moses, Le 19:18, the other is the addition, or wrong interpretation of the Scribes and Pharisees: wherefore the Jew {o} has no reason to charge Christ, or the Evangelist, with a false testimony, as he does, because the latter is no where written in the law, nor in the prophets: nor does Christ say it is; he only observes, that it had been traditionally handed down to them from the ancients, by the masters of the traditions of the elders, that the law of loving the neighbour was so to be understood as to allow, and even enjoin, hatred of enemies: in proof of which, take the following instances {p}.
"When one man sins against another, he may not hate him in his heart, and be silent, as is said of the wicked; Absalom spoke not with Amnon: but it is commanded to make it known to him, and to say to him, why hast thou done to me so and so? As it is said, "rebuking, thou shalt rebuke thy neighbour"; and if he returns, and desires him to pardon him, he shall not be implacable and cruel; but if he reproves him many times, and he does not receive his reproof, nor turn from his sin, then wtwanvl rtwm, "it is lawful to hate him".''
Again, they say {q},
"Every disciple of a wise man, vxnk rjwnw Mqwn wnyav, "who does not revenge, and keep as a serpent"; that is, as the gloss explains it, "enmity in his heart", as a serpent, is no disciple of a wise man.''
And so Maimonides {r}, one of their better sort of writers, says;
"A disciple of a wise man, or a scholar, whom a man despises and reproaches publicly, it is forbidden him to forgive him, because of his honour; and if he forgives him, he is to be punished, for this is a contempt of the law; but "he must revenge, and keep the thing as a serpent", until the other asks pardon of him, and then he may forgive him.''
Thus they bred their scholars in hatred and malice against their enemies. This arises from a mistaken sense of the word "neighbour", which they understood only of a friend; and concluded, that if a friend was to be loved, an enemy was to be hated; not the Gentiles only, but anyone, among themselves, which could come under that name.
{o} R. Isaac Chizuk Emunah, par. 2. c. 11. p. 402. {p} Moses Kotsensis Mitzvot Tora precept. neg. 5. Vid. Maimon. Hilchot Rotseach, c. 13. sect. 14. {q} T. Bab. Yoma, fol. 22. 2. & 23. 1. {r} Maimon. Hilch. Talmud Tora, c. 7. sect. 13.
Matthew 5:44
Ver. 44. But I say unto you, love your enemies,.... That is, as the Apostle Paul may be thought to interpret the words of Christ,
Ro 12:20. "If thine enemy hunger, feed him: if he thirst, give him drink": unless our Lord should be supposed rather to regard the internal affection of the mind; since outward expressions of love, by words and works, are urged in the following exhortations: the actions of a man may be hated, and just indignation be expressed against them, and yet his person be loved, tenderness be used to him, and pity shown him: all men, even enemies, are to be loved with a natural love, as men; though they cannot be loved with a spiritual affection, as brethren in Christ: and in natural affection there are degrees, according to the relation and circumstances that persons stand in to one another.
Bless them that curse you: when wicked men curse you, as Shimei cursed David, do not "render evil for evil, or railing for railing, but contrariwise, blessing"; give good words, use kind language, mild and soft expressions; such as may either win upon them, or put them to shame and silence: "bless, and curse not"; the latter belongs to them, the former to you; "let them curse, but bless thou": curses better fit their mouths, and blessings thine. Blessing here, does not signify praising them, for that would be sinful, which is sometimes the sense of the word; nor wishing, or praying for a blessing on them, which is right and good; but this is mentioned afterwards, as distinct from blessing; wherefore, it is better to understand it of a sweet and engaging address unto, and behaviour and conduct towards such, whose mouths are full of cursing and bitterness.
Do good to them that hate you; such as hate you in their hearts, and discover their hatred by their actions; do not make returns in the same way, but on the contrary, do them all the good you can; perform all the kind offices that lie in your power; let them partake of your bounty and liberality; if poor, feed, clothe, and supply them, as you are able, with the necessaries of life; and give them wholesome advice for the good of their souls: by "so doing", you will "heap coals of fire on their heads"; of enemies, make them friends; engage their affections to you, and you may be happy instruments in doing them good, both in soul and body:
and pray for them that despitefully use you and persecute you. What Christ here commands and advises to, he himself did; for as he hung upon the cross, he prayed for his crucifiers, who were then using him in the most despiteful, as well as cruel manner; saying, "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do": and in this he has left us an example, that we should tread in his steps; and here in he was quickly followed by his holy martyr Stephen; who, whilst he was being stoned, prayed for his persecutors and murderers, saying, "Lord, lay not this sin to their charge". This breathes out the true spirit of Christianity, and is peculiar to it. The whole of this is directly opposite to the tenets of the Jews, particularly the Scribes and Pharisees; who allowed of revenge, and keeping anger against any person that had done them an injury, as has been observed: and which were also the sentiments of the Karaites, or Scripturarians, another sect among them who kept to the letter of the Scriptures, and rejected the traditions of the elders, which the Pharisees held: but in this they agreed with them,
"that it was right to do good to their friends, and to forgive them that asked pardon of them; but to such men who rendered evil, and did not return to do well, that they might receive forgiveness, Mhm rwjnlw Mwqnl rwoa
wnya, "it is not forbidden to revenge, and to keep anger against them" {s}.''
It is indeed said {t} of their former holy men, Mydyox, "Hasideans", which some have thought to be the same with the "Essenes", and a sort of Christians; however, were a better sort of Jews; that these
"heard their reproach, but did not return it; and not only so, but they pardoned him that reproached them, and forgave him.''
And it is reported of these men, that they used to pray to God to pardon and forgive all that disturbed them. But the Pharisees, whom Christ had to do with, and against whom he inveighs, were men of another complexion.
{s} R. Eliahu in Adderet, c. 3. apud Trigland. de Sect. Karaeorum, c. 10. p. 166, 167. {t} Maimon. Hilch. Talmud Tora. c. 7. sect. 13.
Matthew 5:45
Ver. 45. That ye may be the children of your father,.... Not that any became the children of God, by doing things in imitation of him: for as in nature no man becomes the son of another by imitating him, or by doing the things he does but either by birth, or by adoption; so in grace no man becomes a child of God by the works he does, as a follower of God, but by adopting grace; and which is discovered in regeneration. Christ's meaning is, that they might appear, and be known to be the children of God, by doing those things in which they resemble their heavenly Father; and which are agreeable to his nature and conduct; as the tree is known by its fruit, and the cause by its effect: for where adoption and regenerating grace take place, the fruit of good works is brought forth to the glory of God. Some copies, instead of uioi, "children", read omoioi "like": and accordingly, the Persic version renders it thus, "that ye may be like your Father, which is heaven". Our Lord seems to have respect to the Jews, often having in their mouths this expression, Mymvb wnyba, "our Father which is in heaven"; and to their frequent boasting that they were the children of God; and therefore he would have them make this manifest by their being like him, or acting in imitation of him;
for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil, and on the good. Christ instances in one of the greatest blessings in nature, the sun, so useful to the earth, and so beneficial to mankind for light and heat; which he calls "his sun": his own, and not another's; which he has made, and maintains, orders to run its race, and commands it to rise morning by morning, and that upon good and bad men; one, as well as another; all equally share in, and partake of its benign influences, and enjoy the comfortable effects and blessings of it:
and sendeth rain on the just and unjust; that is, on the fields of persons of such different characters, even both the early and the latter rain; which makes the earth fruitful, crowns it with goodness, and causes it to bring forth bread to the eater, and seed to the sower. This is one of the most considerable blessings of life; the gift of it is God's sole prerogative; it is peculiar to him; it is what none of the vanities of the Gentiles can give; and yet is bestowed by him on the most worthless and undeserving. This flows from that perfection of God, which the Cabbalists {u} call
""chesed, mercy", or benignity, to which it is essential to give largely to all, both "to the just and unjust".''
The Jews have a saying {x}, that
"greater is the day of rain, than the resurrection of the dead; for the resurrection of the dead is for the just; but rain is Myevrl Nyb Myqdul Nyb, "both for the just, and for the wicked":''
a way of speaking much like this here. They also used to praise God for rain, on this consideration, because it was given to unworthy persons.
"{y} R. Jose Bar Jacob went to visit R. Joden of Magdala; whilst he was there, rain descended, and he heard his voice, saying, thousands of thousands, and millions of millions are bound to praise thy name, O our king, for every drop thou causest to descend upon us, Mybyyxl hbwj
lmwg tav, "because thou renderest good to the wicked".''
Now our Lord instances in things which could not be denied, and they themselves allowed; and makes use of their own words, to engage them to imitate God, whom they call their Father, by doing good to their enemies, and them that hated them, as well as to their friends and neighbours: yet sometimes they could scarcely allow, that the Gentiles had the same share in this divine favour with themselves; for they say {z}, that
"God works by way of miracle, that rain should not be wanting in his land, although it is wanting in the countries of the Heathen; as he says, Job 5:10 "who giveth rain on the earth", which is the land of Israel; for on that rjm br, "a great rain" descends, and "sendeth waters", Myjem, "few (which is added to the text) upon the fields"; which relates to what is without the land, whereupon it does not descend, but the substance of the land of Israel; therefore he saith, the Lord will open to thee his good treasure, and not to others.''
{u} Sepher Shaar Hassamaim, Tract. 7. c. 12. p. 155. {x} T. Bab. Taanith, fol. 7. 1. {y} T. Hieros. Beracot, fol. 14. 1. & Taanith, fol. 64. 2. {z} Tzeror Hammor, fol. 152. 4.
Matthew 5:46
Ver. 46. For if ye love them which love you,.... That is, if ye only love such that love you; for that such who love should be loved again, is both natural and just: our Lord's meaning is not, that ye ought not to love them that love you, but that these should not be the only objects of your love; for should this be the case,
what reward have ye? or "shall ye have?" Do you deserve any thanks for your love now? none at all, it is what you are obliged to by your friend's love to you. Do you expect any hereafter with God? if you do, you will be mistaken; you have your reward with men, who have loved you as much as you have done them, and therefore none can be due to you, either from God or men: besides,
do not even the publicans the same? men of the worst characters, and who were most hateful to the Jews, upon many accounts; partly because of their business, which was to collect the Roman tax, and carry it to the proper officers appointed to receive it, and of whom they sometimes farmed it. Now the Roman yoke was very grievous to the Jews, who boasted of their being a free people; nor did they willingly pay their tribute money; and some of them would refuse to do it, under a pretence of religion; wherefore those publicans, or tax gatherers, which were oftentimes men of their own nation, as appears from the instances of Levi and Zacchaeus, were very odious to them; because they looked upon them as joining with the Romans, in oppressing them, and abridging them in their liberty: and partly because of their character and conduct, being men of great improbity, rapine, and covetousness: hence, as in the New Testament, they are frequently joined with "sinners", as being notorious ones themselves; so in the Talmudic writings, with thieves {a}, and are reckoned as thieves, with murderers, and robbers {b}; they were not allowed as witnesses {c} in any of their courts of judicature; nor were they to be kept company {d} with in private houses. Now our Lord instances in these men who were the most profligate part of the nation, and had in greatest contempt by the rest; and yet these, by the very dictates of nature, loved such as loved them: wherefore it must be shameful and scandalous in the Pharisees, and others, who pretended to great sanctity and religion, to do no more than these persons did.
{a} Maimon. Hilch. Gezela, c. 5. sect. 9. 11. {b} Misn. Nedarim, c. 3. sect. 4. {c} T. Bab. Sanhedrim, fol. 25. 2. Maimon. Hilch. Eduth, c. 10. sect. 4. Moses Kotsensis Mitzvot Tora pr. neg. 214. {d} Maimon. Hilch. Mishcab, c. 10. sect. 8.
Matthew 5:47
Ver. 47. And if you salute your brethren only,.... This does not mean salutation by embraces or kisses, but by words, asking of each other's welfare, and wishing prosperity and happiness to one another.
"The manner of salutation among the wise men was this {e}; he that salutes says, a good day to my lord; and he replies, saying, a good, and long day to my lord: always he that replies doubles the salutation.''
The persons they usually gave their salutations to were those of their own nation, their countrymen, relations, and friends; and who are here designed by "brethren"; meaning, not brethren in the strict sense, but any kindred, acquaintance, or any of their own nation. Some copies read it "friends", who, generally speaking, only partook of such favours.
"A man, (says Maimonides {f},) might not salute his master, nor return a salutation to him in the manner they gave a salutation Myerl, to "friends": and they return it to one another.''
They were not very free in saluting any persons, as strangers and Gentiles: such advice as this is indeed given Mda lk Mwlvb Mydqm ywh {g}, "prevent every man with a salutation", or be first in saluting every man; upon which passage their commentators {h} say, even a Gentile in the streets. Accordingly, it is elsewhere {i} observed, that
"R. Abai used to say, let a man be always cunning with fear, for "a soft answer turns away wrath"; and multiply salutation with his brethren, and with his relations, and with every man, even with a stranger in the streets.''
But this proceeded not from any cordial hearty respect, but out of policy, and from fear; and in order to maintain peace; and for selfish ends, and with sinister views: otherwise their salutations were confined to their brethren and kinsfolk after the flesh. Now, this being the case, says Christ,
what do ye more than others? do not even publicans so? Or, as some copies read it, Gentiles or Heathens; and accordingly the Ethiopic version, and the Vulgate Latin so render it: the Arabic renders it "idolaters". Now, what great matter was this to salute their brethren and their friends, when even the very Heathens, who had nothing but the light of nature to guide them, did the same?
{e} Sepher Chasidim, fol. 5. col. 2. apud Buxtorf. Florileg. Heb. p. 300, 301. {f} Hilch. Talmud Tora, c. 5. sect. 5. {g} Pirke Abot, c. 4. sect. 15. {h} Jarchi & Bartenora in ib. {i} T. Bab. Beracot, fol. 17. 1.
Matthew 5:48
Ver. 48. Be ye therefore perfect, as your Father,.... This perfection is to be restrained to the subject Christ is upon, love to men, and not to be referred to any, or every other thing; wherefore, in Lu 6:36 it is, "be ye merciful, as your Father also is merciful"; and regards not a perfection of degree in that, but objects and quality: that is to say, not that men may, or can, or ought to be as perfect in love, as to the degree of it, as God is; that is impossible: the "as" here, is not a note of equality, but of likeness: such, who profess God to be their Father, ought to imitate him, particularly in their love to men, which ought to be extended to the same objects, as the divine goodness is; that, as he shows regard in a providential way to all men, good and bad, just and unjust, and his tender mercies are over all his works; so ought they to love all men with a natural affection, and hate no man, no, not their enemies: for he that loves only his friends, and not his enemies, loves imperfectly; he does not take in the whole compass of objects his love is to extend unto; and as God loves sincerely, and without dissimulation, so should they. To be "perfect", is to be sincere and upright: in this sense is the word often used, and answers to the Hebrew word Mymt, which signifies the same: see
De 18:13 which is the passage Christ seems to refer to here; and the sense is, be ye sincere and upright in your love to all men, as your heavenly Father is hearty and sincere in his affections to them.
<ALIGN="CENTER"John Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible.
None will find happiness in this world or the next,
who do not seek it from Christ by the rule of his word. He taught
them what was the evil they should abhor, and what the good they
should seek and abound in./
None will find happiness in this world or the next,
who do not seek it from Christ by the rule of his word.
He taught
them what was the evil they should abhor, and what the good they
should seek and abound in./
Sources: Matthew Henry; Gill's Exposition; Matthew Henry Concise
Commentary
Commentary