Then the Pharisees, and some of the scribes gathered together to him, having come from Jerusalem.
KJV
Then came together unto him the Pharisees, and certain of the scribes, which came from Jerusalem.
Commentary
Commentary
In this chapter we have,
I. Christ's dispute with the scribes and Pharisees about eating meat
with unwashen hands
( ver. 1-13 );
and the needful instructions he gave to the people on that occasion,
and further explained to his disciples, ver. 14-23 .
II. His curing of the woman Canaan's daughter that was possessed, ver. 24-30 .
III. The relief of a man that was deaf, and had an impediment in his
speech, ver. 31-37 .
1 Then came together unto him the Pharisees, and certain of the
scribes, which came from Jerusalem.
2 And when they saw some of his disciples eat bread with
defiled, that is to say, with unwashen, hands, they found fault.
3 For the Pharisees, and all the Jews, except they wash their hands oft, eat not, holding the tradition of the elders.
4 And when they come from the market, except they wash, they
eat not. And many other things there be, which they have received
to hold, as the washing of cups, and pots, brasen vessels, and
of tables.
5 Then the Pharisees and scribes asked him, Why walk not thy
disciples according to the tradition of the elders, but eat bread
with unwashen hands?
6 He answered and said unto them, Well hath Esaias prophesied
of you hypocrites, as it is written, This people honoureth me
with their lips, but their heart is far from me.
7 Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines
the commandments of men.
8 For laying aside the commandment of God, ye hold the
tradition of men, as the washing of pots and cups: and many
other such like things ye do.
9 And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of
God, that ye may keep your own tradition.
10 For Moses said, Honour thy father and thy mother; and, Whoso
curseth father or mother, let him die the death:
11 But ye say, If a man shall say to his father or mother, It
is Corban, that is to say, a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest
be profited by me; he shall be free. 12 And ye suffer him no more to do ought for his father or his
mother;
13 Making the word of God of none effect through your
tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do
ye.
14 And when he had called all the people unto him, he said
unto them, Hearken unto me every one of you, and understand:
15 There is nothing from without a man, that entering into him
can defile him: but the things which come out of him, those are
they that defile the man.
16 If any man have ears to hear, let him hear.
17 And when he was entered into the house from the people, his
disciples asked him concerning the parable.
18 And he saith unto them, Are ye so without understanding
also? Do ye not perceive, that whatsoever thing from without
entereth into the man, it cannot defile him;
19 Because it entereth not into his heart, but into the belly,
and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats?
20 And he said, That which cometh out of the man, that defileth
the man.
21 For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil
thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders,
22 Thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lasciviousness, an
evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness:
23 All these evil things come from within, and defile the man.
One great design of Christ's coming, was, to set aside the ceremonial
law which God made, and to put an end to it; to make way for which he
begins with the ceremonial law which men had made, and added to the law
of God's making, and discharges his disciples from the obligation of
that; which here he doth fully, upon occasion of the offence which the
Pharisees took at them for the violation of it. These Pharisees and
scribes with whom he had this argument, are said to come from
Jerusalem down to Galilee--fourscore or a hundred miles, to pick
quarrels with our Saviour there, where they supposed him to have the
greatest interest and reputation. Had they come so far to be taught by
him, their zeal had been commendable; but to come so far to oppose him,
and to check the progress of his gospel, was great wickedness. It
should seem that the scribes and Pharisees at Jerusalem pretended not
only to a pre-eminence above, but to an authority over, the country
clergy, and therefore kept up their visitations and sent inquisitors
among them, as they did to John when he appeared, John i. 19 .
I. What the tradition of the elders was: by it all were enjoined to wash their hands before meat; a cleanly custom, and no harm in
it; and yet as such to be over-nice in it discovers too great a care
about the body, which is of the earth; but they placed religion
in it, and would not leave it indifferent, as it was in its own nature;
people were at their liberty to do it or not to do it; but they
interposed their authority, and commanded all to do it upon pain of
excommunication; this they kept up as a tradition of the elders. The Papists pretend to a zeal for the authority and antiquity of the
church and its canons, and talk much of councils and fathers, when
really it is nothing but a zeal for their own wealth, interest, and
dominion, that governs them; and so it was with the Pharisees.
We have here an account of the practice of the Pharisees and all the
Jews, v. 3, 4 .
1. They washed their hands oft; they washed them, pygme ; the critics find a great deal of work about that
word, some making it to denote the frequency of their washing (so we
render it); others think it signifies the pains they took in washing
their hands; they washed with great care, they washed their hands to
their wrists (so some); they lifted up their hands when they were
wet, that the water might run to their elbows. 2. They particularly washed before they ate bread; that is,
before they sat down to a solemn meal; for that was the rule; they must
be sure to wash before they ate the bread on which they begged a
blessing. "Whosoever eats the bread over which they recite the
benediction, Blessed be he that produceth bread, must wash his
hands before and after," or else he was thought to be defiled.
3. They took special care, when they came in from the markets, to wash their hands; from the judgment-halls, so some; it
signifies any place of concourse where there were people of all sorts,
and, it might be supposed, some heathen or Jews under a ceremonial
pollution, by coming near to whom they thought themselves polluted;
saying, Stand by thyself, come not near me, I am holier than
thou, Isa. lxv. 5 .
They say, The rule of the rabbies was--That, if they washed their hands
well in the morning, the first thing they did, it would serve for all
day, provided they kept alone; but, if they went into company, they
must not, at their return, either eat or pray till they had washed
their hands; thus the elders gained a reputation among the people for
sanctity, and thus they exercised and kept up an authority over their
consciences.
4. They added to this the washing of cups, and pots, and brazen vessels, which they suspected had been made use of by
heathens, or persons polluted; nay, and the very tables on which
they ate their meat. There were many cases in which, by the law of
Moses, washings were appointed; but they added to them, and
enforced the observation of their own impositions as much as of God's
institutions.
II. What the practice of Christ's disciples was; they knew what the law
was, and the common usage; but they understood themselves so well that
they would not be bound up by it: they ate bread with defiled, that is, with unwashen, hands, v. 2 .
Eating with unwashen hands they called eating with defiled hands; thus men keep up their superstitious vanities by
putting every thing into an ill name that contradicts them. The
disciples knew (it is probable) that the Pharisees had their eye upon
them, and yet they would not humour them by a compliance with their
traditions, but took their liberty as at other times, and ate bread
with unwashen hands; and herein their righteousness, however it might seem to come short, did really exceed, that of the
scribes and Pharisees, Matt. v. 20 .
III. The offence which the Pharisees took at this; They found
fault ( v. 2 );
they censured them as profane, and men of a loose conversation, or
rather as men that would not submit to the power of the church, to
decree rites and ceremonies, and were therefore rebellious, factious,
and schismatical. They brought a complaint against them to their
Master, expecting that he should check them, and order them to conform;
for they that are fond of their own inventions and impositions, are
commonly ready to appeal to Christ, as if he should countenance them,
and as if his authority must interpose for the enforcing of them, and
the rebuking of those that do not comply with them. They do not ask,
Why do not thy disciples do as we do? (Though that was what they
meant, coveting to make themselves the standard.) But, Why do not they walk according to the tradition of the elders? v. 5 .
To which it was easy to answer, that, by receiving the doctrine of
Christ, they had more understanding than all their teachers, yea more than the ancients, Ps. cxix. 99, 100 .
1. He argues with the Pharisees concerning the authority by which this
ceremony was imposed; and they were the fittest to be discoursed
with concerning that, who were the great sticklers for it: but this he
did not speak of publicly to the multitude (as appears by his calling the people to him, v. 14 )
lest he should have seemed to stir them up to faction and discontent at
their governors; but addressed it as a reproof to the persons
concerned: for the rule is, Suum cuique--Let every one have his
own.
(1.) He reproves them for their hypocrisy in pretending to honour God,
when really they had no such design in their religious observances
( v. 6, 7 ); They honour me with their lips, they pretend it is for the glory
of God that they impose those things, to distinguish themselves from
the heathen; but really their heart is far from God, and is
governed by nothing but ambition and covetousness. They would be
thought hereby to appropriate themselves as a holy people to the Lord
their God, when really it is the furthest thing in their thought. They
rested in the outside of all their religious exercises, and their
hearts were not right with God in them, and this was worshipping God in
vain; for neither was he pleased with such sham-devotions, nor were
they profited by them.
(2.) He reproves them for placing religion in the inventions and
injunctions of their elders and rulers; They taught for doctrines
the traditions of men. When they should have been pressing upon
people the great principles of religion, they were enforcing the canons
of their church, and judged of people's being Jews or no, according as
they did, or did not, conform to them, without any consideration had,
whether they lived in obedience to God's laws or no. It was true, there
were divers washings imposed by the law of Moses
( Heb. ix. 10 ),
which were intended to signify that inward purification of the heart
from worldly fleshly lusts, which God requires as absolutely necessary
to our communion with him; but, instead of providing the substance,
they presumptuously added to the ceremony, and were very nice in washing pots and cups; and observe, he adds, Many other such
like things ye do, v. 8 .
Note, Superstition is an endless thing. If one human invention and
institution be admitted, though seemingly ever so innocent, as this of
washing hands, behold, a troop comes, a door is opened for many other such things.
(3.) He reproves them for laying aside the commandment of God, and overlooking that, not urging that in their preaching, and in their
discipline conniving at the violation of that, as if that were no
longer of force, v. 8 .
Note, It is the mischief of impositions, that too often they who are
zealous for them, have little zeal for the essential duties of
religion, but can contentedly see them laid aside. Nay, they rejected the commandment of God, v. 9 . He do fairly disannul and abolish the commandment of God; and
even by your traditions make the word of God of no
effect, v. 13 .
God's statutes shall not only lie forgotten, as antiquated
obsolete laws, but they shall, in effect, stand repealed, that
their traditions may take place. They were entrusted to expound the
law, and to enforce it; and, under pretence of using that power, they
violated the law, and dissolved the bonds of it; destroying the text
with the comment.
This he gives them a particular instance of, and a flagrant one--God
commanded children to honour their parents, not only by the law
of Moses, but, antecedent to that, by the law of nature; and whoso revileth, or speaketh evil of, father or mother, let
him die the death, v. 10 .
Hence it is easy to infer, that it is the duty of children, if their
parents be poor, to relieve them, according to their ability; and if
those children are worthy to die, that curse their parents, much more
those that starve them. But if a man will but conform himself in all
points to the tradition of the elders, they will find him out an
expedient by which he may be discharged from this obligation, v. 11 .
If his parents be in want and he has wherewithal to help them, but has
no mind to do it, let him swear by the Corban, that is, by the gold of the temple, and the gift upon the altar, that his
parents shall not be profited by him, that he will not relieve them;
and, if they ask any thing of him, let him tell them this, and it is
enough; as if by the obligation of this wicked vow he had discharged
himself from the obligation of God's holy law; thus Dr. Hammond
understands it: and it is said to be an ancient canon of the rabbin,
That vows take place in things commanded by the law, as well as in
things indifferent; so that, if a man make a vow which cannot be
ratified without breaking a commandment, the vow must be ratified, and
the commandment violated; so Dr. Whitby. Such doctrine as this the
Papists teach, discharging children from all obligation to their
parents by their monastic vows, and their entrance into religion, as
they call it. He concludes, Any many such like things do ye. Where will men stop, when once they have made the word of God give way
to their tradition? These eager imposers of such ceremonies, at first
only made light of God's commandments in comparison with
their traditions, but afterward made void God's commandments, if
they stood in competition with them. All this, in effect, Isaiah
prophesied of them; what he said of the hypocrites of his own day, was
applicable to the scribes and Pharisees, v. 6 .
Note, When we see, and complain of, the wickedness of the present
times, yet we do not enquire wisely of that matter, if we say
that all the former days were better than these, Eccl. vii. 10 .
The worst of hypocrites and evil doers have had their predecessors.
2. He instructs the people concerning the principles upon which this
ceremony was grounded. It was requisite that this part of his discourse
should be public, for it related to daily practice, and was designed to
rectify a great mistake which the people were led into by their elders;
he therefore called the people unto him ( v. 14 ),
and bid them hear and understand. Note, It is not enough for the
common people to hear, but they must understand what they
hear. When Christ would run down the tradition of the Pharisees about
washing before meat, he strikes at the opinion which was the root of
it. Note, Corrupt customs are best cured by rectifying corrupt
notions.
Now that which he goes about to set them right in, is, what the
pollution is, which we are in danger of being damaged by, v. 15 .
(1.) Not by the meat we eat, though it be eaten with unwashen
hands; that is but from without, and goes through a man. But,
(2.) It is by the breaking out of the corruption that is in our hearts;
the mind and conscience are defiled, guilt is contracted, and we become
odious in the sight of God by that which comes out of us; our
wicked thoughts and affections, words and actions, these defile us, and
these only. Our care must therefore be, to wash our heart from
wickedness.
3. He gives his disciples, in private, an explication of the
instructions he gave the people. They asked him, when they had
him by himself, concerning the parable ( v. 17 );
for to them, it seems, it was a parable. Now, in answer to their
enquiry,
(1.) He reproves their dulness; " Are ye so without understanding
also? Are ye dull also, as dull as the people that cannot understand, as dull as the Pharisees that will
not? Are ye so dull?" He doth not expect they should
understand every thing; "But are ye so weak as not to understand this? "
(2.) He explains this truth to them, that they might perceive it, and then they would believe it, for it carried its own
evidence along with it. Some truths prove themselves, if they be but
rightly explained and apprehended. If we understand the spiritual
nature of God and of his law, and what it is that is offensive to him,
and disfits us for communion with him, we shall soon perceive,
[1.] That that which we eat and drink cannot defile us, so as to call
for any religious washing; it goes into the stomach, and passes
the several digestions and secretions that nature has appointed, and
what there may be in it that is defiling is voided and gone; meats
for the belly, and the belly for meats, but God shall destroy
both it and them. But,
[2.] It is that which comes out from the heart, the corrupt
heart, that defiles us. As by the ceremonial law, whatsoever (almost)
comes out of a man, defiles him
( Lev. xv. 2; Deut. xxiii. 13 ),
so what comes out from the mind of a man is that which defiles
him before God, and calls for a religious washing
( v. 21 ); From within, out of the heart of men, which they boast of the goodness of, and think is the best part of them, thence that
which defiles proceeds, thence comes all the mischief. As a corrupt
fountain sends forth corrupt streams, so doth a corrupt heart send
forth corrupt reasonings, corrupt appetites and passions, and all those
wicked words and actions which are produced by them. Divers particulars
are specified, as in Matthew; we had one there, which is not here, and
that is, false witness-bearing; but seven are mentioned
here, to be added to those we had there. First, Covetousnesses, for it is plural; pleonexiai -- immoderate desires of more of the wealth of the world, and the gratifications of sense,
and still more, still crying, Give, give. Hence we read of a heart exercised with covetous practices, 2 Pet. ii. 14 . Secondly, Wickedness -- poneriai ; malice, hatred,
and ill-will, a desire to do mischief, and a delight in mischief done. Thirdly, Deceit; which is wickedness covered and disguised, that
it may be the more securely and effectually committed. Fourthly,
Lasciviousness; that filthiness and foolish talking which the
apostle condemns; the eye full of adultery, and all wanton dalliances. Fifthly, The evil eye; the envious eye, and the covetous
eye, grudging others the good we give them, or do for them
( Prov. xxiii. 6 ),
or grieving at the good they do or enjoy. Sixthly, Pride -- hyperephania ; exalting ourselves in our own conceit above
others, and looking down with scorn and contempt upon others. Seventhly, Foolishness -- aphrosyne ; imprudence,
inconsideration; some understand it especially of vainglorious
boasting, which St. Paul calls foolishness ( 2 Cor. xi. 1, 19 ),
because it is here joined with pride; I rather take it for that
rashness in speaking and acting, which is the cause of so much evil. Ill-thinking is put first, as that which is the spring of all
our com missions, and unthinking put last, as that which
is the spring of all our o missions. Of all these he concludes
( v. 23 ),
1. That they come from within, from the corrupt nature, the
carnal mind, the evil treasure in the heart; justly is it said, that
the inward part is very wickedness, it must needs be so, when
all this comes from within.
2. That they defile the man; they render a man unfit for
communion with God, they bring a stain upon the conscience; and, if not
mortified and rooted out, will shut men out of the new Jerusalem, into
which no unclean thing shall enter.
24 And from thence he arose, and went into the borders of Tyre
and Sidon, and entered into a house, and would have no man know it: but he could not be hid.
25 For a certain woman, whose young daughter had an unclean
spirit, heard of him, and came and fell at his feet:
26 The woman was a Greek, a Syrophenician by nation; and she
besought him that he would cast forth the devil out of her
daughter.
27 But Jesus said unto her, Let the children first be filled:
for it is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it unto the dogs.
28 And she answered and said unto him, Yes, Lord: yet the dogs
under the table eat of the children's crumbs.
29 And he said unto her, For this saying go thy way; the devil
is gone out of thy daughter.
30 And when she was come to her house, she found the devil gone
out, and her daughter laid upon the bed.
See here,
I. How humbly Christ was pleased to conceal himself. Never man was so cried up as he was in Galilee, and therefore, to teach
us, though not to decline any opportunity of doing good, yet not to be
fond of popular applause, he arose from thence, and went into the
borders of Tyre and Sidon, where he was little known; and there he
entered, not into a synagogue, or place of concourse, but into a private house, and he would have no man to know it; because it was foretold concerning him, He shall not strive nor cry,
neither shall his voice be heard in the streets. Not but that he
was willing to preach and heal here as well as in other places, but for
this he would be sought unto. Note, As there is a time to appear, so there is a time to retire. Or, he would not be
known, because he was upon the borders of Tyre and Sidon, among
Gentiles, to whom he would not be so forward to show himself as to the
tribes of Israel, whose glory he was to be.
II. How graciously he was pleased to manifest himself, notwithstanding. Though he would not carry a harvest of miraculous
cures into those parts, yet, it should seem, he came on purpose to drop
a handful, to let fall this one which we have here an account of. He
could not be hid; for, though a candle may be put under a bushel,
the sun cannot. Christ was too well known to be long incognito--hid, any where; the oil of gladness which he was
anointed with, like ointment of the right hand, would betray itself,
and fill the house with its odours. Those that had only heard his fame,
could not converse with him, but they would soon say, "This must be
Jesus." Now observe,
1. The application made to him by a poor woman in distress and trouble.
She was a Gentile, a Greek, a stranger to the commonwealth of
Israel, an alien to the covenant of promise; she was by extraction
a Syrophenician, and not in any degree proselyted to the Jewish
religion; she had a daughter, a young daughter, that was
possessed with the devil. How many and grievous are the
calamities that young children are subject to! Her address was,
(1.) Very humble, pressing, and importunate; She heard of him, and came, and fell at his feet. Note, Those that would obtain
mercy from Christ, must throw themselves at his feet; must refer
themselves to him, humble themselves before him, and give up themselves
to be ruled by him. Christ never put any from him, that fell at his
feet, which a poor trembling soul may do, that has not boldness and
confidence to throw itself into his arms.
(2.) It was very particular; she tells him what she wanted. Christ gave
poor supplicants leave to be thus free with him; she besought him that
he would cast forth the devil out of her daughter, v. 26 .
Note, The greatest blessing we can ask of Christ for our children is,
that he would break the power of Satan, that is, the power of sin, in
their souls; and particularly, that he would cast forth the unclean
spirit, that they may be temples of the Holy Ghost, and he may
dwell in them.
2. The discouragement he gave to this address
( v. 27 );
He said unto her, " Let the children first be filled; let the
Jews have all the miracles wrought for them, that they have occasion
for, who are in a particular manner God's chosen people; and let not
that which was intended for them, be thrown to those who are not of
God's family, and who have not that knowledge of him, and interest in
him, which they have, and who are as dogs in comparison of them, vile and profane, and who are as dogs to them, snarling at them,
spiteful toward them, and ready to worry them." Note, Where Christ
knows the faith of poor supplicants to be strong, he sometimes delights
to try it, and put it to the stretch. But his saying, Let the
children first be filled, intimates that there was mercy in reserve
for the Gentiles, and not far off; for the Jews began already to be
surfeited with the gospel of Christ, and some of them had desired him
to depart out of their coasts. The children begin to play with
their meat, and their leavings, their loathings, would be a feast for
the Gentiles. The apostles went by this rule, Let the children first
be filled, let the Jews have the first offer; and if their full
souls loathe this honeycomb, Lo, we turn to the Gentiles!
3. The turn she gave to this word of Christ, which made against her,
and her improvement of it, to make for her, v. 28 .
She said, " Yes, Lord, I own it is true that the children's
bread ought not to be cast to the dogs; but they were never denied
the crumbs of that bread, nay it belongs to them, and they are
allowed a place under the table, that they may be ready to
receive them. I ask not for a loaf, no, nor for a morsel, only for a crumb; do not refuse me that." This she speaks, not
as undervaluing the mercy, or making light of it in itself, but
magnifying the abundance or miraculous cures with which she heard the
Jews were feasted, in comparison with which a single cure was but as a
crumb. Gentiles do not come in crowds, as the Jews do; I come
alone. Perhaps she had heard of Christ's feeding five thousand
lately at once, after which, even when they had gathered up the
fragments, there could not but be some crumbs left for the dogs.
4. The grant Christ thereupon made of her request. Is she thus humble,
thus earnest? For this saying, Go thy way, thou shalt have what
thou camest for, the devil is gone out of thy daughter, v. 29 .
This encourages us to pray and not to faint, to continue
instant in prayer, not doubting but to prevail at last; the vision at
the end shall speak, and not lie. Christ's saying that is was
done, did it effectually, as at other times his saying, Let it
be done; for
( v. 30 )
she came to her house, depending upon the word of Christ, that
her daughter was healed, and so she found it, the devil was
gone out. Note, Christ can conquer Satan at a distance; and it was
not only when the demoniacs saw him, that they yielded to his
power (as ch. iii. 11 ),
but when they saw him not, for the Spirit of the Lord is not bound, nor bounded. She found her daughter not in any
toss or agitation, but very quietly laid on the bed, and
reposing herself; waiting for her mother's return, to rejoice with her,
that she was so finely well.
31 And again, departing from the coasts of Tyre and Sidon, he
came unto the sea of Galilee, through the midst of the coasts of
Decapolis.
32 And they bring unto him one that was deaf, and had an
impediment in his speech; and they beseech him to put his hand
upon him.
33 And he took him aside from the multitude, and put his
fingers into his ears, and he spit, and touched his tongue;
34 And looking up to heaven, he sighed, and saith unto him,
Ephphatha, that is, Be opened.
35 And straightway his ears were opened, and the string of his
tongue was loosed, and he spake plain.
36 And he charged them that they should tell no man: but the
more he charged them, so much the more a great deal they
published it; 37 And were beyond measure astonished, saying, He hath done all
things well: he maketh both the deaf to hear, and the dumb to
speak.
Our Lord Jesus seldom staid long in a place, for he knew where his work lay, and attended the changes of it. When he had cured the woman of Canaan's daughter, he had done what he had to do in that place, and therefore presently left those parts, and
returned to the sea of Galilee, whereabout his usual residence was; yet he did not come directly thither, but fetched a compass through the midst of the coasts of Decapolis, which lay mostly on the other side Jordan; such long walks did our
Lord Jesus take, when he went about doing
good.
Now here we have the story of a cure that Christ wrought, which is not
recorded by any other of the evangelists; it is of one that was deaf and dumb.
I. His case was sad, v. 32 .
There were those that brought to him one that was deaf; some
think, born deaf, and then he must be dumb of course; others think that
by some distemper or disaster he was become deaf, or, at least, thick
of hearing; and he had an impediment in his speech. He was mogilalos ; some think that he was quite dumb; others,
that he could not speak but with great difficulty to himself, and so as
scarcely to be understood by those that heard him. He was tongue-tied, so that he was perfectly unfit for conversation,
and deprived both of the pleasure and of the profit of it; he had not
the satisfaction either of hearing other people talk, or of telling his
own mind. Let us take occasion from hence to give thanks to God for
preserving to us the sense of hearing, especially that we may be
capable of hearing the word of God; and the faculty of speech,
especially that we may be capable of speaking God's praises; and let us
look with compassion upon those that are deaf or dumb, and treat them
with great tenderness. They that brought this poor man to Christ,
besought him that he would put his hand upon him, as the
prophets did upon those whom they blessed in the name of the
Lord. It is not said, They besought him to cure him, but to put his hand upon him, to take cognizance of his case, and put
forth his power to do to him as he pleased.
II. His cure was solemn, and some of the circumstances of it were
singular.
1. Christ took him aside from the multitude, v. 33 .
Ordinarily, he wrought his miracles publicly before all the people, to
show that they would bear the strictest scrutiny and inspection; but
this he did privately, to show that he did not seek his own glory, and
to teach us to avoid every thing that savours of ostentation. Let us
learn of Christ to be humble, and to do good where no eye sees, but his
that is all eye.
2. He used more significant actions, in the doing of this cure, than
usual.
(1.) He put his fingers into his ears, as if he would syringe them, and fetch out that which stopped them up.
(2.) He spit upon his own finger, and then touched his tongue, as if he would moisten his mouth, and so loosen that with which his
tongue was tied; these were no causes that could in the least
contribute to his cure, but only signs of the exerting of that power
which Christ had in himself to cure him, for the encouraging of his
faith, and theirs that brought him. The application was all from
himself, it was his own fingers that he put into his ears, and
his own spittle that he put upon his tongue; for he alone
heals.
3. He looked up to heaven, to give his Father the praise of what
he did; for he sought his praise, and did his will, and, as Mediator,
acted in dependence on him, and with an eye to him. Thus he signified
that it was by a divine power, a power her had as the Lord from heaven,
and brought with him thence, that he did this; for the hearing
ear and the seeing eye the Lord has made, and can
remake even both of them. He also hereby directed his patient
who could see, though he could not hear, to look up to
heaven for relief. Moses with his stammering tongue is directed to look
that way
( Exod. iv. 11 ); Who hath made man's mouth? Or who maketh the dumb or deaf, or the
seeing or the blind? Have not I the Lord?
4. He sighed; not as if he found any difficulty in working this
miracle, or obtaining power to do it from his father; but thus he
expressed his pity for the miseries of human life, and his sympathy
with the afflicted in their afflictions, as one that was himself touched with the feeling of their infirmities. And as to this
man, he sighed, not because he was loth to do him this kindness,
or did it with reluctancy; but because of the many temptations which he
would be exposed to, and the sins he would be in danger of, the
tongue-sins, after the restoring of his speech to him, which before he
was free from. He had better be tongue-tied still, unless he
have grace to keep his mouth as with a bridle, Ps. xxxix. 1 .
5. He said, Ephphatha; that is, Be opened. This was
nothing that looked like spell or charm, such as they
used, who had familiar spirits, who peeped and muttered, Isa. viii. 19 .
Christ speaks as one having authority, and power went along with the
word. Be opened, served both parts of the cure; "Let the ears be opened, let the lips be opened, let
him hear and speak freely, and let the restraint be taken off;" and the
effect was answerable
( v. 35 ); Straightway his ears were opened, and the string of his tongue was
loosed, and all was well: and happy he who, as soon as he had his
hearing and speech, had the blessed Jesus so near him to converse
with.
Now this cure was,
(1.) A proof of Christ's being the Messiah; for it was foretold that by
his power the ears of the deaf should be unstopped, and the tongue of the dumb should be made to sing, Isa. xxxv. 5, 6 .
(2.) It was a specimen of the operations of his gospel upon the minds
of men. The great command of the gospel, and grace of Christ to poor
sinners, is Ephphatha-Be opened. Grotius applies it thus, that
the internal impediments of the mind are removed by the Spirit of
Christ, as those bodily impediments were by the word of his power. He opens the heart, as he did Lydia's, and thereby opens the ear to
receive the word of God, and opens the mouth in prayer and praises.
6. He ordered it to be kept very private, but it was made very public
(1.) It was his humility, that he charged them they should tell no
man, v. 36 .
Most men will proclaim their own goodness, or, at least, desire that
others should proclaim it; but Christ, though he was himself in no
danger of being puffed up with it, knowing that we are, would thus set
us an example of self-denial, as in other things, so especially in
praise and applause. We should take pleasure in doing good, but not in
its being known.
(2.) It was their zeal, that, though he charged them to say nothing of
it, yet they published it, before Christ would have had it published.
But they meant honestly, and therefore it is to be reckoned rather an
act of indiscretion than an act of disobedience, v. 36 .
But they that told it, and they that heard it, were beyond measure
astonished, hyperperissos -- more than above
measure; they were exceedingly affected with it, and this was said
by every body, it was the common verdict, He hath done all things
well ( v. 37 );
whereas there were those that hated and persecuted him as an evil-doer, they are ready to witness for him, not only that he
has done no evil, but that he has done a great deal of good, and has
done it well, modestly and humbly, and very devoutly, and all gratis, without money and without price, which added much to the lustre
of his good works. He maketh both the deaf to hear, and the dumb to
speak; and that is well, it is well for them, it is well for
their relations, to whom they had been a burthen; and therefore they are inexcusable who speak ill of him.
Ver. 1. Then came together unto him the Pharisees,.... Having heard of his miracles, and that he was come into the ; they consulted with one another, and came together to Jesus, to watch and observe what was said and done by him, and take what advantage they could against him. These were not of that country, but were of Jerusalem, as were their companions the Scribes:
and certain of the Scribes, which were of Jerusalem; for the fame of Christ had reached the metropolis of the nation; and these men being the more artful and cunning of the whole sect, either came of themselves, or were sent by the sanhedrim, to make their observations upon his doctrine and conduct; See Gill on "Mt 15:1".
Mark 7:2
Ver. 2. And when they saw some of his disciples,.... An opportunity soon offered of giving them an handle against him: for observing some of his disciples to sit down to meat, they took notice that they
eat bread with defiled (that is to say, with unwashen) hands, and
they found fault; with them, and charged them with the breach of the traditions of the elders, and took an occasion from hence of quarrelling with Christ. The Jews use the same phrase the evangelist here does, and interpret it in just the same manner: so, speaking of things eaten, twbawom Mydyb, "with defiled hands"; that is, says the commentator {i}, it is all one as if it was said, Mydy tlyjn alb, "without washing of hands"; which was esteemed a very great crime, and especially if done in a contemptuous way: for they say {k},
"he that despiseth washing of hands, shall be rooted out of the world; for in it is the secret of the decalogue:''
and particularly to eat with unwashed hands, was unpardonable in a disciple of a wise man; for they looked upon this to be the characteristic of one of the vulgar people, a common and illiterate man: for they ask {l},
"who is one of the people of the earth, or a plebeian? he that does not eat his common food with purity.''
By this also they distinguished a Jew from a Gentile; if he washed his hands, and blessed, he was known to be an Israelite, but if not, a Gentile {m}; See Gill on "Mt 15:2".
{i} Bartenora in Misn. Cholin, c. 2. sect. 5. {k} Zoharin Numb fol. 100. 3. {l} T. Bab. Gittin, fol. 61. 1. {m} Bevaidbar Rabba, fol. 228. 4.
Mark 7:3
Ver. 3. For the Pharisees, and all the Jews,.... The far greater part of them; all, excepting the Sadducees; and especially the Pharisees, were very tenacious of this tradition of washing hands before eating: hence Pharisees are described as such, hrhjb
Nhylwx ylkwa, "that eat their common food with cleanness" {n}, i.e. of hands: these,
except they wash their hands oft, eat not; or except they wash very cautiously, with great care, diligence, and exactness, as the Syriac version suggests; and about which there are various rules given, to be observed with great strictness {o}. Some render the words, "they wash their hands to the elbow"; and this is a rule with the Jews, which is closely to be abode by, that the washing of hands is to be,
qrp de, "to the joint", which joins the hand and arm together {p}: particularly it is observed {q}, that
"washing of the hands for the eating of the offering, is unto the elbow, and for common food, to the joints of the fingers: he that eats with an ancient man, and does not wash his hands to the elbow, he may not eat with him.''
Well may it be added,
holding the tradition of the elders; nor do the Jews pretend the authority of the Scriptures as obliging them to such rules; for, they say, the command concerning washing of hands is, Myrpwo yrbdm, "from the words of the Scribes" {r}; and is Mymkx twum, "a command of the wise men" {s}. The tradition is this:
"they wash hands for common food, but for the tithe, and for the first offering, and for that which is holy, they dip them, and for the sin offering; for if the hands are defiled; the body is defiled {t}.''
And this tradition of the elders, the Scribes, and Pharisees, strictly observed.
{n} Gloss in T. Bab. Chagiga, fol. 18. 2. Maimon. & Bartenora in Misn. Chagiga, c. 2. sect. 7. {o} Vid. Maimon. Hilch. Bcracot, c. 6. {p} T. Bab. Cholin, fol. 106. 1, 2. Maimon. Hilch. Beracot, c. 6. 4. Maimon. & Bartenora in Misn. Eracin, c. 5. sect. 1. Zohar in Deut. fol. 115. 2. {q} T. Hieros. Betacot, fol. 12. 1. {r} Maimon. Hilch. Mikvaot, c. 11. sect. 1. {s} Ib. Beracot, c. 6. sect. 2. {t} Misn. Chagiga, c. 2. sect. 5.
Mark 7:4
Ver. 4. And when they come from the market,.... In Beza's most ancient copy, and in one of Stephens's, it is read as we supply, "when they come": wherefore this respects not things bought in the market, a sense favoured by all the Oriental versions, for many of them could not be washed; but the persons of the Scribes and Pharisees, who when they came from market, or from any court of judicature, immersed themselves all over in water, according to the true sense of the word baptizw, here used: for,
"if the Pharisees touched but the garments of the common people, they were defiled, all one as if they had touched a profluvious person, hlybj Nkyruw, "and needed immersion";''
and were obliged to it {u}: hence, when they walked the streets, they walked on the sides of the way, that they might not be defiled by touching the common people {w}:
wherefore, except they wash, they eat not, or immerse themselves in water, as well as used, Mydy tlybj, "immersion of the hands", or washing of the hands by immersion; and which, if only intended, is sufficient to support the primary sense of the word, "baptizo":
and, many other things there be which they have received to hold; by tradition from their elders;
as the washing of cups and pots, brazen, vessels, and of tables: and here the word baptismov, "baptism", is rightly used in its proper and primary signification; for all these things were, according to the traditions of the elders, washed by immersion:
"in a laver, (they say {x}) which holds forty seahs of water, which are not drawn, every defiled man dips himself, except a profluvious man; and in it Nyamjh Mylkh lk
ta Nylybjm, "they dip all unclean vessels";''
"as cups, pots, and brazen vessels": very particularly brazen vessels are mentioned, because earthen ones that were unclean, were to be broken {y}; which were all washed before eaten in, even on a sabbath day, and that by dipping {z}:
""dishes", in which they eat at evening, (i.e. of the sabbath,) they wash them, to eat in in the morning; in the morning they wash them, to eat in at noon; at noon they wash them, to eat in at the "minchah"; and from the "minchah", and forward, they do not wash again: but "cups", and "jugs", and "pots" they wash, and it goes through all the day; for there is no fixed time for drinking.''
All such vessels, whether had of a Gentile, or an Israelite, or even a wise man, were to be immersed before used {a}.
"He that buys a vessel for the use of a feast, of Gentiles, whether molten vessels, or glass vessels--Nlybjm, "they dip them", in the waters of the laver; and after that they may eat and drink in them: and such as they use for cold things, as "cups", and "pots", and "jugs", they wash them,
Nlybjmw, "and dip them", and they are free for use: and such as they use for hot things, as "cauldrons" and "kettles", ("brazen vessels",) they heat them with hot water, and scour them, Nlybjmw, "and immerse them", and they are fit to be used: and things which they use at the fire, as spits and gridirons, they heat them in the fire till the crust (the covering of rust, or dirt) falls off,
Nlybjmw, "and dip them", and they may be lawfully made use of. This is the immersion with which they immerse vessels for a feast, bought of Gentiles; and after that they are free for eating and drinking; for the business of uncleanness and purification is only from the words of the Scribes--and none are obliged to this immersion, but molten vessels for a feast, bought of Gentiles; but if he borrows of Gentiles, or a Gentile leaves in pawn molten vessels, (made of cast brass, or iron,) he washes, or boils, or heats in the fire, but need not immerse them; and so if he buys vessels of wood, or vessels of stone, he washes, or boils them, but need not dip them; and so earthen vessels need not be immersed; but those that are covered with lead, are as molten vessels, hlybj Nykyruw, "and need immersion".''
And not only such that were bought of Gentiles, but even that were made by Jews, and scholars too, were to be immersed in water.
"Vessels, (they say {b},) that are finished in purity, even though a disciple of a wise man makes them, care is to be taken about them, lo! these ought to be immersed:''
and also "tables", at which they eat; and because their posture at them were lying, reclining, or leaning: hence the word klinwn, is used for them here: these were capable of defilement in a ceremonial sense, according to the traditions of the Jews: one of their rules is this {c};
"every vessel of wood, which is made for the use of vessels, and of men, as, Nxlwvh, a "table", a bed, &c. receive defilement.''
And there were several sorts of tables, which, by their laws, were unclean, or might be defiled by the touch of unclean persons, or things: so they say {d},
"a table, and sideboard, which are made less, or covered with marble, if there is a space left, in which cups may be set, they may be defiled. R. Judah says, if a space is left, in which may be put pieces, i.e. of bread or flesh: a table of which the first of its feet is taken away is clean; if the second is taken away it is clean; if the third is taken away it may be defiled.''
Again {e}, every vessel of wood, that is divided into two parts, is, clean, excepting a double table, &c., i.e. a table which consisted of various parts, and were folded together when it was removed: and these were washed by covering them in water; and very nice they were in washing them, that the water might reach every part, and that they might be covered all over; that there might be nothing which might separate between them and the water, and hinder its coming to them: as for instance, pitch being upon a table, whether within or without, divided between that and the water; and when this was the case, it was not rightly washed {f}: but to washing tables by immersion, there is no objection; wherefore, to perplex this matter, and give further trouble, it is insisted on that the word should be rendered "beds"; and it must be owned that it is so rendered in the Syriac, Persic, and Ethiopic versions, (in the Arabic version the clause is omitted,) and in many modern translations: and we are contented it should be so rendered. And these beds design either the couches they lay, or leaned upon at meals; or the beds they slept in at nights: these were capable of being polluted, in a ceremonial sense; for of such pollution, and such washing, are we to understand these traditions: for those things regard not the bare washing of them when naturally unclean, when they ought to be washed; and it is the custom of all people to wash them when this is the case. A bed, and bedstead, are capable of such pollution as soon as they are shaved with a fish skin, or are completed without polishing {g}; that is, as soon as they are finished; and there are several ways by which they are defiled. A bed is defiled, tm amj, "by one that is defiled with the dead" {h}; that is, who has touched a dead body, and he sits upon the bed, or touches it, he defiles it. Again, a bed that is made to lie upon, is defiled, ordm, "by treading" {i}; that is, it is defiled if a man, or a woman, that has a "gonorrhoea", or a menstruous woman, or one in childbirth, or a leper, should sit, stand; lie, hang, or lean upon it; yea, if any thing should touch it, which has been touched by any of these. Also, a bed which is not made for to lie upon, but to lay a dead body on, is defiled in the same way; and so are even the pillow and bolster {k}. Now these were to be washed when they had received any defilement, and that by immersion. Their canons run thus:
"hjm, "a bed", that is wholly defiled, if hlybjh, "he dips" it, part by part, it is pure {l};''
again {m},
"hjmh ta wb lybjh, "if he dips the bed in it", (the pool of water,) although its feet are plunged into the thick clay (at the bottom of the pool), it is clean.''
If it should be insisted upon, that it ought to be shown and proved, that the very bolsters and pillows on which they lay and leaned, were washed in this way, we are able to do it:
"ytokhw rkh, "a pillow", or "a bolster" of skin, when a man lifts up the ends, or mouths of them, out of the water, the water which is within them will be drawn; what shall he do? Nlybjm, "he must dip them", and lift them up by their fringes {n}.''
In short, it is a rule with the Jews, that
"wheresoever, in the law, washing of the flesh, or of clothes, is mentioned, it means nothing else than the dipping of the whole body in water--for if any man wash himself all over, except the top of his little finger, he is still in his uncleanness {o}.''
So that the evangelist uses the words baptizw and baptismov, most properly, without departing from their primary and literal sense; nor could he have used words more appropriate and fit. Various rules, concerning these things, may be seen in the treatises "Celim" and "Mikvaot". Hence it appears, with what little show of reason, and to what a vain purpose this passage is so often appealed to, to lessen the sense of the word baptizw, "baptizo"; as if it did not signify to dip, but a sort of washing, short of dipping; though what that washing is, is not easy to say, since vessels and clothes are in common washed by putting them into water, and covering them with it: this passage therefore is of no service to those who plead for sprinkling, or pouring water in baptism, in opposition to immersion; nor of any disservice, but of real use to those who practise immersion, and must confirm them in it. Nor need they have recourse to a various reading, which one of the manuscripts in the Bodleian Library furnishes with, which is, unless they are sprinkled; which reading must be wrong, not only because, contrary to all other copies, but also to the usages of the Jews in the washing of themselves.
{u} Maimon. in Misn. Chagiga, c. 2. sect. 7. {w} Ib. Hilch. Abot Tumaot, c. 13. sect. 8. {x} Ib. Hilch. Mikvaot, c. 9. sect. 5. {y} Maimon. Hilch. Mikvaot, c. 1. sect. 3. {z} T. Bab. Sabbat, fol. 118. 1. Vid. Maimon. Hilch. Sabbat, c. 23. 7. {a} Maimon. Hilch. Maacolot Asurot, c. 17. sect. 3, 5, 6. {b} Maimon. Hilch. Abot Hatumaot, c. 12. sect. 6. {c} Ib. Hilch. Celim, c. 4. sect. 1. {d} Misn. Celim, c. 22. sect. 1, 2. {e} Ib. c. 16. sect. 1. {f} Misn. Mikvaot, c. 9. sect. 5. Maimon. Hilchot Mikvaot, c. 8. sect. 2. {g} Misn. Celim, c. 16. sect. 1. Maimon. Hilch. Celim, c. 5. sect. 1. {h} Maimon ib. c. 27. sect. 8. {i} Misn. Celim, c. 18. sect. 5, 6. & c. 24. sect. 8. Maimon. ib. c. 27. sect. 7. {k} Misn. Celim, c. 23. sect. 4. {l} Maimon. Hilch. Celim. c. 26. sect. 14. {m} Misn. Mikvaot, c. 7. sect. 7. {n} Ib. sect. 6. & Celim, c. 16. 4. {o} Maimon. Hilch. Mikvaot, c. 3. 2.
Mark 7:5
Ver. 5. Then the Pharisees and Scribes asked him,.... Not the disciples, but Christ himself; for their chief view was to find fault, and quarrel with him:
why walk not thy disciples according to the tradition of the elders, but eat with unwashen hands? or "with common", that is, defiled "hands", as in Mr 7:2. So the words are read in Beza's most ancient copy, and in one of Stephens's copies, and in the Vulgate Latin version. The word "common" is used for that which is unclean or unholy, Ac 10:14, and so signifies unwashen hands, as we read, and render it: besides, "common hands" may have some respect to the hands of the common people, the vulgar and illiterate, who showed no regard to this tradition, but ate their common food without washing their hands. Instead of "the tradition of the elders", the Ethiopic version reads, "the constitution of the Scribes and Pharisees"; and which are sometimes by the Jews called,
Myrpwo yrbd, "the words", or "sayings of the Scribes" {o}, and are preferred by them to the written law; and the same are commonly called twkylh, "ways", in which a man is to walk, and according to which he is to steer his course of life; and to which reference is here had in the word, "walk", used by the Pharisees; who suggest, that these decisions, constitutions, and traditions of the elders, were the rule, according to which men ought to order their manner of life and conversation; blaming the disciples, that they did not conform to them, and particularly in the case of eating bread, which they did without washing their hands, which was strictly enjoined among these canons; and they wanted to know the sense of Christ upon it. Though they might have known from the Scriptures, particularly from Eze 20:18 that it was their duty, as well as the disciples of Christ, to walk, not in the, statutes of their fathers, nor observe their judgments, the laws and ordinances instituted by them; but to walk in the statutes of the Lord, and to keep his judgments, and do them: not the traditions of men, but the word of God, should be the rule of walk and conversation; and as many as walk according to this rule, peace will be upon them; but those that walk according to the commandments of men, justly deserve the character given of such by the prophet Isaiah, whose words our Lord produces in the following verses.
{o} T. Hieros. Beracot, fol. 3. 2.
Mark 7:6
Ver. 6. He answered and said unto them,.... Matthew postpones the following citation and application of the prophecy of Isaiah, to the account of the command of God being broken by the tradition of Corban; which Mark makes the answer of Christ to begin with:
well hath Esaias prophesied of you hypocrites; which in Matthew is read, "ye hypocrites, well did Esaias prophesy of you", Mt 15:7; to the same sense as here: for the prophecy of Isaiah not only described the hypocrites of his time, but had respect chiefly to the Jews in succeeding ages, in the times of Christ, and both before and after; when they would, as they did, greatly degenerate, and lost the power and spirituality of religion, and had only the form of it; left the word of God for the traditions of men, and were given up to great stupidity, and to judicial blindness: hence the Apostle Paul refers to a passage in the same chapter, Isa 29:10, and applies it to the Jews in his time, Ro 11:8;
See Gill on "Mt 15:7", saying,
as it is written in Isa 29:13,
this people honoureth me with their lips, but their heart is far from me. In the Prophet Isaiah more is said than is here cited; and so in Matthew more is produced, and the whole is there expressed thus: "this people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with their lips, but their heart is far from me",
Mt 15:8: they presented their bodies before the Lord in the synagogues, or in the temple, and prayed to him with an air of devotion and fervency, and offered up their praises to him, for their external privileges and blessings; but, alas! this was all lip labour; there was no lifting up their hearts, with their hands, unto God; these were not united to fear his name, but were distracted in his worship, and carried away from him to other objects; See Gill on "Mt 15:8".
Mark 7:7
Ver. 7. Howbeit, in vain do they worship me,.... This is the continuation of the citation out of Isaiah, as is also what follows:
teaching for doctrines the commandments of men. As all these traditions mentioned were such; as washing their hands before they ate bread, and their whole bodies, when they came from the market, or from any court of judicature, or concourse of men, where they had been touched by the common people, and the washing of cups, pots, brazen vessels, and tables, or beds; these they taught the people, and enjoined them the observance of them: instead of instructing them in the doctrines of the Bible, respecting the Messiah, and salvation by him, the right fear, and true worship of God, his ordinances and statutes; wherefore their worship of him, though attended with a great show of sanctity and religion, was a vain thing, a mere empty thing, devoid of life, power, and spirituality, unacceptable to God, and of no real use, profit, and advantage to themselves: it neither issued in the glory of God, nor brought any true pleasure, or solid peace to themselves; and they would find, by sad experience, that their hope of being in the favour of God, and of enjoying eternal happiness on account of it, would prove a vain hope; See Gill on "Mt 15:9".
Mark 7:8
Ver. 8. For laying aside the commandment of God,.... Meaning not any particular commandment, but all the commandments of God, the whole written law; to which they preferred the oral law, or the traditions of the elders, and the decisions of their doctors. So the Syriac, Arabic, Persic, and Ethiopic versions read, "the commandments of God".
Ye hold the tradition of men: very significantly are the elders, whom the, Jews revered, and whose traditions and constitutions they extolled above the Scriptures, called "men", in distinction from "God", whose commands they neglected; which exposes and aggravates their sin, that they should leave the one, which had the stamp of divine authority on them, and hold the other, which were only the devices of men's brains;
as the washing of pots and cups. The Arabic version adds, "and vessels", from Mr 7:4, and the Ethiopic version, between "chalices" and "cups", places "monies"; as if they also contracted uncleanness in some cases, and needed washing: and indeed, there is a tradition to this purpose {p},
"lopnv rnyd, "a penny which is rejected" (that is, as the commentators say {q}, which a kingdom or province has made void, or which wants weight), if any one prepares it to hang about the neck of a child, it is "unclean"; and so a "sela" (which was the value of four pence) and it is prepared to weigh with it, is "unclean".''
And many other such like things you do; so many, that it is almost endless to reckon up. The treatise "Celim", or "of vessels", in the Misna, is full of rules, concerning the cleanness and uncleanness, of almost all things in use with men; and so of what do, and what do not stand in need of washing. And these things they did, not according to the commandment of God, nor did they pretend to it; but according to the words of the Scribes, and traditions of the elders, which reached to all sorts of vessels: their rule is this {r};
"vessels made of wood, and of skin, and of bone, and of glass, if they are plain, they are clean; but if they are hollow, (or made to hold things,) they are liable to pollution.''
Which Maimonides {s} explains thus;
"vessels of wood, and of skin, and of bone, if hollow, receive defilement from the words of the law; but if they are plain, as tables, a seat, a skin on which they eat, they do not receive defilement, but, Myrpwo yrbdm, "from the words of the Scribes".''
And this washing of vessels, not only concerned such as were for private use, but the vessels of the sanctuary: so it is said {t};
"after a feast, at the close of a good day, or festival, "they dip all the vessels in the sanctuary"; because the "common people" have "touched" them at the feast, in the time of keeping it: wherefore they say, touch not the table (the showbread table), when they show it to them that come up to the feast, that it may not be defiled by touching it; and if after the feast, it is found (polluted), it must be dipped and all the vessels are obliged to immersion, excepting the golden altar, and the altar of brass.''
So that our Lord might well say, "and many such like things ye do".
{p} Misn. Celim, c. 12. sect. 7. {q} Jarchi & Battenora in ib. {r} Misn. Celim, c. 2. sect. 1. {s} Hilch. Celim, c. 1. sect. 10. {t} Maimon. Hilch. Mishcab Umoshab, c. 11. sect. 11.
Mark 7:9
Ver. 9. And he said unto them,.... He continued his discourse, saying,
full well, or "fairly",
ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition: these words may be considered, as spoken ironically, thus; as pious and excellently good men, you in a very fair and handsome manner, reject and make void the commandments and laws of God; and it is very fit it should be so, in order to preserve your own traditions, that nothing may be wanting to keep up the honour of them, and a due regard to them. The Arabic version reads the words by way of interrogation, "is it fit that you should omit the commandments of God, and keep your own statutes?" and so the Ethiopic, "do ye rightly make void the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own commandment?" Which makes them come nearer to the passage in Matthew; See Gill on "Mt 15:3".
Mark 7:10
Ver. 10. For Moses said,.... That is, God by Moses; for the following precept was spoken by God, and written by him on one of the tables of stone, and delivered into the hands of Moses, to be given to the children of Israel:
honour thy father and thy mother, Ex 20:12, the sanction of which law is,
and whoso curseth father or mother, let him die the death,
Ex 21:17. As the former of these commands is to be understood, not only of honouring parents in thought, word, and deed, but also of providing for them, when in want and distress, through poverty and old age; so the latter is to be interpreted, not merely of wishing or imprecating the most dreadful things upon parents, which some may not be guilty of, and yet transgress this command; but likewise of every slight put upon them, and neglect of them, when in necessitous circumstances: and both these laws were broken by the Jews, through their tradition hereafter mentioned;
See Gill on "Mt 15:4".
Mark 7:11
Ver. 11. But ye say,.... Your elders, doctors, and wise men, in opposition to God and Moses:
if a man shall say to his father or his mother, it is Corban, that is to say, a gift; in the same manner is this word interpreted by Josephus, who speaking of some that call themselves Corban unto God, says {u} in the Greek tongue, dwron de touto semainei, "this signifies a gift": now, according to the traditions of the elders, whoever made use of that word to his father or his mother, signifying thereby, that what they might have expected relief from at his hands, he had devoted it; or it was as if it was devoted to sacred uses; adding,
by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me, [he shall be free]; and not under any obligation to regard and relieve his parents, let their case and circumstances be what they would. This is the form of a vow, which a man having made on purpose, to free himself from the charge of the maintenance of his parents, when reduced, repeats unto them; or which he makes upon their application to him: various forms of this kind of vows, are produced in the note "Mt 15:5", which see: this was not the form of an oath, or swearing by Corban, or the sacred treasury in the temple, mentioned in Mt 27:6, of which I do not remember any instance; nor was it a dedication of his substance to holy and religious uses; to the service of God and the temple; but it was a vow he made, that what he had, should be as Corban, as a gift devoted to sacred uses: that as that could not be appropriated to any other use, so his substance, after such a vow, could not be applied to the relief of his parents; though he was not obliged by it to give it for the use of the temple, but might keep it himself, or bestow it upon others. L. Capellus has wrote a very learned dissertation upon this vow, at the end of his Spicilegium on the New Testament; very and our learned countryman, Dr. Pocock, has said many excellent things upon it, in his miscellaneous notes on his Porta Mosis; both which ought to be read and consulted, by those who have learning and leisure.
{u} Autiqu. Jud. l. 4. c. 4. sect. 4.
Mark 7:12
Ver. 12. And ye suffer him no more to do ought for his father, or his mother. According to the Jewish canons {w}, if a man vowed a thing which is contrary to a command, he was obliged to keep his vow, and break the command: thus, if a man vowed that his father or his mother should never receive any benefit from what he had, but that his substance was as "Corban", or as any thing devoted to divine service, he was obliged to keep his vow; nor was he allowed after this to do any thing for his father, or mother, however poor or helpless they might be; unless he applied to a wise man to revoke his vow, or to give him liberty to do it; for he could not do it of himself, as wicked as it was; and though he might heartily repent of it, and was ever so willing to make it null and void: and though a dissolution it by a wise man was allowed of, yet hereby they set up their own power and authority against God, and his law; they did not rescind the vow, because it was contrary to the command of God: for notwithstanding its being contrary to the command of God, it was to be observed, though to the breaking of that, unless loosed by a wise man, at the man's request; whereby they established their magisterial power and authority, without any regard to the honour and glory of God; and therefore what follows, is justly observed by our Lord; See Gill on "Mt 15:5".
{w} Maimon. Hilch. Nedarim, c. 3. sect. 1.
Mark 7:13
Ver. 13. Making the word of God of none effect, through your tradition,.... Beza says, in his most ancient copy it is read, "your foolish tradition"; and such it was indeed, that a vow made rashly, and in a passion, or if ever so deliberately entered into, should be more binding upon a man than the law of God; that rather than break this, he should transgress a divine command; and that though he might see his folly, and repent of his sin in making such a wicked vow, he could not go back from it, without the permission of a wise man: should his poor distressed parents come to him for assistance, he was obliged to answer them, that he had bound himself by a vow, that they should receive no advantage from his substance; and should they remonstrate to him the command of God, to honour them and take care of them, and observe that that command is enforced by promises and threatenings; he had this to reply, and was instructed to do it, that it was the sense of the wise men and doctors, and agreeably to the traditions of the elders, to which he ought rather to attend, than to the words of the law, that he should keep and fulfil his vow, whatever command was neglected or broken by it.
Which ye have delivered: they received it from their ancestors, and delivered it to their disciples; and it is in this way, that all their traditions were delivered: they say {x}, that
"Moses received the law (the oral law) at Sinai, hromw, "and delivered" it to Joshua; and Joshua to the elders, and the elders to the prophets; and the prophets to the men of the great synagogue; the last of which was Simeon the just; and Antigonus, a man of Socho, received it from him; and Jose ben Joezer, a man of Tzeredah, and Jose ben Jochanan, a man of Jerusalem, received it from Antigonus; and Joshua ben Perachiah (said to be the master of Jesus Christ), and Nitthai the Arbelite, received it from them; and Judah ben Tabai, and Simeon ben Shetach, received it from them; and Shemaiah and Abtalion received it from them; and from them Hillell and Shammai.''
Who were now the heads of the two grand schools of the Jews; these received, and delivered out these traditions to the Scribes and Pharisees, and they to their disciples:
and many such like things do ye; meaning, that there were many other traditions besides this now mentioned; whereby, instead of preserving the written law, which, they pretended, these were an hedge unto {y}, they, in a great many instances, made it void.
{x} Pirke Abot, c. 1. sect. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12. {y} Pirke Abot, c. 1. sect. 1.
Mark 7:14
Ver. 14. And when he, had called all the people unto him,.... The Vulgate Latin, and Ethiopic versions, instead of "all", read again, and so do some copies: having said what was sufficient to stop the mouths of the Scribes and Pharisees, about their unwarrantable traditions; he turns himself to the common people, who stood at some distance, because of these venerable doctors, and called to them to come nearer to him:
he said unto them, hearken to me every one of you, and understand; signifying, he had something of moment to say to them, which they would do well to attend unto, and what they should be desirous of understanding aright, it being what concerned every one of them;
See Gill on "Mt 15:10".
Mark 7:15
Ver. 15. There is nothing from without a man,.... As any sort of food and drink, whether it be received, with, or without washing of the hands:
that entering into him can defile him; in a moral sense, or render him loathsome and unacceptable in the sight of God:
but the things which come out of him; the Arabic: version reads, "out of the mouth of man", as in Mt 15:11, for the things are, all sinful words which proceed from the imaginations and lusts of the heart; as all idle, unchaste, blasphemous, and wrathful words and expressions: and may include evil thoughts, words, and actions; which actions first in thought, take their rise from the corrupt heart of man; and in word, come out of the mouth; and in action, are performed by some one or other of the members of the body: these are
they that defile the man: his mind and conscience, the faculties of his soul, and the members of his body; and render him abominable in the sight of God, and expose him to his wrath and displeasure;
See Gill on "Mt 15:11". The sense of the whole is, that not what a man eats and drinks, and in whatsoever way he does either, though he may eat and drink with unwashen hands, or out of cups, pots, and platters, not properly washed, according to the traditions of the elders, renders him a polluted sinful man, in the sight of God; or such as one, whose company and conversation are to be, avoided by good men; but that it is sin in the heart, and what proceeds from it; as all evil thoughts, wicked words, and impure actions; which denominate a man filthy and unclean, and expose him to the abhorrence of God, and of his people: the words may be rendered, "there is nothing from without a man, can make him common"; that is, as a plebeian, a vulgar common man, a sinful wicked man, as the common people were, or at least were so esteemed by the Pharisees; nothing that he took into his body, by eating or drinking, could put him into the class of such persons: "but the things which come out of him"; out of his heart, by his lips: "those are they that make a man common"; or a vulgar wicked man. The Ethiopic version renders it, "it is not what enters from without into the mouth of man, which can defile him; but only what goes out of the heart man, this defiles the man": the Persic version adds, "and is the sin of death"; or sin unto death, a deadly, mortal sin.
Mark 7:16
Ver. 16. If any man have ears to hear, let him hear.
See Gill on "Mt ".
Mark 7:17
Ver. 17. And when he was entered into the house,.... Very probably at Capernaum, and it may be the house of Simon and Andrew, where he used to be when there:
from the people; being separated from them, having dismissed and left them, when he and his disciples were by themselves alone:
his disciples asked him concerning the parable; that saying of his to the people, which was somewhat dark and intricate to them; that nothing without a man going into him defiled him, but what comes out of him: this was asked by Peter, in the name of the rest;
See Gill on "Mt 15:15".
Mark 7:18
Ver. 18. And he saith unto them,.... With some warmth of spirit and resentment, at their stupidity:
are ye so without understanding also? As well as others, and to such a degree; and "yet", as Matthew expresses it, Mt 15:16, so wretchedly stupid, and so long, and as much, as others:
do ye not perceive? common sense will tell you,
that whatsoever thing from, without entereth into the man, it cannot defile him; See Gill on "Mt ".
Mark 7:19
Ver. 19. Because it entereth not into his heart,.... Which is the seat and fountain of all moral pollution; and if that is not defiled, no other part can be; and that that is not defiled by eating and drinking, unless in case of intemperance, is clear; because food and drink do not go into it:
but into the belly; it is taken in at the mouth, goes down the throat, and is received into the stomach, and from thence it passes through the bowels:
and goeth into the draught; aokh tyb, "the private house", as the Jews call it, without going into the heart at all:
purging all meats; that which it leaves behind, is pure and nourishing; and whatever is gross and impure, is carried with it into the draught, so that nothing remains in the man that is defiling.
Mark 7:20
Ver. 20. And he said,.... Continued to say in his discourse; though this is left but in the Syriac version;
that which cometh out of the man, that defileth the man; meaning, not his excrements, which were unclean by the law, De 23:13 but what comes out of his heart, by his mouth; or is expressed in action, as appears by what follows; See Gill on "Mt 15:18".
Mark 7:21
Ver. 21. For from within, out of the heart of man,.... The inside of man is very bad, his inward part is not only wicked, but wickedness itself, yea, very wickedness, Ps 5:9, in him dwells no good thing naturally, his heart is wicked, and desperately so; it is full of evil; and out of the abundance of it, proceed the evil things hereafter mentioned; all its powers and faculties are vitiated, there is no place clean; the understanding and judgment are dreadfully corrupted; the mind and conscience are defiled; the affections are inordinate; not only the thought, but every imagination of the thought of the heart is evil, and that continually: what good thing therefore, can come out of such a Nazareth as this? Nothing, but what follows: for from hence
proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders; which several things are related in Mt. 15:19 see the note on "Mt 15:19"; only the order here is a little different; "murders", which are here mentioned last, are there put after "evil thoughts".
Mark 7:22
Ver. 22. Thefts,.... These also are mentioned in Matthew, but Mark omits "false witnesses", and adds the following; which, excepting "blasphemy", are not taken notice of by the other evangelists;
covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lasciviousness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness; See Gill on "Mt 15:19".
Mark 7:23
Ver. 23. All these evil things come from within,.... All evil thoughts, words, and actions, take their rise from the inward parts of man; from his heart; which is sadly corrupted, and is the fountain from whence all these impure streams flow. And if these come from within, then not from without; they are not by imitation or are the mere effects of example in others: example may indeed, and often does, draw out the evil that is within; but it does not produce it there; if it was not there before, it could not draw it out from thence: and if all these evils come from within, then the inward part of man must be sinful and polluted, previous to the commission of these evil things; and from whence springs then that inward pollution? It is the fruit of original sin, of Adam's transgression; the consequence of which is, a corrupt nature, which is derived to all his posterity: for his nature being corrupted by sinning, and he having all human nature in him, the individuals of it could not be propagated by ordinary generation, without the pollution of sin cleaving to them; "who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean? not one", Job 14:4. Nor has there ever been any instance to the contrary, but the man Christ Jesus; whose human nature was holy, it not descending from Adam by ordinary generation; otherwise, all men, as David was, are "shapen in iniquity, and conceived in sin", Ps 51:5, and this is the source and spring of all sinful action, internal and external.
And defile the man; both soul and body; all the powers and faculties of the soul, and all the members of the body; or "make a man common": these show him to be one of the common people, a very sinful man; as such were reckoned, and therefore are called emphatically, "sinners": and are joined with "publicans", who were esteemed the worst of sinners: from all which it appears, that sin in thought, word, and deed, is the defiling thing, and is what ought to be carefully avoided; and not meats, and the manner of eating them, provided moderation is used.
Mark 7:24
Ver 24. And from thence he arose,.... From the , or from , which was in it:
and went into the borders of and ; two cities of : not into them, but into the borders of them; into those parts of , which bordered on ; See Gill on "Mt ".
And entered into an house; in some one of the towns, or cities, in those parts; which house might be, for the entertainment and lodging of strangers:
and would have no man know it; took all proper precaution as man, that nobody should know who, and where he was; that the, Gentiles, on whose borders he was, might not flock to him, which would create envy and disgust in the Jews:
but he could not be hid; he had wrought so many miracles in Galilee, and his fame was so much spread, and he had been seen, and was known by so many persons, that, humanly speaking, it was next to impossible, that he should be long unknown in such a place.
Mark 7:25
Ver. 25. For a certain woman,.... One way and means by which he came to be more openly discovered who he was, was this; a woman in those parts,
whose young daughter had an unclean spirit; a devil, with which she was possessed; hearing of some miracles he had wrought in healing the sick, and casting out devils;
heard of him, and came; and understanding that he was in such a place made all haste to him;
and fell at his feet; and with great respect and reverence to so venerable a person, threw herself at his feet, and earnestly entreated mercy for her child; believing he had power to cast the devil out of her, though at a distance from her.
Mark 7:26
Ver. 26. The woman was a Greek,.... Or Gentile, an Heathen woman, which made her faith the more remarkable. So the Syriac, Persic, and Ethiopic versions call her; which she might be, and was, though she was a woman of Canaan, as she is said to be in Mt 15:22, for though the land of Israel in general, was called the land of Canaan, yet there was a particular part, which was at first inhabited by Canaan himself, which bore this name; and is the same with Phoenicia, of which this woman was an inhabitant, and therefore she is afterwards called a Syrophoenician; See Gill on "Mt 15:22". And this place was now inhabited by Gentiles; hence the Jews often distinguish between an Hebrew and a Canaanitish servant; of which take an {z} instance or two;
"an Hebrew servant is obtained by money, and by writing, a Canaanitish servant is obtained by money, and by writing, and by possession.''
Again {a},
"he that does injury to an Hebrew servant, is bound to all these (i.e. to make compensation for loss, pain, healing, cessation from business, and reproach), excepting cessation from business--but he that hurts a Canaanitish servant, that belongs to others, is bound to them all.''
And by a Canaanitish servant, they understand any one that is not an Israelite; for an Hebrew and a Canaanite, are manifestly opposed to one another. This woman being of , as appears by what follows, which was sometimes called , might be said to be a woman of , and also a Gentile.
A Syrophoenician by nation; or extract. The Syriac and Persic versions say she was "of Phoenicia of Syria"; and the latter, by way of explanation, "of Emisa". The Arabic version adds, "her extraction was of Ghaur"; and the Ethiopic version says, she was "the wife of a Syrophoenician man"; See Gill on "Mt 15:22".
And she besought him, that he would cast forth the devil out of her daughter; which she was persuaded, by what she had heard of him, he was able to do, by a word speaking, though her daughter was not present.
{z} Misn. Kiddushin, c. 1. scct. 2, 3. {a} Misn. Bava Kama, c. 8. sect. 3.
Mark 7:27
Ver. 27. But Jesus said unto her,.... Not directly and immediately, upon her first request; for he answered not a word to that; but after his, disciples had desired she might be sent away, her cries being so troublesome to them; and after she had renewed her request to him; see Mt 15:23.
Let the children first be filled: according to this method, our Lord directed his apostles, and they proceeded: as he himself was sent to the lost sheep of the house of Israel, he ordered his disciples to go to them, and preach the Gospel to them, and work miracles among them; and not go in the way of the Gentiles, nor into any of the cities of the Samaritans; but when they had gone through the cities of Judea, he ordered them, after his resurrection, to go into all the world, and preach the Gospel to all nations, beginning at Jerusalem: and this order they observed in other places, where there were Jews; they first preached to them, and then to the Gentiles; knowing that it was necessary, that the word of God should be first spoken to them; and it was the power of God to the Jew first, and then to the Gentile: and the expression here used, though it gives the preference to the Jew, does not exclude the Gentile; nay, it supposes, that after the Jews had had the doctrines of Christ, confirmed by his miracles, sufficiently ministered unto them, for the gathering in the chosen ones among them, and to leave the rest inexcusable; and so long as until they should despise it, and put it away from them, judging themselves unworthy of it; that then the Gentiles should have plenty of Gospel provisions set before them, and should eat of them, and be filled; and should have a large number of miracles wrought among them, and a fulness of the blessings of grace bestowed on them. The Jews are meant, who were the children of God by national adoption; who were first to be filled with the doctrines and miracles of Christ, before the Gentiles were to have them among them; as they were, even to a loathing and contempt of them:
for it is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it unto the dogs: as by "the children" are meant the Israelites, who were not only the children of Abraham by natural descent, but the children of God, to whom pertained the adoption, by virtue of the national covenant made with them; so by "the dogs", are meant the Gentiles, who were reckoned as such by the Jews; and by the "bread", which it was not fit and proper should be taken from the one for the present, and cast to the other, is designed the ministry of the Gospel; which is as bread, solid, substantial, wholesome, and nourishing; and the miraculous cures wrought on the bodies of men, which accompanied it: now it was not meet and convenient as yet, that these things should be taken away from the Jewish nation, until they had answered the ends for which they were designed, and the Jews should express their loathing and abhorrence of them: which when they did, they were taken away from them, and were ministered to the nations of the world, they contemptuously called dogs;
See Gill on "Mt 15:26".
Mark 7:28
Ver. 28. And she answered and said unto him, yes, Lord,.... Agreeing to, and acquiescing in, what he said; which she seemed to have understood, though delivered in a proverbial way; and very appropriately replies,
yet the dogs under the table eat of the children's crumbs; which they leave, or let fall: signifying that she did not envy the blessings of the Jews, or desire any thing might be done injurious to them; only that this favour might be granted her, which she owned she was unworthy of, that her daughter might be healed. She tacitly owns, that the character of dogs belonged to the Gentiles, and to her and hers among the rest; that they were vile and base in themselves, inferior to the Jews, as to privileges, like dogs under the table; that the provisions with which the table of the Gospel ministry was furnished, was not for them; at least, that they were quite undeserving of them: but however, whereas dogs were allowed to eat crumbs, which now and then fell from the table, or out of the children's hands and laps; so such unworthy Gentiles as she, might be allowed a small benefit or favour by the bye, when it did not take from, and was no disadvantage to the Jews;
See Gill on "Mt 15:27".
Mark 7:29
Ver. 29. And he said unto her, for this saying,.... Or word of faith; in which she expressed such great faith in him: the Persic version reads it, "go thy way; for with the blessing of this word, the devil is gone out of thy daughter": as if this saying referred to the word Christ, and the divine power that went along with it, to the ejection of the devil; when it refers to the saying of the woman, and not to the words of Christ, which follow,
go thy way; in peace, thy request is granted; it is as thou wouldst have it:
the devil is gone out of thy daughter. Christ, who as God is every where, and whose divine power reaches to all places, persons, and things had, in a secret and powerful manner, cast the devil out of this woman's daughter; without going to her, or speaking to him, his power had wrought the miracle effectually.
Mark 7:30
Ver. 30. And when she was come to her house,.... For with those words of Christ; she was abundantly satisfied, and went away with as great a faith, and as strong a persuasion of the dispossession, as that she came with, that Christ was able to effect it: and accordingly
she found the devil gone out; of her daughter; that she was entirely dispossessed of him, and no more vexed and tormented with him, but in perfect ease, and at rest:
and her daughter laid upon the bed; without any violent motions, convulsions, and tossings to and fro, as before; but composed and still, taking some rest, having been for some time greatly fatigued with the possession. The Ethiopic version reads, "she found her daughter clothed, and sat upon the bed": for persons in these possessions, would often put off their clothes, and tear them in pieces; and were seldom composed, and rarely sat long in a place or posture; but now it was otherwise with her.
Mark 7:31
Ver. 31. And again, departing from the coasts of Tyre and Sidon,.... The Vulgate Latin version reads, "and coming out again from the borders of Tyre, he came through Sidon"; and so two of Beza's copies; the Arabic version, which De Dieu made use of reads "to Sidon"; as he must needs come to it, if he came through it; though the version in the Polyglot Bible of Walton's reads, Nym, "from Sidon": but the greater number of copies, and the Syriac and Persic versions read as we do, and which is rightest; since it does not appear, that Christ went out of the land of Israel, into any Heathen cities: and besides, Sidon was further from Galilee than Tyre, and so did not lie in his way to it; and therefore it is not likely he should pass through that city, in order to go to it. The Ethiopic version reads, "and coming out again from Tyre, he went through Sidon": both these places were in Phoenicia, and it is probable that the woman before mentioned might belong to one or other of them. According to this version, she may be thought to be of Tyre, and that it was there, where the above discourse passed between Christ and her; though some Dutch pictures, Dr. Lightfoot {b} takes notice of, represent her as praying for her daughter, at the gate of Sidon; and Borchard the monk, as he relates from him, says, that before the gate of Sidon eastward, there is a chapel built in the place, where the. Canaanitish woman prayed to our Saviour for her daughter. But Christ, for the reason before given, could be in neither of these places, being out of the land of Israel; besides, the text is express, that it was to the borders of this country he came, and from thence he went; and to, or from, or through any of these places.
He came unto the sea of Galilee; or Tiberias, the same with the lake of Gennesaret: he came to those parts of Galilee, which lay by it, where he had been, before he went the borders of Tyre and Sidon:
through the midst the coasts of Decapolis; of this place,
See Gill on "Mt 4:25". It was a country which consisted of ten cities, from whence it had its name: now not through the middle of these cities, or of this country, as the Ethiopic version reads; but through the midst of the borders of it Christ passed, which lay in his way from the coasts of Tyre and Sidon, to the sea of Galilee. The Syriac and Persic versions render the words, "unto the borders of Decapolis, or the ten cities"; and the Arabic version, "unto the middle of the coasts of the ten cities"; See Gill on "Mt 15:29".
{b} Chorograph. Decad. in Mark, ch. vi. sect. 1.
Mark 7:32
Ver. 32. And they bring unto him one that was deaf,.... There were two sorts of persons that were called deaf among the Jews; one that could neither hear nor speak; such were they who were born deaf; and so having never heard any thing, it was impossible they should ever speak: the other sort were they that could speak, but not hear; who lost their hearing by some disaster or another, but retained their speech {c}: of this sort seems to be this man, who though he had some difficulty in speaking, yet could speak a little,
and had an impediment in his speech; or could "scarcely speak", as the word signifies; though it is sometimes used by the Septuagint, for one that was entirely dumb, as in Isa 35:6 and so it is here rendered "dumb", by the Vulgate Latin, and other versions; yet it seems to design one that stammered, and could not speak plainly, and without great difficulty: he was tongue tied, as it should seem from Mr 7:35. This man, the inhabitants of the parts where Christ now was, his relations or friends, bring to him, having heard of his fame, and perhaps they had seen miracles performed by him:
and they beseech him to put his hand upon him; firmly believing, that upon his so doing, the man's hearing would come to him, and he would speak without difficulty: very likely they had seen cures performed by Christ in this way, or at least heard, that by laying his hands on persons disordered, they had been restored to the right use of their senses, or limbs; wherefore they most earnestly entreated, he would be pleased to do the same favour to this poor man. The case of this man much resembles that of a sinner in a state of nature, who is deaf to the voice, both of law and Gospel: he does not hearken to the commanding voice of the law, or attend to its precepts, nor can he be subject to it; nor does he hear its menaces and curses, nor is he at all affected and disturbed with these things; and, like the deaf adder, he stops his ear to the charming voice of the Gospel; he despises it, and has it in the utmost abhorrence: he is deaf to all the instructions, directions, cautions, and exhortations, of the ministers of the word; and even of his best friends, relations, and acquaintance nor can he speak the language of Canaan; it is a strange language to him; he can neither talk it himself, nor understand it in others; for as he has no experience of the grace of God in him, he must be dumb, and cannot speak of what he has no knowledge: and indeed, it may be observed of such who are under the first workings of the spirit of God upon the soul, that they are often as it were tongue tied, and through fear or bashfulness, or the temptations of Satan, care not to speak; or with great difficulty are brought to speak of what God has done for them; and at first, it is but in a lisping, stammering way, they do speak of these things and as the friends and relations of this man, having a great opinion of Christ, and a persuasion of his ability to relieve and cure him, bring him unto him, that he might put his hands upon him; so do such who know Christ themselves, and have felt the power of his grace upon their own souls, bring their deaf and dumb, their relations in a state of nature, under the means of grace; being very desirous that Christ would make bare, and put forth his mighty arm of grace, and lay hold upon them, and work a good work in them, and give them ears to hear his voice, and a tongue to speak his praise.
{c} Mish. Trumot, c. 1. sect. 2. & Maimon. & Bartenora in ib.
Mark 7:33
Ver. 33. And he took him aside from the multitude,.... To shun all appearance of ostentation and vain glory:
and put his fingers into his ears; the finger of his right hand into his left ear, and the finger of his left hand into his right ear:
and he spit and touched his tongue; that is, either he spit upon his tongue, for so the Vulgate Latin renders it, "spitting he touched his tongue"; and the Persic version thus, "he cast his spittle on his tongue"; or rather, he spit on his finger, and touched his tongue with it. These actions were not done as means of healing, or as having any natural virtue, or tendency in them, to effect a cure; but to show the power of Christ, that by the mere touch of his finger, and by the spittle of his mouth, as well as by laying on of hands, as was desired, and by a word speaking, he could at once remove this, or any such disorder. The taking this man aside from the multitude, is an emblem of the Lord's separating his people from the rest of the world, when he calls them by his grace; for as they are distinguished from others, in the choice of them in Christ, and in redemption by him; so in the effectual calling, they are bid to come out from among them, and by the power of divine grace, they are brought out from among them, and give up themselves to Christ, and to his churches: and Christ's putting his fingers into the ears of this man, represents the exertion of his power, and his removing by the finger of his Spirit, the obstructions of spiritual hearing; or rather, the planting of the spiritual ear, or forming a principle ot spiritual nearing in the soul: and his touching his tongue with the spittle of his mouth, may lead us to observe the application of his word, through the efficacy of his grace, as a means of loosing his tongue and opening his lips to show forth his praise.
Mark 7:34
Ver. 34. And looking up to heaven,.... To his Father there, by whom he was sent, and from whom, as man, he received his authority and power; though this was not for assistance in the working of this miracle, which he had power to do of himself; nor do we find that he put up any request to his Father: but he seems to have made use of this motion, not for his own sake, but for the sake of the man: to teach him, that every good gift, blessing, mercy, and favour, and so this he was about to partake of, was from above:
he sighed; not as unequal to the work of healing the man, or as despairing of doing it; but as commiserating the case of the poor man, and reflecting with concern upon his sin, that had been the occasion of it. These actions of looking up to heaven and sighing, as they may be understood in a spiritual sense, or with relation to the spiritual healing of a sinner, may show that such a blessing comes from above: it is received from heaven; it is God that gives the hearing ear, as well as the seeing eye; and that in a spiritual, as well as in a natural sense: and therefore this directs to apply to God for it, whether for a man's self, or for others; and when enjoyed, to look up again to heaven, and return thanks for it: and also that such a favour flows from divine mercy and compassion, Christ pitying the case of persons in such a condition; and he being an high priest that can have compassion on those that are in distress, and having ability to help them, makes use of it, and expresses both his pity and his power, as in the following manner.
And saith unto him; in the Syriac language, which he then spoke,
xtpta,
Ethphatha, or "Ephphatha";
that is, being interpreted,
be opened, both ears and mouth. And this way of speaking is used by the Jews, of a deaf man being restored to hearing, as of a blind man's being restored to sight; of which, take the following instance {d};
"a minor that receives (i.e. a divorce), and afterwards becomes adult, or a deaf man, xqptnw, "and is opened" (i.e. his ears are opened, or his hearing is restored), or a blind man, xtptnw, "and is opened" (has his sight again), or a fool, and he is restored to his reason, or a Gentile, and he becomes a proselyte, is unfit or unlawful (to carry a divorce from a man to his wife), but xqp, "one that is open", and afterwards becomes deaf, and then again "opened"; xwtp, or "open", and afterwards become blind, and again "opened"; or a fool, and is restored to his senses, and again becomes a fool, he is right or fit''
(for the above purpose). It is common with them to call one that hears well, in distinction from a deaf man, "one that is open" {e}. This is an instance of the power of Christ in curing disorders, merely by a word speaking, without the use of means; for what he did before, were not as means of healing, but significative of his power; which now went along with his word, and which was expressed with great majesty and authority: and such a power attends the word of his grace, to the opening of the heart, to give heed to the things which are spoken; and to the opening of the ear to discipline, and sealing instruction to it; land to the opening of the mouth and lips, in praise and thankfulness.
{d} Gittin, c. 2. sect. 6. {e} Vid. Misn. Yebamot, c. 14. scct. 10. & T. Bab. Yebamot, fol. 114. 2.
Mark 7:35
Ver. 35. And straightway his ears were opened,.... It is in the Greek text, "his hearings"; the instruments of his hearing, and so rightly rendered, "his ears": the Persic version reads, "both his ears"; but the word "both" is unnecessary, since the word, "ears", takes in both. Such a power went along with the words of Christ, when he said, "be opened"; that immediately, as soon as ever the words were pronounced, the man's hearing came to him, and he heard as quick as ever he did before he lost it, or, as any other man:
and the string of his tongue; which caused it to cleave to his jaws, or the roof of his mouth, and hindered him from speaking plainly,
was loosed, and he spake plain; tyaqyvp, "easily", as the Syriac version renders it; without any difficulty to himself, and so as to be readily understood by others. Thus those whose ears are opened, and whose tongues are loosed in a spiritual manner by Christ, speak plainly of what they have heard and seen, and felt; they can give a plain and clear account of the work of God upon their souls; how they have been convinced of the impurity of their nature, the corruptions of their hearts, and the exceeding sinfulness of sin, in heart, lip, and life; how they have seen Christ to be an all sufficient and suitable Saviour, and have been directed, and encouraged, to go to him, for healing, pardon, righteousness, and everlasting salvation; they can tell what promises have been applied to them, and what comforts they have enjoyed; how busy Satan has been with them; and what temptations of his they have been delivered out of, and by what means: in a word, they can speak plainly of the love of God to them; of the glories and excellencies of Christ; of their faith and hope in him, and love to him; and of the operations of the Spirit of God upon their hearts; and of the glories of the world to come, they are in the expectation of, so far as they are taught of God.
Mark 7:36
Ver. 36. And he charged them,.... The man that had his hearing and speech restored to him, and those that brought him, and as many as were witnesses of the miracle:
that they should tell no man; of the cure that was wrought, being not desirous of the applause of men; and knowing it would bring upon him the envy of the Scribes and Pharisees; and be a means of putting the common people upon setting him up as a temporal king, such as they expected the Messiah would be:
but the more he charged them, so much the more a great deal they published [it]; or "spake of him", as the Ethiopic version reads it; for they looked upon his charge merely to proceed from modesty, and that made them the more forward to speak of his greatness and in his praise, to publish his mighty works, and spread the fame of his miracles far and near. So, such who have received the grace of God, are become acquainted with Christ, and have a real experience of divine things, cannot but speak of them; they are like new wine which hath no vent; and are ready to burst like new bottles; to forbear speaking is a pain, and weariness to them; nay, they think, should they hold their peace, the stones in the walls would cry out. Wherefore, partly for the glory of God, the magnifying of the riches of his grace, and the honour of Christ, and the blessed Spirit; and partly to show their own sense of things, the gratitude of their minds, and the thankfulness of their hearts, as well as for the use, comfort, edification, and instruction of others, they must speak, and cannot be silent, whatever restraints are laid upon them.
Mark 7:37
Ver. 37. And were beyond measure astonished,.... The man that was cured, the men that brought him, and the whole multitude were exceedingly, beyond all expression, amazed at what was done, in this case, and many others; for there were other miracles also wrought at this time; see Mt 15:30. The grace of God, in opening the ears and heart of a sinner, and causing the tongue of the dumb to sing his praise, is very astonishing, to men and angels; to the persons themselves that partake of it; and to all the saints that hear of it; it is amazing that such grace should be bestowed at all; and it is more, that it should be communicated to such unworthy persons it is; as also that it should produce such effects it does; that it should make such a surprising change, and be attended with such blessed consequences:
saying, he hath done all things well; not by Beelzebub, the prince of devils, as said the Scribes and Pharisees; nor in any ostentatious manner, for the sake of the honour and applause of men, as they plainly saw; but for the good of mankind, and for the glory of God: and as all the miraculous works, which Christ did, were well done by him, so all other works of his: all that he did in eternity before the world was, he did well; what he did in the council and covenant of grace, in espousing the persons and cause of his people, and in all his federal transactions and suretyship engagements for them: he drew nigh to God on their account; he cheerfully agreed to what his Father proposed; he entered into a covenant with him, and took the care and charge of all his people, and of all promises and blessings of grace for them: and whatsoever he has done in time is well done; as his assumption of human nature; taking a nature, and not a person, this of a virgin, and an holy nature, though subject to sinless infirmities, and this in due and proper time; also his subjection to the law, moral, civil, and ceremonial, as it became him to fulfil all righteousness; and his preaching the Gospel, which he did with authority, and which he spake as never man did, and which he confirmed by his miracles; but especially the great work of redemption he came about, was well done by him: this he has thoroughly done; he has redeemed his people from the law, its curse, and condemnation; he has ransomed them out of the hands of Satan; he has saved them from all their sins; he has procured the remission of them, made reconciliation for them, and brought in an everlasting righteousness: he has done this work to the satisfaction of all parties; to the glory of all the divine perfections, of justice, as well as of grace and mercy; to the contentment and pleasure of all the divine persons; his Father, himself, and the blessed Spirit: and to the joy of angels and men: and all that he has done, or is now doing in heaven, as an advocate and intercessor, is done well; and we may be assured, that all that he will do hereafter, as the judge of quick and dead, will be done in like manner.
He maketh both the deaf to hear, and the dumb, or those that could not speak, at least without a great deal of difficulty,
to speak; an instance of both which there was in this single man's case.
John Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible.
One great design of Christ's coming was, to set aside
the ceremonial law; and to make way for this, he rejects the
ceremonies men added to the law of God's making. Those clean
hands and that pure heart which Christ bestows on his disciples,
and requires of them, are very different from the outward and
superstitious forms of Pharisees of every age. Jesus reproves them
for rejecting the commandment of God. It is clear that it is the duty
of children, if their parents are poor, to relieve them as far as they
are able; and if children deserve to die that curse their parents,
much more those that starve them. But if a man conformed to the
traditions of the Pharisees, they found a device to free him from the
claim of this duty.
One great design of Christ's coming was, to set aside
the ceremonial law; and to make way for this, he rejects the
ceremonies men added to the law of God's making. Those clean
hands and that pure heart which Christ bestows on his disciples,
and requires of them, are very different from the outward and
superstitious forms of Pharisees of every age.
It is clear that it is the duty
of children, if their parents are poor, to relieve them as far as they
are able; and if children deserve to die that curse their parents,
much more those that starve them. But if a man conformed to the
traditions of the Pharisees, they found a device to free him from the
claim of this duty.
Sources: Matthew Henry; Gill's Exposition; Matthew Henry Concise
Commentary
Commentary