And as Jesus passed by, he saw a man which was blind from his birth.
Commentary
Commentary
After Christ's departure out of the temple, in the close of the
foregoing chapter, and before this happened which is recorded in this
chapter, he had been for some time abroad in the country, it is
supposed about two or three months; in which interval of time Dr.
Lightfoot and other harmonists place all the passages that occur from Luke x. 17 to xiii. 17 .
What is recorded in ch. vii. and viii. was at the feast of tabernacles, in September; what is recorded in this
and the following chapter was at the feast of dedication in December, ch. x. 22 .
Mr. Clark and others place this immediately after the foregoing
chapter. In this chapter we have,
I. The miraculous cure of a man that was born blind, ver. 1-7 .
II. The discourses which were occasioned by it.
1. A discourse of the neighbours among themselves, and with the man, ver. 8-12 .
2. Between the Pharisees and the man, ver. 13-34 .
3. Between Christ and the poor man, ver. 35-38 .
4. Between Christ and the Pharisees, ver. 39 to the end .
1 And as Jesus passed by, he saw a man which was blind from his birth.
2 And his disciples asked him, saying, Master, who did sin,
this man, or his parents, that he was born blind?
3 Jesus answered, Neither hath this man sinned, nor his
parents: but that the works of God should be made manifest in
him.
4 I must work the works of him that sent me, while it is day:
the night cometh, when no man can work.
5 As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world.
6 When he had thus spoken, he spat on the ground, and made clay
of the spittle, and he anointed the eyes of the blind man with
the clay,
7 And said unto him, Go, wash in the pool of Siloam, (which is
by interpretation, Sent.) He went his way therefore, and washed,
and came seeing.
We have here sight given to a poor beggar that had been blind from his
birth. Observe,
I. The notice which our Lord Jesus took of the piteous case of this
poor blind man
( v. 1 ): As Jesus passed by he saw a man which was blind from his birth. The first words seem to refer to the last of the foregoing chapter, and
countenance the opinion of those who in the harmony place this story
immediately after that. There it was said, paregen -- he
passed by, and here, without so much as repeating him name (though
our translators supply it) kai parago -- and as he
passed by. 1. Though the Jews had so basely abused him, both by
word and deed gave him the highest provocation imaginable, yet he did
not miss any opportunity of doing good among them, nor take up a
resolution, as justly he might have done, never to have favoured them
with any good offices. The cure of this blind man was a kindness to the public, enabling him to work for his living who before was a
charge and burden to the neighbourhood. It is noble, and generous, and
Christ-like, to be willing to serve the public, even when we are
slighted and disobliged by them, or think ourselves so. Though he was
in his flight from a threatening danger, and escaping for his life, yet
he willingly halted and staid awhile to show mercy to this poor man. We
make more haste than good speed when we out-run opportunities of doing
good.
3. When the Pharisees drove Christ from them, he went to this poor
blind beggar. Some of the ancients make this a figure of the bringing
of the gospel to the Gentiles, who sat in darkness, when the
Jews had rejected it, and driven it from them.
4. Christ took this poor blind man in his way, and cured him in
transitu--as he passed by. Thus should we take occasions of doing
good, even as we pass by, wherever we are.
Now,
(1.) The condition of this poor man was very sad. He was blind, and had been so from his birth. If the light is sweet, how
melancholy must it needs be for a man, all his days, to eat in
darkness! He that is blind has no enjoyment of the
light, but he that is born blind has no idea of it.
Methinks such a one would give a great deal to have his curiosity
satisfied with but one day's sight of light and colours, shapes and
figures, though he were never to see them more. Why is the light of life given to one that is in this misery, that
is deprived of the light of the sun, whose way is thus hid,
and whom God hath thus hedged in? Job iii. 20-23 .
Let us bless God that it was not our case. The eye is one of the most
curious parts of the body, its structure exceedingly nice and fine. In
the formation of animals, it is said to be the first part that appears
distinctly discernible. What a mercy is it that there was no
miscarriage in the making of ours! Christ cured many that were blind by
disease or accident, but here he cured one that was born blind. [1.] That he might give an instance of his power to help in the most
desperate cases, and to relieve when none else can.
[2.] That he might give a specimen of the work of his grace upon
the souls of sinners, which gives sight to those that were by nature
blind.
(2.) The compassions of our Lord Jesus towards him were very tender. He saw him; that is, he took cognizance of his case, and looked
upon him with concern. When God is about to work deliverance, he is
said to see the affliction; so Christ saw this poor man. Others
saw him, but not as he did. This poor man could not see Christ, but
Christ saw him, and anticipated both his prayers and expectations with
a surprising cure. Christ is often found of those that seek him not,
nor see him, Isa. lxv. 1 .
And, if we know or apprehend any thing of Christ, it is because we were
first known of him ( Gal. iv. 9 )
and apprehended by him, Phil. iii. 12 .
II. The discourse between Christ and his disciples concerning this man.
When he departed out of the temple they went along with him: for
these were they that continued with him in his temptations, and
followed him whithersoever he went; and they lost nothing by their
adherence to him, but gained experience abundantly. Observe,
1. The question which the disciples put to their Master upon this blind
man's case, v. 2 .
When Christ looked upon him, they had an eye to him too; Christ's
compassion should kindle ours. It is probable that Christ told them
this poor man was born blind, or they knew it by common fame; but they
did not move Christ to heal him. Instead of this, they started a very
odd question concerning him: Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his
parents, that he was born blind? Now this question of theirs
was,
(1.) Uncharitably censorious. They take it for granted that this
extraordinary calamity was the punishment of some uncommon wickedness,
and that this man was a sinner above all men that dwelt at Jerusalem, Luke xiii. 4 .
For the barbarous people to infer, Surely this man is a
murderer, was not so strange; but it was inexcusable in
them, who knew the scriptures, who had read that all things come
alike to all, and knew that it was adjudged in Job's case that the
greatest sufferers are not therefore to be looked upon as the
greatest sinners. The grace of repentance calls our own afflictions punishments, but the grace of charity calls the afflictions of
others trials, unless the contrary is very evident.
(2.) It was unnecessarily curious. Concluding this calamity to
be inflicted for some very heinous crime, they ask, Who were the
criminals, this man or his parents? And what was this to them? Or
what good would it do them to know it? We are apt to be more
inquisitive concerning other people's sins than concerning our own;
whereas, it is more our concern to know wherefore God contends with us
than wherefore he contends with others; for to judge ourselves is our
sin. They enquire,
[1.] Whether this man was punished thus for some sin of his own, either
committed or foreseen before his birth. Some think that the disciples
were tainted with the Pythagorean notion of the pre-existence of
souls, and their transmigration from one body to another. Was
this man's soul condemned to the dungeon of this blind body to punish
it for some great sin committed in another body which it had before
animated? The Pharisees seem to have had the same opinion of his case
when they said, Thou wast altogether born in sin ( v. 34 ),
as if all those, and those only, were born in sin whom nature had stigmatized. Or,
[2.] Whether he was punished for the wickedness of his parents, which
God sometimes visits upon the children. It is a good reason why
parents should take heed of sin, lest their children smart for it when
they are gone. Let not us thus be cruel to our own, as the ostrich
in the wilderness. Perhaps the disciples asked this, not as
believing that this was the punishment of some actual sin of his own or
his parents, but Christ having intimated to another patient that his
sin was the cause of this impotency
( ch. v. 14 ),
"Master," say they, "whose sin is the cause of this impotency?" Being
at a loss what construction to put upon this providence, they desire to
be informed. The equity of God's dispensations is always certain, for his righteousness is as the great mountains, but not always to
be accounted for, for his judgments are a great deep.
2. Christ's answer to this question. He was always apt to teach, and to rectify his disciples' mistakes.
(1.) He gives the reason of this poor man's blindness: " Neither has
this man sinned nor his parents, but he was born blind, and has
continued so to this day, that now at last the works of God should
be made manifest in him, " v. 3 .
Here Christ, who perfectly knew the secret springs of the divine
counsels, told them two things concerning such uncommon calamities:--
[1.] That they are not always inflicted as punishments of sin. The
sinfulness of the whole race of mankind does indeed justify God in all
the miseries of human life; so that those who have the least share of
them must say that God is kind, and those who have the largest
share must not say that he is unjust; but many are made much
more miserable than others in this life who are not at all more sinful. Not but that this man was a sinner, and his parents
sinners, but is was not any uncommon guilt that God had an eye to in
inflicting this upon him. Note, We must take heed of judging any to be
great sinners merely because they are great sufferers, lest we be
found, not only persecuting those whom God has smitten ( Ps. lxix. 26 ),
but accusing those whom he has justified, and condemning those
for whom Christ died, which is daring and dangerous, Rom. viii. 33, 34 .
[2.] That they are sometimes intended purely for the glory of
God, and the manifesting of his works. God has a sovereignty
over all his creatures and an exclusive right in them, and may make
them serviceable to his glory in such a way as he thinks fit, in doing
or suffering; and if God be glorified, either by us or in us, we were
not made in vain. This man was born blind, and it was
worth while for him to be so, and to continue thus long dark, that
the works of God might be manifest in him. That is, First, That the attributes of God might be made manifest in him: his
justice in making sinful man liable to such grievous calamities; his
ordinary power and goodness in supporting a poor man under such a
grievous and tedious affliction, especially that his extraordinary
power and goodness might be manifested in curing him. Note, The
difficulties of providence, otherwise unaccountable, may be resolved
into this--God intends in them to show himself, to declare his
glory, to make himself to be taken notice of. Those who regard him not
in the ordinary course of things are sometimes alarmed by things
extraordinary. How contentedly then may a good man be a loser in his
comforts, while he is sure that thereby God will be one way or
other a gainer in his glory! Secondly, That the counsels of God
concerning the Redeemer might be manifested in him. He was born
blind that our Lord Jesus might have the honour of curing
him, and might therein prove himself sent of God to be the true
light to the world. Thus the fall of man was permitted, and the blindness that followed it, that the works of God might be
manifest in opening the eyes of the blind. It was now a great
while since this man was born blind, and yet it never appeared till now why he was so. Note, The intentions of Providence commonly do
not appear till a great while after the event, perhaps many
years after. The sentences in the book of providence are sometimes long, and you must read a great way before you can apprehend the
sense of them.
(2.) He gives the reason of his own forwardness and readiness to help
and heal him, v. 4, 5 .
It was not for ostentation, but in pursuance of his undertaking: I
must work the works of him that sent me (of which this is one), while it is day, and working time; the night cometh, the
period of that day, when no man can work. This is not only a
reason shy Christ was constant in doing good to the souls and bodies of
men, but why particularly he did this, though it was the sabbath day,
on which works of necessity might be done, and he proves this to be a
work of necessity.
III. The manner of the cure of the blind man, v. 6, 7 .
The circumstances of the miracle are singular, and no doubt
significant. When he had thus spoken for the instruction of his
disciples, and the opening of their understandings, he addressed
himself to the opening of the blind man's eyes. He did not defer it
till he could do it either more privately, for his greater safety, or
more publicly, for his greater honour, or till the sabbath was past,
when it would give less offence. What good we have opportunity of doing
we should do quickly; he that will never do a good work till there is
nothing to be objected against it will leave many a good work for ever
undone, Eccl. xi. 4 .
In the cure observe,
1. The preparation of the eye-salve. Christ spat on the ground, and
made clay of the spittle. He could have cured him with a word, as
he did others, but he chose to do it in this way to show that he is not tied to any method. He made clay of his own spittle, because
there was no water near; and he would teach us not to be nice or
curious, but, when we have at any time occasion, to be willing to take
up with that which is next hand, if it will but serve the turn.
Why should we go about for that which may as well be had and
done a nearer way? Christ's making use of his own spittle
intimates that there is healing virtue in every thing that belongs to
Christ; clay made of Christ's spittle was much more precious than the
balm of Gilead.
2. The application of it to the place: He anointed the eyes of the
blind man with the clay. Or, as the margin reads it, He
spread ( epechrise ), he daubed the clay upon the
eyes of the blind man, like a tender physician; he did it himself
with his own hand, though the patient was a beggar. Now Christ did
this,
(1.) To magnify his power in making a blind man to see by that method
which one would think more likely to make a seeing man blind. Daubing
clay on the eyes would close them up, but never open
them. Note, The power of God often works by contraries; and he
makes men feel their own blindness before he gives them sight.
(2.) To give an intimation that it was his mighty hand, the very same
that at first made man out of the clay; for by him God made
the worlds, both the great world, and man the little world. Man was formed out of the clay, and moulded like the clay, and here
Christ used the same materials to give sight to the body that at first
he used to give being to it.
(3.) To represent and typify the healing and opening of the eyes of the
mind by the grace of Jesus Christ. The design of the gospel is to open men's eyes, Acts xxvi. 18 .
Now the eye-salve that does the work is of Christ's preparing; it is
made up, not as this, of his spittle, but of his blood, the blood and
water that came out of his pierced side; we must come to Christ for the eye-salve, Rev. iii. 18 .
He only is able, and he only is appointed, to make it up, Luke iv. 18 .
The means used in this work are very weak and unlikely, and are made
effectual only by the power of Christ; when a dark world was to be
enlightened, and nations of blind souls were to have their eyes opened,
God chose the foolish things, and weak, and despised, for the
doing of it. And the method Christ takes is first to make men feel
themselves blind, as this poor man did whose eyes were daubed with
clay, and then to give them sight. Paul in his conversion was struck
blind for three days, and then the scales fell from his
eyes. The way prescribed for getting spiritual wisdom is, Let a
man become a fool, that he may be wise, 1 Cor. iii. 18 .
We must be made uneasy with our blindness, as this man here, and then
healed.
3. The directions given to the patient, v. 7 .
His physician said to him, Go, wash in the pool of Siloam. Not
that this washing was needful to effect the cure; but,
(1.) Christ would hereby try his obedience, and whether he would with
an implicit faith obey the orders of one he was so much a stranger to.
(2.) He would likewise try how he stood affected to the tradition of
the elders, which taught, and perhaps had taught him (for many that are blind are very knowing), that it was not lawful to wash the
eyes, no not with spittle medicinally, on the sabbath day, much less to
go to a pool of water to wash them.
(3.) He would hereby represent the method of spiritual healing, in
which, though the effect is owing purely to his power and grace, there
is duty to be done by us. Go, search the scriptures, attend upon the
ministry, converse with the wise; this is like washing in the pool of
Siloam. Promised graces must be expected in the way of instituted
ordinances. The waters of baptism were to those who had been trained up
in darkness like the pool of Siloam, in which they might not only wash
and be clean, but wash, and have their eyes opened. Hence they
that were baptized are said to be photisthentes -- enlightened; and the ancients
called baptism photismos -- illumination. Concerning
the pool of Siloam observe,
[1.] That it was supplied with water from mount Zion, so that these
were the waters of the sanctuary ( Ps. xlvi. 4 ),
living waters, which were healing, Ezek. xlvii. 9 .
[2.] That the waters of Siloam had of old signified the throne and
kingdom of the house of David, pointing at the Messiah
( Isa. viii. 6 ),
and the Jews who refused the waters of Shiloa, Christ's doctrine
and law, and rejoiced in the tradition of the elders. Christ would try
this man, whether he would cleave to the waters of Siloam or no.
[3.] The evangelist takes notice of the signification of the name, its
being interpreted sent. Christ is often called the sent of
God, the Messenger of the covenant
( Mal. iii. 1 );
so that when Christ sent him to the pool of Siloam he did in effect
send him to himself; for Christ is all in all to the healing of
souls. Christ as a prophet directs us to himself as a priest. Go,
wash in the fountain opened, a fountain of life, not a pool.
4. The patient's obedience to these directions: He went his way
therefore, probably led by some friend or other; or perhaps he was
so well acquainted with Jerusalem that he could find the way himself.
Nature often supplies the want of sight with an uncommon sagacity; and he washed his eyes; probably the disciples, or some stander by,
informed him that he who bade him do it was that Jesus whom he had
heard so much of, else he would not have gone, at his bidding, on that
which looked so much like a fool's errand; in confidence of Christ's
power, as well as in obedience to his command, he went, and washed.
5. The cure effected: He came seeing. There is more glory in
this concise narrative, He went and washed, and came
seeing, than in Cæsar's Veni, vidi, vici--I came, I saw, I
conquered. When the clay was washed off from his eyes, all
the other impediments were removed with it; so when the pangs and
struggles of the new birth are over, and the pains and terrors of
conviction past, the bands of sin fly off with them, and a glorious
light and liberty succeed. See here an instance,
(1.) Of the power of Christ. What cannot he do who could not
only do this, but do it thus? With a lump of clay laid on
either eye, and washed off again, he couched those cataracts
immediately which the most skilful oculist, with the finest instrument
and the most curious hand, could not remove. No doubt this is he
that should come, for by him the blind receive their sight.
(2.) It is an instance of the virtue of faith and obedience. This man
let Christ do what he pleased, and did what he appointed him to
do, and so was cured. Those that would be healed by Christ must be
ruled by him. He came back from the pool to his neighbours and
acquaintance, wondering and wondered at; he came seeing. This
represents the benefit gracious souls find in attending on instituted
ordinances, according to Christ's appointment; they have gone to the
pool of Siloam weak, and have come away strengthened; have gone
doubting, and come away satisfied; have gone mourning, and come away
rejoicing; have gone trembling, and come away triumphing; have gone blind, and come away seeing, come away singing, Isa. lii. 8 .
8 The neighbours therefore, and they which before had seen him
that he was blind, said, Is not this he that sat and begged?
9 Some said, This is he: others said, He is like him: but he said, I am he. 10 Therefore said they unto him, How were thine eyes opened?
11 He answered and said, A man that is called Jesus made clay,
and anointed mine eyes, and said unto me, Go to the pool of
Siloam, and wash: and I went and washed, and I received sight.
12 Then said they unto him, Where is he? He said, I know not.
Such a wonderful event as the giving of sight to a man born blind could
not but be the talk of the town, and many heeded it no more than they
do other town-talk, that is but nine days' wonder; but here we are told
what the neighbours said of it, for the confirmation of the matter of
fact. That which at first was not believed without scrutiny may
afterwards be admitted without scruple. Two things are debated
in this conference about it:--
I. Whether this was the same man that had before been blind, v. 8 .
1. The neighbours that lived near the place where he was born and bred,
and knew that he had been blind, could not but be amazed when they saw
that he had his eye-sight, had it on a sudden, and perfectly; and they
said, Is not this he that sat and begged? It seems, this blind
man was a common beggar, being disabled to work for his living; and so
discharged from the obligation of the law, that if any would not
work, neither should he eat. When he could not go about, he sat; if we cannot work for God, we must sit still quietly for him. When he could not labour, his parents not being able
to maintain him, he begged. Note, Those who cannot otherwise
subsist must not, like the unjust steward, be ashamed to beg; let no man be ashamed of anything but sin. There are some common
beggars that are objects of charity, that should be distinguished; and
we must not let the bees starve for the sake of the drones or wasps
that are among them. As to this man,
(1.) It was well ordered by Providence that he on whom this miracle was
wrought should be a common beggar, and so generally known and
remarkable, by which means the truth of the miracle was better
attested, and there were more to witness against those infidel Jews who
would not believe that he had been blind than if he had been
maintained in his father's house.
(2.) It was the greater instance of Christ's condescension that he
seemed (as I may say) to take more pains about the cure of a common
beggar than of others. When it was for the advantage of his miracles
that they should be wrought on those that were remarkable, he pitched
upon those that were made so by their poverty and misery; not by their
dignity.
2. In answer to this inquiry,
(1.) Some said, This is he, the very same man; and these are
witnesses to the truth of the miracle, for they had long known him
stone-blind.
(2.) Others, who could not think it possible that a man born blind
should thus on a sudden receive his sight, for that reason, and no
other, said, He is not he, but is like him, and so, by their
confession, if it be he, it is a great miracle that is wrought upon
him. Hence we may take occasion to think,
[1.] Of the wisdom and power of Providence in ordering such a universal
variety of the faces of men and women, so that no two are so alike but
that they may be distinguished, which is necessary to society, and
commerce, and the administration of justice. And,
[2.] Of the wonderful change which the converting grace of God makes
upon some who before were very wicked and vile, but are thereby so
universally and visibly altered that one would not take them to be the
same persons.
3. This controversy was soon decided by the man himself: He said, I
am he, the very man that so lately sat and begged; "I am he that
was blind, and was an object of the charity of men, but now see, and am
a monument of the mercy and grace of God." We do not find that the
neighbours appealed to him in this matter, but he, hearing the debate,
interposed, and put an end to it. It is a piece of justice we owe to
our neighbours to rectify their mistakes, and to set things before
them, as far as we are able, in a true light. Applying it spiritually,
it teaches us that those who are savingly enlightened by the grace of
God should be ready to own what they were before that blessed change
was wrought, 1 Tim. i. 13, 14 .
II. How he came to have his eyes opened, v. 10-12 .
They will now turn aside, and see this great sight, and enquire
further concerning it. He did not sound a trumpet when he did
these alms, nor perform his cures upon a stage; and yet, like a
city upon a hill, they could not be hid. Two things these neighbours
enquire after:--
1. The manner of the cure: How were thine eyes opened? The works
of the Lord being great, they ought to be sought out, Ps. cxi. 2 .
It is good to observe the way and method of God's works, and they will
appear the more wonderful. We may apply it spiritually; it is strange
that blind eyes should be opened, but more strange when we consider how
they are opened; how weak the means are that are used, and how strong
the opposition that is conquered. In answer to this enquiry the poor
man gives them a plain and full account of the matter: A man that is
called Jesus made clay,--and I received sight. v. 11 .
Note, Those who have experienced special instances of God's power and
goodness, in temporal or spiritual things, should be ready upon all
occasions to communicate their experiences, for the glory of God and
the instruction and encouragement of others. See David's collection of
his experiences, his own and others', Ps. xxxiv. 4-6 .
It is a debt we owe to our benefactor, and to our brethren. God's
favours are lost upon us, when they are lost with us, and
go no further.
2. The author of it
( v. 12 ): Where is he? Some perhaps asked this question out of curiosity.
"Where is he, that we may see him?" A man that did such cures as these
might well be a show, which one would go a good way for the sight of.
Others, perhaps, asked out of ill-will. "Where is he, that we may seize him?" There was a proclamation out for the discovering and
apprehending of him
( ch. xi. 57 );
and the unthinking crowd, in spite of all reason and equity, will have
ill thoughts of those that are put into an ill name. Some, we hope,
asked this question out of good-will. "Where is he, that we may
be acquainted with him? Where is he, that we may come to him, and share
in the favours he is so free of?" In answer to this, he could say
nothing: I know not. As soon as Christ had sent him to the pool
of Siloam, it should seem, he withdrew immediately (as he did, ch. v. 13 ),
and did not stay till the man returned, as if he either doubted of the
effect or waited for the man's thanks. Humble souls take more pleasure
in doing good than in hearing of it again; it will be time
enough to hear of it in the resurrection of the just. The man
had never seen Jesus, for by the time that he had gained his sight he
had lost his Physician; and he asked, it is probable, Where is
he? None of all the new and surprising objects that presented
themselves could be so grateful to him as one sight of Christ, but as
yet he knew no more of him than that he was called, and rightly called, Jesus--a Saviour. Thus in the work of grace wrought upon the
soul we see the change, but see not the hand that makes it; for the way
of the Spirit is like that of the wind, which thou hearest the sound
of, but canst not tell whence it comes nor whither it goes.
13 They brought to the Pharisees him that aforetime was blind.
14 And it was the sabbath day when Jesus made the clay, and
opened his eyes.
15 Then again the Pharisees also asked him how he had received
his sight. He said unto them, He put clay upon mine eyes, and I
washed, and do see.
16 Therefore said some of the Pharisees, This man is not of
God, because he keepeth not the sabbath day. Others said, How can
a man that is a sinner do such miracles? And there was a division
among them.
17 They say unto the blind man again, What sayest thou of him,
that he hath opened thine eyes? He said, He is a prophet.
18 But the Jews did not believe concerning him, that he had
been blind, and received his sight, until they called the parents
of him that had received his sight.
19 And they asked them, saying, Is this your son, who ye say
was born blind? how then doth he now see?
20 His parents answered them and said, We know that this is our
son, and that he was born blind:
21 But by what means he now seeth, we know not; or who hath
opened his eyes, we know not: he is of age; ask him: he shall
speak for himself.
22 These words spake his parents, because they feared the
Jews: for the Jews had agreed already, that if any man did
confess that he was Christ, he should be put out of the
synagogue.
23 Therefore said his parents, He is of age; ask him.
24 Then again called they the man that was blind, and said unto
him, Give God the praise: we know that this man is a sinner.
25 He answered and said, Whether he be a sinner or no, I know
not: one thing I know, that, whereas I was blind, now I see.
26 Then said they to him again, What did he to thee? how opened
he thine eyes?
27 He answered them, I have told you already, and ye did not
hear: wherefore would ye hear it again? will ye also be his
disciples?
28 Then they reviled him, and said, Thou art his disciple; but
we are Moses' disciples.
29 We know that God spake unto Moses: as for this fellow, we know not from whence he is.
30 The man answered and said unto them, Why herein is a
marvellous thing, that ye know not from whence he is, and yet he hath opened mine eyes.
31 Now we know that God heareth not sinners: but if any man be
a worshipper of God, and doeth his will, him he heareth.
32 Since the world began was it not heard that any man opened
the eyes of one that was born blind.
33 If this man were not of God, he could do nothing.
34 They answered and said unto him, Thou wast altogether born
in sins, and dost thou teach us? And they cast him out.
One would have expected that such a miracle as Christ wrought upon the
blind man would have settled his reputation, and silenced and shamed
all opposition, but it had the contrary effect; instead of being
embraced as a prophet for it, he is prosecuted as a criminal.
I. Here is the information that was given in to the Pharisees
concerning this matter: They brought to the Pharisees him that
aforetime was blind, v. 13 .
They brought him to the great sanhedrim, which consisted chiefly of
Pharisees, at least the Pharisees in the sanhedrim were most active
against Christ.
1. Some think that those who brought this man to the Pharisees did it
with a good design, to show them that this Jesus, whom they
persecuted, was not what they represented him, but really a great man,
and one that gave considerable proofs of a divine mission. What hath
convinced us of the truth and excellency of religion, and hath removed
our prejudices against it, we should be forward, as we have
opportunity, to offer to others for their conviction.
2. It should seem, rather, that they did it with an ill design, to exasperate the Pharisees the more against Christ, and there was no
need of this, for they were bitter enough of themselves. They brought
him with such a suggestion as that in ch. xi. 47, 48 , If we let him thus alone, all men will believe on him. Note,
Those rulers that are of a persecuting spirit shall never want ill
instruments about them, that will blow the coals, and make them
worse.
II. The ground which was pretended for this information, and the colour
given to it. That which is good was never maligned but under the
imputation of something evil. And the crime objected here
( v. 14 )
was that it was the sabbath day when Jesus made the clay, and opened
his eyes. The profanation of the sabbath day is certainly wicked,
and gives a man a very ill character; but the traditions of the Jews
had made that to be a violation of the law of the sabbath which was far
from being so. Many a time this matter was contested between Christ and
the Jews, that it might be settled for the benefit of the church in all
ages. But it may be asked, "Why would Christ not only work miracles on
the sabbath day, but work them in such a manner as he knew would give
offence to the Jews? When he had healed the impotent man, why should he
bid him carry his bed? Could he not have cured this blind man without
making clay?" I answer,
1. He would not seem to yield to the usurped power of the scribes and
Pharisees. Their government was illegal, their impositions were
arbitrary, and their zeal for the rituals consumed the substantials of
religion; and therefore Christ would not give place to them, by subjection, no not for an hour. Christ was made under the law
of God, but not under their law.
2. He did it that he might, both by word and action, expound the law of
the fourth commandment, and vindicate it from their corrupt glosses,
and so teach us that a weekly sabbath is to be perpetually observed in the church, one day in seven (for what need was there to
explain that law, if it must be presently abrogated?) and that it is
not to be so ceremonially observed by us as it was by the Jews?
Works of necessity and mercy are allowed, and the sabbath-rest to be
kept, not so much for its own sake as in order to the sabbath-work.
3. Christ chose to work his cures on the sabbath day to dignify and
sanctify the day, and to intimate that spiritual cures should be
wrought mostly on the Christian sabbath day. How many blind eyes have
been opened by the preaching of the gospel, that blessed eye-salve, on
the Lord's day! How many impotent souls cured on that day!
III. The trial and examination of this matter by the Pharisees, v. 15 .
So much passion, prejudice, and ill-humour, and so little reason,
appear here, that the discourse is nothing but crossing questions. One
would think, when a man in these circumstances was brought before them,
they would have been so taken up in admiring the miracle, and
congratulating the happiness of the poor man, that they could not have
been peevish with him. But their enmity to Christ had divested them of
all manner of humanity, and divinity too. Let us see how they teased
this man.
1. They interrogated him concerning the cure itself.
(1.) They doubted whether he had indeed been born blind, and
demanded proof of that which even the prosecutors had acknowledged
( v. 18 ):
They did not believe, that is, they would not, that he was born blind. Men that seek occasion to quarrel with the clearest
truths may find it if they please; and they that resolve to hold
fast deceit will never want a handle to hold it by. This was not a
prudent caution, but a prejudiced infidelity. However, it was a good
way that they took for the clearing of this: They called the parents
of the man who had received his sight. This they did in hopes to
disprove the miracle. These parents were poor and timorous, and if they
had said that they could not be sure that this was their son, or that
it was only some weakness or dimness in his sight that he had been born
with, which if they had been able to get help for him might have been
cured long since, or had otherwise prevaricated, for fear of the court,
the Pharisees had gained their point, had robbed Christ of the honour
of this miracle, which would have lessened the reputation of all the
rest. But God so ordered and overruled this counsel of theirs that it
turned to the more effectual proof of the miracle, and left them under
a necessity of being either convinced or confounded. Now in this part
of the examination we have,
First, They fully attest that which they could safely say in
this matter; safely, that is, upon their own knowledge, and safely, that is, without running themselves into a premunire ( v. 20 ): We know that this is our son (for they were daily conversant
with him, and had such a natural affection to him as the true mother
had, 1 Kings iii. 26 ,
which made them know it was their own ); and we know that he was born blind. They had reason to know it, inasmuch as it had cost
them many a sad thought, and many a careful troublesome hour, about
him. How often had they looked upon him with grief, and lamented their
child's blindness more than all the burdens and inconveniences of their
poverty, and wished he had never been born, rather than be born to such
an uncomfortable life! Those who are ashamed of their children, or any
of their relations, because of their bodily infirmities, may take a
reproof from these parents, who freely owned, This is our
son, though he was born blind, and lived upon alms.
Secondly, They cautiously decline giving any evidence concerning
his cure; partly because they were not themselves eye-witnesses of it,
and could say nothing to it of their own knowledge; and partly
because they found it was a tender point, and would not bear to
be meddled with. And therefore, having owned that he was their
son and was born blind, further these deponents say not.
a. Observe how warily they express themselves
( v. 21 ):
" By what means he now seeth we know not, or who has opened
his eyes we know not, otherwise than by hearsay; we can give
no account either by what means or by whose hand it was done." See how
the wisdom of this world teaches men to trim the matter in
critical junctures. Christ was accused as a sabbath-breaker, and as an
imposter. Now these parents of the blind man, though they were not
eye-witnesses of the cure, were yet fully assured of it, and were bound
in gratitude to have borne their testimony to the honour of the Lord
Jesus, who had done their son so great a kindness; but they had not
courage to do it, and then thought it might serve to atone for their
not appearing in favour of him that they said nothing to his prejudice;
whereas, in the day of trial, he that is not apparently for
Christ is justly looked upon as really against him, Luke xi. 23; Mark viii. 38 .
That they might not be further urged in this matter, they refer
themselves and the court to him: He is of age, ask him, he shall
speak for himself. This implies that while children are not of age
(while they are infants, such as cannot speak) it is incumbent
upon their parents to speak for them, speak to God for them in
prayer, speak to the church for them in baptism; but, when they are of
age, it is fit that they should be asked whether they be willing to
stand to that which their parents did for them, and let them speak for
themselves. This man, though he was born blind, seems to have
been of quick understanding above many, which enabled him to speak for
himself better than his friends could speak for him. Thus God often by
a kind providence makes up in the mind what is wanting in the body, 1 Cor. xii. 23, 24 .
His parents turning them over to him was only to save themselves from
trouble, and expose him; whereas they that had so great an interest in
his mercies had reason to embark with him in his hazards for the honour of that Jesus who had done so much for them.
b. See the reason why they were so cautious
( v. 22, 23 ): Because they feared the Jews. It was not because they would put
an honour upon their son, by making him his own advocate, or because
they would have the matter cleared by the best hand, but because
they would shift trouble off from themselves, as most people are in
care to do, no matter on whom they throw it. Near is my friend, and
near is my child, and perhaps near is my religion, but nearer is
myself--Proximus egomet mihi. But Christianity teaches another
lesson, 1 Cor. x. 24; Esth. viii. 6 .
Here is,
( a. ) The late law which the sanhedrim had made. It was
agreed and enacted by their authority that, if any man within their
jurisdiction did confess that Jesus was Christ, he should be
put out of the synagogue. Observe,
( b. ) The influence which this law had upon the parents of the
blind man. They declined saying any thing of Christ, and shuffled it
off to their son, because they feared the Jews. Christ had
incurred the frowns of the government to do their son a kindness, but
they would not incur them to do him any honour. Note, The fear of
man brings a snare ( Prov. xxix. 25 ),
and often makes people deny and disown Christ, and his truths and ways,
and act against their consciences. Well, the parents have thus
disentangled themselves, and are discharged from any further
attendance; let us now go on with the examination of the man himself;
the doubt of the Pharisees, whether he was born blind, was put
out of doubt by them; and therefore,
(2.) They enquired of him concerning the manner of the
cure, and made their remarks upon it, v. 15, 16 .
First, Some took this occasion to censure and condemn Christ for
what he had done. Some of the Pharisees said, This man is not of
God, as he pretends, because he keepeth not the sabbath day. 1. The doctrine upon which this censure is grounded is very true--that
those are not of God --those pretenders to prophecy not sent of
God, those pretenders to saintship not born of God --who do
not keep the sabbath day. Those that are of God will keep the
commandments of God; and this is his commandment, that we sanctify
the sabbath. Those that are of God keep up communion with God, and
delight to hear from him, and speak to him, and therefore will observe
the sabbath, which is a day appointed for intercourse with heaven. The
sabbath is called a sign, for the sanctifying of it is a sign of
a sanctified heart, and the profaning of it a sign of a profane heart.
But,
2. The application of it to our Saviour is very unjust, for he did
religiously observe the sabbath day, and never in any instance violated
it, never did otherwise than well on the sabbath day. He did not
keep the sabbath according to the tradition of the elders and the
superstitious observances of the Pharisees, but he kept it according to
the command of God, and therefore, no doubt, he was of God, and his
miracles proved him to be Lord also of the sabbath day. Note,
much unrighteous and uncharitable judging is occasioned by men's making
the rules of religion more strict than God has made them, and adding
their own fancies to God's appointments, as the Jews here, in the case
of sabbath-sanctification. We ourselves may forbear such and such
things, on the sabbath day, as we find a distraction to us, and we do
well, but we must not therefore tie up others to the same strictness.
Every thing that we take for a rule of practice must not presently be
made a rule of judgment.
Secondly, Others spoke in his favour, and very pertinently
urged, How can a man that is a sinner do such miracles? It seems
that even in this council of the ungodly there were some that
were capable of a free thought, and were witnesses for Christ,
even in the midst of his enemies. The matter of fact was plain, that
this was a true miracle, the more it was searched into the more it was
cleared; and this brought his former similar works to mind, and gave
occasion to speak magnificently of them, toiauta
semeia -- such great signs, so many, so evident. And the
inference from it is very natural: Such things as these could never be
done by a man that is a sinner, that is, not by any mere man, in
his own name, and by his own power; or, rather, not by one that is a
cheat or an imposter, and in that sense a a sinner; such a one may
indeed show some signs and lying wonders, but not such signs and
true wonders as Christ wrought. How could a man produce such divine
credentials, if he had not a divine commission? Thus there was a division among them, a schism, so the word is; they clashed in
their opinion, a warm debate arose, and the house divided upon
it. Thus God defeats the counsels of his enemies by dividing them; and
by such testimonies as these given against the malice of persecutors,
and the rubs they meet with, their designs against the church are
sometimes rendered ineffectual and always inexcusable.
2. After their enquiry concerning the cure, we must observe their
enquiry concerning the author of it. And here observe,
(1.) What the man said of him, in answer to their enquiry. They ask him
( v. 17 ),
" What sayest thou of him, seeing that he has opened thine eyes? What dost thou think of his doing this? And what idea hast thou of him
that did it?" If he should speak slightly of Christ, in answer
to this, as he might be tempted to do, to please them, now that he was
in their hands, as his parents had done--if he should say, "I know not
what to make of him; he may be a conjuror for aught I know, or some
mountebank"--they would have triumphed in it. Nothing confirms
Christ's enemies in their enmity to him so much as the slights put upon
him by those that have passed for his friends. But, if he should speak
honourably of Christ, they would prosecute him upon their new law,
which did not except, no, not his own patient; they would make him an
example, and so deter others from applying to Christ for cures, for
which, though they came cheap from Christ, yet they would make them pay
dearly. Or perhaps Christ's friends proposed to have the man's own
sentiments concerning his physician, and were willing to know, since he
appeared to be a sensible man, what he thought of him. Note, Those
whose eyes Christ has opened know best what to say of him, and have
great reason, upon all occasions, to say well of him. What think we of
Christ? To this question the poor man makes a short, plain, and direct
answer: " He is a prophet, he is one inspired and sent of God to
preach, and work miracles, and deliver to the world a divine message."
There had been no prophets among the Jews for three hundred years; yet
they did not conclude that they should have no more, for they knew that
he was yet to come who should seal up vision and prophecy, Dan. ix. 24 .
It should seem, this man had not any thoughts that Christ was the
Messiah, the great prophet, but one of the same rank with the other
prophets. The woman of Samaria concluded he was a prophet before
she had any thought of his being the Messiah
( ch. iv. 19 );
so this blind man thought well of Christ according to the light he had,
though he did not think well enough of him; but, being faithful in what
he had already attained to, God revealed even that unto him.
This poor blind beggar had a clearer judgment of the things pertaining
to the kingdom of God, and saw further into the proofs of a divine
mission, than the masters in Israel, that assumed an authority
to judge of prophets.
(2.) What they said of him, in reply to the man's testimony. Having in
vain attempted to invalidate the evidence of the fact, and finding that
indeed a notable miracle was wrought, and they could not deny
it, they renew their attempt to banter it, and run it down, and do
all they can to shake the good opinion the man had of him that opened
his eyes, and to convince him that Christ was a bad man
( v. 24 ): Give God the praise, we know that this man is a sinner. Two ways
this is understood:
[1.] By way of advice, to take heed of ascribing the praise of
his cure to a sinful man, but to give it all to God, to whom it was
due. Thus, under colour of zeal for the honour of God, they rob Christ
of his honour, as those do who will not worship Christ as God, under
pretence of zeal for this great truth, that there is but one God to be
worshipped; whereas this is his declared will, that all men should honour the Son even as they honour the Father; and in confessing
that Christ is Lord we give glory to God the Father. When God
makes use of men that are sinners as instruments of good to us, we must give God the glory, for every creature is that to us which he
makes it to be; and yet there is gratitude owing to the instruments. It
was a good word, Give God the praise, but here it was ill used;
and there seems to be this further in it, "This man is a sinner, a bad man, and therefore give the praise so much the more to
God, who could work by such an instrument."
[2.] By way of adjuration; so some take it. "We know (though
thou dost not, who hast but lately come, as it were, into a new world)
that this man is a sinner, a great impostor, and cheats the
country; this we are sure of, therefore give God praise " (as
Joshua said to Achan) "by making an ingenuous confession of the fraud
and collusion which we are confident there is in this matter; in God's
name, man, tell the truth." Thus is God's name abused in papal
inquisitions, when by oaths, ex officio, they extort accusations
of themselves from the innocent, and of others from the ignorant. See how basely they speak of the Lord Jesus: We know that this man is a sinner, is a man of sin. In which we
may observe, First, Their insolence and pride. They would not
have it thought, when they asked the man what he thought of him, that
they needed information; nay, they know very well that he is a sinner,
and nobody can convince them of the contrary. He had challenged them to
their faces
( ch. viii. 46 )
to convince him of sin, and they had nothing to say; but now
behind his back they speak of him as a malefactor, convicted upon the
notorious evidence of the fact. Thus false accusers make up in
confidence what is wanting in proof. Secondly, The injury and
indignity hereby done to the Lord Jesus. When he became man, he took
upon him the form not only of a servant, but of a sinner ( Rom. viii. 3 ),
and passed for a sinner in common with the rest of mankind. Nay, he
was represented as a sinner of the first magnitude, a sinner above all
men; and, being made sin for us, he despised even this
shame.
3. The debate that arose between the Pharisees and this poor man
concerning Christ. They say, He is a sinner; he says, He is a
prophet. As it is an encouragement to those who are concerned for
the cause of Christ to hope that it shall never be lost for want of
witnesses, when they find a poor blind beggar picked up from the
way-side, and made a witness for Christ, to the faces of his most
impudent enemies; so it is an encouragement to those who are called out
to witness for Christ to find with what prudence and courage this man
managed his defence, according to the promise, It shall be given you
in that same hour what you shall speak. Though he had never seen
Jesus, he had felt his grace. Now in the parley between the Pharisees
and this poor man we may observe three steps:--
(1.) He sticks to the certain matter of fact the evidence of which they
endeavour to shake. That which is doubtful is best resolved into that
which is plain, and therefore,
[1.] He adheres to that which to himself at least, and to his own
satisfaction, was past dispute
( v. 25 ):
" Whether he be a sinner or no I know not, I will not now stand
to dispute, nor need I, the matter is plain, and though I should
altogether hold my peace would speak for itself;" or, as it might
better be rendered, " If he be a sinner, I know it not, I see no
reason to say so, but the contrary; for this one thing I know, and can be more sure of than you can be of that of which you are so
confident, that whereas I was blind, now I see, and therefore
must not only say that he has been a good friend to me, but that he is
a prophet; I am both able and bound to speak well of him." Now
here, First, He tacitly reproves their great assurance of the
ill character they gave of the blessed Jesus: "You say that you know him to be a sinner; I, who know him as well as you
do, cannot give any such character." Secondly, He boldly relies
upon his own experience of the power and goodness of the holy Jesus,
and resolves to abide by it. There is no disputing against experience,
nor arguing a man out of his senses; here is one that is properly an
eyewitness of the power and grace of Christ, though he had never seen
him. Note, As Christ's mercies are most valued by those that have felt
the want of them, that have been blind and now see, so the most
powerful and durable affections to Christ are those that arise from an
experimental knowledge of him, 1 John i. 1; Acts iv. 20 .
The poor man does not here give a nice account of the method of the
cure, nor pretend to describe it philosophically, but in short, Whereas I was blind, now I see. Thus in the work of grace in the
soul, though we cannot tell when and how, by what instruments and by
what steps and advances, the blessed change was wrought, yet we may
take the comfort of it if we can say, through grace, " Whereas I was
blind, now I see. I did live a carnal, worldly, sensual life, but,
thanks be to God, it is now otherwise with me," Eph. v. 8 .
[2.] They endeavour to baffle and stifle the evidence by a needless
repetition of their enquiries into it
( v. 26 ): What did he to thee? How opened he thine eyes? They asked these
questions, First, Because they wanted something to say, and
would rather speak impertinently than seem to be silenced or run
a-ground. Thus eager disputants, that resolve they will have the last
word, by such vain repetitions, to avoid the shame of being silenced,
make themselves accountable for many idle words. Secondly, Because they hoped, by putting the man upon repeating his evidence, to
catch him tripping in it, or wavering, and then they would think they
had gained a good point.
(2.) He upbraids them with their obstinate infidelity and invincible
prejudices, and they revile him as a disciple of Jesus, v. 27-29 ,
where the man is more bold with them and they are more sharp upon him
than before.
First, They taunted this man for his affection to Christ; they
said, Thou art his disciple, as if that were reproach enough,
and they could not say worse of him. "We scorn to be his disciples, and
will leave that preferment to thee, and such scoundrels as thou art."
They do what they can to put Christ's religion in an ill name, and to
represent the profession of it as a contemptible scandalous thing. They reviled him. The Vulgate reads it, maledixerunt eum--they
cursed him; and what was their curse? It was this, Be thou his
disciple. "May such a curse" (saith St. Augustine here) "ever be on
us and on our children!" If we take our measures of credit and disgrace
from the sentiment or rather clamours of a blind deluded world, we
shall glory in our shame, and be ashamed of our glory. They had no reason to call this man a disciple of Christ, he had
neither seen him nor heard him preach, only he had spoken favourably of
a kindness Christ had done him, and this they could not bear.
Secondly, They gloried in their relation to Moses as their
Master: " We are Moses's disciples, and do not either need or
desire any other teacher." Note,
1. Carnal professors of religion are very apt to trust to, and be proud
of, the dignities and privileges of their profession, while they are
strangers to the principles and powers of their religion. These
Pharisees had before boasted of their good parentage: We are
Abraham's seed; here they boast of their good education, We are
Moses's disciples; as if these would save them.
2. It is sad to see how much one part of religion is opposed, under
colour of zeal for another part. There was a perfect harmony between
Christ and Moses; Moses prepared for Christ, and Christ perfected
Moses, so that they might be disciples of Moses, and become the
disciples of Christ too; and yet they here put them in opposition, nor
could they have persecuted Christ but under the shelter of the abused
name of Moses. Thus those who gainsay the doctrine of free grace value
themselves as promoters of man's duty, We are Moses's disciples; while, on the other hand, those that cancel the obligation of the law
value themselves as the assertors of free grace, and as if none were
the disciples of Jesus but they; whereas, if we rightly understand the
matter, we shall see God's grace and man's duty meet together and kiss
and befriend each other.
Thirdly, They gave some sort of reason for their adhering to
Moses against Christ
( v. 29 ): We know that God spoke unto Moses; as for this fellow, we know not
whence he is. But did they not know that among other things which
God spoke unto Moses this was one, that they must expect another
prophet, and further revelation of the mind of God? yet, when our Lord
Jesus, pursuant to what God said to Moses, did appear, and gave
sufficient proofs of his being that prophet, under pretence of sticking
to the old religion, and the established church, they not only
forfeited, but forsook, their own mercies. In this argument of their
observe,
1. How impertinently they allege, in defence of their enmity to Christ,
that which none of his followers ever denied: We know that God spoke
unto Moses, and, thanks be to God, we know it too, more plainly to
Moses than to any other of the prophets; but what then? God spoke to
Moses, and does it therefore follow that Jesus is an impostor? Moses
was a prophet also? Moses spoke honourably of Jesus
( ch. v. 46 ),
and Jesus spoke honourably of Moses
( Luke xvi. 29 );
they were both faithful in the same house of God, Moses as a servant,
Christ as a Son; therefore their pleading Moses' divine warrant in
opposition to Christ's was an artifice, to make unthinking people
believe it was as certain that Jesus was a false prophet as that Moses
was a true one; whereas they were both true.
2. How absurdly they urge their ignorance of Christ as a reason to
justify their contempt of him: As for this fellow. Thus
scornfully do they speak of the blessed Jesus, as if they did not think
it worth while to charge their memories with a name so inconsiderable;
they express themselves with as much disdain of the Shepherd of Israel
as if he had not been worthy to be set with the dogs of their flock:
As for this fellow, this sorry fellow, we know not whence he
is. They looked upon themselves to have the key of knowledge, that
none must preach without a license first had and obtained from them,
under the seal of their court. They expected that all who set up for
teachers should apply to them, and give them satisfaction, which this
Jesus had never done, never so far owned their power as to ask their
leave, and therefore they concluded him an intruder, and one that came
not in by the door: They knew not whence nor what he was, and therefore concluded him a sinner; whereas those we know
little of we should judge charitably of; but proud and narrow souls
will think none good but themselves, and those that are in their
interest. It was not long ago that the Jews had made the contrary to
this an objection against Christ
( ch. vii. 27 ): We know this man whence he is, but when Christ comes no man knows
whence he is. Thus they could with the greatest assurance either
affirm or deny the same thing, according as they saw it would serve
their turn. They knew not whence he was; and whose fault was
that?
(1.) It is certain that they ought to have enquired. The Messiah was to
appear about this time, and it concerned them to look about them, and
examine every indication; but these priests, like those, Jer. ii. 6 , said not, Where is the Lord? (2.) It is certain that they might have known whence he was, might not
only have known, by searching the register, that he was born in
Bethlehem; but by enquiring into his doctrine, miracles, and
conversation, they might have known that he was sent of God, and had
better orders, a better commission, and far better instructions, than
any they could give him. See the absurdity of infidelity. Men will not
know the doctrine of Christ because they are resolved they will not
believe it, and then pretend they do not believe it because they do not
know it. Such ignorance and unbelief, which support one another,
aggravate one another.
(3.) He reasons with them concerning this matter, and they
excommunicate him.
First, He wonders at their obstinate infidelity
( v. 30 );
not at all daunted by their frowns, nor shaken by their confidence, he
bravely answered, " Why, herein is a marvelous thing, the
strangest instance of wilful ignorance that ever was heard of among men
that pretend to sense, that you know not whence he is, and yet
he has opened mine eyes." Two things he wonders at:--
1. That they should be strangers to a man so famous. He that
could open the eyes of the blind must certainly be a considerable man,
and worth taking notice of. The Pharisees were inquisitive men, had a
large correspondence and acquaintance, thought themselves the eyes of
the church and its watchmen, and yet that they should talk as if they
thought it below them to take cognizance of such a man as this, and
have conversation with him, this is a strange thing indeed. There are
many who pass for learned and knowing men, who understand business, and
can talk sensibly in other things, who yet are ignorant, to a wonder,
of the doctrine of Christ, who have no concern, no, not so much as a
curiosity, to acquaint themselves with that which the angels desire
to look into. 2. That they should question the divine mission of one that had
undoubtedly wrought a divine miracle. When they said, We know not
whence he is, they meant, "We know not any proof that his doctrine
and ministry are from heaven." "Now this is strange," saith the poor
man, "that the miracle wrought upon me has not convinced you, and put
the matter out of doubt,--that you, whose education and studies give
you advantages above others of discerning the things of God, should
thus shut your eyes against the light." It is a marvelous work and
wonder, when the wisdom of the wise thus perisheth ( Isa. xxix. 14 ),
that they deny the truth of that of which they cannot gainsay the
evidence. Note,
(1.) The unbelief of those who enjoy the means of knowledge and
conviction is indeed a marvelous thing, Mark vi. 6 .
(2.) Those who have themselves experienced the power and grace of the
Lord Jesus do especially wonder at the wilfulness of those who reject
him, and, having such good thoughts of him themselves, are amazed that
others have not. Had Christ opened the eyes of the Pharisees, they
would not have doubted his being a prophet.
Secondly, He argues strongly against them, v. 31-33 .
They had determined concerning Jesus that he was not of God
( v. 16 ),
but was a sinner ( v. 24 ),
in answer to which the man here proves not only that he was not a
sinner ( v. 31 ),
but that he was of God, v. 33 .
a. He argues here,
( a. ) With great knowledge. Though he could not read a letter of
the book, he was well acquainted with the scripture and the things of
God; he had wanted the sense of seeing, yet had well improved that of
hearing, by which faith cometh; yet this would not have served him if
he had not had an extraordinary presence of God with him, and special
aids of his Spirit, upon this occasion.
( b. ) With great zeal for the honour of Christ, whom he could not
endure to hear run down, and evil spoken of.
( c. ) With great boldness, and courage, and undauntedness, not
terrified by the proudest of his adversaries. Those that are ambitious
of the favours of God must not be afraid of the frowns of men. "See
here," saith Dr. Whitby, "a blind man and unlearned judging more
rightly of divine things than the whole learned council of the
Pharisees, whence we learn that we are not always to be led by the
authority of councils, popes, or bishops; and that it is not absurd for
laymen sometimes to vary from their opinions, these overseers being
sometimes guilty of great oversights."
b. His argument may be reduced into form, somewhat like that of
David, Ps. lxvi. 18-20 .
The proposition in David's argument is, If I regard iniquity in my
heart, God will not hear me; here it is to the same purport, God
heareth not sinners: the assumption there is, But verily God
hath heard me; here it is, Verily God hath heard Jesus, he hath
been honoured with the doing of that which was never done before: the
conclusion there is to the honour, Blessed be God; here to the
honour of the Lord Jesus, He is of God.
( a. ) He lays it down for an undoubted truth that none but good
men are the favourites of heaven
( v. 31 ): Now we know, you know it as well as I, that God heareth not
sinners; but if any man be a worshipper of God, and does his
will, him he heareth. Here,
( b. ) He magnifies the miracles which Christ had wrought, to
strengthen the argument the more
( v. 32 ): Since the world began was it not heard that any man opened the eyes
of one that was born blind. This is to show either,
[ a. ] That it was a true miracle, and above the power of nature;
it was never heard that any man, by the use of natural means, had cured
one that was born blind; no doubt, this man and his parents had
been very inquisitive into cases of this nature, whether any such had
been helped, and could hear of none, which enabled him to speak this
with the more assurance. Or,
[ b. ] That it was an extraordinary miracle, and beyond the
precedents of former miracles; neither Moses nor any of the prophets,
though they did great things, ever did such things as this, wherein
divine power and divine goodness seem to strive which should outshine.
Moses wrought miraculous plagues, but Christ wrought miraculous cures.
Note, First, The wondrous works of the Lord Jesus were such as
the like had never been done before. Secondly, It becomes those
who have received mercy from God to magnify the mercies they have
received, and to speak honourably of them; not that thereby glory may
redound to themselves, and they may seem to be extraordinary favourites
of Heaven, but that God may have so much the more glory.
( c. ) He therefore concludes, If this man were not of God, he
could no nothing, that is, nothing extraordinary, no such thing as this; and therefore, no doubt, he is of God, notwithstanding his nonconformity to your traditions in the business of
the sabbath day. Note, What Christ did on earth sufficiently
demonstrated what he was in heaven; for, if he had not been sent of
God, he could not have wrought such miracles. It is true the man of sin
comes with lying wonders, but not with real miracles; it is
likewise supposed that a false prophet might, by divine permission,
give a sign or a wonder ( Deut. xiii. 1, 2 ),
yet the case is so put as that it would carry with it its own
confutation, for it is to enforce a temptation to serve other gods,
which was to set God against himself. It is true, likewise, that
many wicked people have in Christ's name done many wonderful works,
which did not prove those that wrought them to be of God, but him in
whose name they were wrought. We may each of us know by this whether we
are of God or no: What do we? What do we for God, for our souls,
in working out our salvation? What do we more than others?
First, What they said. Having nothing to reply to his
argument, they reflected upon his person: Thou wast altogether born
in sin, and dost thou teach us? They take that amiss which they had
reason to take kindly, and are cut to the heart with rage by that which
should have pricked them to the heart with penitence. Observe,
1. How they despised him, and what a severe censure they passed upon
him: " Thou wast not only born in sin, as every man is, but
altogether so, wholly corrupt, and bearing about with thee in thy body
as well as in thy soul the marks of that corruption; thou wast one whom
nature stigmatized. " Had he still continued blind, it had been
barbarous to upbraid him with it, and thence to gather that he was more
deeply tainted with sin than other people; but it was most unjust to
take notice of it now that the cure had not only rolled away the
reproach of his blindness, but had signalized him as a favourite
of Heaven. Some take it thus: "Thou hast been a common beggar, and such
are too often common sinners, and thou hast, no doubt, been as bad as
any of them;" whereas by his discourse he had proved the contrary, and
had evinced a deep tincture of piety. But when proud imperious
Pharisees resolve to run a man down, any thing shall serve for a
pretence.
2. How they disdain to learn of him, or to receive instruction
from him: Dost thou teach us? A mighty emphasis must be laid
here upon thou and us. "What! wilt thou, a silly
sorry fellow, ignorant and illiterate, that hast not seen the light of
the sun a day to an end, a beggar by the way-side, of the very dregs
and refuse of the town, wilt thou pretend to teach us, that are
the sages of the law and grandees of the church, that sit in Moses's
chair and are masters in Israel?" Note, Proud men scorn to be taught,
especially by their inferiors, whereas we should never think ourselves
too old, nor too wise, nor too good, to learn. Those that have much
wealth would have more; and why not those that have much knowledge? And
those are to be valued by whom we may improve in learning. What a poor
excuse was this for the Pharisees' infidelity, that it would be a
disparagement to them to be instructed, and informed, and convinced, by
such a silly fellow as this!
35 Jesus heard that they had cast him out; and when he had
found him, he said unto him, Dost thou believe on the Son of God?
36 He answered and said, Who is he, Lord, that I might believe
on him?
37 And Jesus said unto him, Thou hast both seen him, and it is
he that talketh with thee.
38 And he said, Lord, I believe. And he worshipped him.
I. The tender care which our Lord Jesus took of this poor man
( v. 35 ): When Jesus heard that they had cast him out (for it is likely
the town rang of it, and everybody cried out shame upon them for it),
then he found him, which implies his seeking him and looking
after him, that he might encourage and comfort him,
1. Because he had, to the best of his knowledge, spoken so very well,
so bravely, so boldly, in defence of the Lord Jesus. Note, Jesus Christ
will be sure to stand by his witnesses, and own those that own him and
his truth and ways. Earthly princes neither do, nor can, take
cognizance of all that vindicate them and their government and
administration; but our Lord Jesus knows and observes all the faithful
testimonies we bear to him at any time, and a book of remembrance is
written, and it shall redound not only to our credit hereafter, but our
comfort now.
2. Because the Pharisees had cast him out and abused him. Besides the
common regard which the righteous Judge of the world has to those who
suffer wrongfully
( Ps. ciii. 6 ),
there is a particular notice taken of those that suffer in the cause of
Christ and for the testimony of a good conscience. Here was one poor
man suffering for Christ, and he took care that as his afflictions
abounded his consolations should much more abound. Note,
(1.) Though persecutors may exclude good men from their communion, yet
they cannot exclude them from communion with Christ, nor put them out
of the way of his visits. Happy are they who have a friend from whom
men cannot debar them.
(2.) Jesus Christ will graciously find and receive those who for his
sake are unjustly rejected and cast out by men. He will be a hiding
place to his outcasts, and appear, to the joy of those whom their
brethren hated and cast out.
II. The comfortable converse Christ had with him, wherein he brings him
acquainted with the consolation of Israel. He had well improved the
knowledge he had, and now Christ gives him further instruction; for he
that is faithful in a little shall be entrusted with more, Matt. xiii. 12 .
1. Our Lord Jesus examines his faith: " Dost thou believe on the Son
of God? Dost thou give credit to the promises of the Messiah? Dost
thou expect his coming, and art thou ready to receive and embrace him
when he is manifested to thee?" This was that faith of the Son of God
by which the saints lived before his manifestation. Observe,
(1.) The Messiah is here called the Son of God, and so the Jews
had learned to call him from the prophecies, Ps. ii. 7; lxxxix. 27 .
See ch. i. 49 , Thou art the Son of God, that is, the true Messiah. Those that
expected the temporal kingdom of the Messiah delighted rather in
calling him the Son of David, which gave more countenance to
that expectation, Matt. xxii. 42 .
But Christ, that he might give us an idea of his kingdom, as purely
spiritual and divine, calls himself the Son of God, and rather Son of man in general than of David in particular.
(2.) The desires and expectations of the Messiah, which the
Old-Testament saints had, guided by and grounded upon the promise, were
graciously interpreted and accepted as their believing on the Son of
God. This faith Christ here enquires after: Dost thou
believe? Note, The great thing which is now required of us
( 1 John iii. 23 ),
and which will shortly be enquired after concerning us, is our believing on the Son of God, and by this we must stand or fall
for ever.
2. The poor man solicitously enquires concerning the Messiah he was to
believe in, professing his readiness to embrace him and close with him
( v. 36 ): Who is he, Lord, that I may believe on him? (1.) Some think he did know that Jesus, who cured him, was the Son of
God, but did not know which was Jesus, and therefore, supposing this
person that talked with him to be a follower of Jesus, desired him to
do him the favour to direct him to his master; not that he might
satisfy his curiosity with the sight of him, but that he might the more
firmly believe in him, and profess his faith, and know whom he had
believed. See Cant. v. 6, 7; iii. 2, 3 .
It is Christ only that can direct us to himself.
(2.) Others think he did know that this person who talked with him was
Jesus, the same that cured him, whom he believed a great and good man
and a prophet, but did not yet know that he was the Son of God and the
true Messiah. "Lord, I believe there is a Christ to come; thou who hast
given me bodily sight, tell me, O tell me, who and where this Son of
God is." Christ's question intimated that the Messiah was come, and was
now among them, which he presently takes the hint of, and asks, Where is he, Lord? The question was rational and just: Who is
he, Lord, that I may believe on him? For how could he believe in
one of whom he had not heard; the work of ministers is to tell us who the Son of God is, that we may believe on him, ch. xx. 31 .
3. Our Lord Jesus graciously reveals himself to him as that Son of God
on whom he must believe: Thou hast both seen him, and it is he that
talketh with thee, v. 37 .
Thou needest not go far to find out the Son of God, Behold the Word
is nigh thee. We do not find that Christ did thus expressly, and in
so many words, reveal himself to any other as to this man here and to
the woman of Samaria: I that speak unto thee am he. He left
others to find out by arguments who he was, but to these weak and
foolish things of the world he chose to manifest himself, so as not to
the wise and prudent. Christ here describes himself to this man
by two things, which express his great favour to him:--
(1.) Thou hast seen him; and he was much indebted to the Lord
Jesus for opening his eyes, that he might see him. Now he was made
sensible, more than ever, what an unspeakable mercy it was to be cured
of his blindness, that he might see the Son of God, a sight which
rejoiced his heart more than that of the light of this world. Note, The Greatest comfort of bodily eyesight is its serviceableness to
our faith and the interests of our souls. How contentedly might this
man have returned to his former blindness, like old Simeon, now that
his eyes had seen God's salvation! If we apply this to the
opening of the eyes of the mind, it intimates that spiritual sight is
given principally for this end, that we may see Christ, 2 Cor. iv. 6 .
Can we say that by faith we have seen Christ, seen him in his beauty
and glory, in his ability and willingness to save, so seen him as to be
satisfied concerning him, to be satisfied in him? Let us give him the
praise, who opened our eyes.
(2.) It is he that talketh with thee; and he was indebted to
Christ for condescending to do this. He was not only favoured with a
sight of Christ, but was admitted into fellowship and communion with
him. Great princes are willing to be seen by those whom yet they
will not vouchsafe to talk with. But Christ, by his word and
Spirit, talks with those whose desires are towards him, and in talking
with them manifests himself to them, as he did to the two disciples,
when he talked their hearts warm, Luke xxiv. 32 .
Observe, This poor man was solicitously enquiring after the Saviour,
when at the same time he saw him, and was talking with him. Note,
Jesus Christ is often nearer the souls that seek him than they
themselves are aware of. Doubting Christians are sometimes saying, Where is the Lord? and fearing that they are cast out from his
sight when at the same time it is he that talks with them, and puts strength into them.
4. The poor man readily entertains this surprising revelation, and, in
a transport of joy and wonder, he said, Lord, I believe, and he
worshipped him. (1.) He professed his faith in Christ: Lord, I believe thee to be
the Son of God. He would not dispute any thing that he said
who had shown such mercy to him, and wrought such a miracle for him,
nor doubt of the truth of a doctrine which was confirmed by such signs.
Believing with the heart, he thus confesses with the mouth; and now the
bruised reed was become a cedar.
(2.) He paid his homage to him: He worshipped him, not only gave
him the civil respect due to a great man, and the acknowledgments owing
to a kind benefactor, but herein gave him divine honour, and worshipped
him as the Son of God manifested in the flesh. None but God is
to be worshipped; so that in worshipping Jesus he owned him to be God.
Note, True faith will show itself in a humble adoration of the Lord
Jesus. Those who believe in him will see all the reason in the world
to worship him. We never read any more of this man; but, it is very
likely, from henceforth he became a constant follower of Christ.
39 And Jesus said, For judgment I am come into this world, that
they which see not might see; and that they which see might be
made blind.
40 And some of the Pharisees which were with him heard these
words, and said unto him, Are we blind also?
41 Jesus said unto them, If ye were blind, ye should have no
sin: but now ye say, We see; therefore your sin remaineth.
Christ, having spoken comfort to the poor man that was persecuted, here
speaks conviction to his persecutors, a specimen of the distributions
of trouble and rest at the great day, 2 Thess. i. 6, 7 .
Probably this was not immediately after his discourse with the man, but
he took the next opportunity that offered itself to address the
Pharisees. Here is,
I. The account Christ gives of his design in coming into the world
( v. 39 ):
" For judgment I am come to order and administer the great
affairs of the kingdom of God among men, and am invested with a
judicial power in order thereunto, to be executed in conformity to the
wise counsels of God, and in pursuance of them." What Christ spoke, he
spoke not as a preacher in the pulpit, but as a king upon the throne,
and a judge upon the bench.
1. His business into the world was great; he came to keep the
assizes and general goal-delivery. He came for judgment, that
is,
(1.) To preach a doctrine and a law which would try men, and
effectually discover and distinguish them, and would be completely
fitted, in all respects, to be the rule of government now and of
judgment shortly.
(2.) To put a difference between men, by revealing the thoughts of many
hearts, and laying open men's true characters, by this one test,
whether they were well or ill affected to him.
(3.) To change the face of government in his church, to abolish the
Jewish economy, to take down that fabric, which, though erected for the
time by the hand of God himself, yet by lapse of time was antiquated,
and by the incurable corruptions of the managers of it was become
rotten and dangerous, and to erect a new building by another model, to
institute new ordinances and offices, to abrogate Judaism and enact
Christianity; for this judgment he came into the world, and it was a great revolution.
2. This great truth he explains by a metaphor borrowed from the miracle
which he had lately wrought. That those who see not might see, and
that those who see might be made blind. Such a difference of
Christ's coming is often spoken of; to some his gospel is a savour
of life unto life, to others of death unto death. (1.) This is applicable to nations and people, that the Gentiles, who
had long been destitute of the light of divine revelation, might see
it; and the Jews, who had long enjoyed it, might have the things of
their peace hid from their eyes, Hos. i. 10; ii. 23 .
The Gentiles see a great light, while blindness is happened unto
Israel, and their eyes are darkened. (2.) To particular sons. Christ came into the world,
[1.] Intentionally and designedly to give sight to those that were
spiritually blind; by his word to reveal the object, and by his Spirit
to heal the organ, that many precious souls might be turned from
darkness to light. He came for judgment, that is, to set
those at liberty from their dark prison that were willing to be
released, Isa. lxi. 1 .
[2.] Eventually, and in the issue, that those who see might be made
blind; that those who have a high conceit of their own wisdom, and
set up that in contradiction to divine revelation, might be sealed up
in ignorance and infidelity. The preaching of the cross was
foolishness, and an infatuating think, to those who by wisdom knew
not God. Christ came into the world for this judgment, to administer the affairs of a spiritual kingdom,
seated in men's minds. Whereas, in the Jewish church, the blessings and
judgments of God's government were mostly temporal, now the method of
administration should be changed; and as the good subjects of his
kingdom should be blessed with spiritual blessings in heavenly things,
such as arise from a due illumination of the mind, so the rebels should
be punished with spiritual plagues, not war, famine, and pestilence, as
formerly, but such as arise from a judicial infatuation, hardness of heart, terror of conscience, strong delusions, vile
affections. In this way Christ will judge between cattle and
cattle, Ezek. xxxiv. 17, 22 .
II. The Pharisees' cavil at this. They were with him, not
desirous to learn any good from him, but to form evil against him; and
they said, Are we blind also? When Christ said that those who
saw should by his coming be made blind, they apprehended that he
meant them, who were the seers of the people, and valued
themselves on their insight and foresight. "Now," say
they, "we know that the common people are blind; but are we blind
also? What we? The rabbin, the doctors, the learned in the laws,
the graduates in the schools, are we blind too? " This is scandalum magnatum--a libel on the great. Note, Frequently those
that need reproof most, and deserve it best, though they have wit
enough to discern a tacit one, have not grace enough to bear a just one. These Pharisees took this reproof for a reproach, as
those lawyers
( Luke xi. 45 ):
" Are we blind also? Darest thou say that we are blind, whose
judgment every one has such a veneration for, values, and yields to?"
Note, Nothing fortifies men's corrupt hearts more against the
convictions of the word, nor more effectually repels them, than the
good opinion, especially if it be a high opinion, which others have of
them; as if all that had gained applause with men must needs obtain
acceptance with God, than which nothing is more false and deceitful,
for God sees not as man sees.
III. Christ's answer to this cavil, which, if it did not convince them,
yet silenced them: If you were blind you should have no sin; but now
you say, We see, therefore your sin remaineth. They gloried that
they were not blind, as the common people, were not so credulous and
manageable as they, but would see with their own eyes, having
abilities, as they thought, sufficient for their own guidance, so that
they needed not any body to lead them. This very thing which they
gloried in, Christ here tells them, was their shame and ruin. For,
1. If you were blind, you would have no sin. (1.) "If you had been really ignorant, your sin had not been so deeply
aggravated, nor would you have had so much sin to answer for as now you
have. If you were blind, as the poor Gentiles are, and many of your own
poor subjects, from whom you have taken the key of knowledge, you would
have had comparatively no sin. " The times of ignorance God winked at; invincible ignorance, though it does not justify sin,
excuses it, and lessens the guilt. It will be more tolerable with those
that perish for lack of vision than with those that rebel against
the light. (2.) "If you had been sensible of your own blindness, if when you would
see nothing else you could have seen the need of one to lead you, you
would soon have accepted Christ as your guide, and then you would have had no sin, you would have submitted to an evangelical
righteousness, and have been put into a justified state." Note, Those
that are convinced of their disease are in a fair way to be cured, for
there is not a greater hindrance to the salvation of souls than
self-sufficiency.
2. " But now you say, We see; now that you have knowledge, and
are instructed out of the law, your sin is highly aggravated; and now
that you have a conceit of that knowledge, and think you see your way
better than any body can show it you, therefore your sin
remains, your case is desperate, and your disease incurable." And
as those are most blind who will not see, so their blindness is
most dangerous who fancy they do see. No patients are so hardly managed
as those in a frenzy who say that they are well, and nothing
ails them. The sin of those who are self-conceited and self-confident remains, for they reject the gospel of grace, and therefore the
guilt of their sin remains unpardoned; and they forfeit the Spirit of
grace, and therefore the power of their sin remains unbroken. Seest
thou a wise man in his own conceit? Hearest thou the Pharisees say, We see? There is more hope of a fool, of a publican and a
harlot, than of such.
Ver. 1. And as [Jesus] passed by,.... The word "Jesus" is not in the Greek text, but is rightly supplied by us, as it is in the Vulgate Latin, and as the word "Christ" is in the Persic version; for of his passing from the temple, and by the multitude that were there, and on his way to the place he designed to make to, is this said, as appears from the close of the preceding chapter; though some think this is to be understood of his passing by at another time and place, since the preceding fact of the woman's being taken in adultery, and the discourse of our Lord with the Jews, were quickly after the feast of tabernacles; whereas the following ones, both in this, and the next chapter, seem to be at the feast of dedication, Joh 10:22, which was some months after: but it may be, that the parable of the sheep, though it runs in connection with what is said in this chapter, might be delivered then; or what follows, Joh 10:22, might be said at the feast of dedication, when the parable, and what is related here, might be delivered before, seeing there is so very strict a connection between this, and the preceding chapter; and the Ethiopic version is very express, rendering it, "and departing from thence"; that is, from the temple, at that time when the Jews took up stones to stone him:
he saw a man which was blind from his birth; which man was an emblem of God's elect in a state of nature, who being conceived in sin, are transgressors from the womb, and so are alienated from the life of God through their ignorance and blindness: they are blind as to any true and spiritual knowledge of God in Christ; as to any true sight of sin, or sense of their own estate and condition; and with respect to Christ, and the way of peace, righteousness, and salvation by him; and as to the Spirit, and the operations of his grace, and with regard to the Scriptures, and the doctrines of the Gospel: and as Christ saw this man first, and not the man him, for he was blind, so Christ first looks upon his chosen ones with an eye of love and mercy, as he passes by them, and both enlightens and quickens them,
Eze 16:6. He saw Matthew the publican first, as he passed along, and called him from the receipt of custom to be a follower of him, Mt 9:10.
John 9:2
Ver. 2. And his disciples asked him,.... It may be that some of the twelve apostles, or others of his disciples, might put the following question to him on sight of this blind man, who by some means or another knew was born blind:
saying, master, who did man, or his parents, that he was born blind? the first of these questions, whether the man himself had sinned before he was born, which might be the occasion of his blindness, proceeds not upon the doctrine of original sin, though the Jews then believed that; See Gill on "Ro 5:12"; since that was common to all men, and therefore could not admit of such a question; but either upon the notion of transmigration of souls into other bodies; and so the disciples might ask whether this man had sinned in a pre-existent state when in another body, which was the reason of this blindness, or of his being put into a blind body. This notion, Josephus says {a}, was embraced by the Pharisees; though, according to him, it seems, that they only understood it of the souls of good men; and if so, this could lay no foundation for such a question, unless these disciples had given into the Pythagorean notion of a transmigration of all souls, which was to be known by defects, as blindness, &c. {b}; or else this question proceeded upon a principle received by the Jews, that an infant might do that which was faulty and criminal, and actually sin in the womb; of which Dr. Lightfoot has given instances: the second question proceeds upon the methods which sometimes God has taken with men, by visiting the iniquities of the fathers upon the children; or, as the above learned writer observes, upon a notion the Jews had, that a child might suffer for what the mother did whilst it was in the womb; or on another, which prevailed among them, that there should be neither merit nor demerit in the days of the Messiah; that is, that neither the good deeds, nor bad deeds of their parents, should be imputed to their children, neither the one to their advantage, nor the other to their disadvantage: and therefore since he the Messiah was come, they ask, how this blindness should come to pass? what should be the reason of it?
{a} De Bello Jud. l. 2. c. 8. sect. 14. {b} Sallust. de Diis, c. 20.
John 9:3
Ver. 3. Jesus answered, neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents,.... Not but that both were guilty of original sin, and had committed actual transgressions; but Christ's answer is to be considered agreeable to the design of the question; and the sense is, that it was not any sin that either of them had committed, whilst he was in the womb, or previous to his birth, that was the cause of this blindness; otherwise, all such irregularities and afflictions arise from sin, and the fall of man, as does that spiritual blindness with which all mankind are attended:
but that the works of God should be manifest in him; that is, that Christ might have an opportunity of working a miracle in the cure of him, whereby it might appear that he is truly and properly God, the Son of God, and the Messiah; and so spiritual blindness, which has followed the fall of man, takes place in the elect of God in common with others, that the power of divine grace might be displayed in bringing them out of darkness into marvellous light.
John 9:4
Ver. 4. I must work the works of him that sent me,.... This shows, that the works of God, that were to be manifest, were to be done by Christ: many were the works which the Father gave him to do, and which he undertook to perform; and therefore there was a necessity of doing them, as principally the work of redemption, by fulfilling the law, and satisfying justice: and besides this, there were the preaching of the Gospel, and doing of miracles, and among these was this of giving sight to the blind, see Isa 35:5, both in a natural and spiritual sense: and with a view to this he speaks of the works he mast do,
while it is day; while the day of life lasts, for in the grave there is no work nor device:
the night cometh when no man can work; meaning the night of death, and of the grave, and suggesting his own death hereby, that he had but a little time to be in this world, and therefore would make the best use of it, to do the will and work of his Father that sent him; and which should be a pattern to us. This life is but short, it is but as the length of a day; a great deal of business is to be done; and death is hastening on, which will put a period to all working.
John 9:5
Ver. 5. As long as I am in the world,.... Which had been now two or three and thirty years; but was not to be much longer.
I am the light of the world; See Gill on "Joh ". Though doubtless he said this with some view to the cure he was about to perform, it being agreeable to his character and work, while he was in the world.
John 9:6
Ver. 6. And when he had thus spoken,.... In answer to the disciples' question, and declaring his own work and office in the world, and the necessity he was under of performing it:
he spat on the ground, and made clay of the spittle; the Misnic doctors speak {c} of qwrn jyj, "clay that is spitted", or "spittle clay", which their commentators say {d} was a weak, thin clay, like spittle or water; but this here was properly spittle clay, or clay made of spittle, for want of water; or it may be rather, through choice Christ spat upon the dust of the earth, and worked it together into a consistence, like clay:
and he anointed the eyes of the blind man with the clay; however, spittle, especially fasting spittle, might be thought proper in some disorder of the eyes, to be used, as it was by the Jews;
See Gill on "Joh 9:16"; yet clay was a most unlikely means of restoring sight to a man that was born blind, which might be thought rather a means of making a man blind that could see. This may be an emblem of the word of God, the eye salve of the Gospel; which is a very unlikely means in the opinion of a natural man, who counts it foolishness, of enlightening and saving sinners; and yet by this foolishness of preaching God does save those that believe.
{c} Misn. Mikvaot, c. 7. sect. 1. {d} Jarchi, Maimon. & Bartenora in ib.
John 9:7
Ver. 7. And said unto him, go wash in the Pool of Siloam,.... A fountain of this name is called Siloah, Isa 8:6, and according to the Jewish writers, sometimes Gihon {e}; and this, they say {f}, was without Jerusalem, though near unto it: hither the Jews went at the feast of tabernacles {g}, and drew water with great rejoicing, and brought it, and poured it on the altar; the waters thereof also the priests drank for digestion, when they had eaten too much flesh {h}; and this was likewise made use of to wash in, in case of uncleanness. It is said {i} of Benaiah, one of David's worthies, that
"one day he set his foot upon a dead toad, and he went down to Siloah, and broke the pieces of hail, (or ice congealed together,) and dipped himself.''
This fountain was to the south west of Jerusalem; and was, as Josephus says, sweet and large {k}; and from it were two watercourses, upper and lower, 2Ch 32:30, which ran into two pools; the one was called the Pool of Siloam, which may be the same that Josephus {l} calls the Pool of Solomon, and is here meant, and which was situated on the south of the wall of Sion, towards the east; and the other was called the Pool of Shelah, and which, in Ne 3:15, is called in our translation, and in some others, the Pool of Siloah. Now both the fountain, and the pool, were without the city; and yet we read of a Siloah in the midst of the city {m}. This blind man was sent, not to wash himself all over, but only his face or eyes; and so the Arabic and Persic versions read, "wash thy face"; the clay from it: this may be emblematical of the grace of the Spirit, sometimes signified by water and washing, which accompanying the word, makes it effectual to the salvation of souls:
which is by interpretation sent. This interpretation of the word Siloam does not determine which of the pools is meant, the upper or lower, "Siloah" or "Shelah", since they both come from the word xlv, which signifies to "send"; but by the flexion of the word, the upper pool "Siloah" seems plainly intended, which was not so forenamed, as Nonus suggests, from the sending this man thither, but rather from the sending forth its waters, which flowed softly and gently for the supply of the city of Jerusalem, Some think Christ gave this interpretation of it with a view to himself, as the sent of God, the true Messiah: but the words seem not to be the words of Christ, but of the evangelist, who interprets this word; wherefore they are left out in the Syriac and Persic versions, where such an interpretation was needless.
He went his way therefore and washed, and came seeing: he did as he was commanded; he was obedient to the directions and orders of Christ, though they seemed so unlikely to answer the end; and yet that was brought about through the divine power of Christ, which appeared the more in making use of such unlikely means.
{e} Targum, Jarchi, Kimchi, & Solomon ben Melech in 1 Kings i. 39. {f} Jarchi & Bartenora in Misn. Succa, c. 4. sect. 9. {g} Misn. Succa, c. 4. sect. 9. {h} Abot R. Nathan, c. 35. fol. 8. 3. {i} Targum in 1 Chron. xi. 22. {k} De Bello Jud. l. 5. c. 4. sect. 1. {l} Ib. l. 6. c. 6. vel. l. 5. c. 4. sect. 1. {m} T. Hieros. Chagigah, fol. 76. 1.
John 9:8
Ver. 8. The neighbours therefore, and they which before had seen him,.... For it seems the blind man was not a stranger, one that came out of the country to the city to beg; but a native of Jerusalem, that had long lived in a certain neighbourhood in it, and was well known to be what he was;
that he was blind; the Alexandrian copy, and one of Beza's exemplars, and the Vulgate Latin version read, "that he was a beggar"; to which agree the Syriac, Arabic, and Ethiopic versions: wherefore they
said, is this not he that sat and begged? they particularly remark his begging posture; he was not laid all along, as the lame man in Ac 3:2; nor did he go from door to door, as others were used to do, but he sat in some certain place, as blind men generally did; see
Mt 20:30.
John 9:9
Ver. 9. Some said, this is he,.... It is the same man that was blind, and begged:
others [said]; in one of Beza's copies it is added "no", and so read the Vulgate Latin, and all the Oriental versions; though they owned and said,
he is like him. This discourse of the neighbours concerning the blind man restored to sight, resembles the talk that generally is among relations, acquaintance, and neighbours, when anyone belonging to them is called by grace, and converted, saying, what is come to such an one? is he mad or melancholy? he is not the man he was: he is scarcely the same; is it he, or another? what is the matter with him?
[but] he said, I am [he]; and so put an end to the dispute between them, by his frank acknowledgment that he was the blind man, and the beggar they before knew as such: so persons enlightened by the Spirit of God, and effectually called by his grace, are very free and ready to acknowledge what they were before conversion, what poor, blind, and miserable, and contemptible creatures they were: Matthew owns himself to have been a publican; and Paul confesses he was a blasphemer, a persecutor, and an injurious person, and the chief of sinners.
John 9:10
Ver. 10. Therefore said they unto him,.... When the case was clear, and it was out of question that he was the man:
how were thine eyes opened? or made to see: they might well ask this question, since such a thing was never known before, that one born blind received his sight; and as great a miracle it is in grace, and as great a mystery to a natural man, how one should be born again, or be spiritually enlightened.
John 9:11
Ver. 11. He answered and said, a man that is called Jesus,.... Whom he had as yet little knowledge of, only by some means or another he had learned his name;
made clay and anointed mine eyes, &c. See Gill on "Joh 9:6",
See Gill on "Joh 9:7".
John 9:12
Ver. 12. Then they said unto him, where is he?.... For Christ had withdrawn himself and was gone; whether on account of the Jews, who he knew would be irritated by this miracle, or whether to avoid all popular applause and glory, which he sought not, is not certain; it may be on both accounts: this question, however, was put, not out of good will to Christ, but that they might apprehend him, and bring him before the sanhedrim, for doing work on the sabbath day; and such enmity there is in carnal men, at the conversion of sinners, their acquaintance, instead of rejoicing at it:
he said I know not; for when he returned from the pool, Jesus was gone: and so it sometimes is, that when Christ has wrought a good work of grace upon the heart, he withdraws himself for a while, and the converted sinner knows not where he is.
John 9:13
Ver. 13. They brought to the Pharisees,.... That is, to the sanhedrim, which chiefly consisted of Pharisees; and so Nonnus calls them the priests and chief priests:
him that was aforetime blind; to be examined by them. And something like this is the method used by carnal relations and friends, who when they have any belonging to them under a work of grace, have them to their learned doctors of a different religion, to talk to them, and dissuade them from the ways of truth and godliness.
John 9:14
Ver. 14. And it was the sabbath day when Jesus made the clay,.... Which was reckoned a violation of the sabbath, Joh 9:16, and was one reason why they had the man to the Pharisees to be examined, and why they were desirous of knowing where Jesus was:
and opened his eyes; by putting on the clay, and sending him to wash in the Pool of Siloam: nor did the miracle, nor the good done to the man, excuse with them, what they thought a breach of the sabbath.
John 9:15
Ver. 15. Then again the Pharisees asked him,.... Not that they had put any question of this kind to him before; but they also, as well as the neighbours, inquired of him,
how he had received his sight; from whom, and by what means:
he said unto them, he put clay upon mine eyes, and I washed and do see. This account agrees with the matter of fact, and with that he gave to his neighbours: he did not vary as to the truth of the relation, but this is somewhat more concise and short; and it is reasonable to suppose, that the Pharisees had talked much with him before, which made it less necessary to be more particular; for he makes no mention of the name of Jesus, nor of his making the clay, and the manner of it, nor of the Pool of Siloam, or his orders to go there and wash; See Gill on "Joh 9:6",
See Gill on "Joh 9:7".
John 9:16
Ver. 16. Wherefore said some of the Pharisees,.... Or sanhedrim, for they were not all of one mind, as appears by what follows:
this man is not of God; meaning not the blind man, but Jesus; and their sense is, he is not sent of God, he does not come from him to do his will and work, nor does he seek his glory, nor is he on his side, or for his interest;
because he keepeth not the sabbath day: this they concluded from his making clay of spittle, and spreading it on the blind man's eyes, which was contrary to the traditions of their elders: one of whose rules and canons is {n}, that
"it is forbidden to put fasting spittle even on the eyelid on a sabbath day.''
An eye salve, or a plaster for the eye, if it was put on for pleasure, was lawful, but not for healing {o}: but if it was put on, on the evening of the sabbath, it might continue on the sabbath day {p}.
Others said, how can a man that is a sinner, or a sabbath breaker,
do such miracles? as curing a man born blind, the like of which was never heard: those that reasoned after this manner may be supposed to be Nicodemus and Joseph of Arimathea.
And there was a division among them; even in the sanhedrim, they could not agree about the character of the person that had done this miracle.
{n} T. Hieros. Sabbat, fol. 14. 4. & Avoda Zara, fol. 40. 4. & T. Bab. Sabbat, fol 108. 2. & Maimon. Hilchot Sabbat, c. 21. sect. 25. {o} Piske Tosephot Sabbat, art. 67. {p} T. Hieros. Sabbat, fol. 3, 4. Maimon. ib.
John 9:17
Ver. 17. They say unto the blind man again,.... After they had discoursed among themselves, and could not agree about the author of the miracle, they turn to him that had been blind, who is called the blind man, because he had been so, and ask him his sentiments of him:
what sayest thou of him, that he hath opened thine eyes? the question seems, at first sight, as if it was, whether Jesus had opened his eyes or not; but by the answer it appears, that it required his thoughts of him, "who hath opened thine eyes", as the Vulgate Latin and Persic versions read; or "seeing", or "because he hath opened thine eyes", as the Arabic and Ethiopic versions:
he said, he is a prophet; the Syriac and Persic versions read, "I say he is a prophet"; or, "he is certainly a prophet", as the Arabic version. The Jews were wont to conclude a man's being a prophet from miracles wrought by him; see Joh 6:14; though it does not appear that he believed him, as yet, to be that prophet, or the Messiah, that was to come; see Joh 9:36.
John 9:18
Ver. 18. But the Jews did not believe concerning him,.... Not Jesus, but the blind man;
that he had been blind, and received his sight; they imagine there was a fraud in the case, that it was collusion between Jesus and this man; that he was a man who had never been blind, but only had given out that he was, and pretended he had now received his sight from Jesus, on purpose to spread his fame, and induce people to believe he was the Messiah; and in this imagination they endeavoured to strengthen themselves and others:
until they called the parents of him that had received his sight; they sent messengers to them, and summoned them before them, that they might examine them about this matter, hoping, they might get something out of them, which might detect the supposed fraud, and bring Jesus under disgrace.
John 9:19
Ver. 19. And they asked them, saying, is this your son,.... The first question they put was, whether the man that stood before them, pointing to him, was their son or not; whether they knew him by any marks to be their son, and would own him as such: had they answered to this in the negative, they would have got an advantage against him, and would have convicted him of a lie, since he had given out that he was the son of such parents; and proving such a lie upon him, would at once have brought the whole affair into suspicion at least: they add,
who ye say was born blind; this contains a second question, whether, if this was their son, he was born blind or not; and if he was not born blind, though he had been blind, it would have greatly lessened the miracle: and besides, they would have put other questions upon this, whether his blindness was real, and by what means it came. Next follows a third question,
how then doth he now see? By what means has he received his sight? They might hope, that if he was their son, and was really born blind, that he had his sight some other way than by Jesus; or they might object this to his being born, blind, as being a thing impossible, or at least not credible that he should ever see, was that the case.
John 9:20
Ver. 20. His parents answered them, and said,.... What follows, which contains distinct answers to the several questions: and to the first they reply very freely, and with great confidence,
we know that this is our son; for though his receiving his sight made a considerable alteration in him, yet his features were the same; and there might be some marks in his body, which they were acquainted with, by which they knew assuredly he was their son: and if even the neighbours, though they disagreed about him, yet some of them knew him to be the same person that had been blind and begged, then much more his parents; and even those who said it was not he, yet they owned he was like him: and with respect to the second question they answer,
and that he was born blind: this they were ready to attest, and did attest.
John 9:21
Ver. 21. But by what means he now seeth we know not,.... As to the third question they could say nothing to it, they were not present when the cure was wrought, and knew nothing of the matter, but what they had heard from their son, or from others, or both:
or who hath opened his eyes we know not; they had heard it was Jesus, and their son had doubtless told them it was he; but since they could say nothing of their own personal knowledge, they choose not to say anything of him:
he is of age; at man's estate, as, with the Jews, one was, who was at the age of thirteen years, if he could produce the signs of puberty: and such an one was allowed a witness in any case, but not under this age; nor if he was arrived to it, if the above signs could not be produced {q}. This man very likely was much older, as may be thought from the whole of his conduct, his pertinent answers, and just reasoning: wherefore his parents direct the sanhedrim to him for an answer to their third question,
ask him, he shall speak for himself; or "of himself", as the Vulgate Latin and Ethiopic versions render it: their sense is, he is capable of giving an account of himself in this matter, and he will do it, and let him do it; put the question to him, and a proper answer will be returned; and so they left the affair to be issued in this way.
{q} Maimon. Hilchot Eduth, c. 9. sect. 7.
John 9:22
Ver. 22. These words spake his parents,.... these were the answers they returned to the three questions put to them: and the reason why they answered in the manner they did to the third, was,
because they feared the Jews; the Jewish sanhedrim, otherwise they were Jews themselves:
for the Jews had agreed already; the sanhedrim had made a decree, either at this time, upon this account, or some time before,
that if any man did confess that he was Christ; that Jesus of Nazareth was the Messiah,
he should be put out of the synagogue; which was not that sort of excommunication which they called ywdn, "Niddui", a separation from civil society for the space of four cubits, and which held but thirty days, if the person repented; if he did not, it was continued to sixty days; and after that, in case of non-repentance, to ninety days; and if no amendment, then they proceeded to another excommunication called Mrx, "Cherem", or atmv, "Shammatha", whereby such were anathematized, and cut off from the whole body of the Jewish church and people, called sometimes the synagogue and congregation of Israel {r}; and this struck great terror in the minds of the people; and this was what intimidated the parents of the blind man, being what is intended here. Though these are sometimes put one for another, and signify the same thing; and he that was under the former of those censures, is said to be rwbyu Nm
ldbwm, "separated from the congregation" {s}, a phrase by which the word here used may be very well rendered: but in some things there was a difference between them; the one was without cursing, the other with; he that was under "Niddui", might teach others the traditions, and they might teach him; he might hire workmen, and be hired himself: but he that was under "Cherem" might neither teach others, nor they teach him; but he might teach himself, that he might not forget his learning; and he might neither hire, nor be hired; and they did not trade with him, nor did they employ him in any business, unless in very little, just to keep him alive {t}; yea, the goods which he was possessed of, were confiscated, and which they conclude should be done from {u} Ezr 10:8, which may be compared with this passage; so that this greatly and chiefly affected them in the affairs of civil life, and which made it so terrible: for I do not find that they were obliged to abstain from the temple, or temple worship, or from the synagogue, and the worship of it, and which is the mistake of some learned men: it is certain, they might go into places of worship, though with some difference from others; for it is said {w}, that
"all that go into the temple, go in, in the right hand way, and go round, and come out in the left, except such an one to whom anything has befallen him, and he goes about to the left; (and when asked) why dost thou go to the left? (he answers) because I am a mourner; (to whom it is replied) he that dwells in this house comfort thee: (or)
hdwnm ynav, "because I am excommunicated"; (to whom they say) he that dwells in this house put it into thy heart (that thou mayest hearken to the words of thy friends, as it is afterwards explained) and they may receive thee.''
And it is elsewhere said {x}, that
"Solomon, when he built the temple, made two gates, the one for bridegrooms, and the other for mourners and excommunicated persons; and the Israelites, when they went in on sabbath days, or feast days, sat between these two gates; and when anyone came in by the gate of the bridegrooms, they knew he was a bridegroom, and said unto him, he that dwells in this house make thee cheerful with sons and daughters: and when anyone came in at the gate of mourners, and his upper lip covered, they knew that he was a mourner, and said unto him, he that dwells in this house comfort thee: and when anyone came in at the gate of mourners, and his upper lip was not covered, they knew
hdwnm hyhv, "that he was excommunicated"; and said unto him, he that dwells in this house comfort thee, and put it into thy heart to hearken to thy friends.''
And it is afterwards also said in the same place, that when the temple was destroyed, it was decreed that such persons should come into synagogues and schools; but then they were not reckoned as members of the Jewish church, but as persons cut off from the people of Israel, and scarce allowed to be of their commonwealth. And it may be further observed, that excommunication with the Jews was not only on religious accounts, but on civil accounts; on account of money, or when a man would not pay his debts, according to the decree of the sanhedrim {y}. The twenty four reasons of excommunication, given by Maimonides {z}, chiefly respect contempt of the sanhedrim, and of the wise men, and breach of the traditions of the elders; sometimes they excommunicated for immorality, particularly the Essenes, as Josephus relates, who says {a}, that such who are taken in grievous sins, they cast them out of their order; and he that is so dealt with commonly dies a miserable death; for being bound by oaths and customs, he cannot eat the food of others, and so starves. The same is reported {b} by R. Abraham Zachuth: and sometimes excommunication was for Epicurism, or heresy, and such they reckoned the belief of Jesus of Nazareth, as the Messiah, on account of which this decree was made, and which continued with them; for not only this blind man was cast out of the synagogue by virtue of it, but our Lord tells his disciples, that they should be so treated by the Jews after his death; and we find it remained in force and practice many hundreds of years afterwards. Athanasius {c} relates of a Jew, that lived in Berytus, a city in Syria, between Tyre and Sidon, that an image of Christ being found in his house by another Jew, though unknown to him; and this being discovered to the chief priests and elders of the Jews, they cast him out of the synagogue. Sometimes this sentence was pronounced by word of mouth, and sometimes it was delivered in writing: the form of one is given us by Buxtorf {d}, out of an ancient Hebrew manuscript; and a dreadful shocking one it is; and is as follows:
"according to the mind of the Lord of lords, let such an one, the son of such an one, be in "Cherem", or anathematized, in both houses of judgment, of those above, and those below; and with the anathema of the saints on high, with the anathema of the "Seraphim" and "Ophanim", and with the anathema of the whole congregation, great and small; let great and real stripes be upon him, and many and violent diseases; and let his house be an habitation of dragons; and let his star be dark in the clouds; and let him be for indignation, wrath, and anger; and let his carcass be for beasts and serpents; and let those that rise up against him, and his enemies, rejoice over him; and let his silver and his gold be given to others; and let all his children be exposed at the gate of his enemies, and at his day may others be amazed; and let him be cursed from the mouth of Addiriron and Actariel, (names of angels, as are those that follow,) and from the mouth of Sandalphon and Hadraniel, and from the mouth of Ansisiel and Pathchiel, and from the mouth of Seraphiel and Zaganzael, and from the mouth of Michael and Gabriel, and from the mouth of Raphael and Meshartiel; and let him be anathematized from the mouth of Tzabtzabib, and from tile mouth of Habhabib, he is Jehovah the Great, and from the mouth of the seventy names of the great king, and from the side of Tzortak the great chancellor; and let him be swallowed up as Korah and his company, with terror, and with trembling; let his soul go out; let the reproof of the Lord kill him; and let him be strangled as Ahithophel in his counsel; and let his leprosy be as the leprosy of Gehazi; and let there be no raising him up from his fall; and in the sepulchres of Israel let not his grave be; and let his wife be given to another; and let others bow upon her at his death: in this anathema, let such an one, the son of such an one be, and let this be his inheritance; but upon me, and upon all Israel, may God extend his peace and his blessing. Amen.''
And if he would, he might add these verses in De 29:19: "and it come to pass when he heareth the words of this curse, that he bless himself in his heart, saying, I shall have peace, though I walk in the imagination of mine heart, to add drunkenness to thirst: the Lord will not spare him, but then the anger of the Lord, and his jealousy shall smoke against that man, and all the curses that are written in this book shall lie upon him, and the Lord shall blot out his name from under heaven. And the Lord shall separate, him unto evil, out of all the tribes of Israel, according, to all the curses of the covenant, that are written in this book of the law". There were many rites and ceremonies, which in process of time were used, when such a sentence was pronounced, as blowing of horns and trumpets, and lighting of candles, and putting them out: hence, trumpets are reckoned {d} a among the instruments of judges. It is said {e} of R. Judah, that being affronted by a certain person, he resented the injury, and brought out the trumpets and excommunicated him: and they tell us {f}, that Barak anathematized Meroz, whom they take to be some great person, with four hundred trumpets: and they also say {g}, that four hundred trumpets were brought out, and they excommunicated Jesus of Nazareth; though these words are left out in some editions of the Talmud. Now this was done in order to inject terror both into those that were guilty, and also into the whole congregation of the people, that they might hear and fear; for the "Cherem", or that sort of excommunication which goes by that name, was done publicly before the whole synagogue, all the heads and elders of the church being gathered together; and then candles were lighted, and as soon as the form of the curse was finished, they were put out, as a sign that the excommunicated person was unworthy of the heavenly light {h}. Very likely the Papists took their horrible custom from hence of cursing with bell, book, and candle.
{r} Vid. Maimon. Talmud Tora, c. 7. sect. 6. Buxtorf. Lex. Rab. col. 1303. & Epist. Heb. Institut. p. 57. {s} Maimon. Hilchod Talmud Tora, c. 7. sect. 4. {t} Ib. sect. 5. {u} T. Bab. Moed Katon, fol. 16. 1. {w} Misn. Middot, c. 2. sect. 2. {x} Pirke Eiiezer, c. 17. {y} T. Bab. Moed Katon, fol. 16. 1. & Gloss in ib. {z} Hilchot Talmud Tora, c. 6. sect. 14. {a} De Bello Jud. l. 2. c. 8. sect. 8. {b} Juchasin, fol. 139. 2. {c} Oper. ejus, Tom. 2. p. 12, 17. Ed. Commelin. {d} Lex Rab. col. 828. {d} T. Bab. Sanhedrin, fol 7. 2. {e} T. Bab. Kiddushin, c. 4. in Beth Israel, fol. 57. 1. {f} T. Bab. Moed Katon, fol. 16. 1. & Shebuot, fol. 36. 1. {g} T. Bab. Sanhedrin, fol. 107. 2. Ed. Venet. {h} Buxtorf. Epist. Heb. Institut. c. 6. p. 56.
John 9:23
Ver. 23. Therefore said his parents, he is of age,....
See Gill on "Joh 9:21".
John 9:24
Ver. 24. Then again called they the man that was blind,.... That had been blind. After they had examined his parents, and could get nothing from them for their purpose, they try a second time what they could do with the son:
and said unto him, give God the praise; a phrase used when confession of sin was required; see Jos 7:19; and this may be the meaning of it here; confess this fraud and imposture before the omniscient God, the searcher of hearts, and in so doing glorify that perfection of his. One and the same word, hdy, signifies both to confess the truth of anything, as a sinful action, Pr 28:13, and to give thanks and praise to God for any mercy and blessing,
Ps 45:17. Some take this to be the form of an oath, and that the Pharisees adjured the than by the living God, that he would tell the truth, and discover the cheat and collusion used in this affair of receiving his sight; and thought hereby to have deterred him from speaking of this benefit he had received from Christ, especially in such a manner as to reflect any honour upon the author of it. Or the sense may be, if this really is matter of fact, that thou wast born blind, and hast received thy sight by the means of this man, give all the glory of it to God, to whom alone it is due, and not to him. God sometimes works by wicked instruments, when the glory of what is done ought not to be ascribed to them, but to him.
We know that this man is a sinner; this they concluded from his breaking the sabbath, as they supposed; though they also aspersed his character, and accused him of other things, yet falsely; see
Mt 11:19; nor could they prove one single instance of sin in him, though they express themselves here with so much assurance.
John 9:25
Ver. 25. He answered and said,.... That is, the man who had been blind, who takes no notice of the confession they pressed him to, which is what he could not do; there being no collusion in this case, he only replies to the reproachful character they had given of his benefactor.
Whether he be a sinner or not, I know not: or "if he is a sinner I know not", as the Vulgate Latin version renders it, suggesting that he did not know he was a sinner; he could not charge him with being one; nor could he join with them in saying he was a sinner; nor did he think and believe he was: however, he was sure he had done a good thing to him, and in that he was no sinner; and what proof they had of his being one he could not tell: and be that as it will, adds he,
one thing I know, that whereas I was blind, now I see; as if he should say, whatever charges you bring against the person that has done me this favour, which I am not able to answer to, you cannot reason me out of this; this I am sure of, that once I had no eyes to see with, and now I have, and that by the means of this man you reproach. And so it is with persons enlightened in a spiritual sense, whatever things they may be ignorant of, though they may not know the exact time of their conversion, nor have so much Gospel light and knowledge as others, or be so capable of expressing themselves, or giving such a distinct and orderly account of the work of God upon them as some can, nor dispute with an adversary for the truths of the Gospel, or have that faith of assurance, and discoveries of God's love, and the application of such great and precious promises as others have; yet this they know, that they were once blind, as to the knowledge of spiritual things, as to a saving knowledge of God in Christ, as to a true sight and sense of themselves, their sins and lost estate, as to the way of righteousness and salvation by Christ, or the work of the Spirit of God upon their souls, or as to any true and spiritual discerning of the Scriptures, and the doctrines of grace in them: but now they are comfortably assured, they see the exceeding sinfulness of sin, the plague of their own hearts, the insufficiency of their righteousness to justify them before God, and the beauty, fulness, suitableness, and ability of Christ as a Saviour; and that their salvation is, and must be of free grace; and that they see the truths of the Gospel in another light than they did before, and have some glimpse of eternal glory and happiness, in the hope of which they rejoice.
John 9:26
Ver. 26. Then said they to him again,.... Finding they could not bring him to deny the fact, or cause him to entertain an ill opinion of him that did it, they examine him again about the manner of it:
what did he to thee? how opened he thine eyes? These questions they had put before, Joh 9:15, and propose them again, in hope he would vary in the account, which they would not fail of improving against him; or that it would appear that he had not been really blind, at least from his birth; or that Christ made use of some unlawful means, as magic art, which they were always ready to charge him with, and to impute his miracles to a diabolical familiarity and influence; and they would have been glad to have had something to support such a calumny.
John 9:27
Ver. 27. He answered them, I have told you already,..... As he had, Joh 9:15,
and ye did not hear; the Vulgate Latin version reads, and ye have heard; and so some copies of Stephens's; that is, an account had been given of the manner how his eyes were opened, and they had heard the account with their bodily ears, though not with the ears of their minds; and therefore, according to most copies and versions, it is read, "ye did not hear"; did not regard it, or give credit to it; and so the Persic version renders it, "and ye have not believed"; they would not believe the man had been blind, until they sent for his parents; much less would they believe the account of his cure:
wherefore would ye hear it again? once is sufficient, especially since the former account has been disregarded and discredited: their view could not be their own information but to baffle and confound the man, if they could. The Syriac, Arabic, and Ethiopic versions leave out the word "again", and only read, "wherefore would ye hear?" what end can you have in it? of what avail would it be? or what purpose can be answered by it?
will ye also be his disciples? as many whom you call ignorant and accursed people are, and as I myself desire to be. This he might say either in an ironical and sarcastic way; or else seriously, suggesting, that if they were willing to examine into this fact, with upright views and sincere intentions, that should it appear to be a true miracle, they would become the disciples and followers of Jesus, then he would, with all his heart, relate the account to them over and over again, or as often as they pleased.
John 9:28
Ver. 28. Then they reviled him,.... Called him an impertinent, saucy, impudent fellow, for talking in this pert manner to them, the great sanhedrim of the nation; or, as the Vulgate Latin version reads, they cursed him; they thundered out their anathemas against him, and pronounced him an execrable and an accursed fellow:
and said, thou art his disciple; for they looked upon it a reproach and scandal to be called a disciple of Jesus of Nazareth; though there is nothing more honourable than to be a follower of him the Lamb whithersoever he goes: wherefore these Jews threw off what they thought a term of reproach from themselves to the blind man; and perhaps they might say this to ensnare him, hoping that he would own himself to be a disciple of Jesus, and profess him to be the Christ, that they might, according to their own act, excommunicate him. The Vulgate Latin, Persic, and Ethiopic versions read, "be thou his disciple"; if thou wilt, we despise the character; far be it from us that we should be followers of him:
but we are Moses's disciples. Thus they preferred Moses to Christ, and chose to be the disciples of Moses the servant, rather than of Christ the Son; though indeed they were not the genuine disciples of Moses; for if they had, they would have been the disciples of Christ, and believers in him, since Moses wrote and testified of him: they might indeed be so far the disciples of Moses, or of his law, since they sought for righteousness and justification by obedience to his law. This was a phrase in use among the Jews: so the Targumist {i} on Nu 3:2 says,
"these are the names of they sons of Aaron the priests,
hvmd aydymlt, "the disciples of Moses", the master of the Israelites;''
particularly the Pharisees, as here, claimed this title to themselves: for it is said {k},
"all the seven days (before the day of atonement) they delivered to him (the high priest) two of the disciples of the wise men, to instruct him in the service (of that day), who were, hvm lv wydymltm, "of the disciples of Moses", in opposition to the Sadducees:''
from whence it appears, that these disciples of Moses were of the sect of the Pharisees, who assumed this character as peculiar to themselves; sometimes they call themselves the disciples of Abraham, though the description they give of such, by no means belongs to them; See Gill on "Joh 8:39". They say {l},
"whoever has three things in him, is Mhrba lv wydymltm, "of the disciples of Abraham" our father, and who has three other things is of the disciples of Balaam the wicked: he that has a good eye, (beneficence, or temperance, or contentment,) a lowly spirit, and an humble soul, he is of "the disciples of Abraham" our father; but he that has evil eye, and a proud spirit, and a large soul (lustful or covetous), is of the disciples of Balaam.''
This last character best agrees with those very persons, who would be thought to be the disciples of Abraham and of Moses.
{i} Jonathan ben Uzziel in ib. {k} T. Bab. Yoma, fol. 4. 1. {l} Pirke Abot, c. 5. sect. 19.
John 9:29
Ver. 29. We know that God spoke to Moses,.... Out of the bush, and told him who he was, and sent him to deliver the children of Israel out of Egyptian bondage, and spoke the ten words, or law unto him, and by him delivered them to the children of Israel, and to whom he spake face to face, as a man does to his friend, and mouth to mouth, and not in dark sayings; they mean, they knew that Moses had his mission, commission, and credentials from God:
but as for this fellow; so they contemptuously called the Lord Jesus Christ,
we know not from whence he is; contradicting what others of them had said, Joh 7:27. They imagined they knew the country from whence he came, which they supposed to be Galilee, and the place where he was born, which they concluded was Nazareth; though in both they were in the wrong; and they knew his parents, Joseph and Mary, and his brethren and sisters; but as to his divine filiation, they knew nothing of it; nor would they own his mission, commission, and credentials to be from heaven; and pretended they had no reason to conclude they were.
John 9:30
Ver. 30. The man answered and said unto them,.... Very appropriately and pertinently,
why herein is a marvellous thing; strange and unaccountable,
that ye know not from whence he is; that you learned doctors, men of sagacity and penetration, should not be able to discern that this man is of God, is a prophet sent by him, and that there should be any doubt from whence he comes, or from whom he has his commission:
and [yet] he hath opened mine eyes; which was so clearly and plainly the work of the Messiah, and to be done by him when he came,
Isa 35:4.
John 9:31
Ver. 31. Now we know that God heareth not sinners,.... All mankind are sinners, even God's elect; yea, such who are truly gracious and righteous persons; for there is no man without sin; and God hears such who cry unto him day and night; such Christ came to save; for such he died; and these he calls to repentance; and every penitent sinner God hears: but by "sinners" are meant notorious sinners, such in whom sin reigns, who live in sin, and particularly impostors. The man takes up the word the Jews had made use of, and applied to Christ, Joh 9:24, and suggests, that had Jesus been a sinner, that is, an impostor, God would not have heard him, or have assisted him in doing a miracle, to support an imposture, or cover and encourage a fraud; but that he was heard and assisted, was a plain case: whereas not only they, the learned doctors of the nation, but such an illiterate man as himself knew, that notoriously wicked men, cheats, and deceivers, were not heard of God; and this was known from the Scripture, and all experience; see Ps 66:18. The Persic and Ethiopic versions read, "I know, that God", &c.
but if any man be a worshipper of God; fears the Lord, and worships him in spirit and in truth, both with internal and external worship:
and doth his will; for it is not everyone that Lord, or draws nigh to God with his mouth, and honours him with his lips, that is a true and sincere worshipper of him; but he that does his will in faith, from a principle of love, and with a view to his glory: and
him he heareth; for he is nigh to all that call upon him in truth; and such an one the man intimates Jesus must be, since it was out of all dispute that God had heard him, and had bore a testimony to him.
John 9:32
Ver. 32. Since the world began,.... ek tou aiwnov, "from eternity", or never: the phrase answers to Mlwem, frequently used by the Jews {m}, for never; and so the Arabic version renders it, "it was never heard", &c. since time was:
was it not heard, that any man opened the eyes of one that was born blind; as not any physician by any natural means, or art, so not any prophet in a miraculous way, no not Moses himself; among all the miracles he wrought, which the Jews say {n} were seventy six, and which were two more than were wrought by all the prophets put together, this is not to be found in the list of them, nor in the catalogue of miracles done by others. Elisha indeed prayed to God to restore sight to an army smitten with blindness; but then they were persons who saw before, and were not blind from their birth. Wherefore it must follow, that Jesus, the author of this miracle, must be greater than any of the prophets, even than Moses himself, and has a greater confirmation of his mission from God, than either he or they had: and as this was a miracle in nature, it is no less a miracle in grace, that one born in the blindness and darkness of sin, ignorance, and infidelity, should have the eyes of his understanding opened, to behold divine and spiritual things.
{m} Abot R. Nathan, c. 35. fol. 8. 2. Maimon. Mechira, c. 20. sect. 8. & Shelchim & Shotaphim, c. 10. sect. 1, 2, 3, 4. & passim. {n} Menasseh ben lsrael, Conciliat. in Deut. Quaest. 11. p. 240.
John 9:33
Ver. 33. If this man were not of God,.... If he had not his mission, commission, and credentials from God; if he had not been sent by him, and had not authority from him, and was not assisted by him, as man, or God was not with him,
he could do nothing; or "not do these things", as the Syriac version reads; that is, such miraculous works; or, as the Persic version, "he could not do this miracle": open the eyes of a man born blind. His doing this is a full proof that he is of God, and comes from him.
John 9:34
Ver. 34. They answered and said unto him,.... Being nettled, and stung at what he said, and not able to confute his reasoning; and it is amazing that a man that could never read the Scriptures, who had had no education, was not only blind, but a beggar from his youth, should be able to reason in so strong and nervous a manner, and should have that boldness and presence of mind, and freedom of speech before the whole sanhedrim. Certainly it was God that gave him a mouth and wisdom which these learned doctors could not resist, and therefore they reply in the following manner,
thou wast altogether born in sins; meaning not in original sin, as all mankind are, for this might have been retorted on themselves; but having imbibed the Pythagorean notion of a transmigration of souls into other bodies, and of sinning in a pre-existent state, or a notion of infants sinning actually in the womb, and so punished with blindness, lameness, or some deformity or another for it, they reproach this man, calling him vile miscreant, saying, thou vile, sinful creature, who came into the world covered with sin, with the visible marks of having sinned, either in another body, or in the womb before birth, and therefore wast born blind:
and dost thou teach us, holy, wise, and learned men! which breathes out the true pharisaical spirit they were possessed of, and which appeared in their ancestors before them; see Isa 65:5.
And they cast him out; not merely out of the place where the sanhedrim sat, or out of the temple; this would have been no great matter, nor have made any great noise in the city, or have been taken notice of by Christ, or moved his compassion towards him; nor merely out of any particular synagogue, or was the excommunication called "Niddui", which was a separation for thirty days, and for the space of four cubits only; but was what they call "Cherem", which was a cutting him off from the whole congregation of Israel;
See Gill on "Joh 9:22"; an anathematizing him, and a devoting him to ruin and destruction: and now in part was fulfilled, Isa 66:5, for this was done in pretence of zeal, for the honour and glory of God; and Christ appeared to the joy and comfort of this man, and to the shame and confusion of those that cast him out, as the following verses show.
John 9:35
Ver. 35. Jesus heard that they had cast him out,.... this being perhaps the first instance, of putting in execution the act they had made, Joh 9:22, and was a stretching of that act; which only threatened with an ejection, in case any should confess Jesus to be the Messiah; which this man had not done as yet, only had said he was a prophet, and that he was of God; it made a very great noise in the city, and the report of it was soon spread over it; and it became the talk of everyone, and so Jesus, as man, came to hear of it; though he, as God, knew it the very instant it was done, and needed not any to make report of it to him:
and when he had found him: not by chance, meeting him at an unawares, but seeking him; and knowing where he was, went to the very place, and found him in this piteous condition, abandoned by all mankind: this is an emblem of Christ's seeking after his chosen ones, both in redemption, and in the effectual calling, who are like sheep going astray, and never come to, and lay hold on Christ, till he comes first, seeks after, and apprehends them: he sends his ministers and his Gospel after them, where they are, and his Spirit into their hearts; yea, he comes himself, and enters there, and dwells in them by faith: he knows where they are, as he did Matthew the publican, Zacchaeus, and the woman of Samaria; and even though they are at the ends of the earth; and he goes and looks them up, and finds them; and he finds them in a deplorable condition, in a desert, in a waste howling wilderness, hopeless and helpless, poor and miserable, and blind and naked; in a pit wherein is no water; in the mire and clay of sin; in the paw of Satan, and under the power of darkness.
He said unto him, dost thou believe on the Son of God? the Persic version adds, "who hath healed thee": this supposes that there was a Son of God, or a divine person known by the Jews under this character, and that the expected Messiah would appear as such; and that, as such, he is the object of faith, and therefore, as such, must be God, since a creature, though ever so much dignified, or with whatsoever office invested, is not the object of faith, trust, and confidence, with respect to everlasting life and happiness: and it may be observed, that whenever Christ finds any of his people, he brings them to believe in him as the Son of God for righteousness and life: he himself is the author of faith in them, as well as the object of it; and no doubt power went along with these words, creating faith in this man: this was a most proper and pertinent question put to him in his present case, and suggests, that if he believed in the Son of God, it was no matter in what situation he was among men: since he would then appear to be a Son of God himself by adopting grace, and so an heir of God, and a joint heir with Christ; would receive the remission of his sins, openly justified in the court of conscience, as well of God, and be everlastingly saved: and this question is put by Christ, not as though he was ignorant, whether he believed in him or not; for he knew from the beginning, who would, and who would not believe in him: he that knew whether Peter loved him or not, knew whether this man believed in him or not; but this he said to draw forth the principle of faith, which was wrought in him, into act and exercise, and to direct it to its proper object. And this effect it had, as appears by what follows.
John 9:36
Ver. 36. He answered and said,.... That is, "he that was healed", as the Syriac version reads:
who is the Lord that I might believe in him? which shows, that though he knew there was a Messiah expected, and he believed in him as to come, yet he knew not that he was already come, nor the particular person in human nature, who was the Messiah, and the Son of God; even though he had been cured of his blindness by him, and had vindicated him, and pleaded for him before the sanhedrim, and had also suffered for him; which makes it appear, that Christ does many and great things for his people before they know him: nor does their interest in him, in his favour, and in the blessings of his grace, depend upon their knowledge of him, and faith in him; as likewise, that a man may plead for Christ, and suffer much for him, and yet be ignorant of him: however, there were in this man desires of knowing Christ; he was not like those in Job 21:14; and there was a readiness in him to believe on him, as soon as he was pointed out to him; not that there is any natural disposition in men to believe, or any readiness in themselves to it, or that it is of themselves; nothing of this nature was in this man; but he having, by the power and grace of Christ, the principle of faith implanted in his heart, what he wanted was to be directed to the proper object of it, as he is in Joh 9:37.
John 9:37
Ver. 37. And Jesus said unto him,.... Giving him the tokens by which he might know him: thou hast both seen him; not that he had seen him before now, with his bodily eyes; for he was blind when Christ anointed him, and sent him to Siloam to wash; nor when he came back, since Jesus was gone, and he knew not where he was; but he had seen him, that is, he had perceived and felt the power of him in restoring him to sight; and now he had seen him bodily, and did at this present time: but as this was not sufficient to distinguish him from other persons in company, he adds,
and it is he that talketh with thee; in like manner he made himself known to the woman of Samaria, Joh 4:26.
John 9:38
Ver. 38. And he said, Lord, I believe,.... He immediately found faith in his soul, and that in exercise, moving towards, and acting upon Christ, as the Son of God, and true Messiah, for everlasting life and salvation; and as soon as he did perceive it, he made an open and hearty profession of it:
and he worshipped him: as God, with religious worship and adoration, not only trusting in him, but ascribing honour, glory, and blessing to him, which are due to God only, and not a creature.
John 9:39
Ver. 39. And Jesus said, for judgment I am come into this world,.... The Syriac version reads, "for the judgment of this world I am come"; and with which agrees the Ethiopic version, "for the judgment of the world I am come into the world"; and the Arabic and Persic versions still more expressly, "to judge this world", or "the world, am I come"; which seems contrary to what Christ elsewhere says, Joh 3:17. Nor is the sense of the words that Christ came by the judgment of God, or the order of divine providence, or to administer justice in the government of the world, in a providential way, or to distinguish his own people from others, though all these are true; but either to fulfil the purpose and decree of God in revealing truth to some, and hiding it from others; or in a way of judgment to inflict judicial blindness on some, whilst in a way of mercy he illuminated others. So Nonnus interprets it of krima yisson, a twofold "judgment", which is different the one from the other.
That they which see not, might see; meaning, not so much corporeally as spiritually, since in the opposite clause corporeal blindness can have no place; for though Christ restored bodily sight to many, he never took it away from any person. The sense is, that Christ came as a light into the world, that those who are in the darkness of sin, ignorance, and unbelief, and who are sensible of the same, and desire spiritual illuminations, as this man did, might see what they are by nature, what need they stand in of him, and what fulness of grace, life, righteousness, and salvation, there is in him for them.
And that they which see might be made blind; that such who are wise and knowing in their own conceit, who fancy themselves to have great light and knowledge, to have the key of knowledge, and to have the true understanding of divine things, and to be guides of the blind, such as the Scribes and Pharisees, might be given up to judicial blindness and hardness of heart, so as to shut their eyes, and harden their hearts against the Gospel, and the truths of it, and which was in judgment to them: such different effects Christ and his Gospel have, as to illuminate and soften some, and blind and harden others; just as some creatures, as bats and owls, are blinded by the sun, whilst others see clearly by the light of it; and as that also has these different effects to soften the wax, and harden the clay; see Isa 6:9.
John 9:40
Ver. 40. And some of the Pharisees which were with him,.... Who had followed him, and were watching him, and observing what he said and did, in order to take all advantages, and every opportunity against him, they could,
heard these words, and said unto him, are we blind also? they perceived he pointed at them, and therefore with indignation ask this question, taking it as a great affront unto them, to put such wise, learned, and knowing men as they in company with the ignorant and unlearned common people; see Isa 42:19.
John 9:41
Ver. 41. Jesus said unto them, if ye were blind,.... And sensible of it, and knew yourselves to be blind, and were desirous of light and knowledge,
ye would have no sin: or your sin would not be so aggravated; it would not be imputed to you; it would be pardoned and taken away from you: for the sense cannot be, that their blindness would not have been criminal, or they should have no sin in them, or any done by them; only, that had this been barely their case, there would have been some hope of them, that their sin might be forgiven, and put away, and be no more; see 1Ti 1:13;
but now ye say we see; they thought themselves to be wise and knowing, and stood in no need of any illumination from him, but were obstinate and hardened in their infidelity, and wilfully opposed and shut their eyes against all the light and evidence of truth:
therefore your sin remaineth; untaken away, yea, immoveable, or unpardonable; the guilt of it abode upon them; nor was there any hope of its being removed from them; owning that they saw, and yet believed not: sinning wilfully against light and knowledge in rejecting Jesus, as the Messiah, they sinned the sin against the Holy Ghost, which is never forgiven. And so the Ethiopic version renders it, "your error shall not be forgiven you"; see Mt 12:32.
John Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible.
Christ cured many who were blind by disease or
accident; here he cured one born blind. Thus he showed his power
to help in the most desperate cases, and the work of his grace upon
the souls of sinners, which gives sight to those blind by nature. This
poor man could not see Christ, but Christ saw him. And if we know
or apprehend anything of Christ, it is because we were first known
of him. Christ says of uncommon calamities, that they are not
always to be looked on as special punishments of sin; sometimes
they are for the glory of God, and to manifest his works. Our life is
our day, in which it concerns us to do the work of the day. We must
be busy, and not waste day-time; it will be time to rest when our day
is done, for it is but a day. The approach of death should quicken us
to improve all our opportunities of doing and getting good. What
good we have an opportunity to do, we should do quickly. And he
that will never do a good work till there is nothing to be objected
against, will leave many a good work for ever undone, Ecclesiastes
11:4. Christ magnified his power, in making a blind man to see,
doing that which one would think more likely to make a seeing man
blind. Human reason cannot judge of the Lord's methods; he uses
means and instruments that men despise. Those that would be
healed by Christ must be ruled by him. He came back from the pool
wondering and wondered at; he came seeing. This represents the
benefits in attending on ordinances of Christ's appointment; souls
go weak, and come away strengthened; go doubting, and come
away Satisfied; go mourning, and come away rejoicing; go blind,
and come away seeing./WHBC 1007.2
Christ cured many who were blind by disease or
accident; here he cured one born blind. Thus he showed his power
to help in the most desperate cases, and the work of his grace upon
the souls of sinners, which gives sight to those blind by nature.
He came back from the pool
wondering and wondered at; he came seeing. This represents the
benefits in attending on ordinances of Christ's appointment; souls
go weak, and come away strengthened; go doubting, and come
away Satisfied; go mourning, and come away rejoicing; go blind,
and come away seeing./WHBC 1007.2
Sources: Matthew Henry; Gill's Exposition; Matthew Henry Concise
Commentary
Commentary